Search

Background/aims: To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD)., Methods: This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation., Results: The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable., Conclusion: Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Background: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) insufficiency causes a primary immune regulatory disorder characterised by lymphoproliferation, dysgammaglobulinaemia, and multi-organ autoimmunity including cytopenias and colitis., Objective: To examine the outcome of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency and study the impact of pre-HSCT CTLA-4-Ig therapy and pre-HSCT immune dysregulation on survival and immunological outcome., Methods: Retrospective study of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency and 2q33.2-3 deletion from the Inborn Errors Working Party of EBMT. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease- and chronic GvHD-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoint was immunological outcome assessed by Immune Dysregulation Disease Activity (IDDA) score., Results: Forty patients were included over a 25-year period. Pre-HSCT, 60% received CTLA-4-Ig and IDDA was 23.3 (3.9-84.0). Median age at HSCT was 14.2 (1.3-56.0) years. Patients received PBSC (58%) or marrow (43%) from MUD (75%), MMUD (12.5%) or MFD (12.5%). Median follow-up was 3 years (0.6-15 years) and 3-year OS was 76.7% (58-87%) and DFS was 74.4% (54.9-86.0%). At latest follow-up, 28/30 surviving patients are in disease-free remission with median IDDA reduction of 16. Probability of OS and DFS was greater in patients with lower disease activity pre-HSCT (IDDA<23, p=0.002 and p=0.006, respectively). CTLA-4-Ig receipt did not influence OS or DFS. Cause of death was transplant-related in 7/8 patients., Conclusion: This is the largest retrospective study of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency to date. HSCT is an effective therapy to prevent ongoing disease progression and morbidity, with improving survival rates over time and in patients with lower pre-HSCT disease activity., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication., Objective: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery., Methods: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery., Results: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease., Conclusion: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Feldman has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alvotech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Samsung, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, Sun Pharma, Almirall, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Ortho Dermatology, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient, Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Teladoc, BMS, Ono, Micreos, Eurofins, Informa, UpToDate, and the National Psoriasis Foundation and is a founder and part owner of Causa Research and holds stock in Sensal Health. Dr Wu is or has been an investigator, consultant, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, EPI Health, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, and Zerigo Health. Dr Hsu has served on the advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, LEO Pharma, and Sanofi and has served on the registries/clinical trials for CorEvitas, PROSE, Argenx, and Cabaletta. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, Leo, UCB, Janssen, Lilly, Mindera, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Pfizer. Dr Wallace has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Pfizer, Target RWE, Kyowa, Amgen, Arcutis, and Argenx. Dr Lee has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer, Trevi Therapeutics, AbbVie, Mayne Pharmaceuticals, Incyte Corp, Castle Creek, Pyramid Bioscience, Amyrt, Krystal Biotech, Arcutis, Celgene, Target Pharma, Amgen, Novartis, UCB, Galderma, Kiniksa, Avita, Janssen, MoonLake Pharmaceuticals, and Timber Pharmaceuticals. Dr Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sanofi Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, and LEO Pharma. Dr Schwartzman has served as a speaker and/or consultant to AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Myriad, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, Stelexis, Jubilant, and Teijin and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Gladman has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Liu has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi Regeneron, Arcutis, Dermavant, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB, Incyte, Amgen, and Evelo. Dr Koo has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Dermavant, Incyte, Janssen, Eli Lilly, EPI, Leo, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics/Valeant, Pfizer, Regeneron/Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Dr Hawkes has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Janssen, LearnSkin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB, has served on the medical/scientific board for the National Psoriasis Foundation and International Psoriasis Council (IPC), and has stock ownership/equity in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Reddy has served on the advisory board/consultant UCB, Novartis, Fresenius, Amgen, AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer. Dr Prussick has served as a scientific adviser and/or speaker to of Amgen, Janssen, AbbVie, and Novartis and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Yamauchi has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Sun Pharma, BMS, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, and Novartis. Dr Lewitt has received grants/research support from Novan, Galderma, Leo, Lilly, DermTech, and Amgen and has served as a speaker’s bureau/consultant/advisory board for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Galderma, Pfizer, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Dermavant, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Soung has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Celgene, Amgen, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatologics, National Psoriasis Foundation (non-profit), LEO, Novartis, Regeneron/Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Dermavant, Bristol Myers Squibb, Arcutis, KoBioLabs, and Castle Biosciences. Dr Weinberg has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Dermavant, Lilly, Janssen, BMS, Amgen, and UCB and has received research grants from Arcutis, Dermavant, AbbVie, UCB, Janssen, and Lilly. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai, has received research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Inozyme, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc, and is a consultant for AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Avotres Therapeutics, BioMX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brickell Biotech, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, CorEvitas, Dermavant Sciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Hexima Ltd, Incyte, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, National Society of Cutaneous Medicine, New York College of Podiatric Medicine, Pfizer, Seanergy, SUN Pharma, Verrica, and Vial. Dr Glick has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Galderma, Sun Pharma, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Dermavant Sciences, Incyte, EPI/Novan, BMS, Nimbus Lakshmi, Cara Therapeutics, Dermira, Sanofi/Genzyme, Regeneron, Pfizer, ChemoCentryx, Ortho Dermatologics, UCB, Brickell, Biotech, CorEvitas Registry PSO, CorEvitas Registry AD, PROSE Registry for AD. Dr Kircik has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, board member, and/or speaker to Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Allergan, Inc, Almirall, Amgen, Inc, Arcutis, Biogen-Idec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Inc, Cellceutix, Cipher, Combinatrix, Connetics Corporation, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Idera, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Maruho, Merck, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, Novartis AG, Promius, PharmaDerm, Pfizer, Serono (Merck Serono International SA), Stiefel Laboratories, Inc, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl, and XenoPort. Dr Desai has served on the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation and holds multiple other leadership positions in dermatologic organizations, and has served as a researcher and/or consultant for Pfizer, Lilly, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, and other organizations. Drs James and Zaino and Author Rosenberg have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate whether rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and shared epitope (SE) allele-related genetic markers associate with treatment response to abatacept, certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment (ACT)., Methods: Patients with treatment-naïve early rheumatoid arthritis were randomised in the NORD-STAR trial to ACT, certolizumab pegol, abatacept or tocilizumab, all with methotrexate. Centralised laboratory analyses for ACPA, RF and SE were performed. Clinical Disease Activity Index remission was analysed longitudinally with logistic generalised estimating equations. Differences in treatment effect across RF, ACPA and SE subgroups were assessed with interaction terms at 24 and 48 weeks, adjusted for sex, country, age, body mass index, Disease Activity Score of 28 joints based on C-reactive protein and smoking., Results: In total, 778 patients were included. At 24 weeks, abatacept treatment showed a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroups, but this effect was not significantly different from the negative subgroups. By 48 weeks, abatacept treatment showed better response regardless of RF/ACPA status. No differences were found across RF, ACPA, SE allele, valine at amino acid position 11 or valine-arginine-alanine haplotype subgroups for any biological treatment at 48 weeks., Conclusions: Based on this randomised controlled trial, abatacept treatment was associated with a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroup at 24 weeks, but this was no longer seen at 48 weeks; adding SE allele-related genetic markers did not strengthen the association. Moreover, ACPA, RF and SE allele-related genotypes were not, alone or in combination, associated with clinical responses of importance sufficiently strongly to warrant implementation in clinical practice., Trial Registration Number: EudraCT 2011-004720-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01491815., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LP reports institutional support for the present manuscript from Amsterdam University Medical Centers. MLH reports