Search

Abstract: Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, has shown clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas. The phase 2 CITADEL-204 study (NCT03144674, EudraCT 2017-000970-12) assessed efficacy and safety of parsaclisib in Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor-experienced (cohort 1) or BTK inhibitor-naive (cohort 2) patients with R/R marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed R/R MZL, treated with ≥1 prior systemic therapy (including ≥1 anti-CD20 antibody) received parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 20 mg once weekly (weekly dosing group [WG]) or parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 2.5 mg once daily (daily dosing group [DG]); DG was selected for further assessment. Primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR). Owing to slower than expected recruitment, cohort 1 was closed with 10 patients (WG, n = 4; DG, n = 6) enrolled. Based on a planned interim analysis in cohort 2, the futility boundary was not crossed, and enrollment continued to study completion. At data cutoff (15 January 2021), 100 patients were enrolled and treated in cohort 2 (WG, n = 28; DG, n = 72). In the DG, the ORR was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1-69.8), with a complete response rate of 4.2% (95% CI, 0.9-11.7); the lower bound of the ORR 95% CI exceeded the protocol-defined threshold of 40%. The median duration of response was 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.1-17.5) and progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 11.5-20.6); median overall survival was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all patients were diarrhea (47.0%), cough (23.0%), and rash (18.0%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs included diarrhea (12.0%), neutropenia, and pneumonia (9.0% each). TEAEs led to dose interruptions, reductions, and discontinuations in 56.0%, 16.0%, and 29.0% of all patients, respectively. Durable responses and an overall manageable safety profile were demonstrated in patients with R/R MZL treated with parsaclisib monotherapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: The Proviral Integration site of Moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) kinases are implicated in tumorigenesis; the pan-PIM kinase inhibitor, INCB053914, demonstrated antitumor activity in hematologic malignancy preclinical models., Patients and Methods: This phase 1/2 study evaluated oral INCB053914 alone or combined with standard-of-care agents for advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02587598). In Parts 1/2 (monotherapy), patients (≥18 years) had acute leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm, myelofibrosis (MF), multiple myeloma, or lymphoproliferative neoplasms. In Parts 3/4 (combination therapy), patients had relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed (≥65 years, unfit for intensive chemotherapy) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MF with suboptimal ruxolitinib response., Results: Parts 1/2 (n = 58): 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), most commonly aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase-elevated (AST/ALT; each n = 4). Fifty-seven patients (98.3%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly ALT-elevated and fatigue (36.2% each); 48 (82.8%) had grade ≥3 TEAEs, most commonly anemia (31.0%); 8 (13.8%) had grade ≥3 ALT/AST-elevated TEAEs. Parts 3/4 (n = 39): for INCB053914 + cytarabine (AML; n = 6), 2 patients experienced DLTs (grade 3 maculopapular rash, n = 1; grade 3 ALT-elevated and grade 4 hypophosphatemia, n = 1); for INCB053914 + azacitidine (AML; n = 16), 1 patient experienced a DLT (grade 3 maculopapular rash). Two complete responses were observed (1 with incomplete count recovery). For INCB053914 + ruxolitinib (MF; n = 17), no DLTs occurred; 3 patients achieved best reduction of >25% spleen volume at week 12 or 24., Conclusion: INCB053914 was generally well tolerated as monotherapy and in combinations; TEAEs were most commonly ALT/AST-elevated. Limited responses were observed with combinations. Future studies are needed to identify rational, effective combination strategies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, has shown clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. This phase 2 study (CITADEL-203; NCT03126019, EudraCT 2017-001624-22) assessed efficacy and safety of parsaclisib monotherapy in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL)., Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed R/R FL (grade 1-3a) and prior treatment with ≥2 systemic therapies received parsaclisib 20 mg once daily (QD) for 8 weeks then parsaclisib 20 mg once weekly (weekly dosing group [WG]) or parsaclisib 20 mg QD for 8 weeks then parsaclisib 2.5 mg QD (daily dosing group [DG]); DG was selected for further assessment. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR)., Findings: At data cut-off (January 15, 2021), 126 patients had been treated (WG: n = 23; DG: n = 103). ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 77.7% (68.4-85.3) with a complete response rate (95% CI) of 19.4% (12.3-28.4) in DG; median (95% CI) duration of response was 14.7 months (10.4-not estimable [NE]), median progression-free survival was 15.8 months (11.0-NE), and median overall survival was not reached. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all treated patients included diarrhoea (n = 48, 38.1%), nausea (n = 31, 24.6%), and cough (n = 28, 22.2%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhoea (n = 15, 11.9%), neutropenia (n = 13, 10.3%), and colitis (n = 7, 5.6%). Dose interruption, reduction, and discontinuation from TEAEs occurred in 46.8% (n = 59), 17.5% (n = 22), and 23.8% (n = 30) of patients, respectively., Interpretation: Treatment with parsaclisib demonstrated rapid and durable responses, and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R FL., Funding: Incyte Corporation., Competing Interests: Marek Trněný—Consultancy: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, MorphoSys, Roche, and Takeda. Honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, MorphoSys, Roche, and Takeda. Travel, accommodations, or expenses: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. Research funding: Roche. Abraham Avigdor—Consultancy: Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Takeda. Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Takeda. Research funding: Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen. Matthew S. McKinney—Consultancy: BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Genentech, Molecular Templates, Pharmacyclics, and Verastem Oncology. Honoraria: Genentech and Kite Pharma/Gilead Sciences. Research funding: BeiGene, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte Corporation, Molecular Templates, Nordic Nanovector, and Novartis. Speakers bureau: Kite Pharma/Gilead Sciences. Shankara Paneesha—Honoraria: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen. Björn E. Wahlin—Consultancy: Roche. Research funding: Gilead Sciences and Roche. David Cunningham—Advisory committee: OVIBIO. Research funding: 4SC, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly & Company, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. Nicholas Morley—Advisory board: Roche. Honoraria: Kite Pharma and Janssen. Conference support: AbbVie, Roche, and Takeda. Miguel Canales—Honoraria: BeiGene, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kyowa, Novartis, Sandoz, and Takeda. Speakers' bureau: Amgen, Janssen, Kyowa, Roche, Sandoz, and Takeda. Mariana Bastos-Oreiro—Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche. Research funding: Roche. Speakers’ bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Roche, Novartis, and Takeda. David Belada—Consultancy: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. Board of Directors or Advisory committee: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. Travel expenses: Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Takeda. Research funding: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. Fred Zheng—Employment and stock ownership: Incyte Corporation. Douglas J. DeMarini—Former employment and stock ownership: Incyte Corporation. Wei Jiang—Former employment and stock ownership: Incyte Corporation. Ping Jiang—Former employment and stock ownership: Incyte Corporation. Ryan C. Lynch—Consultancy: MorphoSys. Research funding: Bayer, Cyteir Therapeutics, Genentech, Incyte Corporation, Juno Pharmaceuticals, Rhizen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics. John S. Hrom and Liliana Devizzi—No relevant financial relationships to disclose., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Parsaclisib is a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor that has shown clinical benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. In this phase 2 study (CITADEL-205; NCT03235544, EudraCT 2017-003148-19), the efficacy and safety of parsaclisib was evaluated in patients with R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)., Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with pathologically confirmed R/R MCL and prior treatment with 1-3 systemic therapies, with (cohort 1) or without (cohort 2) previous Bruton kinase inhibitor (BTKi) treatment, received oral parsaclisib 20 mg once-daily (QD) for 8 weeks, then either parsaclisib 20 mg once-weekly (weekly dosing group [WG]) or parsaclisib 2.5 mg QD (daily dosing group [DG]). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR)., Findings: At the primary analysis data cutoff on January 15, 2021, 53 patients in cohort 1 (BTKi-experienced) (WG, n = 12; DG: n = 41) and 108 patients in cohort 2 (BTKi-naive) (WG, n = 31; DG: n = 77) had received parsaclisib monotherapy. The BTKi-experienced cohort was closed after an interim analysis demonstrated limited clinical benefit. In the BTKi-naive cohort, the ORR (95% CI) for DG (dosing selected for further study) was 70.1% (58.6%-80.0%), with a complete response rate (95% CI) of 15.6% (8.3%-25.6%) and a median duration of response (95% CI) of 12.1 (9.0-not evaluable) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred among 90.7% (98/108) of all treated patients in the BTKi-naive cohort. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred among 62.0% (67/108) of patients, including diarrhoea (13.9%, 15/108) and neutropenia (8.3%, 9/108). Parsaclisib interruption, reduction, or discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred among 47.2% (51/108), 8.3% (9/108), and 25.0% (27/108) of patients, respectively. Fatal TEAEs were experienced by six patients and determined to be treatment-related in one patient., Interpretation: Parsaclisib, a potent, highly selective, PI3Kδ inhibitor demonstrated meaningful clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile (25.0% discontinuation rate, low incidences of individually reported grade ≥3 or serious adverse events) in R/R MCL patients with no prior BTKi therapy. Limited clinical benefit was observed with parsaclisib monotherapy in patients who had previously received BTKi treatment. Future development of PI3K inhibitors for NHL will require further investigation of dose optimisation to improve safety and long-term survival., Funding: Incyte Corporation., Competing Interests: PLZ reports consulting or advisory role, and involvement of speakers bureau for Beigene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Incyte Corporation, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics; advisory role for ADC Therapeutics, Sandoz, and Secura Bio. MTrněný reports honoraria, consulting or advisory role, travel and accommodations expenses for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda; honoraria, consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Incyte Corporation, and MorphoSys. VR reports research funding for ArgenX and Astex; membership on a board or advisory committee for Bristol Myers Squibb, Epizyme, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte Corporation, Infinity, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nanostring, and Roche; membership on a board or advisory committee, honoraria for PharmaMar; membership on a board or advisory committee, consultancy for Servier. VRZ reports consulting or advisory role, speakers bureau for Gentili, Gilead, Italfarmaco, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Servier, and Takeda. JW reports research funding for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Roche; advisory role and lecture honoraria for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Takeda. GR reports consulting or advisory role, and involvement of speakers bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda; consulting or advisory role for EUSA Pharma. MC reports research funding for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Meyers, Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Innocare, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Pharmacyclics; consulting for BeiGene, Epizyme, Gilead. CD reports advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and Janssen; travel and accommodation expenses for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. CP reports advisory board for Abbvie, Incyte Corporation, and Janssen. FP reports consulting or advisory role, speakers bureau, travel and accommodations expenses for AbbVie (Investigator in sponsored clinical trials), Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis Pharma SAS; consulting or advisory role, travel and accommodations expenses for Daiichi Sankyo; travel and accommodations expenses for Janssen; research funding for Novartis Pharma SAS (Institutional). WJurczak reports research funding for Bayer, Gilead, Incyte Corporation, Mei Pharma, and TG Therapeutics. MTaszner reports consulting or advisory role, travel and accommodations expenses for Roche and Takeda. SP reports honoraria for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, and Janssen. FZ reports employment and stock ownership for Incyte Corporation. DJD reports former employment and stock ownership for Incyte Corporation. WJiang reports former employment and stock ownership for Incyte Corporation. AG reports employment and stock ownership for Incyte Corporation. AM reports consultancy, membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees, research funding, speakers bureau for Seattle Genetics and TG Therapeutics; research funding for Affimed, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, fortyseven Inc/Gilead, Innate Pharmaceuticals, Juno Pharmaceuticals/Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite/Gilead, Merck, OncoTartis, Roche-Genentech, and Takeda; consultancy, membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees, research funding, speakers bureau for Incyte Corporation. JHC, VD, and PV report no relevant disclosures to declare., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Epacadostat, an oral, selective inhibitor of IDO1, has shown activity when administered with pembrolizumab. We evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to epacadostat and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. One proposed mechanism of resistance to PD-1 checkpoint inhibition is through immunosuppression mediated by L-kynurenine. IDO1, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 is the rate-limiting enzyme catalyzing the conversion of L-tryptophan to L-kynurenine. If IDO1 is a mechanism of tumor escape from checkpoint inhibition, then addition of an IDO1 inhibitor with a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor could enable tumor response to immunotherapy., Methods: Patients received one of 7 tumor-appropriate chemotherapy regimens. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was infused intravenously every 3 weeks. Epacadostat 100 mg was administered orally twice daily. The primary objectives of phase I were determining safety/tolerability and defining the maximum tolerated or pharmacologically active dose of epacadostat. Phase II of the study was designed to enroll efficacy-expansion cohorts and to assess changes in the tumor and tumor microenvironment via mandatory-biopsy cohorts., Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were enrolled in the phase II mandatory-biopsy cohorts. Due to early study closure, efficacy expansion did not enroll. Grades 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 78.6% of patients. Neutropenia and disease progression were the only grades 3 and 4 TEAEs reported in ≥10.0% of patients. One treatment-related death was reported. The ORR was 31.4% across all treatment groups., Conclusion: The combination of epacadostat 100 mg bid with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile. This regimen showed antitumor activity across multiple types of advanced or metastatic solid tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03085914)., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Based on biology and pre-clinical data, bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitors have at least three potential roles in paediatric malignancies: NUT (nuclear protein in testis) carcinomas, MYC/MYCN-driven cancers and fusion-driven malignancies. However, there are now at least 10 BET inhibitors in development, with a limited relevant paediatric population in which to evaluate these medicinal products. Therefore, a meeting was convened with the specific aim to develop a consensus among relevant biopharmaceutical companies, academic researchers, as well as patient and family advocates, about the development of BET inhibitors, including prioritisation and their specific roles in children. Although BET inhibitors have been in clinical trials in adults since 2012, the first-in-child study (BMS-986158) only opened in 2019. In the future, when there is strong mechanistic rationale or pre-clinical activity of a class of medicinal product in paediatrics, early clinical evaluation with embedded correlative studies of a member of the class should be prioritised and rapidly executed in paediatric populations. There is a strong mechanistic and biological rationale to evaluate BET inhibitors in paediatrics, underpinned by substantial, but not universal, pre-clinical data. However, most pan-BET inhibitors have been challenging to administer in adults, since monotherapy results in only modest anti-tumour activity and provides a narrow therapeutic index due to thrombocytopenia. It was concluded that it is neither scientifically justified nor feasible to undertake simultaneously early clinical trials in paediatrics of all pan-BET inhibitors. However, there is a clinical need for global access to BET inhibitors for patients with NUT carcinoma, a very rare malignancy driven by bromodomain fusions, with proof of concept of clinical benefit in a subset of patients treated with BET inhibitors. Development and regulatory pathway in this indication should include children and adolescents as well as adults. Beyond NUT carcinoma, it was proposed that further clinical development of other pan-BET inhibitors in children should await the results of the first paediatric clinical trial of BMS-986158, unless there is compelling rationale based on the specific agent of interest. BDII-selective inhibitors, central nervous system-penetrant BET inhibitors (e.g. CC-90010), and those dual-targeting BET/p300 bromodomain are of particular interest and warrant further pre-clinical investigation. This meeting emphasised the value of a coordinated and integrated strategy to drug development in paediatric oncology. A