1. Impact of a novel oxidized regenerated cellulose application method on postoperative outcomes and lung function recovery in lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.
- Author
-
Liu Y, Zhang M, Zou Z, and Xin N
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Lung physiopathology, Lung surgery, Postoperative Complications prevention & control, Postoperative Complications etiology, Forced Expiratory Volume, Recovery of Function, Cellulose, Oxidized therapeutic use, Pulmonary Emphysema surgery, Pulmonary Emphysema physiopathology, Pneumonectomy adverse effects, Pneumonectomy methods, Respiratory Function Tests
- Abstract
Background: One of the significant complications associated with Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), which is a critical intervention for patients with advanced emphysema, is the development of postoperative air leaks. We have found that oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) can be used in LVRS to minimize postoperative air leaks and enhance recovery in our clinical work. This study evaluates the efficacy of a novel ORC application method in improving lung function and reducing complications in patients undergoing LVRS for emphysema., Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted on 83 patients who underwent LVRS, divided into two groups: 41 received ORC (ORC group), and 42 did not (No-ORC group). Lung function parameters, including Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and FEV1% predicted, were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes, such as the duration of chest tube placement, hospital stay, and the incidence of air leaks, were also compared., Results: Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, smoking history, Body Mass Index (BMI), and baseline lung function, were similar between the two groups. Postoperatively, both groups showed improvements in lung function. By 12 months, lung function parameters between the groups were comparable. The ORC group had a shorter duration of chest tube placement (mean 4.41 days vs. 6.76 days, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (mean 6.78 days vs. 9.12 days, P < 0.01). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative air leaks was lower in the ORC group compared to the No-ORC group (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The novel application method of ORC in LVRS is associated with enhanced early postoperative recovery, reflected in shorter chest tube duration, reduced hospital stays, and a lower incidence of postoperative air leaks. And, long-term lung function outcomes between ORC and No-ORC groups are similar., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF