Search

Islatravir, a deoxyadenosine analog that inhibits HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms of action, including reverse transcriptase translocation inhibition, is being developed for use in HIV-1 treatment. People living with HIV often have comorbidities, such as dyslipidemia or type 2 diabetes mellitus, necessitating long-term concomitant drug therapy. This nonrandomized, two-period, fixed-sequence, open-label, phase 1, drug-drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate the effects of islatravir coadministration on atorvastatin and metformin pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy adults. In period 1, participants received a single dose of atorvastatin 20 mg and metformin 1000 mg. After a 5-day washout, participants received atorvastatin 20 mg and metformin 1000 mg coadministered with a single oral dose of islatravir 60 mg (period 2). In both periods, blood samples were collected up to 72 h post dose to characterize the plasma PK of atorvastatin and metformin. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Fourteen participants were enrolled and completed the study. Atorvastatin and metformin plasma PK were similar after administration of atorvastatin and metformin with or without islatravir. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval of the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) for atorvastatin and metformin with or without a single oral dose of islatravir were 1.04 (1.00-1.10) and 0.87 (0.79-0.96), respectively. Coadministration of islatravir with atorvastatin and metformin was well tolerated. Overall, coadministration of atorvastatin and metformin with a single oral dose of islatravir did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the PK profiles of either drug., (© 2024 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Antiretroviral therapy has substantially reduced morbidity, mortality, and disease transmission in people living with HIV. Islatravir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor that inhibits HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms of action, and it is in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. In preclinical and clinical studies, islatravir had a long half-life (t ½ ) of 3.0 and 8.7 days (72 and 209 hours, respectively); therefore, islatravir is being investigated as a long-acting oral antiretroviral agent. A study was conducted to definitively elucidate the terminal t ½ of islatravir and its active form islatravir-triphosphate (islatravir-TP). A single-site, open-label, non-randomized, single-dose phase 1 study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of islatravir in plasma and the pharmacokinetics of islatravir-TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after administration of a single oral dose of islatravir 30 mg. Eligible participants were healthy adult males without HIV infection between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Fourteen participants were enrolled. The median time to maximum plasma islatravir concentration was 1 hour. Plasma islatravir concentrations decreased in a biphasic manner, with a t ½ of 73 hours. The t ½ (percentage geometric coefficient of variation) of islatravir-TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells through 6 weeks (~1008 hours) after dosing was 8.1 days or 195 hours (25.6%). Islatravir was generally well tolerated with no drug-related adverse events observed. Islatravir-TP has a long intracellular t ½ , supporting further clinical investigation of islatravir administered at an extended dosing interval., Competing Interests: X.Z., W.A., R.V., S.A.S., M.I., and R.P.M. are current or former employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and may own stock and/or options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. W.A. was an employee of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, at the time the study was conducted. W.K.K. has no conflicts to report.

Long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations can provide several advantages over the more traditional oral formulation as drug product opportunities. LAI formulations can achieve sustained drug release for extended periods of time, which results in less frequent dosing requirements leading to higher patient adherence and more optimal therapeutic outcomes. This review article will provide an industry perspective on the development and associated challenges of long-acting injectable formulations. The LAIs described herein include polymer-based formulations, oil-based formulations, and crystalline drug suspensions. The review discusses manufacturing processes, including quality controls, considerations of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), biopharmaceutical properties and clinical requirements pertaining to LAI technology selection, and characterization of LAIs through in vitro, in vivo and in silico approaches. Lastly, the article includes a discussion around the current lack of suitable compendial and biorelevant in vitro models for the evaluation of LAIs and its subsequent impact on LAI product development and approval., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a deoxyadenosine analog in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. An islatravir-eluting implant could provide an additional option for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)., Setting: Previous data support a threshold islatravir triphosphate concentration for PrEP of 0.05 pmol/10 6 cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Prototype islatravir-eluting implants were previously studied to establish general tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of islatravir relative to the threshold level., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial, a next-generation radiopaque islatravir-eluting implant (48 mg, 52 mg, or 56 mg) or placebo implant was placed for a duration of 12 weeks in participants at low risk of HIV infection. Safety and tolerability, as well as PK for islatravir parent and islatravir triphosphate from plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were assessed throughout placement and 8 weeks after removal., Results: In total, 36 participants (8 active and 4 placebo per dose arm) were enrolled and completed this study. Implants were generally well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to an adverse event, and no clear dose-dependence in implant-related adverse events. No clinically meaningful relationships were observed for changes in laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiogram assessments. Mean islatravir triphosphate levels at day 85 (0.101-0.561 pmol/10 6  cells) were above the PK threshold for all dose levels., Conclusion: Islatravir administered using a subdermal implant has the potential to be an effective and well-tolerated method for administering PrEP to individuals at risk of acquiring HIV-1., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Islatravir (MK-8591) is a high-potency reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Data from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that ~30% to 60% of islatravir is excreted renally and that islatravir is not a substrate of renal transporters. To assess the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of islatravir, an open-label phase 1 trial was conducted with individuals with severe renal insufficiency (RI). A single dose of islatravir 60 mg was administered orally to individuals with severe RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and to healthy individuals without renal impairment (matched control group; eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Safety and tolerability were assessed, and blood samples were collected to measure the pharmacokinetics of islatravir and its major metabolite 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'deoxyinosine (M4) in plasma, as well as active islatravir-triphosphate (TP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Plasma islatravir and M4 area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) were ~2-fold and ~5-fold higher, respectively, in participants with severe RI relative to controls, whereas islatravir-TP AUC 0-∞ was ~1.5-fold higher in the RI group than in the control group. The half-lives of islatravir in plasma and islatravir-TP in PBMCs were longer in participants with severe RI than in controls. These findings are consistent with renal excretion playing a major role in islatravir elimination. A single oral dose of islatravir 60 mg was generally well tolerated. These data provide guidance regarding administration of islatravir in individuals with impaired renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04303156.).