institutional grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sandoz, Novartis, Nordforsk and UCB; speaker honoraria from Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB; institutional data safety monitoring board or advisory board fees from AbbVie. MLH has chaired the steering committee of the Danish Rheumatology Quality Registry (DANBIO, DRQ), which receives public funding from the hospital owners and funding from pharmaceutical companies. MLH co-chairs EuroSpA, which generates real-world evidence of treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis based on secondary data and is partly funded by Novartis and UCB. DCN reports research grant from MSD; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; speaker honoraria from Pfizer and UCB; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board fees from UCB. MØ reports institutional grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Celgene, Eli Lilly Novartis and UCB; personal speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board personal fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. EAH reports institutional grant from research council of Norway; personal speaker honoraria from Pfizer, UCB and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Pfizer and Eli Lilly. TU reports personal speaker honoraria from Lilly, Pfizer, UCB and Galapagos. TR reports a patent application (TR is the inventor) based on the use of bioengineered IgG targets for the characterisation of rheumatoid factor reactivity patterns. RFvV reports institutional support for the present manuscript from Bristol Myers Squibb; institutional grants for research or education from Alfasigma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen and UCB; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer and UCB; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen and UCB. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objectives: Tapering biologic agents can be considered for patients with stable disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the specific strategy for abatacept is uncertain. This study aimed to examine the impact of tapering abatacept on disease activity in RA patients and assess the potential influence of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment., Methods: Using data from the KOBIO registry, we included 505 1 year intervals from 176 patients with RA that initiated abatacept with concomitant MTX at baseline. The intervals were divided into two groups based on the dose quotient (DQ) of abatacept during each period (i.e., the tapering group (DQ < 1) and control group (DQ = 1)). The primary outcome was achieving DAS28-remission at 1 year intervals. Marginal structural models (MSM) were used to minimize confounding caused by an imbalance in time-varying variables., Results: Abatacept was tapered at 146 (28.9%) intervals, and the mean DQ was 0.68. DAS28-remission was achieved in 207 (41.8%) intervals. Tapering abatacept did not affect the odds of achieving DAS28-remission compared with the control group (OR 1.04 [0.67-1.62]). The odds remained unaffected in the subgroup that continued MTX (OR 1.42 [0.88-2.30]) but not in the subgroup that discontinued MTX (OR 0.26 [0.10-0.57]). The effects of interaction between tapering abatacept and concomitant MTX use on DAS28 and patient's functional status showed consistent results. The incidence of adverse events within a 1 year interval was comparable between the two groups., Conclusion: Withdrawal of MTX while tapering abatacept may compromise meeting the treatment goal for patients with RA., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Park, Kim, Kim, Lim, Kim, Kim and Shin.)

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study., Methods: Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216., Results: The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population., Conclusions: The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Predicting the efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is challenging. In this study, we aimed to explore markers that predict the efficacy of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: Thirty RA patients receiving abatacept were recruited, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the participants were subjected to DNA microarray analysis. The expression of CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which was selected by the result of DNA microarray, was determined by flow cytometry in 16 newly diagnosed treatment-naïve RA patients. CCR4 expression on each helper T-cell subset was also measured., Results: CCR4 was upregulated in the abatacept responder. The expression levels of CCR4 were significantly correlated with the improvement of the Clinical Disease Activity Index. CCR4 expression was predominantly observed in CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The percentage of CCR4-expressing CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy individuals. Interestingly, Th17 and Treg cells expressed high levels of CCR4 compared to non-Th17-related helper T cells., Conclusions: CCR4 is a Th17- and Treg-related gene, and the high CCR4 expression in peripheral blood samples may predict the efficacy of abatacept in RA., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To address improvements in quality of life, we analysed the relative contributions of factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in abatacept-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study., Methods: Patients who were evaluable for disease activity through to  Week 52 in the ORIGAMI study were divided into those achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index-remission/low disease activity (remission/LDA; n = 178) and patients with moderate disease activity/high disease activity (MDA/HDA; n = 99). We compared the changes in EQ-5D and other outcomes through to Week 52. Focusing on the remission/LDA group, the contribution of each factor to the variance of EQ-5D at baseline and Week 52 was examined using analysis of variance., Results: The remission/LDA group showed greater improvements than the MDA/HDA group in EQ-5D, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain (Pain VAS), and patient's global assessment (PtGA). In the remission/LDA group, factors significantly contributing to EQ-5D were sex, C-reactive protein, and Pain VAS at baseline, and PtGA and age at Week 52., Conclusions: In rheumatoid arthritis patients who achieved remission/LDA during abatacept treatment, PtGA and age at Week 52 contribute to the variance of EQ-5D, suggesting that the identification of factors associated with PtGA may be important to address improvements in quality of life., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Aim: To evaluate real-world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan., Methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real-world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis., Results: A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%-66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD-naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow-up (6.1%). Abatacept was well-tolerated with no new safety signals., Conclusion: The 24-month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting in Taiwan., (© 2024 Bristol‐Myers Squibb and The Author(s). International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ABA in RA-ILD patients according to the route of administration., Methods: National retrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD patients on treatment with ABA. They were divided into 2 groups: a) IV, and b) SC. The following outcomes were analysed from baseline to final follow-up using linear mixed models: a) forced vital capacity (FVC), b) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), c) chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), d) dyspnoea, e) RA activity, and f) sparing corticosteroids effect., Results: A total of 397 patients were included (94 IV-ABA and 303 SC-ABA), median follow-up of 24 [10-48] months. After adjustment for possible confounders, FVC and DLCO remained stable during the first 24 months without differences between IV-ABA and SC-ABA (p = 0.6304 and 0.5337). Improvement/ stability of lung lesions in HRCT was observed in 67 % of patients (75 % IV-ABA, 64 % SC-ABA; p = 0.07). Dyspnoea stabilized/ improved in 84 % of patients (90 % IV-ABA, 82 % SC-ABA; p = 0.09). RA - disease activity improved in both groups. No statistically significant differences regarding any of the variables studied between the two groups were found. ABA was withdrawn in 87 patients (21.9 %), 45 % IV-ABA and 37 % SC-ABA (p = 0.29). ILD worsening and articular inefficacy were the most common reasons for ABA discontinuation., Conclusion: In patients with RA-ILD, ABA seems to be equally effective regardless of the route of administration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Disclosures that may be interpreted as constituting of possible conflict(s) of interest for the study: B. A.-M. received grants/research supports from Abbvie and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Pfizer, Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB and Lilly, outside the submitted work; N.V.-R. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau and research supports from AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, Nordic Pharma, MSD and Rubió; L.C.D.-C has received research supports and participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly and Celgene; J.L.M has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Galapagos and had consultation fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; G.B has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); A.U.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Galápagos, Novartis, GSK, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Pfizer and Amgen; C.F.-D. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from: Janssen, Galápagos, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); I. F.