1. Which images to label for few-shot medical image analysis?
- Author
-
Quan Q, Yao Q, Zhu H, Wang Q, and Zhou SK
- Subjects
- Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods, Algorithms, Deep Learning
- Abstract
The success of deep learning methodologies hinges upon the availability of meticulously labeled extensive datasets. However, when dealing with medical images, the annotation process for such abundant training data often necessitates the involvement of experienced radiologists, thereby consuming their limited time resources. In order to alleviate this burden, few-shot learning approaches have been developed, which manage to achieve competitive performance levels with only several labeled images. Nevertheless, a crucial yet previously overlooked problem in few-shot learning is about the selection of template images for annotation before learning, which affects the final performance. In this study, we propose a novel TEmplate Choosing Policy (TECP) that aims to identify and select "the most worthy" images for annotation, particularly within the context of multiple few-shot medical tasks, including landmark detection, anatomy detection, and anatomy segmentation. TECP is composed of four integral components: (1) Self-supervised training, which entails training a pre-existing deep model to extract salient features from radiological images; (2) Alternative proposals for localizing informative regions within the images; and (3) Representative Score Estimation, which involves the evaluation and identification of the most representative samples or templates. (4) Ranking, which rank all candidates and select one with highest representative score. The efficacy of the TECP approach is demonstrated through a series of comprehensive experiments conducted on multiple public datasets. Across all three medical tasks, the utilization of TECP yields noticeable improvements in model performance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF