Search

Objectives: Heterogeneity of SLE patients in clinical trials remains a challenge for developing new therapies. This study used a combinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers to define key sources of heterogeneity., Methods: Combinations of IFN (high/low), anti-dsDNA (+/-) and C3 and C4 (low/normal) were used to subset n = 1747 patients from two randomized phase III trials. A dichotomous classification scheme defined SLE (+) as: IFN (high), anti-dsDNA (+), C3 (low) and/or C4 (low). SLE (-) required all of the following: IFN (low), anti-dsDNA (-), C3 (normal) and C4 (normal). Additional analyses subset the data further by IFN, anti-dsDNA and complement., Results: The trials enrolled n = 2262 patients of which n = 1747 patients had data for IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 at baseline. There were n = 247 patients in the SLE (-) population and n = 1500 patients in the SLE (+) population. The SLE (-) population had more mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal disease at baseline, while SLE (+) had more haematological, renal and vascular involvement. There was lower concomitant medication use in the SLE (-) population for corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, except for MTX. Time to severe flare was significantly longer in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P < 0.0001) and SRI-4 response rate was significantly lower in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P = 0.00016). The USA had more SLE (-) patients (22%) than Mexico/Central America/South America (10%), Europe (7%) and the rest of the world (5%)., Conclusion: Combinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers revealed subsets of SLE patients that discriminated by disease manifestations, concomitant medication use, geography, time to severe flare and SRI-4 response. These data may be useful for designing clinical trials and identifying subsets of patients for analysis. Rheumatology key messages SLE patients from a P3 trial were categorized by IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 status. Patients lacking molecular markers of SLE distinguished from biomarker positive patients on multiple clinical parameters. Biomarker negative patients have distinct disease characteristics that may impact clinical trial outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: An inverted repeat is a DNA sequence followed downstream by its reverse complement, potentially with a gap in the centre. Inverted repeats are found in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes and they have been linked with countless possible functions. Many international consortia provide a comprehensive description of common genetic variation making alternative sequence representations, such as IUPAC encoding, necessary for leveraging the full potential of such broad variation datasets., Results: We present IUPACPAL, an exact tool for efficient identification of inverted repeats in IUPAC-encoded DNA sequences allowing also for potential mismatches and gaps in the inverted repeats., Conclusion: Within the parameters that were tested, our experimental results show that IUPACPAL compares favourably to a similar application packaged with EMBOSS. We show that IUPACPAL identifies many previously unidentified inverted repeats when compared with EMBOSS, and that this is also performed with orders of magnitude improved speed.

Objective: The SLE Responder Index (SRI) is a composite endpoint used in SLE trials. This investigation examined the clinical trial elements that drive response measured by the SRI., Methods: Analyses are based on data from two phase 3 trials (n = 2262) that evaluated the impact of an anti-B-cell activating factor antibody on disease activity using SRI-5 as the primary endpoint (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01196091 and NCT01205438)., Results: The SRI-5 response rate at week 52 for all patients was 32.8%. Non-response due to a lack of SLEDAI improvement, concomitant medication non-compliance or dropout was 31, 16.5 and 19.1%, respectively. Non-response due to deterioration in BILAG or Physician's Global Assessment after SLEDAI improvement, concomitant medication compliance and trial completion was 0.5%. Disease activity in three SLEDAI organ systems was highly prevalent at baseline: mucocutaneous, 90.6%; musculoskeletal, 82.9%; and immunologic, 71.6%. Disease activity in each of the other organ systems was <11% of patients. Four clinical manifestations were highly prevalent at baseline: arthritis, 82.6%; rash, 69.2%; alopecia, 58.2%; and mucosal ulcer, 32.5%. The combined prevalence of renal, vascular and CNS disease at baseline was 17.6%; these patients had high SRI-5 response rates. Adjustments to corticosteroids were allowed during the first 24 weeks. Increases in corticosteroids above 2.5 mg/day were observed in 16.2% of placebo patients over the first 24 weeks after randomization., Conclusion: The primary drivers of SRI-5 response were SLEDAI improvement, concomitant medication adherence and trial completion. Arthritis, rash, alopecia and mucosal ulcer were the most prevalent clinical manifestations at baseline. Corticosteroid increases and rare, highly weighted disease manifestations in SLEDAI can confound the SRI signal., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Purpose: Tadalafil has regulatory approval for the treatment of men with signs/symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia with and without erectile dysfunction. We assessed whether the effects of treatment with tadalafil for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia are independent of improvements in erectile dysfunction., Materials and Methods: Four separate analyses used integrated data from 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia with and without erectile dysfunction to test whether total I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) improvement was due to improvement in IIEF-EF (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score). Unidirectional and bidirectional path analysis models determined direct and indirect treatment effects mediated by improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction symptoms., Results: A total of 1,496 men, of whom 77% had erectile dysfunction, received at least 1 dose of tadalafil 5 mg once daily or placebo. The placebo adjusted treatment effect for men with erectile dysfunction was represented by a mean decrease of -2.3 (p <0.0001) in total I-PSS vs -2.2 (p = 0.0007) for men without erectile dysfunction. The correlation between change from baseline in total I-PSS and IIEF-EF was weak (r(2) = 0.08, p <0.0001). The unidirectional path analysis model suggested that the total treatment effect on total I-PSS score improvement (2.25) was derived from a direct treatment effect of 1.57 (70%, p <0.001) and an indirect treatment effect of 0.67 (30% via IIEF-EF improvement, p <0.001). Bidirectional path analysis showed that total I-PSS improvement was largely attributed to direct (92.5%, p <0.001) vs indirect (7.5%, p = 0.32) treatment effects via IIEF-EF improvement., Conclusions: Regardless of the analytical approach, self-reported erectile dysfunction status did not appreciably influence tadalafil treatment response in men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia, supporting the dual action of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor efficacious for erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), in population subgroups, using pooled data from 4 international, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in men with LUTS/BPH., Methods: The safety database included 1500 men randomized to tadalafil 5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Changes in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life index, and BPH impact index were examined overall, and changes in IPSS or adverse events (AEs) were examined across subgroups of interest. Treatment-group differences were assessed using analysis of covariance., Results: Results of pooled data confirmed that tadalafil (N = 752) resulted in significant improvements from baseline vs placebo (N = 746) in IPSS (mean difference -2.3; P <.001), and also in BPH impact index and IPSS-quality of life index (both P <.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that IPSS improvements were significant regardless of baseline LUTS severity (IPSS <20/≥20), age (≤65/>65 years), recent previous use of α-blockers or PDE5 inhibitors, total testosterone level (<300/≥300 ng/dL), or prostate-specific antigen predicted prostate volume (<40/≥40 mL). [corrected] Rates of treatment emergent AEs were comparable between subgroups of baseline age (≤65/>65 years), previous PDE5 inhibitor use, and the presence or absence of pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease (including hypertension), but somewhat higher for recent previous α-blocker use., Conclusion: In these pooled data analyses, tadalafil 5 mg improved LUTS/BPH across subgroups of age, LUTS severity, testosterone levels, and prostate volume. Rates of AEs were similar across the subgroups assessed., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Tadalafil, a long-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is approved for treating signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED); tamsulosin, an alpha-blocker, is approved for treating signs and symptoms of BPH., Aim: To determine the effects of tadalafil or tamsulosin on sexual function, including ejaculation and orgasm, satisfaction, and erectile function, in sexually active men with ED and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of BPH (LUTS/BPH)., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks in men with LUTS/BPH; tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily was an active control., Main Outcome Measures: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was administered at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Analysis of orgasm and ejaculation was post hoc based on the IIEF-Orgasmic Function (OF) domain (IIEF-Q9 [ejaculatory frequency] and Q10 [orgasmic frequency]). Other measures included IIEF-Intercourse Satisfaction (IS), Overall Satisfaction (OS), and Erectile Function (EF) domains. Changes from baseline to 12 weeks (or last observation) vs. placebo were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Higher IIEF scores indicate better functioning., Results: Of 511 study participants, 310 (60.7%) had ED and were sexually active. The IIEF-OF increased significantly through 12 weeks with tadalafil vs. placebo (P = 0.048), as did IIEF-Q9 (P = 0.045) but not IIEF-Q10 (P = 0.100). Compared with placebo, IIEF-OF, Q9, and Q10 decreased significantly with tamsulosin (all P < 0.05). The IIEF-IS and OS increased significantly at end point with tadalafil (both P < 0.001); for tamsulosin, change was not significant for IS, while OS decreased significantly (P = 0.009). The IIEF-EF domain increased significantly vs. placebo with tadalafil (P < 0.001) but not tamsulosin (P = 0.699)., Conclusions: Tadalafil 5 mg once daily significantly improved ejaculation and orgasm, intercourse and overall satisfaction, and erectile function. Men receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily experienced a decrease in both ejaculatory/orgasmic frequency and overall satisfaction vs. placebo, with no significant effect on erectile function., (© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.)

Objectives: To compare effects of tadalafil on ejaculatory and orgasmic function in patients presenting with erectile dysfunction (ED). To determine the effects of post-treatment ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) and orgasmic dysfunction (OD) on measures of sexual satisfaction., Patients and Methods: Data from 17 placebo-controlled 12-week trials of tadalafil (5, 10, 20 mg) as needed in patients with ED were integrated. EjD and OD severities were defined by patient responses to the International Index of Erectile Function, question 9 (IIEF-Q9; ejaculation) and IIEF-Q10 (orgasm), respectively. Satisfaction was evaluated using the intercourse and overall satisfaction domains of the IIEF and Sexual Encounter Profile question 5. Analyses of covariance were performed to compare mean ejaculatory function and orgasmic function, and chi-squared tests evaluated differences in endpoint responses to IIEF-Q9 and IIEF-Q10., Results: A total of 3581 randomized subjects were studied. Treatment with tadalafil 10 or 20 mg was associated with significant increases in ejaculatory and orgasmic function (vs placebo) across all baseline ED, EjD, and OD severity strata. In the tadalafil group, 66% of subjects with severe EjD reported improved ejaculatory function compared with 36% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Similarly, 66% of the tadalafil-treated subjects (vs 35% for placebo; P < 0.001) with severe OD reported improvement. Residual severe EjD and OD after treatment had negative impacts on sexual satisfaction. Limitations of the analysis include its retrospective nature and the use of an instrument (IIEF) with as yet unknown performance in measuring treatment responses for EjD and OD., Conclusions: Tadalafil treatment was associated with significant improvements in ejaculatory function, orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction. Proportions of subjects reporting improved ejaculatory or orgasmic function were ≈ twofold higher with tadalafil than with placebo. These findings warrant corroboration in prospective trials of patients with EjD or OD (without ED)., (© 2013 BJU International.)

Objective: To determine frequencies of, and risk factors for, ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) and orgasmic dysfunction (OD) in men with different degrees of erectile dysfunction (ED)., Patients and Methods: Baseline data from 28 ED trials were integrated and analysed. The International Index of Erectile Function Question 9 (IIEF-Q9; 'When you had sexual stimulation or intercourse, how often did you ejaculate?') and IIEF-Q10 ('How often did you have the feeling of orgasm with or without ejaculation?') were used to evaluate ejaculatory and orgasmic functions. Responses of 'almost never or never' or 'a few times (much less than half the time)' were taken as evidence of EjD or OD, respectively, whereas responses of 'almost always or always' or 'most times (much more than half the time)' were taken as evidence of normal function. Estimates of the relative risks (RRs) of EjD or OD were determined for multiple patient characteristics., Results: Among 12,130 study participants with available data, only 5117 (42.2%) reported normal ejaculatory function, and 4321 (35.6%) normal orgasm, regardless of ED severity. Among subjects with poor ejaculatory function, 16.7% had mild ED, and among subjects with poor sensation of orgasm, 21.9% had mild ED. Frequencies of EjD and OD increased with increasing ED severity. Of the 5117 individuals with normal ejaculatory function, 796 (15.6%) had poor sensation of orgasm. Of the 4321 subjects with normal orgasm, 226 (5.2%) had poor ejaculatory function. Men with (vs without) EjD or OD tended to be younger: 53.7 vs 56.9 years and 54.2 vs 56.2 years, respectively. Factors associated with increased RRs of EjD and OD included cardiomyopathy (RR for EjD 1.74; RR for OD 1.59); cardiac failure (RR 1.40; 1.22); and baseline use (or history of use) of antipsychotics (RR 1.45; 1.30), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (RR 1.31; 1.27), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 1.34; 1.28)., Conclusions: EjD and OD occurred at baseline in more than one in three men enrolled in tadalafil trials. Even men with mild ED reported EjD or OD. Further studies are warranted to better understand the impacts of EjD and OD on male sexuality and quality of life., (© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of the daily erectogenic therapy, tadalafil, on lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS) in men with or without comorbid erectile dysfunction (ED)., Methods: Following a 4-week placebo run-in period, men with moderate-to-severe BPH-LUTS were randomized to placebo or tadalafil 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg once daily for 12 weeks. International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), IPSS quality of life, and BPH Impact Index were measured every 4 weeks. Safety was mainly assessed via spontaneous reports of adverse events. Data from men with (n=716) or without (n=340) ED at baseline were compared in posthoc analyses., Results: Men with ED were older and had more frequent hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes at baseline compared with men without ED. After 12 weeks, changes in IPSS in men with ED (least squares mean change from baseline, placebo: -2.4; tadalafil 2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg: -4.3, -4.8, -5.3, -5.6) and without ED (-2.4, -3.2, -5.3, -5.1, -4.5) were not significantly different (subgroup/interaction P values: .352/.644). Similar effects were observed for IPSS quality of life (with ED: -0.6, -0.9, -0.9, -1.0, -1.1; without ED: -0.6, -0.7, -0.9, -0.8, -0.8; 0.090/0.773) and BPH Impact Index (with ED: -0.7, -0.9, -1.3, -1.3, -1.4; without ED: -1.0, -0.7, -1.3, -1.3, -1.2; 0.753/0.852). Tadalafil was generally well tolerated, and men with or without ED had similar tolerability profiles., Conclusions: Changes in BPH-LUTS after 12 weeks of treatment with placebo or various doses of once daily tadalafil were similar in men with or without comorbid ED., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify the patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and concomitant medications associated with a change in the likelihood of tadalafil-associated adverse events (AEs) in men with erectile dysfunction., Methods: Pooled safety data were analyzed from 3488 tadalafil-treated men who participated in 21 placebo-controlled clinical trials of tadalafil taken as needed or once daily. Three categories of tadalafil-associated AEs were defined: vasodilatory (headache, flushing, nasal congestion, nasopharyngitis, and dizziness); musculoskeletal (back pain and myalgia); and gastrointestinal (dyspepsia). A classification and regression tree analysis was used to determine the patient characteristics most likely to be associated with a change in the likelihood of these types of AEs., Results: Of the 3488 tadalafil-treated patients, 973 (27.9%) had any vasodilatory, musculoskeletal, and/or gastrointestinal tadalafil-associated AE. The patient characteristics associated with a change in the likelihood of any tadalafil-associated AE were diabetes, geographic region, and age. The patient characteristics associated with a change in the likelihood of a vasodilatory tadalafil-associated AE included antihypertensive medication use, geographic region, and height, with several additional splits occurring along these primary and secondary nodes. No patient characteristics associated with a change in the likelihood of musculoskeletal or gastrointestinal AEs were identified owing to the limitation of a relatively low incidence of these types of AEs., Conclusions: The findings from classification and regression tree analyses could help physicians to better understand some of the associations between patient characteristics and the tolerability of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and could contribute to improved patient outcomes, satisfaction, treatment seeking, and treatment persistence.