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbott, MSD, Janssen, and Roche, as well as consultation fees from company sponsored speakers bureaus associated with Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Celgene, and MSD; S.C. has received research supports from MSD and Pfizer and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Amgen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Roche, and UCB. S. C. is also assistant professor of the cátedra EPID-Future, funded by UAM-Roche, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain; R. B. received grants/research support from AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in a company-sponsored speaker's bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD. The rest of the authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions that can cause marked disability and diminished quality of life. Data on predictors of clinical response are insufficient to guide selection of the appropriate biologic agent for individual patients. This study aimed to investigate the propensity of S100A8/9 and S100A12 as predictive biomarkers of abatacept response in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA)., Methods: Data from a phase 3 trial (NCT01844518) of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with active pJIA (n = 219) were used in this exploratory analysis. Association between biomarker levels at baseline and improvements in JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses or baseline disease activity (measured by Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 27 joints using C-reactive protein [JADAS27-CRP]) were assessed. Biomarker level changes from baseline to month 4 were assessed for disease outcome prediction up to 21 months., Results: At baseline, 158 patients had available biomarker samples. Lower baseline S100A8/9 levels (≤ 3295 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-5.18]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.72 [95% CI: 1.48-9.37]), JIA-ACR inactive disease (ID; OR: 4.25 [95% CI: 2.03-8.92]), JADAS27-CRP ID (OR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.02-5.39]) at month 4, and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.01 [95% CI: 1.57-5.78]) at month 16. Lower baseline S100A12 levels (≤ 176 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.52 [95% CI: 1.23-5.13]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.68 [95% CI: 1.46-9.28]), JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.66 [95% CI: 1.76-7.61]), JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.07-3.87]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 2.14 [95% CI: 1.10-4.17]), and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 4.22 [95% CI: 2.15-8.29]) at month 16. From baseline to month 4, decreases in S100A8/9 and S100A12 generally exceeded 50% among JIA-ACR90/100/ID responders., Conclusion: Lower baseline levels of S100A8/9 and S100A12 proteins predicted better response to abatacept treatment than higher levels and may serve as early predictive biomarkers in pJIA. Decreases in these biomarker levels may also predict longer-term response to abatacept in pJIA., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Since adalimumab approval in childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis (cNIU), the prognosis has been dramatically changed, but the 25 % failed to achieve inactivity. There is not accordance if it is better to switch to another anti-TNF or to swap to another category of biologic. Thus, we aim to summarize evidence regarding the best treatment of cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF., Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA Guidelines, was performed(Jan2000-Aug2023). Studies investigating the efficacy of treatment in cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to SUN. A combined estimation of the proportion of children responding to switch or swap and for each drug was performed., Results: 23 articles were eligible, reporting 150 children of whom 109 switched anti-TNF (45 adalimumab, 49 infliximab, 9 golimumab) and 41 swapped to another biologics (31 abatacept, 8 tocilizumab and 1 rituximab). The proportion of responding children was 46 %(95 % CI 23-70) for switch and 38 %(95 % CI 8-73) for swap (χ 2 0.02, p = 0.86). Instead analysing for each drug, the proportion of responding children was the 24 %(95 % CI 2-55) for adalimumab, 43 %(95 % CI 2-80) for abatacept, 79 %(95 % CI 61-93) for infliximab, 56 %(95 % CI 14-95) for golimumab and 96 %(95 % CI 58-100) for tocilizumab. We evaluated a superiority of tocilizumab and infliximab compared to the other drugs(χ 2 27.5 p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Although non-conclusive, this meta-analysis suggests that, after the first anti-TNF failure, tocilizumab and infliximab are the best available treatment for the management of cNIU., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis., Objective: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines., Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts., Results: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination., Limitations: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking., Conclusion: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Chat, Dr Ellebrecht, Ms. Kingston, and Dr Cordoro have no conflicts of interest to declare. Dr Bell is an employee of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Author Gondo is an employee of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Desai has served as a research investigator, consultant, speaker, and/or advisor for AbbVie, Galderma, Foundation for Research & Education of Dermatology, Almirall, Dermavant, Ferndale Laboratories, Inc, Incyte Corporation, Gore Range Capital, AOBiome, LLC, Bristol Myers Squibb, Verrica Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Scientis, EPI Health, Avita, Pfizer, Lilly, LEO, Incyte Corporation, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Beiersdorf, Inc, and Johnson and Johnson; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation and Women's Derm Society; and is a stockholder for Gore Range Capital. Dr Duffin has been a consultant, advisor, or served as an investigator for AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, CorEvitas/Corrona, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologica, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sienna, Stiefel, and UCB. Dr Feldman has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alovtech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Samsung, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen Inc, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, SunPharma, Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Valeant, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Advance Medical, Suncare Research, Informa, UpToDate and the National Psoriasis Foundation; is the founder and majority owner of www.DrScore.com; is a founder and part owner of Causa Research; and has stock in Sensal Health. Dr Garg is an advisor for AbbVie, Aclaris Therapeutics, Anaptys Bio, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, InflaRx, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viela Biosciences; receives honoraria; and receives research grants from AbbVie, UCB and National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Gelfand served as a consultant for Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celldex (DSMB), FIDE (which is sponsored by multiple pharmaceutical companies) GSK, Happify, Lilly (DMC), Leo, Janssen Biologics, Neumentum, Novartis Corp, Pfizer, UCB (DSMB), Neuroderm (DSMB), Regeneron, Trevi, and Mindera Dx., receiving honoraria; receives research grants (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer Inc; and received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly pharmaceutical sponsors. Dr Gelfand is a co-patent holder of resiquimod for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Dr Gelfand is a Deputy Editor for the Journal of Investigative Dermatology receiving honoraria from the Society for Investigative Dermatology, is Chief Medical Editor for Healio Psoriatic Disease (receiving honoraria) and is a member of the Board of Directors for the International Psoriasis Council, receiving no honoraria. Dr Gladman has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Green is a research investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, BMS, Dermavant, Lilly, MC2, SunPharma, and UCB. Dr Gudjonsson has served as an advisor for Novartis, Janssen, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received research support from Almirall, Eli Lilly, Prometheus, BMS, and Janssen. Dr Han has served as a research investigator, consultant, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Dermavant, Janssen, Lilly, UCB, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Ortho Dermatologics, Bond Avillion, Pellepharm, MC2, Athenex, Celgene, Sun Pharma, and Pfizer. Dr Hawkes is an advisor and/or consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, LearnSkin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation; and has stock ownership/equity of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Kircik is a research investigator, speaker, advisor, and/or consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Biogen-Idec, BMS, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Inc, Cellceutix, Cipher, Combinatrix, Connetics Corporation, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc, Dr Reddy's Lab, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Idera, Leo, Maruho, Merck, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Novartis AG, Promius, PharmaDerm, Pfizer, Serono, Stiefel Laboratories, Inc, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl, and XenoPort. Dr Koo is a speaker and/or advisor for AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, LEO, Sun Pharma, Janssen, and Epi Pharm. Dr Langley has been an investigator, served on the scientific advisory board, and/or has provided a lecture for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai; receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc; and is a consultant for Aditum Bio, Almirall, AltruBio Inc, AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Arrive Technologies, Avotres Therapeutics, BiomX, Brickell Biotech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corevitas, Dermavant Sciences, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Evelo Biosciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitatation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Helsinn Therapeutics, Hexima Ltd., LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Pfizer, Seanergy, and Verrica. Dr Lewitt has received speaking and/or consulting support from AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Ortho Dermatologics, UCB, Galderma, Pfizer; received honoraria; and served as an advisor for AbbVie, Janssen, and Dermavant. Dr Liao has received research/grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Trex Bio, Pfizer, and Regeneron. Dr Martin has served as an advisor for Bristol Meyers Squibb, DUSA/SUN, AbbVie, Ortho/Bausch Health, Galderma, Pfizer, LEO, Janssen, Horizon, UCB, Trevi, Almirall, Dermavent, Incyte, and Lilly; has served as a consultant for Bristol Meyers Squibb, DUSA/SUN, AbbVie, Ortho/Bausch Health, Galderma, Pfizer, LEO, UCB, Trevi, Almirall, Lilly, Arcutis, and Dermavant; and has received speaking support from UCB, Almirall, LEO, Incyte, Dermavant, and Bristol Meyers Squibb. Dr Orbai is a consultant and/or advisor for Janssen, Novartis, and UCB; and receives