multi-stakeholder approach with multiple companies developing a consensus with academic investigators early in the development of a class of compounds, and then engaging regulatory agencies would improve efficiency, productivity, conserve resources and maximise potential benefit for children with cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement KS has consulted for Kronos Bio and Auron Therapeutics, receives grant funding from Novartis for an unrelated project, holds stock options with Auron Therapeutics, and has given a sponsored presentation for Bristol Meyers Squibb. MK is an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. KB is an employee of AbbVie. EG is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG. FG has consulted for Epigene Therapeutics. MH is an employee of Astra-Zeneca. KL is an employee of Constellation Pharmaceuticals. ZN is an employee of Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb. AT is an employee of Plexxikon. FZ is an employee of Incyte. ADJP has participated in advisory boards for Novartis, Takeda, Merck, Lilly and Celgene. SGD has received fees for consulting and advisory board roles from Bayer and Loxo Oncology and has received travel expenses from Loxo Oncology, Roche/Genentech, and Salarius Pharmaceuticals. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins are key epigenetic transcriptional regulators, inhibition of which may suppress oncogene expression. We report results from 2 independent first-in-human phase 1/2 dose-escalation and expansion, safety and tolerability studies of BET inhibitors INCB054329 (study INCB 54329-101; NCT02431260) and INCB057643 (study INCB 57643-101; NCT02711137)., Patients and Methods: Patients (≥18 years) with advanced malignancies, ≥1 prior therapy, and adequate organ functions received oral INCB054329 (monotherapy) or INCB057643 (monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care) in 21-day cycles (or 28-day cycles depending on standard-of-care combination). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability., Results: Sixty-nine and 134 patients received INCB054329 and INCB057643, respectively. Study INCB 54329-101 has been completed; INCB 57643-101 is currently active, but not recruiting (no patients were receiving treatment as of January 8, 2019). Terminal elimination half-life was shorter for INCB054329 versus INCB057643 (mean [SD], 2.24 [2.03] vs. 11.1 [8.27] hours). INCB054329 demonstrated higher interpatient variability in oral clearance versus INCB057643 (CV%, 142% vs. 45.5%). Most common (>20%) any-grade treatment-related adverse events were similar for both drugs (INCB054329; INCB057643): nausea (35%; 30%), thrombocytopenia (33%; 32%), fatigue (29%; 30%), decreased appetite (26%; 22%). Two confirmed complete responses and 4 confirmed partial responses with INCB057643 were reported as best responses., Conclusions: INCB057643 exhibited a more favorable PK profile versus INCB054329; exposure-dependent thrombocytopenia was observed with both drugs which limited the target inhibition that could be safely maintained. Further efforts are required to identify patient populations that can benefit most, and an optimal dosing scheme to maximize therapeutic index., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of fostamatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)., Experimental Design: Relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients originally received the oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, fostamatinib in a two-arm, randomised, double-blinded manner at either 100 mg twice a day (BID) or 200 mg BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate (ORR). Preliminary analysis showed limited efficacy and all subsequent patients were treated at 200 mg BID. Previously randomised patients were unblinded and given the opportunity to receive 200 mg BID., Results: Sixty-eight patients were treated (47 at 200 mg BID, 21 at 100 mg BID). Cell of origin analysis showed 58% germinal B-cell (GCB) origin, 30% activated B-cell (ABC) origin and 12% with an intermediate cell of origin signature. The most common treatment-related adverse events of all patients were diarrhoea (21% total, 6% grade 3/4), nausea (19% total, 3% grade 3/4), and, fatigue (18% total, 9% grade 3/4). The ORR rate was 3% across both arms and clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) was achieved for 13% of all patients. The cell of origin for patients with clinical benefit was GCB (4 patients), intermediate (4 patients) or unknown (1 patient). None of the patients with clinical benefit had ABC genotype., Conclusions: While fostamatinib was generally well tolerated in this patient population, efficacy at these doses and schedule was poor. Unlike data with other B-cell antigen receptor pathway inhibitors, responses were not observed in the ABC genotype., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)