Objective: To provide clinically relevant information on tadalafil 2.5 or 5 mg once daily for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), by reviewing safety and efficacy study findings. Findings from an integrated analysis of trials of tadalafil 10 and 20 mg as needed are presented to provide context for the daily dosing regime., Research Design and Methods: Of the three studies that included approved once-daily doses, two were conducted in the general ED population and one in a diabetic ED population. An integrated analysis was performed using 12-week efficacy and safety data from the studies conducted in the general ED population., Results: In the general ED population, the 12-week mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain scores increased by 6.2 to an endpoint score of 19.2 and by 8.6 to 21.9 for 2.5 and 5 mg doses, respectively, versus an increase of 1.3 to 14.9 for placebo (p < 0.01). Mean successful intercourse attempts (SEP3) were 50% and 62% for tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg once daily, respectively, versus 33% for placebo (p < 0.01). These findings were consistent with those for tadalafil as needed. In 1- and 2-year open label extensions of tadalafil 5 mg once daily, efficacy was maintained. In the diabetic ED population, 12-week mean IIEF EF scores increased by 4.8 to 18.3 and 4.5 to 17.2 with tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg, respectively, versus an increase of 1.3 to 14.7 for placebo (p < 0.01). Mean successful intercourse attempts were more than 40% for each tadalafil dose, versus 28% for placebo (p < 0.01). The profile of treatment-emergent adverse events with tadalafil once daily was similar to that previously reported with as-needed treatment; the most common adverse events with tadalafil (dyspepsia, nasopharyngitis, headaches) were reported in

Objectives: Assess the effects on spermatogenesis of daily tadalafil 20mg over three spermatogenesis cycles in men >or= 45 yr., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority study, healthy men (or with mild erectile dysfunction) were randomized to receive tadalafil 20mg (n=125) or placebo (n=128) for 9 mo followed by a 6-mo, treatment-free period. Semen and serum samples were provided at baseline and every 10-12 wk. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration at end point. Secondary outcomes included sperm concentration, number per ejaculate, motility and morphology; serum concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones; and tolerability., Results: Of 253 men enrolled, 191 (75%) completed treatment phase: 2 of 96 (2.1%, placebo) and 12 of 95 (12.6%, tadalafil) subjects had >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration. Tadalafil was noninferior to placebo because the upper 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of tadalafil and placebo subjects with a >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration was 17.5%, significantly less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 20% (p=0.015). Ninety-four percent (179 of 191) of men completed the 6-mo, treatment-free period: Baseline sperm concentration levels were restored in 8 of 12 (tadalafil) and 1 of 2 (placebo) men. There were no significant differences between groups in secondary end points. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and myalgia. Twelve (9.6%) tadalafil and seven (5.5%) placebo subjects discontinued because of adverse events., Conclusions: This study demonstrated no deleterious effects of 9 mo of daily tadalafil 20mg on spermatogenesis or hormones related to testicular function in men >or= 45 yr.

Introduction: Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with documented efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED)., Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in men with severe ED., Methods: A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 10 and 20 mg measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) among patients with severe ED (EF domain score = 1-10) in a Japanese placebo-controlled study (PCT). We also analyzed the efficacy of the two doses in men with severe ED post hoc by pooling data from three tadalafil clinical trials that evaluated these doses using a similar study design (three placebo-controlled trials), and evaluated (post hoc) the presence of organic comorbidities in patients with different levels of response to tadalafil 10 or 20 mg., Main Outcome Measures: Mean change in the IIEF-EF domain and mean per-patient changes in percent "yes" responses to SEP Question 2 (SEP2) and Question 3 (SEP3)., Results: Patients with severe ED in the Japanese study experienced numerically greater increases (improvements) when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (14.3 vs. 12.4; P = 0.355), SEP2 (60% vs. 57%; P = 0.781), and SEP3 (61% vs. 49%, P = 0.196). When sufficiently powered, these observations reached statistical significance in the three PCTs: patients with severe ED experienced greater increases when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (13.6 vs. 10.4; P = 0.014) and SEP3 (56% vs. 43%, P = 0.019). Both doses were well tolerated., Conclusions: Patients with severe ED, and especially those with an organic comorbidity, may derive greater clinical benefits from tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in Japanese men with erectile dysfunction (ED)., Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study enrolled 343 Japanese men with ED. The men were stratified into those with mild, moderate, or severe ED and then randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to placebo and 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg tadalafil. Co-primary outcomes were the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain score, the percentage of "yes" responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Questions 2 and 3, and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included the International Index of Erectile Function intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domain scores and the percentage of "yes" responses to a global assessment question., Results: The least square mean change from baseline was 7.5, 9.1, and 9.4 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 2.1 for placebo for the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain; 28.5, 36.0, and 36.5 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 8.6 for placebo for Sexual Encounter Profile question 2; and 34.3, 47.3, and 50.8 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 12.3 for placebo for Sexual Encounter Profile question 3, respectively (P <0.001 for all doses and all measures). Patients taking tadalafil had significantly greater changes from baseline for the intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domains compared with patients taking placebo (P <0.001). Also, 76.5%, 81.4%, and 83.7% of patients taking 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil, respectively, reported improved erections (global assessment question) versus 31.4% of patients taking placebo (P <0.001). Most (98%) treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. One patient (tadalafil 5 mg) discontinued because of an adverse event (ureteral calculus). Of the 343 patients, 302 (88%) completed the study. No deaths were reported., Conclusions: All doses of tadalafil studied were efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese men with ED.

Objective: Raloxifene hydrochloride (60 mg/day) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Raloxifene treatment for 3 years increases bone mineral density (BMD) and, unlike tamoxifen (a triphenylethylene selective estrogen receptor modulator), does not stimulate the endometrium in healthy postmenopausal women. The effect of longer duration of treatment with raloxifene is not known. Therefore, the main objectives of these analyses are (1) to compare the effect of 5 years of treatment with raloxifene (60 mg/day) with placebo in terms of the likelihood of developing osteoporosis and (2) to evaluate the effect of 5 years of raloxifene treatment on the endometrium and incidence of vaginal bleeding., Design: The current analyses include integrated data from two identically designed, prospective, double-blinded trials including postmenopausal women (mean age, 55 years) randomly assigned to either placebo (n = 143) or raloxifene (60 mg/day; n = 185). Osteoporosis and osteopenia were diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria, using the manufacturer's database for the lumbar spine and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's 1998 reference base for the hip. Endometrial thickness was determined using transvaginal ultrasonography. Clinical diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer were confirmed by blinded review of histopathology reports., Results: Compared with the case of placebo, raloxifene treatment for 5 years reduced bone turnover markers (osteocalcin: -10.9%, P < 0.001; bone-specific alkaline phosphatase: -7.2%, P = 0.042; urinary C-telopeptide: -11.1%, P = 0.034) and was associated with increased BMD in the lumbar spine (2.8%; P < 0.001) and total hip BMD (2.6%; P < 0.001). Women taking raloxifene were less likely to develop osteoporosis (relative risk [RR] for raloxifene v placebo: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.37; P = 0.001) or osteopenia (RR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.81; P = 0.038) at the lumbar spine and were more likely to convert to normal BMD status at the lumbar spine (RR: 4.01; 95% CI: 1.34, 11.23; P = 0.043) and total hip (RR: 3.92; 95% CI: 1.12,14.27; P = 0.011) at 5 years, compared with the case of placebo. Raloxifene also significantly reduced total cholesterol (-5.5%; P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-8.7%; P < 0.001), compared with the case of placebo. No significant changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.257) or triglycerides (P = 0.620) were detected. Incidence of hot flashes was higher among women taking raloxifene compared with those taking placebo [raloxifene, 47 (28.8%); placebo, 21 (16.8%); P = 0.017]. Women taking placebo or raloxifene reported a similar incidence of vaginal bleeding (P = 0.999) or of mean endometrial thickness of more than 5 mm at baseline and at each visit, up to the 5-year endpoint (P >/= 0.349). No diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer were made in either treatment group., Conclusions: Five years of raloxifene treatment in healthy postmenopausal women preserves BMD, significantly reduces the likelihood of development of osteoporosis, and was not associated with an increased rate of vaginal bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, or endometrial carcinoma, compared with the case of placebo.