1. The polygenic basis of relapse after a first episode of schizophrenia.
- Author
-
Segura ÀG, Prohens L, Gassó P, Rodríguez N, Garcia-Rizo C, Moreno-Izco L, Andreu-Bernabeu Á, Zorrilla I, Mane A, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Roldán A, Sarró S, Ibáñez Á, Usall J, Sáiz PA, Cuesta MJ, Parellada M, González-Pinto A, Berrocoso E, Bernardo M, Mas S, Mezquida G, Arbelo N, De Matteis M, Galvañ J, Duque Guerra A, Arias I Queralt L, Perez-Bacigalupe M, Gonzalez-Ortega I, Toll A, Casanovas F, Sanchez-Pastor L, Valtueña M, Pomarol-Clotet E, García-León MÁ, Butjosa A, Rubio-Abadal E, Ribeiro M, López-Ilundain JM, Saiz-Ruiz J, León-Quismondo L, Rivero O, Ruiz P, Echevarría RS, and García-Portilla MP
- Abstract
Little is known about genetic predisposition to relapse. Previous studies have linked cognitive and psychopathological (mainly schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) polygenic risk scores (PRS) with clinical manifestations of the disease. This study aims to explore the potential role of PRS from major mental disorders and cognition on schizophrenia relapse. 114 patients recruited in the 2EPs Project were included (56 patients who had not experienced relapse after 3 years of enrollment and 58 patients who relapsed during the 3-year follow-up). PRS for schizophrenia (PRS-SZ), bipolar disorder (PRS-BD), education attainment (PRS-EA) and cognitive performance (PRS-CP) were used to assess the genetic risk of schizophrenia relapse.Patients with higher PRS-EA, showed both a lower risk (OR=0.29, 95% CI [0.11-0.73]) and a later onset of relapse (30.96± 1.74 vs. 23.12± 1.14 months, p=0.007. Our study provides evidence that the genetic burden of neurocognitive function is a potentially predictors of relapse that could be incorporated into future risk prediction models. Moreover, appropriate treatments for cognitive symptoms appear to be important for improving the long-term clinical outcome of relapse., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest A. Ibáñez has received research support from or served as speaker or advisor for Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck and Otsuka. A. Gonzalez-Pinto has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Exeltis, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM), the Ministry of Science (Carlos III Institute), and the Basque Government, J. Saiz-Ruiz has been as speaker for and on the advisory boards of Adamed, Lundbeck, Servier, Medtronic, Casen Recordati, Neurofarmagen, Otsuka, Indivior, Lilly, Schwabe, Janssen and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. M. Bernardo has been a consultant for, received grant/research support and honoraria from, and been on the speakers/advisory board of ABBiotics, Adamed, Angelini, Casen Recordati, Janssen-Cilag, Menarini, Rovi and Takeda, Pilar A. Saiz has been a consultant to and/or has received honoraria or grants from Adamed, CIBERSAM, European Comission, Government of the Principality of Asturias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas and Servier. R. Rodriguez-Jimenez has been a consultant for, spoken in activities of, or received grants from: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid Regional Government (S2010/ BMD-2422 AGES; S2017/BMD-3740), JanssenCilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Ferrer, Juste, Takeda, Exeltis, Casen-Recordati, Angelini. The rest of the authors reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF