Search

Background: Serum and plasma are widely used matrices in biological and clinical studies. To improve reliability and consistency of markers quantification, the influence of these matrices on proteins was evaluated by targeted mass spectrometry., Results: 65 proteins were quantified in matched blood samples collected in serum, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and heparin plasma tubes from 40 healthy and 10 pathological individuals. Only 52% of the proteins were not impacted by any of the biological matrices tested, and the effects on quantification of proteins affected was matrix and protein dependent., Conclusion: Matrix comparisons using mass spectrometry is therefore recommended to assess the relevance of using surrogate matrix, performing biomarker discovery study or evaluating the clinical use of biomarkers in large clinical cohorts.

Purpose: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) are of particular interest in the remodeling processes of pulmonary hypertension. The aim of this study was to investigate MMP/TIMP ratios of selected biomarkers (MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP4) at follow-up examination (V2) and their prognostic value in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH)., Methods: Blood samples were taken from iPAH patients during right heart catheterization at diagnosis (V1, from 2003 to 2012) and first follow-up examination (V2). MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, and TIMP4 plasma levels at V2 were determined by ELISA. Coincident with sample collection hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters were acquired. Additionally, death and clinical worsening (CW) events were listed until July 2015., Results: MMP2/TIMP1 and MMP9/TIMP1 did not correlate with hemodynamic and clinical parameters. MMP2/TIMP4 showed a good correlation with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion (TAPSE). MMP9/TIMP4 shows good correlation with mPAP and eGFR. MMP2/TIMP4 showed significant results in the receiver operating characteristics analysis predicting death (AUC = 0.922; p = 0.005) and CW event (AUC = 0.818; p = 0.026). Patients above the cut-off values had a significantly higher probability to die or experience CW, respectively, estimated by log-rank test (p = 0.010 for death; p = 0.032 for CW)., Conclusions: MMP2/TIMP4 ratio was detected as a marker of disease severity and right ventricular function as well as a predictor for survival and time to clinical worsening and therefore might help for guidance of disease progression in iPAH patients at V2.

Background: Circulating angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) has been linked to pulmonary hypertension (PH) in experimental studies. However, the clinical relevance of Ang-1 as a biomarker in PH remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic and clinical significance of Ang-1 in PH using data from the prospectively recruiting Giessen PH Registry., Methods: Patients with suspected PH (without previous specific pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH] therapy) who underwent initial right heart catheterization (RHC) in our national referral center between July 2003 and May 2012 and who agreed to optional biomarker analysis were included if they were diagnosed with idiopathic PAH, connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH), PH due to left heart disease (PH-LHD), or chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), or if PH was excluded by RHC (non-PH controls). The association of Ang-1 levels with disease severity (6-minute walk distance and pulmonary hemodynamics) was assessed using linear regression, and the impact of Ang-1 levels on transplant-free survival (primary endpoint) and clinical worsening was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and Cox regression., Results: 151 patients (39, 39, 32, and 41 with idiopathic PAH, CTD-PAH, PH-LHD, and CTEPH, respectively) and 41 non-PH controls were included. Ang-1 levels showed no significant difference between groups (p = 0.8), and no significant associations with disease severity in PH subgroups (p ≥ 0.07). In Kaplan-Meier analyses, Ang-1 levels (stratified by quartile) had no significant impact on transplant-free survival (p ≥ 0.27) or clinical worsening (p ≥ 0.51) in PH subgroups. Regression models found no significant association between Ang-1 levels and outcomes (p ≥ 0.31). ROC analyses found no significant cut-off that would maximize sensitivity and specificity., Conclusions: Despite a strong pathophysiological association in experimental studies, this first comprehensive analysis of Ang-1 in PH subgroups suggests that Ang-1 is not a predictive and clinically relevant biomarker in PH., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.