Antiretroviral therapy is able to effectively control but not eradicate HIV infection, which can persist, leading to the need for lifelong therapy. The existence of latently HIV-infected cells is a major barrier to the eradication of chronic HIV infection. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), small molecules licensed for oncology indications, have shown the ability to produce HIV transcripts in vitro and in vivo. The pharmacologic parameters that drive optimal HIV latency reversal in vivo are unknown and could be influenced by such factors as the HDACi binding kinetics, concentration of compound, and duration of exposure. This study evaluates how these parameters affect HIV latency reversal for a series of novel HDACis that differ in their enzymatic on and off rates. Varying cellular exposure, using automated washout methods of HDACi in a Jurkat cell model of HIV latency, led to the investigation of the relationship between pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, target engagement (TE), and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses. Using an automated robotic platform enabled miniaturization of a suspension cell-based washout assay that required multiple manipulations over the 48 h duration of the assay. Quantification of histone acetylation (TE) revealed that HDACis showed early peaks and differences in the durability of response between different investigated HDACis. By expanding the sample times, the shift between TE and PD, as measured by green fluorescent protein, could be fully characterized. The comprehensive data set generated by automating the assays described here was used to establish a PK/PD model for HDACi-induced HIV latency reversal.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days, patients were randomized 1:1 to either plerixafor FD 20 mg (n = 30) or WB 0.24 mg/kg (n = 31) on the evening of Day 4. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥5 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg in ≤4 days of apheresis, and total systemic exposure to plerixafor (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 10 h [AUC 0-10 ]). There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients attaining the primary efficacy endpoint (60% FD arm, 55% WB arm; P = 0.395). Exposure to plerixafor was greater in the FD arm relative to the WB arm; however, there was no appreciable difference regarding fold increases of peripheral blood CD34 + cells. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. These results suggest there is no statistically significant difference in HSC mobilization with a standard WB dosing regimen of plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with low body weight compared with an FD regimen.

The purpose of this report is to analyze long-term clinical outcomes of patients exposed to plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilization. This was a study of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 167) and multiple myeloma (MM; n = 163) who were enrolled in the long-term follow-up of 2 pivotal phase III studies (NCT00741325 and NCT00741780) of 240 µg/kg plerixafor plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF, or placebo plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF to mobilize and collect CD34 + cells for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated over a 5-year period following the first dose of plerixafor or placebo. The probability of OS was not significantly different in patients with NHL or MM treated with plerixafor or placebo (NHL: 64%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 56% to 71% versus 56%; 95% CI, 44% to 67%, respectively; MM: 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 72% versus 64%; 95% CI, 53% to 73%, respectively). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of PFS over 5 years between treatment groups in patients with NHL (50%; 95% CI, 44% to 67% for plerixafor versus 43%; 95% CI, 31% to 54% for placebo) or those with MM (17%; 95% CI, 10% to 24% for plerixafor versus 30%; 95% CI, 21% to 40% for placebo). In this long-term follow-up study, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF for stem cell mobilization did not affect 5-year survival in patients with NHL or patients with MM., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit has been shown to be therapeutic in animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). However, findings with investigational NR2B receptor antagonists in PD patients have been mixed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the NR2B selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-0657 on levodopa-induced dyskinesias and motor symptoms in PD patients., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 22 patients with PD and levodopa-induced peak-dose dyskinesias. Patients received oral MK-0657 (7 mg) or placebo, in randomized order, on each of 2 test days. On both days, levodopa was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion at greater than or equal to 1 mg/kg per hour with frequent assessments of dyskinesia, motor function, and pharmacokinetics., Results: MK-0657 7 mg had no significant effect on dyskinesias (difference versus placebo in modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale mean change from baseline area under the curve over 5 hours, -2.3; 95% confidence interval, -5.1 to 0.4) or motor function (difference versus placebo in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III mean change from baseline area under the curve over 5 hours, 13.9; 95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 29.5). MK-0657 7 mg achieved the target mean maximum plasma concentration of 400 nM., Conclusions: These data suggest that a single dose of MK-0657 7 mg is not effective in improving levodopa-induced dyskinesias and motor symptoms in PD patients., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00505843.

Development of in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) for extended-release (ER) products is commonly pursued during pharmaceutical development to increase product understanding, set release specifications, and support biowaivers. This manuscript details the development of Level C and Level A IVIVCs for ER formulations of niacin, a highly variable and extensively metabolized compound. Three ER formulations were screened in a cross-over study against immediate-release niacin. A Multiple Level C IVIVC was established for both niacin and its primary metabolite nicotinuric acid (NUA) as well as total niacin metabolites urinary excretion. For NUA, but not for niacin, Level A IVIVC models with acceptable prediction errors were achievable via a modified IVIVC rather than a traditional deconvolution/convolution approach. Hence, this is in contradiction with current regulatory guidelines that suggest that when a Multiple Level C IVIVC is established, Level A models should also be readily achievable. We demonstrate that for a highly variable, highly metabolized compound such as niacin, development of a Level A IVIVC model fully validated according to agency guidelines may be challenging. However, Multiple Level C models are achievable and could be used to guide release specifications and formulation/manufacturing changes., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.)

To support the development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe and atorvastatin for the treatment of dyslipidemia, bioequivalence (BE) studies were conducted across a combined dose range (10/10, 10/20, 10/40, and 10/80 mg of ezetimibe/atorvastatin). In the BE trials, all parameters met traditional BE bounds except for atorvastatin peak plasma concentration (Cmax) at two intermediate doses. Literature-based metadata analysis predicted that the observed difference in Cmax between an ezetimibe+atorvastatin FDC and coadministration of these agents translates directly into a non-clinically significant change of <1.2% absolute difference in the percentage lowering of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol . Both FDC doses were confirmed to be clinically equivalent to coadministration in the subsequent clinical equivalence trials. These data suggest that modeling of dose-response relationships may be useful in predicting clinical equivalence, lowering cost/timelines through effective powering of studies, and predicting the effectiveness of new dosage formulations without the need for additional clinical efficacy trials in regulatory settings.

Medical civil military operations (MCMO) are part of military civil capacity-building efforts within the full spectrum of military operations, from war to military operations other than war. In 2008-2009 during Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Division Surgeon's Section (DSS) of the 25th Infantry Division (25ID) and Multinational Division-North developed an innovative MCMO program in northern Iraq. The program centered on understanding and mapping key relationships, empowering brigade-level programs, and leveraging technology to identify and share best practices. The DSS mapped the critical relationships within and between the three entities affecting MCMO: the government of Iraq (GOI), Department of State (DOS), and the Department of Defense (DOD). A division MCMO working group was then created along with processes to facilitate MCMO project execution and program management. The structure and organization of the 25ID MCMO program lend themselves to other operational environments requiring synchronization of medical capacity-building efforts.

Background: Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion complicated by early right ventricular (RV) failure has a poor prognosis and is generally unpredictable., Methods: To determine preoperative risk factors for perioperative RV failure after LVAD insertion, patient characteristics and preoperative hemodynamics were analyzed in 100 patients with the HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, MA) at the Cleveland Clinic., Results: RV assist device support was required for 11 patients (RVAD group). RVAD use was significantly higher in younger patients, female patients, smaller patients, and myocarditis patients. There was no significant difference in the cardiac index, RV ejection fraction, or right atrial pressure between the two groups preoperatively. The preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and RV stroke work index (RV SWI) were significantly lower in the RVAD group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.011, respectively). Survival to transplant was poor in the RVAD group (27%) and was 83% in the no-RVAD group., Conclusions: The need for perioperative RVAD support was low, only 11%. Preoperative low PAP and low RV SWI were significant risk factors for RVAD use.

During metabolic stress testing, 9 of 20 patients with left ventricular assist devices exhibited a lag in peak device rate by < or = 85% of peak native heart rate (group I), with peak device rates of 118 +/- 9 beats/min compared with group II, in which peak device rate nearly equaled peak native rates. Peak systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in group II than group I, but there was no significant difference in peak oxygen consumption, anaerobic threshold, or peak flows.

Background: Implantable left ventricular assist devices are common as a bridge to transplantation but are just reaching their goal as an alternative to transplantation., Methods: From December 1991 until December 1996, 97 left ventricular assist devices were implanted as a bridge to transplantation, one as an alternative to transplantation, and two as a bridge to recovery. Included were 64 pneumatic devices and 36 electric devices. Most patients (69%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy and most (53%) had had previous cardiac surgery. Preoperative circulatory support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) was used in 25., Results: Perioperative insertion of a right ventricular assist device was unusual (11%). The mean duration of support with a left ventricular assist device (bridge to transplantation) was 70 +/- 41 days (up to 206 days). Survival to transplantation was 76%. Cause of death included multiple organ failure (n = 13), perioperative stroke (n = 5), device failure (n = 5), and controller disconnect (n = 1). Significant risk factors for death included (1) preoperative need for ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, (2) elevated blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, or bilirubin, and (3) low pulmonary artery pressures. Risks after insertion of the left ventricular assist device were reoperation for bleeding, support with a right ventricular assist device, dialysis, or device failure. Catastrophic failure of the device occurred 14 times in 12 patients and was treated by emergency pump exchange in six instances. Only two device-related thromboembolic episodes were detected. Positive blood cultures were found in 59% of patients, driveline infection in 28%, and pump infection in 11%., Conclusions: The HeartMate device provided excellent hemodynamic support with low device-related thromboembolic events. Infection and reliability of the device contributed to the high cost of therapy. These areas need to be improved for the left ventricular assist device to attain its goal as a viable alternative to transplantation.

Objective: We sought to determine the role of partial left ventriculectomy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy., Methods: Since May 1996 we have performed partial left ventriculectomy in 53 patients, primarily (94%) in heart transplant candidates. The mean age of the patients was 53 years (range 17 to 72 years); 60% were in class IV and 40% in class III. Preoperatively, 51 patients were thought to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, one familial cardiomyopathy, and one valvular cardiomyopathy. As our experience accrued we increased the extent of left ventriculectomy and more complex mitral valve repairs. For two patients mitral valve replacement was performed. For 51 patients the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets were approximated (Alfieri repair); 47 patients also had ring posterior annuloplasty. In 27 patients (51%) one or both papillary muscles were divided, additional left ventricular wall was resected, and the papillary muscle heads were reimplanted., Results: Echocardiography showed a significant decrease in left ventricular dimensions after resection (8.3 cm to 5.8 cm), reduction in mitral regurgitation (2.8+ to 0), and increase in forward ejection fraction (15.7% to 32.7%). Cardiac index did not increase significantly (2.2 to 2.4 L/min per square meter). Eight patients (15%) required a perioperative left ventricular assist device; one died and was the only perioperative mortality (1.9%). At 11 months, actuarial survival was 87% and freedom from relisting for transplantation was 72%., Conclusions: Improved selection criteria are necessary to avoid early failures, and much more follow-up and analyses of data are mandatory. However, the operation may become a biologic bridge, or even alternative, to transplantation.

Background: Patients bridged to transplantation (TX) with the implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may be at increased risk for the development of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) during support., Methods: To investigate that, we evaluated 60 patients who received the HeartMate LVAD at our institution, of whom 53 had PRA results available for analysis. T lymphocyte PRA levels were examined before LVAD, at the peak PRA level during LVAD support (PEAK), and just before TX. A PRA level more than 10% was considered indicative of sensitization against HLA antigens., Results: The only factor that had a significant effect on PRA levels before LVAD was patient's sex (1.3% for men versus 7.4% for women; p = 0.005). During LVAD support, peak PRA levels increased significantly and the sex-associated differences were no longer evident (33.3% men, 34.3% women; not significant). At the time of TX, PRAs decreased to 10.9% (men) and 7.0% (women) (not significant). We examined the influence of blood products received before TX on PRA levels. Patients who received less than the median number of total units (median). When examined by the type of blood product, only the number of platelet transfusions significantly increased the peak PRA (median: 46.9%; p = 0.03). Patients who received blood that was leukocyte-depleted tended to have lower TX PRA levels (2.9%) compared with those who did not (13.9%, p = 0.18). Forty-two patients were successfully bridged to TX, with three early and two late deaths after TX. Whereas 39 patients received transplants without intervention, 3 were treated by plasmapheresis with a 77% reduction in their HLA antibody levels at TX as measured by flow cytometry., Conclusions: Patients with the implantable LVAD are at significant risk for the development of anti-HLA antibodies during support. Although this sensitization is often transient, intervention using plasmapheresis may be useful for some patients.

A 67-year-old man had end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. He had had two previous coronary bypass operations and a previous left ventricular aneurysmectomy. In December 1995 he underwent vented-electric HeartMate LVAD insertion as an alternative to transplantation. He was discharged from the hospital 13 days after the operation, and 5 months postoperatively he had returned to New York Heart Association functional class II.

Objectives: We sought to determine whether cardiac transplant recipients who required a bridge to transplantation with an implantable left ventricular assist device had a different outcome than patients who underwent transplantation without such a bridge., Methods: A retrospective study of 256 cardiac transplants from 1992 to 1996 included 53 patients who received the HeartMate left ventricular assist device and 203 patients who had no left ventricular assist device support., Results: Left ventricular assist device transplants increased from 8% of all transplants in 1992 (n = 63) to 32% in 1995 (n = 65) and 43% in 1996 (n = 14 year to date). Patients with and without left ventricular assist device had similar age and sex distributions. Left ventricular assist device recipients were larger (body surface area 1.96 vs 1.86 m2, p = 0.004). They were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (70% vs 45%, p = 0.001) and type O blood group (51% vs 34%, p = 0.06). All patients with left ventricular assist device and 42% of those without had undergone previous cardiac operations by the time of transplantation (mean number per patient 1.5 vs 0.3, p < 0.001). More patients in the left ventricular assist device group had anti-HLA antibodies before transplantation (T-cell panel reactive antibody level > 10% in 66% of left ventricular assist device group vs 15% of control group, p < 0.0001). Waiting time was longer for the left ventricular assist device than for patients in status I without a left ventricular assist device (median 88 vs 37 days, p = 0.002). There was no difference in length of posttransplantation hospital stay (median 15 days for each) or operative mortality (3.8% vs 4.4%). Mean follow-up averaged 22 months. No significant difference was found in Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. One-year survival was 94% in the left ventricular assist device group and 88% in the control group (difference not significant). Comparison of posttransplantation events showed no significant difference in actuarial rates of cytomegalovirus infection (20% vs 17%) or vascular rejection (15% vs 12%) at 1 year of follow-up. Similar percentages of patients were free from cellular rejection at 1 year of follow-up (12% vs 22%, p = 0.36)., Conclusions: Left ventricular assist device support intensified the donor shortage by including recipients who otherwise would not have survived to transplantation. Bridging affected transplant demographics, favoring patients who are larger, have ischemic cardiomyopathy, have had multiple blood transfusions and complex cardiac operations, and are HLA sensitized. Successfully bridged patients wait longer for a transplant than do UNOS status I patients without such a bridge, but they have similar posttransplantation hospital stay, operative mortality, and survival to those of patients not requiring left ventricular assist device support.

Background: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) significantly affects mortality and morbidity after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, and its occurrence often is unpredictable. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of RVD after LVAD implantation., Methods and Results: We studied right ventricular (RV) hemodynamics in 28 patients before and after LVAD implantation with a rapid-response thermistor pulmonary artery catheter. Measurements included mean right atrial pressure (RAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), cardiac index, transpulmonary gradient (TPG), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes (EDVI and ESVI, respectively), and RV ejection fraction (RVEF). We regarded patients who had RAP > or = 15 mm Hg at LVAD explantation (n = 8) or who required an RV assist device (n = 3) as the RVD group (n = 11). The other patients were categorized as the RV nondysfunctional group (RVN, n = 17). Before LVAD implantation, the RVD group had larger RV volumes (200 +/- 107 versus 125 +/- 46 mL/m2 for EDVI; 177 +/- 109 versus 104 +/- 48 mL/m2 for ESVI) and higher preload (23 +/- 6 versus 17 +/- 6 mm Hg for RAP) and afterload (20 +/- 9 versus 13 +/- 6 mm Hg for TPG; 5.9 +/- 3.0 versus 3.8 +/- 2.0 Wood units for PVR) than the RVN group (P < .05 for all). RVEF and PAP did not differ significantly. LVAD implantation remarkably improved RV hemodynamics in both groups, decreasing RV volumes, preload, and afterload and increasing RVEF in all patients, but post-LVAD PAP tended to be higher in the RVD group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that RAP and TPG before LVAD implantation and an acute decrease (delta) in PAP by LVAD were significant predictors of RVD (P < .05). The sensitivity for predicting RVD by a combination of at least two of these three predictors (RAP > or = 20 mm Hg, TPG > or = 16 mm Hg, and delta PAP < or = 10 mm Hg) was 82%, and the specificity was 88%., Conclusions: Dilated right ventricle with increased RV preload and afterload predisposes to RVD after LVAD implantation. Not only baseline parameters but also the immediate hemodynamic response to the LVAD are predictive, and a combination of these parameters may be useful in predictions of the occurrence of RVD after LVAD implantation.

Anatomic fitting studies of the Cleveland Clinic-Nimbus total artificial heart were performed in 33 patients undergoing heart transplantation. The pump fit in the pericardial space in 20 men (80%) and 4 women (50%). There was no significant difference between the Fit and Non-Fit groups in external chest dimensions. Among 42 intrathoracic dimensions, the distance from the center of the mitral valve to the diaphragm (Fit: 5.6 +/- 2.2 cm, Non-Fit: 3.6 +/- 0.4 cm, p < 0.00001) and the distance from the caudal end of the pulmonary valve to the diaphragm (Fit: 9.4 +/- 1.6 cm, Non-Fit: 6.3 +/- 0.8 cm, p < 0.0001) were the most critical. To predict anatomic fit, an index (A x B x C) was obtained from chest X-ray measurements (A, the craniocaudal distance from the dorsal region of the 8th left rib to the left diaphragm; B, the maximum left chest width; and C, the maximum anteroposterior sternum-vertebrae dimension). The pump fit in 88.5% of the patients with an index above 1200 cm3, whereas it fit in only 14.3% of the patients with an index below 1200 cm3 (p < 0.001). This index was an easily obtainable, good predictor of anatomic fit.

Unlike transplantation candidates, patients with pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) and a high transpulmonary gradient do not appear to be at increased risk for right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist system implant. To verify this observation, we reviewed 63 patients supported with the HeartMate (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, MA) left ventricular assist system. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with PHTN (47 patients) had mean pulmonary artery pressure > 30 mm Hg and/or pulmonary vascular resistance > 4 Wood units, and the remainder of patients did not have PHTN (16 patients). Both groups were similar in age (mean, 51 years), gender distribution (% men, 83% vs 94%, not significant), and number of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (72% vs 69%, not significant). More patients in the group without PHTN required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (38% vs 12%, p = .06). Right ventricular assist device support was instituted in five (11%) patients with PHTN and four (25%) patients without PHTN. A significantly larger number of patients without PHTN died while on support (14% vs 44%, p = .01). Survival after transplantation in both groups was > 90%. Patients with PHTN have higher transpulmonary gradient, show a significant decrease in pulmonary pressure after left ventricular assist system implantation, and have a higher transplantation rate compared to patients without PHTN. A larger patient cohort is needed to determine if the absence of PHTN is a risk factor for RVAD need and poor outcome after LVAS support.

To examine the relationship between age and outcome after implantable left ventricular assist system support, the authors investigated the results of 223 patients from 17 centers who were supported with a HeartMate (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc., Woburn, MA) pneumatic left ventricular assist system between 1986 and 1994. In addition, the authors examined a single center's experience with 67 patients between 1992 and 1996. Ages are separated by decile and ranged from 10 to 69 years. Men dominated all age groups, averaging 82% of the total (range, 64-91%). Viral, idiopathic, and post partum cardiomyopathies were the indication for support in 88% of the patients younger than 39 years of age. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the cause of myocardial failure in the majority of patients older than 40 years of age (40-49 years, 54%; 50-59 years, 57%; and 60-69 years, 67%). Patients aged 40-59 accounted for 64% of the patients supported, and had the best outcomes both on support and after transplantation. Survival to transplantation was not significantly different among the groups, although the patients older than 60 and younger than 69 years of age had higher mortalities on support, most commonly from cardiac failure. At the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the survival to transplantation and survival to discharge were indistinguishable between age groups. Age does not appear to be significant risk factor for outcome after implantable left ventricular assist system support. These results predict acceptable mortality for patients supported who are older than the age of 60.

Since 1986, the HeartMate left ventricular assist system (LVAS) has been widely used as a bridge to transplantation. Recently, a multicenter study was undertaken to evaluate the safety of allowing patients supported by the vented electric (VE) LVAS to await transplantation at home. Eligible patients progressed from 1 day to 3 day passes, then were discharged from the hospital. Twenty-nine patients at four centers were evaluated for incidence of adverse events and change in quality of life. Mean time of support was 193.7 +/- 138 days (range, 35-504 days). Patients spent a total of 2,922 days at home: 344 1 day passes and 150 3 day passes were issued; 21 patients were discharged from the hospital. There were 15 readmissions to the hospital: 9 for medical reasons and 6 for device related problems. Patients were able to resolve numerous technical problems at home. No deaths occurred outside of the hospital. Two patients returned to full-time employment, and all patients resumed an active lifestyle. Although adverse events occurred, the results of this study appear to demonstrate that patients may safely await transplantation at home while supported by a HeartMate VE-LVAS.

Background: Infection in implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients is common and has serious implications regarding permanent use of the LVAD., Methods: Thirty-three patients had HeartMate LVAD insertion as a bridge to heart transplantation. The mean length of hospital stay was 8 days before LVAD insertion. Before insertion 6 patients (18%) had positive pulmonary cultures and 5 patients (15%) had bacteremia., Results: During LVAD support 18 patients (55%) had bloodstream infection. Of 24 patients (73%) successfully bridged to transplantation, 12 (50%) had positive blood cultures including Staphylococcus species (n = 9), Candida (n = 3), Pseudomonas (n = 2), and Enterococcus (n = 2). Infectious complications encountered in this series included driveline infection requiring surgical revision, septic embolus, "cleared" device infection, "suppressed" device infection, and LVAD infection treated by device removal in 1 patient and device exchange in another., Conclusions: Infection in implantable LVAD patients is common, especially in patients in whom multiple organ failure develops, requiring prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. Strategies are needed to prevent these infections in recipients of the permanent LVADs because treatment of an established infection is difficult and expensive.

Background: The HeartMate left ventricular assist device has been successfully used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Because many patients exhibit marked clinical improvement in their heart failure after HeartMate implantation, we studied the physiological effect of this device on the neurohormonal axis., Methods and Results: In 13 patients awaiting transplant (mean cardiac index, 1.7 +/- 0.3 L.min-1.m-2) who underwent HeartMate implantation, venous atrial natriuretic peptide, epinephrine, norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, angiotensin, and arginine vasopressin were measured immediately before insertion and at explant/transplantation. Mean time to explant was 86 +/- 40 days. All patients were taken off inotropic medications within 1 month. Mean cardiac index on support before explant was 3.1 +/- 0.9 L.min-1.m-2. Plasma renin activity decreased from 57 +/- 56 ng.mL-1.h-1 at baseline (before insertion) to 3 +/- 3 ng.mL-1.h-1 at explant (mean percent change, 92%; P < .001). Angiotensin II level decreased from 237 +/- 398 U/L at baseline to 14 +/- 14 U/L at explant (mean percent change, 73%; P < .001). Plasma epinephrine level fell from 6800 +/- 1323 pg/mL at baseline to 46 +/- 46 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 86%; P < .001). Norepinephrine level decreased from 2953 +/- 1457 pg/mL at baseline to 518 +/- 290 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 79%; P < .001). Atrial natriuretic peptide fell from baseline values of 227 +/- 196 to 168 +/- 40 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, -49%; P = 519); and arginine vasopressin level decreased from 6 +/- 6 pg/mL at baseline to 0.8 +/- 0.5 pg/mL (mean percent change, 69%; P = .002)., Conclusions: We provide data supporting that the neurohormonal axis markedly improves after HeartMate implantation, providing biochemical confirmation of the improvement in hemodynamic status.

Background: Although use of long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is becoming more popular, further reduction of the mortality rate accompanying device insertion through improved patient selection would make this alternative even more appealing. We sought to develop a scoring system that was based on criteria obtainable at the time of evaluation and predictive of successful early outcome and simple to apply., Methods and Results: Patients (n = 56) undergoing LVAD insertion between 1990 and 1994 were screened for easily obtainable preoperative risk factors. To test the association between survival and each risk factor, a chi 2 analysis was performed, and relative risks were estimated. Oliguria, ventilator dependence, elevated central venous pressure, elevated prothrombin time, and reoperation stats had low probability values and high estimated relative risks. On the basis of these relations, a risk factor-selection scale (RFSS) (range, 0 to 10) was developed by computing appropriate weights for each risk factor. The distribution of patients for each scale score reveal that with RFSS > or = 5, most device recipients will die (P < .001). The average RFSS (+/- SD) of survivors (n = 42) was 2.45 +/- 1.73 compared with 5.43 +/- 2.85 in nonsurvivors (n = 14) (P < .0001). Univariate logistical regression was also significant (score statistic, 16.2; df = 1; P = .001)., Conclusions: The RFSS is simple, easy to apply, and statistically valid. Physicians could use the scale as a starting point in discussing the suitability for LVAD implantation in a specific patient and as a basis for comparing patient outcomes.

Successful support of patients using the implantable left ventricular assist device requires sustained and coordinated efforts by physicians and medical personnel. The authors describe the role of their registered nurse-first assistant (RNFA) as it has evolved through caring for 43 implantable pneumatic left ventricular assist device patients and 8 vented-electric left ventricular assist system patients during a 3 year period. Intraoperatively, the RNFA is responsible for pump assembly, including pre sealing all grafts and connecting areas of the pump using a combination of cryoprecipitate and thrombin. The RNFA assists with pump insertion during surgery. At device explantation, the RNFA dismantles the pump according to the FDA protocol for disassembly. Post operatively, the RNFA assesses and maintains patient hemodynamic stability and intervenes to manage hemodynamic and mechanical problems. Of the 51 patients, 13 are still on support, 9 died before transplantation (17.6%), and post transplant survival is 96.0%. In conclusion, an active left ventricular assist device program requires skilled personnel to manage complex problems and contributes to a successful patient outcome.

Candidates for ventricular assist devices often have hepatic dysfunction and concomitant coagulation abnormalities. Factors II, V, VII, XI, plasminogen, fibrinopeptide A (FpA), and D-dimers were measured in 19 HeartMate (ThermoCardiosystems, Inc., Woburn, MA) patients before device implantation; at 6 hr, 24 hr, and 2 weeks postimplantation; and before explantation. Ten patients had entry hepatic dysfunction (total bilirubin > 2 mg/dl; aspartate and alanine aminotransferases > 60 U/L); nine had normal hepatic function. All except one patient received perioperative aprotinin; all received only aspirin and dipyridamole after surgery. At preimplant, both patient groups had subnormal factor II, V, VII, XI, and plasminogen with elevated FpA and D-dimer. By 2 weeks postimplant, these factor levels had normalized, except for FpA and D-dimer levels, which suggest ongoing remodeling of fibrin deposits on the device surfaces. No statistically significant differences in the assayed hemostatic markers were observed between the two patient groups. Clinically, 15/19 (79%) patients survived to cardiac transplantation; 3/19 (16%) patients required reoperation for early bleeding. All three had low factor VII and XI; two of three also had hepatic dysfunction and subnormal levels of factor II and V. Most patients with entry hepatic dysfunction improve after device implantation; all four deaths were in patients with persistent hepatic dysfunction despite circulatory support.

The management of painful arthritis and deformity after trauma to the midfoot starts with careful assessment by physical examination and appropriate investigation to identify the affected joints. Conservative treatment may be very effective and includes the use of NSAIDs, custom insoles with arch support, and a rocker-bottom sole with extended steel shank with or without a SACH heel. If this treatment fails, usually a year after the injury, then arthrodesis of all the symptomatic joints with restoration of the arch and alignment of the weight-bearing surface is the recommended treatment. The long-term results of these fusions may be compromised by the subsequent development of arthritis in adjacent joints.

To evaluate hemodynamic effectiveness and physiologic changes on the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc., Woburn, Mass.), we studied 25 patients undergoing bridge to heart transplantation (35 to 63 years old, mean 50 years). All were receiving inotropic agents before left ventricular assist device implantation, 21 (84%) were supported with a balloon pump, and 7 (28%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Six patients died, primarily of right ventricular dysfunction and multiple organ failure. Nineteen (76%) were rehabilitated, received a donor heart, and were discharged (100% survival after transplantation). Pretransplantation duration of support averaged 76 days (22 to 153 days). No thromboembolic events occurred in more than 1500 patient-days of support with only antiplatelet medications. Significant hemodynamic improvement was measured (before implantation to before explantation) in cardiac index (1.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.1 +/- 0.8 L/min per square meter; p < 0.001), left atrial pressure (23.7 +/- 7 to 9 +/- 7.5 mm Hg; p < 0.001), pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Both creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels were significantly higher before implantation in patients who died while receiving support. Renal and liver function returned to normal before transplantation. We conclude that support with the HeartMate device improved hemodynamic and subsystem function before transplantation. Long-term support with the HeartMate device has a low risk of thromboemboli and makes a clinical trial of a portable HeartMate device a realistic alternative to medical therapy.

Long-term support on the implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) produces structural changes in the recipient's heart. To assess the possibility of heart "recovery" we reviewed the records of 19 HeartMate LVAD recipients to determine structural and left ventricular histologic changes during LVAD support. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic studies were performed in the operating room before LVAD insertion, immediately after LVAD insertion, and at explantation and heart transplantation (mean duration of support, 76 +/- 34 days). The initiation of LVAD pumping led to an immediate decrease (p < 0.001) in left ventricular dimensions, which were not significantly different by the time of device explantation. Left ventricular fractional shortening did not significantly improve during LVAD support (0.07 +/- 0.03 before LVAD; 0.11 +/- 0.10 immediately after LVAD; 0.11 +/- 0.11 before explantation). Histologic specimens showed a significant reduction in the number of wavy fibers, and contraction band necrosis (p < 0.01), both markers of acute myocyte damage. However, myocardial fibrosis increased (p < 0.05). Myocyte diameter increased slightly (p = 0.07). We conclude that implantable LVAD support is associated with immediate changes in ventricular structure. Histologic markers of acute myocyte damage improve, but fibrosis increases. Because the structural changes occur immediately, they do not indicate "recovery" of left ventricular function, but merely changes in loading conditions.

Background: The implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was designed to provide circulatory support as an alternative to heart transplantation or to continued medical therapy of end-stage heart failure. Initial experience with the implantable LVAD used as a bridge to heart transplantation provides a clinical opportunity to study the function of the device and adaptation by the patient., Methods and Results: Nineteen heart transplant candidates (mean age, 50 years; 17 males) underwent insertion of the HeartMate LVAD as a bridge to heart transplantation from December 1991 to November 1993. All patients were in cardiogenic shock on inotropes, and 16 (84%) were on an intra-aortic balloon pump. Three patients died because of multiple organ failure; all had right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (2 required RV assist devices). Sixteen patients (84%) improved markedly and were rehabilitated to New York Heart Association functional class I-II. Three patients are still on support. Significant improvements in hemodynamic function (based on analysis of the percent change from pre-LVAD condition to pretransplantation) were observed: cardiac index rose from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.9 L/min per m2 (P = .0002), left atrial pressure fell from 22.9 +/- 9.5 to 8.0 +/- 5.5 mm Hg (P = .003), RV ejection fraction increased from 19.8 +/- 11.3% to 40.8 +/- 8.9% (P = .0004), pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from 5.2 +/- 2.6 to 2.0 +/- 0.8 Wood units (P = .004). Thirteen patients had successful transplants after a mean duration of 66 days on the LVAD (range, 22 to 101 days). There were no thromboembolic events while the patients were on the LVAD. Only aspirin with dipyridamole was given for anticoagulation during a total of > 1100 patient days of support., Conclusions: Bridge to transplant implantable LVAD experience indicates that hemodynamic improvement should be significant after insertion of the devices and that the risk of thromboembolic events with the HeartMate LVAD should be extremely low. Rehabilitation and quality of life should be markedly improved. Limitations of extrapolating this clinical experience to the permanent implantable LVAD include that these patients were hospitalized (permanent implants will be outpatients); the "vented-electric" HeartMate LVAD was not tested (it is a portable, battery-powered device), and true "chronic" LVAD support (> 1 year) was not tested, so questions regarding long-term device reliability and the chronic risk of infection are unknown.

During a 16-month period, 12 consecutive patients underwent insertion of a HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device in a preperitoneal pocket that separated the device from the abdomen. All patients were in cardiogenic shock awaiting heart transplantation. Preoperatively, the mean cardiac index was 1.6 L.min-1.m-2, with 11 patients on intraaortic balloon pump support and 2 on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The pocket was formed below the rectus abdominis and internal oblique muscles and above the posterior rectus sheath. The pump fit easily in all patients. One patient died of progressive multiorgan failure. Four patients are still on support. Seven patients underwent successful transplantation after a mean duration of 55 days of support (mean pump index was 3.1 L.min-1.m-2 during support). One patient had driveline revision because of an exit site infection but had successful transplantation. The pump was explanted without difficulty at each transplant operation. All patients having transplantation are alive and well. Preperitoneal insertion of the HeartMate left ventricular assist device can be safely performed and may avoid problems posed by intraabdominal left ventricular assist device insertion.

The success of cardiac transplantation is limited by the gap between the supply and demand of donor hearts. This limitation increases the risk of patient morbidity and mortality during the long waiting period. A variety of temporary support devices are in use as "bridges to transplant" to sustain cardiac function until a suitable organ donor is found. A device to permanently replace the failing heart is close to becoming a reality, as data from temporary support devices indicate that permanent devices are feasible. As reliability improves, the effectiveness of mechanical support may approach the survival rate of current transplant procedures. Successful permanent support may be an alternative to transplantation and may provide effective treatment for those patients with end-stage heart failure.

Chronic heart failure is a progressive syndrome characterized by diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) or left ventricular failure not amenable to acute interventions of myocardial revascularization. A spectrum of treatment options is available to such patients. Medical therapies consist largely of pharmacologic alternatives and are used in the early stages of heart failure to slow the processes of ventricular remodeling. Surgical interventions are used as adjunctive therapies in the later stages of heart failure. These procedures include coronary endarterectomy, high-risk surgical revascularization, automatic internal cardioverter-defibrillator insertion (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Conjunction with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Trial), cardiac transplantation, and dynamic cardiomyoplasty. This article provides an overview of each of these surgical therapies. Indications for each procedure and patient selection criteria are outlined. A description of each surgical procedure is included. Guidelines for postoperative nursing care are provided, and postoperative complications are discussed.

Lung and heart-lung transplantation is one of the most rapidly evolving transplantation fields. Survival has been improving with better patient selection, better graft preservation, and better immunosuppression. This paper outlines criteria for patient selection, reviews the surgical options involving lung transplantation, and discusses factors influencing morbidity and survival in these patients. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience with these procedures is presented. Lung and heart-lung transplantation has emerged from the experimental realm to the therapeutic, and can now be offered as an effective treatment option to many patients with previously fatal heart and lung disorders.

Heart-lung transplantation has been used successfully for patients with pulmonary vascular disease but its application has been very limited due to the scarcity of donors. We report a patient with Eisenmenger's syndrome who underwent right single-lung transplantation with closure of atrial septal defect; postoperative convalescence was uneventful. Serial magnetic resonance imaging examinations demonstrate improved right heart function.

Increased numbers of cardiac transplantations are being performed as a therapeutic option for end-stage cardiac disease. Immunosuppressive therapy combining multiple drugs to prevent rejection is essential to the success of this procedure. Although the patient's primary problem of heart failure is alleviated by a successful transplant, the secondary effect of immunosuppression causes many potential problems for this patient population. Infection from common pathogens or opportunistic microorganisms is the primary complication causing death in the post-transplant patient. Bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic infection may ensue during the postoperative period. Life-long immunosuppressive therapy places the patient at continuous risk for the development of infection. Nurses play an important role in the management of the cardiac transplant patient. A thorough knowledge of normal immune system function and the specific actions of each immunosuppressive drug on the immune system function is a prerequisite for providing care for these patients. Continuous monitoring of the patient to detect the signs and symptoms of infection or other side effects of the drugs is part of the nurse's role in caring for these patients. Maintenance of the patient's nonspecific host defenses is supported by specific nursing actions. In preparation for the life-long effects of the drugs, education of the patient and family regarding the implications of therapy with immunosuppressive agents is a crucial nursing function for the successful management of the cardiac transplant patient.

The prognosis for recipients of a liver transplant has been vastly improved by the advent of cyclosporine therapy, and the future holds even more promise with improvements in drug therapy and surgical techniques. The transition from experimental procedure to accepted clinical practice requires nursing to develop standards of care to promote quality care in transplant nursing. With postoperative infection identified as a major cause of mortality for this patient group, nurses will be expected to be skillful in assessing and monitoring for signs and symptoms of infection. Nurses will also need to understand what is involved in the clinical diagnosis of infection, the role of immunosuppressive drug therapy, and the laboratory findings that predispose or herald infection. Infection control standards and methods to manage the risk of infection are appropriate areas of research for critical care nursing and hold the potential for improved patient outcomes for this vulnerable group of transplant patients.