research support from AbbVie, Amgen, and Celgene. Dr Reddy has served as a consultant for Novartis, AbbVie, Janssen, and UCB; and has received grant support from Pfizer. Ms Richardson has served as an advisor for and received honoraria from Boehringer Engelheim and Lilly. Dr Ritchlin is a consultant and/or speaker for Novartis, Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, and Pfizer. Dr Schwartzman has received speaking support from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, and UCB; served as a consultant for Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, UCB, Stelexis, Jubilant, and Teijin; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation; and served as an advisor for Myriad. Dr Siegel has served as an advisor, speaker, and/or consultant for Abbvie, UCB, Lilly, Horizon, and BMS. Dr Van Voorhees has served as a research investigator and/or scientific advisor for Lilly, AbbVie, UCB, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Merck. Dr Wallace serves as an investigator for Pfizer and Target RWE. Dr Weinberg is a research investigator, consultant, and/or speaker for Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, AbbVie, Sun, Janssen, and BMS. Dr Winthrop is a consultant for Pfizer, AbbVie, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), Eli Lilly & Company, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Roche, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Regeneron, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; and receives research funding from BMS and Pfizer. Dr Yamauchi serves as a research investigator, consultant, and speaker for Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator, scientific advisor, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, Leo, UCB, Janssen, Lilly, Mindera, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Pain management is a major unmet need in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although many patients are treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS), including biologic therapies, many people with RA continue to experience significant pain. We aimed to determine whether performing a comprehensive pain evaluation is feasible in people with active RA receiving conventional DMARDs and biologic therapies., Methods: The BIORA-PAIN feasibility study was an open-label, randomised trial, which recruited participants suitable for treatment with biologic therapy. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, randomisation and retention of eligible participants. All participants underwent pain assessment for nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain during the 12-month study period, with quarterly assessments for VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain, painDETECT and QST (quantitative sensory testing). This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT04255134., Results: During the study period, 93 participants were screened of whom 25 were eligible: 13 were randomised to adalimumab and 12 to abatacept. Participant recruitment was lower than expected due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain assessments were practical in the clinical trial setting. An improvement was observed for VAS pain from baseline over 12 months, with a mean (SEM) of 3.7 (0.82) in the abatacept group and 2.3 (1.1) in the adalimumab group. There was a reduction in painDETECT and improvement in QST measures in both treatment groups during the study. Participant feedback included that some of the questionnaire-based pain assessments were lengthy and overlapped in their content. Adverse events were similar in both groups. There was one death due to COVID-19., Conclusions: This first-ever feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial assessing distinct modalities of pain in RA met its progression criteria. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit and assess participants with active RA for specific modalities of pain, including nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic elements. Our data suggests that it is possible to stratify people for RA based on pain features. The differences in pain outcomes between abatacept and adalimumab treated groups warrant further investigation., Trial Registration: NCT04255134, Registered on Feb 5, 2020., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

T-cells play a significant role in the development of autoimmune diseases. The CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway is crucial for activating T-cells, and blocking this pathway is essential for treating autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic antibodies and fusion proteins that target costimulatory molecules like CD80, CD86, CTLA-4, and CD28 have been developed to explore the costimulation process and as targeted treatments. To advance our understanding of costimulation in autoimmunity and the inhibition of the costimulatory pathway, it is crucial to have an accurate, precise, and direct method for detecting and quantifying the soluble form of these molecules in body fluids and various biological systems. Herein, we developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantifying the four costimulatory proteins depending on the signature peptides derived from the soluble isoform of these proteins in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was validated using the US FDA guidelines. The LOQ was determined as ∼0.5 nM for the four analytes, with quantification extended to 20 nM with a correlation coefficient of R 2 >0.998. The developed MRM method was used to analyze on-bead digested protein mixtures to establish a competitive assay for the CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway using CTLA4-Ig (Abatacept ™) as an FDA-approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis. The IC 50 was determined to be 2.99 and 159.8 nM for sCD80 and sCD86, respectively. A straightforward MRM-based competitive assay will advance the knowledge about the costimulatory role in autoimmunity and the autoimmune therapeutic drug discovery, with the need for broad application on different in vitro and in vivo models to discover new targeted inhibitors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors whose names are listed immediately below report the following details of affiliation or involvement in an organization or entity with a financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. Please specify the nature of the conflict on a separate sheet of paper if the space below is inadequate., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and factors affecting Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) improvement during abatacept treatment in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: The ORIGAMI study is an ongoing observational study of biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate disease activity treated with subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg, once-weekly). Patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were extracted from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry as an historical, weighted control group. The primary endpoint for this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with J-HAQ remission (score ≤0.5) at 3 years., Results: Among 279 abatacept-treated and 220 csDMARD-treated patients, J-HAQ remission was achieved at 3 years in 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.7%-46.2%) and 28.9% (95% CI 9.9%-47.8%), respectively. Age, RA duration <1 year, baseline J-HAQ score, and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 6 months were associated with 3-year J-HAQ remission in the abatacept group. Overall, 24/298 patients (8.1%; safety analysis set) experienced serious adverse drug reactions with an incidence of 5.3 per 100 person-years., Conclusions: This study confirmed the 3-year effectiveness and safety, and revealed potential factors associated with J-HAQ remission in biologic-naïve RA patients treated with abatacept in real-world clinical practice., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by insulin deficiency resulting from loss of function of beta cells in the pancreas, leading to hyperglycemia and associated long-term systemic complications and even death. Immunotherapy demonstrates beta cell function-preserving potential; however, its impact on C-peptide levels, a definitive biomarker of beta cell function, and endogenous insulin secretion remain unclear. A systematic review of various immunotherapeutic interventions is hence needed for a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness as well as identifying research gaps and influencing future research and clinical decisions. An extensive literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using precise keywords and filters to identify relevant studies. Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility according to predetermined eligibility criteria, and data was extracted. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality and validity of the included studies. A senior reviewer resolved discrepancies and differences of opinion between independent reviewers. A total of 11 studies were included, with 1464 study participants. Both Phase II and III trials were included. Within the included studies, four studies assessed the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab as an intervention. Another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, teplizumab, was assessed as an intervention in four studies, whereas two studies assessed the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab and one study assessed abatacept as its interventional drug. Otelixizumab demonstrated benefits at higher doses but was associated with adverse effects like Ebstein-Barr virus reactivation and cytomegalovirus infection, while at lower doses it failed to show a significant difference in C-peptide levels or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Teplizumab, on the other hand, showed promise in reducing C-peptide loss and exogenous insulin requirements and was associated with adverse events such as rash, lymphopenia, urinary tract infection, and cytokine release syndrome. However, these reactions were only associated with therapy initiation, and they subsided on their own. Rituximab improved C-peptide responses, and abatacept therapy demonstrated reduced loss of C-peptide, improved C-peptide levels, and lowered HbA1c. Teplizumab, rituximab, otelixizumab, and abatacept show potential for preserving beta cell function by reducing C-peptide loss in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. However, careful monitoring of adverse reactions, particularly viral infections and cytokine release syndrome, is necessary for the safe implementation of these therapies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Roy et al.)

Background: We aimed to reveal the effect of abatacept (ABT) on atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 3-year efficacy for arthritis, and safety in a population of older vs. younger patients., Methods: In this open-label, prospective, observational study, patients were stratified into four groups: younger (20-64 years old) and older (≥ 65 years) patients taking ABT (AY and AO) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (CY and CO). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in mean intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery, IMT max (bulbus, bifurcation, and internal and common carotid artery), and plaque score at Week 156. Disease activity, retention rate, and adverse effects were also evaluated., Results: The ABT group (AY + AO) tended to have smaller increases in mean IMT, max IMT, and plaque score than the csDMARD group (CY + CO) at Week 156, although the differences between groups were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower increases in plaque score with ABT than with csDMARDs, only when considering disease activity at 156 weeks (p = 0.0303). Proportions of patients with good or good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism response were higher in the ABT group, without significant difference between older and younger patients. No significant differences were observed in ABT retention rates between older and younger patients. Serious adverse effects, especially infection, tended to be more frequent with ABT than with csDMARDs, although no significant differences were found., Conclusions: ABT may decelerate atherosclerosis progression and may be useful for patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease, such as older patients., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000014913., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Exhausted CD8 T cells (T EX ) are associated with worse outcome in cancer yet better outcome in autoimmunity. Building on our past findings of increased TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX with teplizumab therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D), in the absence of treatment we found that the frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX is stable within an individual but differs across individuals in both T1D and healthy control (HC) cohorts. This TIGIT + KLRG1 + CD8 T EX population shares an exhaustion-associated EOMES gene signature in HC, T1D, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and cancer subjects, expresses multiple inhibitory receptors, and is hyporesponsive in vitro , together suggesting co-expression of TIGIT and KLRG1 may broadly define human peripheral exhausted cells. In HC and RA subjects, lower levels of EOMES transcriptional modules and frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX were associated with RA HLA risk alleles (DR0401, 0404, 0405, 0408, 1001) even when considering disease status and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity. Moreover, the frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX was significantly increased in RA HLA risk but not non-risk subjects treated with abatacept (CTLA4Ig). The DR4 association and selective modulation with abatacept suggests that therapeutic modulation of T EX may be more effective in DR4 subjects and T EX may be indirectly influenced by cellular interactions that are blocked by abatacept., Competing Interests: SL has past and current research projects sponsored by Janssen and SonomaBio. She is a member of the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. VM is currently employed by The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. HU is currently employed by Anocca AB. VW is currently employed by Notch Therapeutics. JT is currently employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. PL is a consultant for Link Therapeutics. JB is a Scientific Co-Founder and Scientific Advisory Board member of GentiBio, a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Neoleukin Therapeutics and Hotspot Therapeutics, and has past and current research projects sponsored by Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. She is a member of the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, a partner of the Allen Institute for Immunology, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, and BMS Immunology. JB also has a patent for tenascin-C autoantigenic epitopes in rheumatoid arthritis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Long, Muir, Jones, Wall, Ylescupidez, Hocking, Pribitzer, Thorpe, Fuchs, Wiedeman, Tatum, Lambert, Uchtenhagen, Speake, Ng, Heubeck, Torgerson, Savage, Maldonado, Ray, Khaychuk, Liu, Linsley and Buckner.)

Although unrelated-donor (URD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with many toxicities, a detailed analysis of adverse events, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), has not previously been curated. This represents a major unmet need, especially as it relates to assessing the safety of novel agents. We analyzed a detailed AE database from the "ABA2" randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of abatacept for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prevention, for which the FDA mandated a detailed AE assessment through Day +180, and weekly neutrophil and platelet counts through Day +100. These were analyzed for their relationship to key transplant outcomes, with a major focus on the impact of aGVHD on the development/severity of AEs. A total of 2102 AEs and 1816 neutrophil/platelet counts were analyzed from 142 8/8-HLA-matched URD HCT recipients on ABA2 (placebo cohort, n = 69, abatacept cohort, n = 73). This analysis resulted in 2 major observations. (1) Among graft source, conditioning intensity, age, and Grade 2 to 4 aGVHD, only aGVHD impacted Grade 3 to 5 AE acquisition after the first month post-transplant. (2) The development of Grade 3 to 4 aGVHD was associated with thrombocytopenia. We have created a detailed resource for the transplant community by which to contextualize clinical toxicities after transplant. It has identified aGVHD as a major driver of post-HCT Grade 3 to 5 AEs, and underscored a link between aGVHD and thrombocytopenia. This establishes a critical safety framework upon which the impact of novel post-transplant aGVHD therapeutics should be evaluated. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01743131)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Despite the improvements of insulin therapy, people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) still suffer from a decreased quality of life and life expectancy. The search toward a cure for T1D is therefore still a scorching open field of research., Areas Covered: Tackling the immune checkpoint signaling pathways has gained importance in the field of cancer immunotherapy. The same pathways can be targeted in autoimmunity with an opposite principle: to dampen the exaggerated immune response. In this review, we report a comprehensive excursus on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that lead to loss of immunological tolerance, and recent evidence on the role of immune checkpoint molecules in the development of T1D and their potential application for the mitigation of autoimmune diabetes., Expert Opinion: Contrasting results about the efficacy of immune checkpoint modulators for T1D have been published, with very few molecules from preclinical studies eligible for use in humans. The heterogeneous and complex pathophysiology of T1D may explain the conflicting evidence. Designing clinical trials that acknowledge the pathophysiological and clinical complexity of T1D and that forecast the need of simultaneously tackling different disease pathways will be crucial to enhance the benefits which may be gained by such compounds.

Purpose: Evaluate the benefit of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F] FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the therapeutic assessment of Abatacept (ABA) as first-line therapy in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients., Methods: This was an ancillary study of ALORS trial (Abatacept in earLy Onset polymyalgia Rheumatica Study) assessing the ability of ABA versus placebo to achieve low disease activity (C-Reactive Protein PMR activity score (CRP PMR-AS) ≤ to 10) without glucocorticoid (GC) at week 12 in patients with early-onset PMR. The patients underwent [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Responses to treatments were evaluated according to CRP PMR-AS, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) PMR-AS, Clin PMR-AS, and CRP-Imputed (Imput-CRP) PMR-AS. Quantitative score by maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and combined qualitative scores according to liver uptake (Leuven, Leuven/Groningen, and Besançon Scores) were used for assessment of [ 18 F] FDG uptake in regions of interest (ROI) usually affected in PMR. Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the clinical, biological, and [ 18 F] FDG uptake variation difference in ABA and placebo groups between W0 and W12. Subgroup analysis by GC rescue was performed., Results: At W12, there was no significant difference according to SUVmax between the ABA and the placebo groups in all ROI. Subgroup analysis according to GC administration demonstrated a significant (p 0.047) decrease in SUVmax within the left sternoclavicular joint ROI in the ABA group (- 0.8) compared to the placebo group (+ 0.6) without GC rescue. Other results did not reveal any significant difference between the ABA and placebo groups. According to combined qualitative scores, there was no significant difference between ABA and placebo groups for the direct comparison analysis and subgroup analysis according to GC rescue., Conclusion: [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT uptake did not decrease significantly after ABA compared to placebo in anatomical areas usually affected in PMR patients. These results are correlated with the clinical-biological therapeutic assessment., Clinical Trial Registration: The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est II Ref CPP: 2018-33), and all patients gave their written informed consent before study enrollment. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03632187)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Offspring of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are at an increased risk of developing neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral disorders compared to offspring from non-affected pregnancies. Using rodent models of Preeclampsia (PreE; new onset of hypertension after 20 weeks gestation) and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets), we studied the behavioral outcome of their offspring in adolescence., Methods: A subset of dams received Orencia, a T-cell activation inhibitor, as T cells have been associated with the induction of hypertension and inflammation during pregnancy. We hypothesized that offspring from hypertensive dams would experience adverse behavioral outcomes in social, cognitive, locomotor, and anxiety tests, and offspring from dams treated with Orencia would demonstrate less adverse behaviors., Results: Male offspring of PreE + Orencia dams (p < 0.05) and female offspring from HELLP + Orencia dams (p < 0.05) spent more time playing compared to normal pregnant offspring. All offspring from hypertensive and Orencia-treated dams performed worse on the Barnes Maze test compared to normal pregnant. We also measured adult (postnatal day > 60) myelin basic protein (MBP) and NeuN expression in both the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. In the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, there was no difference in expression of either MBP or NeuN in all groups regardless of sex., Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that offspring of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have behavioral changes, specifically cognitive differences. This study has shown that there is a sex dependent difference in offspring neurobehavioral development, influenced in part by the type of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, and alterations in the maternal immune system., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The strongest genetic risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been known as HLA-DRB1 based on amino acid positions 11, 71, and 74. This study analyzed the association between specific HLA-DRB1 locus and treatment response to abatacept or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with seropositive RA. A total of 374 Korean RA patients were treated with abatacept (n = 110) or TNFi (n = 264). Associations between HLA-DRB1 and treatment response after 6 months were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Seropositive RA patients with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) had a favorable response to abatacept (OR = 3.67, P = 0.067) and an inversely associated response to TNFi (OR 0.57, P = 0.058) based on EULAR response criteria, but the difference was not statistically significant in comparison to those without SE. In analyses using amino acid positions of HLA-DRB1, a significant association was found between valine at amino acid position 11 of SE and good response to abatacept (OR = 6.46, P = 5.4 × 10 -3 ). The VRA haplotype also showed a good response to abatacept (OR = 4.56, P = 0.013), but not to TNFi. Our results suggest that treatment response to abatacept or TNFi may differ depending on HLA-DRB1 locus in seropositive RA, providing valuable insights for selecting optimal therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) naïve RA patients., Methods: Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients initiating treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, TNFi, and bDMARD-naive patients their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Patients were identified in DANBIO and followed for cancer from 2006-2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years (PYRS), deaths, and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab group compared with TNFI and bDMARD naïve groups, respectively., Results: In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 PYRS, and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7-1.1). More than five years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals CI 0.74-2.71). For hematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi (HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95%CI 0.00-1.89)., Conclusion: Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term impact of immunosuppressive therapeutic agents on antibody response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) in order to propose a strategy for annual vaccination., Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study evaluated the humoral response to second and third BNT162b2 and/or mRNA-1273 vaccines in 382 Japanese AIRD patients classified into 12 different medication groups and in 326 healthy controls (HCs). The third vaccination was administered six months after the second vaccination. Antibody titres were measured using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay., Results: The seroconversion rate and antibody titres were lower in AIRD patients than in HCs 3-6 weeks after the second vaccination and 3-6 weeks after the third vaccination. Seroconversion rates were <90% after the third vaccination in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab. Antibody levels after the third vaccination were significantly lower in the groups prescribed TNF inhibitor with or without methotrexate, abatacept and rituximab or cyclophosphamide than those of HCs in a multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, and glucocorticoid dosage. The third vaccination induced an adequate humoral response in patients treated with sulfasalazine, bucillamine, methotrexate monotherapy, iguratimod, interleukin-6 inhibitors or calcineurin inhibitors including tacrolimus., Conclusions: Repeated vaccinations in many immunosuppressed patients produced antibody responses similar to those observed in HCs. In contrast, annual vaccination in patients receiving TNF inhibitors, abatacept, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab may require caution., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Abatacept (ABT) is a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when conventional synthetic DMARDs are ineffective. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of ABT on joint destruction in patients treated for over 2 years. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) by two rheumatologists at ABT initiation and after 2 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with structural remission, defined as the mean annual change in mTSS ≤0.5. Among the 111 patients included, 48 discontinued, and 63 continued ABT treatment until radiographic evaluation was performed. The rate of patients who achieved estimated TSS REM (yearly progression of van der Heijde modified total Sharp scores ≤0.5) was significantly lower in ABT-dropouts than in the ABT-continued group (69% vs. 48%, p  = .0336 by Fisher's exact test). Among the continued ABT cases, concomitant glucocorticoid treatment at ABT initiation was the strongest negative predictive factor of estimated TSS REM in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Radiographic progression after ABT administration should be evaluated separately for dropout and non-dropout cases. Glucocorticoids at the initiation of ABT may serve as a predictive factor for joint destruction in long-term ABT use.

Background: Belatacept (BTC), a fusion protein, selectively inhibits T-cell co-stimulation by binding to the CD80 and CD86 receptors on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and has been used as immunosuppression in adult renal transplant recipients. However, data regarding its use in heart transplant (HT) recipients are limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to delineate BTC's application in HT, focusing on efficacy, safety, and associated complications at a high-volume HT center., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent HT between January 2017 and December 2021 and subsequently received BTC as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. Twenty-one HT recipients were identified. Baseline characteristics, history of rejection, and indication for BTC use were collected. Outcomes included renal function, graft function, allograft rejection and mortality. Follow-up data were collected through December 2023., Results: Among 776 patients monitored from January 2017 to December 2021 21 (2.7%) received BTC treatment. Average age at transplantation was 53 years (± 12 years), and 38% were women. BTC administration began, on average, 689 [483, 1830] days post-HT. The primary indications for BTC were elevated pre-formed donor-specific antibodies in highly sensitized patients (66.6%) and renal sparing (23.8%), in conjunction with reduced calcineurin inhibitor dosage. Only one (4.8%) patient encountered rejection within a year of starting BTC. Graft function by echocardiography remained stable at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. An improvement was observed in serum creatinine levels (76.2% of patients), decreasing from a median of 1.58 to 1.45 (IQR [1.0-2.1] to [1.1-1.9]) over 12 months (p = .054). eGFR improved at 3 and 6 months compared with 3 months pre- BTC levels; however, this was not statistically significant (p = .24). Treatment discontinuation occurred in seven patients (33.3%) of whom four (19%) were switched back to full dose CNI. Infections occurred in 11 patients (52.4%), leading to BTC discontinuation in 4 patients (19%)., Conclusion: In this cohort, BTC therapy was used as alternative immunosuppression for management of highly sensitized patients or for renal sparing. BTC therapy when combined with CNI dose reduction resulted in stabilization in renal function as measured through renal surrogate markers, which did not, however, reach statistical significance. Patients on BTC maintained a low rejection rate and preserved graft function. Infections were common during BTC therapy and were associated with medication pause/discontinuation in 19% of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of BTC in HT recipients., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The management of refractory juvenile idiopathic associated uveitis (JIAU) or childhood-onset chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) is a challenge. There is no clear consensus or evidence base for to suggest the most appropriate therapy after primary or secondary failure of biweekly adalimumab. In this scenario, most clinicians advocate switching to another anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor; however, there are a variety of other disease modifying agents to choose from albeit with a differing levels of evidence., Areas Covered: We discuss how to define nonresponse and potential treatment options for patients with JIAU and CAU refractory to biweekly adalimumab., Expert Opinion: Uncontrolled CAU and JIAU remain one of the most challenging diseases to manage and can lead to irreversible loss of vision in a third of those affected. Amongst the possible choices, weekly adalimumab, infliximab, tocilizumab and abatacept have more evidence to support their use. JAK inhibitors seem to be a promising option. Golimumab and Rituximab has also been thought to be partially effective in some refractory cases, whereas IL-17, IL-23, and IL-12 inhibition along with apremilast seem not to be a therapeutic option currently. The route of administration should also be considered as there can be significant pros and cons for different children.

Objectives: The aim of the article is to investigate the associations of disease duration and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: We performed post hoc analyses of the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study of biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥20 years with moderate disease activity who were prescribed abatacept. Changes in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at 4, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment were analysed in patients divided according to ACPA serostatus (positive/negative), disease duration (<1/≥1 year), or both., Results: SDAI scores decreased from baseline in all groups. SDAI scores tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group and disease duration <1-year group than in the ACPA-negative group and disease duration ≥1-year group, respectively. In the disease duration <1-year group, SDAI tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group than in the ACPA-negative group. Disease duration was independently associated with the change in SDAI and SDAI remission at Week 52 in multivariable regression models., Conclusions: These results suggest that starting abatacept within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with greater effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with RA and moderate disease activity., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: The evaluation of microvascular alterations might provide clinically useful information for patients with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, such as those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), being the small artery remodeling the earliest form of target organ damage in primary CV diseases, such as arterial hypertension. The evaluation of retinal arterioles is a non-invasive technique aimed to identify an early microvascular damage, represented by the increase of the wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) index. Abatacept (ABA), a T-cell co-stimulator blocker, is used to treat RA. A CV protective action was hypothesized for its peculiar mechanism of action in the modulation of T-cells, potentially involved in the pathogenesis of CV comorbidity. The study aimed to non-invasively investigate morphological characteristics of retinal arterioles in a cohort of RA patients treated with ABA., Materials and Methods: Seventeen RA patients [median (25th-75thpercentile) age = 58 (48-64) years, baseline 28-joint Disease Activity Score DAS28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) = 4.4 (3.9-4.6), body mass index (BMI) = 24.2 (23.4-26) kg/m 2 , rheumatoid factor positive:52.9%, anti-citrullinated peptide autoantibodies positive:76.5%] without known CV risk factors (arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, previous CV events, smoking) were evaluated by the adaptive optics imaging system of retinal arterioles before and every 6 months of therapy with ABA (T0, T6 and T12). Office blood pressure evaluation, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and tissue-doppler echocardiography were also performed., Results: A progressive significant reduction of the WLR of retinal arterioles was observed [T0 = 0.28 (0.25-0.30), T6 = 0.27 (0.24-0.31), T12 = 0.23 (0.23-0.26); p T0 vs. T6 = 0.414; p T6 vs. T12 = 0.02; p T0 vs. T12 = 0.009], without significant variations in other parameters. The T0-T12 reduction of WLR was correlated with that of DAS28-CRP (r:0.789; p = 0.005). Moreover, a significant reduction of diastolic office blood pressure and a trend for reduction of daily pressure measured by ambulatory monitoring were observed., Conclusion: In a cohort of RA patients without known CV risk factors, a reduction of retinal microvascular alterations was demonstrated after treatment for 12 months with ABA, in parallel with the reduction of disease activity. These results might suggest the possibility of microvascular abnormalities regression induced by the immune system modulation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Piantoni, Regola, Angeli, Caproli, Trovati, Tomasi, Chiarini, Rossini, Rosei, De Ciuceis, Franceschini, Muiesan, Rizzoni and Airò.)

Objective: CD4+CXCR5+PD-1hi follicular helper T (Tfh) cells dwell in the germinal centers (GCs) of lymphoid organs and participate in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) pathogenesis; the frequency of their circulating counterparts (cTfh-frequency) is expanded in RA and correlates with the pool of GC Tfh cells. Our objective was to study the effect of abatacept (ABT) or TNF blockers (TNFb) on the cTfh-frequency in RA., Methods: Peripheral blood was drawn from seropositive-longstanding RA patients chronically receiving csDMARDS (n = 45), TNFb (n = 59), or ABT (n = 34), and healthy controls (HC) (n = 137). Also, patients with an incomplete response to csDMARDS (n = 41) who initiated TNFb (n = 19) or ABT (n = 22), were studied at 0 and 12 months. The cTfh-frequency was examined by cytometry., Results: As compared with HC, an increased cTfh-frequency was seen in seropositive-longstanding RA chronically receiving csDMARDs or TNFb but not ABT. After escalating from csDMARDs, the cTfh-frequency did not vary in patients who were given TNFb but decreased to HC levels in those given ABT. In the ABT group, the baseline cTfh-frequency was higher for patients who attained 12M remission (12Mr), vs those who remained active (12Ma): 0m cutoff for remission >0.38% (Sens. 92%, Sp. 90%), OR 25.3. Conversely, in the TNFb group, the baseline cTfh-frequency was lower for 12Mr vs 12Ma: 0m cutoff for non-remission >0.44% (Sens. 67%, Sp. 90%), OR 8.5., Conclusion: ABT but not TNFb, is able to curtail the cTfh-frequency in RA. A higher baseline cTfh-frequency predicts a good response to ABT but a poor response to TNFb., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation when treated with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study aims to investigate the risk in this population., Methods: From January 2004 through December 2020, 1068 RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARDs therapy and 416 patients with HBsAg-/HBcAb+ were enrolled. Factors associated with HBV reactivation were analysed., Results: During 2845 person-years of follow-up, 27 of 416 (6.5%,9.5 per 1000 person-years) patients developed HBV reactivation, with a cumulative rate of HBV reactivation of 3.5% at 5 years, 6.1% at 10 years and 24.2% at 17 years. The median interval from beginning b/tsDMARDs to HBV reactivation was 85 months (range: 9-186 months). The risk of HBV reactivation varied by type of b/tsDMARD, with rituximab having the highest risk (incidence rate: 48.3 per 1000 person-years), followed by abatacept (incidence rate: 24.0 per 1000 person-years). In multivariate analysis, rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 15.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.12-60.32, p = .001), abatacept (aHR: 9.30, 1.83-47.19, p = .007), adalimumab (aHR: 3.86, 1.05-14.26, p = .04) and negative baseline HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs, <10 mIU/mL) (aHR: 3.89, 1.70-8.92, p < .001) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation., Conclusion: HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients are susceptible to HBV reactivation during b/tsDMARD therapy. Those with negative baseline anti-HBs and those on certain b/tsDMARDs, such as rituximab, abatacept and adalimumab, have high reactivation risks. Risk stratification and management should be based on the patient's baseline anti-HBs titre and type of therapy., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To determine whether an expanded antigen-specific ACPA profile predicts changes in disease activity in patients with RA initiating biologics., Methods: The study included participants from a prospective, non-randomized, observational RA cohort. For this sub-study, treatment groups of interest included biologic-naïve initiating anti-TNF, biologic-exposed initiating non-TNF, and biologic-naïve initiating abatacept. ACPAs to 25 citrullinated peptides were measured using banked enrolment serum. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed and associations of resulting principal component (PC) scores (in quartiles) and anti-CCP3 antibody (≤15, 16-250 or >250 U/ml) with EULAR (good/moderate/none) treatment response at 6 months were examined using adjusted ordinal regression models., Results: Participants (n = 1092) had a mean age of 57 (13) years and 79% were women. At 6 months, 68.5% achieved a moderate/good EULAR response. There were three PCs that cumulatively explained 70% of variation in ACPA values. In models including the three components and anti-CCP3 antibody category, only PC1 and PC2 were associated with treatment response. The highest quartile for PC1 (odds ratio [OR] 1.76; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.53) and for PC2 (OR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.46) were associated with treatment response after multivariable adjustment. There was no evidence of interaction between PCs and treatment group in EULAR responses (P-value for interaction >0.1)., Conclusion: An expanded ACPA profile appears to be more strongly associated with biologic treatment response in RA than commercially available anti-CCP3 antibody levels. However, further enhancements to PCA will be needed to effectively prioritize between different biologics available for the treatment of RA., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) is a risk factor for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in RA patients. Our objective was to examine the real-world effectiveness of abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA who were SE and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP3) positive., Methods: Abatacept or TNFi initiators who were SE + and anti-CCP3+ (> 20 U/mL) at or prior to treatment and had moderate or high CDAI score (> 10) at initiation were identified. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI score over six months. Analyses were conducted in propensity score (PS)-trimmed and -matched populations overall and a biologic-experienced subgroup. Mixed-effects models were used., Results: In the overall PS-trimmed (abatacept, n = 170; TNFi, n = 157) and PS-matched cohorts (abatacept, n = 111; TNFi, n = 111), there were numerically greater improvements in mean change in CDAI between abatacept and TNFi but were not statistically significant. Similar trends were seen for biologic-experienced patients, except that statistical significance was reached for mean change in CDAI in the PS-trimmed cohort (abatacept, 12.22 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 10.13 to 14.31]; TNFi, 9.28 [95%CI 7.08 to 11.48]; p = 0.045)., Conclusion: In this real world cohort, there were numerical improvements in efficacy outcomes with abatacept over TNFi in patients with RA who were SE + and ACPA+, similar to results from a clinical trial population The only statistically significant finding after adjusting for covariates was greater improvement in CDAI with abatacept versus TNFi in the bio-experienced PS-trimmed cohort.., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: This evaluation included 16 abatacept RA clinical trials and 6 observational studies. NMSC incidence rates (IRs)/1000 patient-years (p-y) of exposure were compared between patients treated with abatacept versus placebo, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biological/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs. For observational studies, a random-effects model was used to pool rate ratios (RRs)., Results: ~49 000 patients receiving abatacept were analysed from clinical trials (~7000) and observational studies (~42 000). In randomised trials (n=4138; median abatacept exposure, 12 (range 2-30) months), NMSC IRs (95% CIs) were not significantly different for abatacept (6.0 (3.3 to 10.0)) and placebo (4.0 (1.3 to 9.3)) and remained stable throughout the long-term, open-label period (median cumulative exposure, 28 (range 2-130 months); 21 335 p-y of exposure (7044 patients over 3 years)). For registry databases, NMSC IRs/1000 p-y were 5-12 (abatacept), 1.6-10 (csDMARDs) and 3-8 (other b/tsDMARDs). Claims database IRs were 19-22 (abatacept), 15-18 (csDMARDs) and 14-17 (other b/tsDMARDs). Pooled RRs (95% CIs) from observational studies for NMSC in patients receiving abatacept were 1.84 (1.00 to 3.37) vs csDMARDs and 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) vs other b/tsDMARDs., Conclusions: Consistent with the warnings and precautions of the abatacept label, this analysis suggests a potential increase in NMSC risk with abatacept use compared with csDMARDs. No significant increase was observed compared with b/tsDMARDs, but the lower limit of the 95% CI was close to unity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TS was an employee of and shareholder in Bristol Myers Squibb (at the time of the analysis; former employee at present). LD, VK, AD and MAM are employees of and shareholders in Bristol Myers Squibb. SS reports advisory board involvement, speaker fees and grant/research support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. KM reports grant/research support from Rheumatology Research Foundation. MH is an employee of the University of Maryland School of Medicine (full time) and US Department of Veterans Affairs (part time); reports consultancy fees and advisory board involvement from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Kolon TissueGene, Inc, Novartis, Pfizer, Samumed and Theralogix; is a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee for Galapagos, Roche, and IQVIA; reports royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate; reports stock ownership in BriOri Biotech and Theralogix; and is president of Rheumcon. MB reports consultancy fees from Novartis. JA reports grant/research support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi and UCB for ARTIS. AS reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer and Roche., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Considering the similarities between swine and humans, it is a logical consequence to use swine as a translational model in research and drug development, including non-clinical safety. Here, we compared the reactivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from humans and minipigs under the influence of different compounds in vitro . We conducted a flow cytometry-based proliferation assay that focused on the T-cell response to three different stimuli: concanavalin A (ConA), phytohemagglutinin-L (PHA-L), and staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (SEB). Furthermore, four approved immunosuppressive drugs-abatacept, belatacept, rapamycin, and tofacitinib-which are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or rejection in transplant recipients, were combined with the different stimuli. This allowed us to study the effect of suppressive drugs in comparison with the different stimuli in both species. We examined proliferating T cells (CD3 + ) and investigated the presence of TCR-αβ + and TCR-γδ + T cells. Differences in the response of T cells of the two species under these various conditions were evident. CD4 + T cells were more activated within humans, whereas CD8 + T cells were generally more abundant in swine. The effectiveness of the used humanized antibodies is most likely related to the conserved structure of CTLA-4 as abatacept induced a much stronger reduction in swine compared with belatacept. The reduction of proliferation of rapamycin and tofacitinib was highly dependent on the used stimuli. We further investigated the effect of the immunosuppressive compounds on antigen-specific restimulation of pigs immunized against porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2). Treatment with all four compounds resulted in a clear reduction of the proliferative response, with rapamycin showing the strongest effect. In conclusion, our findings indicate that the effectiveness of suppressive compounds is highly dependent on the stimuli used and must be carefully selected to ensure accurate results. The results highlight the importance of considering the response of T cells in different species when evaluating the potential of an immunomodulatory drug., Competing Interests: Authors SJ and MWS were employed by company Merck KGaA. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Pernold, Lagumdzic, Stadler, Dolezal, Jäckel, Schmitt, Mair and Saalmüller.)

Abatacept, a co-stimulatory blocker comprising the extracellular portion of human CTLA-4 linked to the Fc region of IgG1, is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. By impairing the interaction between CD28 on T cells and CD80/CD86 on APCs, its mechanisms of action include the suppression of follicular T helper cells (preventing the breach of self-tolerance in B cells), inhibition of cell cycle progression holding T cells in a state described as 'induced naïve' and reduction in DC conditioning. However, less is known about how long these inhibitory effects might last, which is a critical question for therapeutic use in patients. Herein, employing a murine model of OVA-induced DTH, we demonstrate that the effect of abatacept is short-lived in vivo and that the inhibitory effects diminish markedly when treatment is ceased., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology.)

Background: The biological mechanisms underlying the differential response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unknown. Here, we aimed to identify cellular, transcriptomic, and proteomic features that predict resistance to abatacept in patients with RA., Methods: Blood samples were collected from 22 RA patients treated with abatacept at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Response to treatment was defined by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 3 months, and seven patients were classified as responders and the others as non-responders. We quantified gene expression levels by RNA sequencing, 67 plasma protein levels, and the expression of surface molecules (CD3, 19, and 56) by flow cytometry. In addition, three gene expression data sets, comprising a total of 27 responders and 50 non-responders, were used to replicate the results., Results: Among the clinical characteristics, the number of monocytes was significantly higher in the non-responders before treatment. Cell type enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between responders and non-responders were enriched in monocytes. Gene set enrichment analysis, together with single-cell analysis and deconvolution analysis, identified that Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and interleukin-17 receptor A (IL17RA) pathway in monocytes was upregulated in non-responders. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) correlated with this signature showed higher concentrations in non-responders before treatment. The DEGs in the replication set were also enriched for the genes expressed in monocytes, not for the TLR5 and IL17RA pathway but for the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway., Conclusions: Monocyte-derived transcriptomic features before treatment underlie the differences in abatacept efficacy in patients with RA. The pathway activated in monocytes was the TLR5 and IL17RA-HGF signature in the current study, while it was the OXPHOS pathway in the replication set. Elevated levels of HGF before treatment may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting poor responses to abatacept. These findings provide insights into the biological mechanisms of abatacept resistance, contributing valuable evidence for stratifying patients with RA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Current maintenance immunosuppression commonly comprises a synergistic combination of tacrolimus as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolic acid, and glucocorticoids. Therapy is often individualized by steroid withdrawal or addition of belatacept or inhibitors of the mechanistic target of rapamycin. This review provides a comprehensive overview of their mode of action, focusing on the cellular immune system. The main pharmacological action of CNIs is suppression of the interleukin-2 pathway that leads to inhibition of T cell activation. Mycophenolic acid inhibits the purine pathway and subsequently diminishes T and B cell proliferation but also exerts a variety of effects on almost all immune cells, including inhibition of plasma cell activity. Glucocorticoids exert complex regulation via genomic and nongenomic mechanisms, acting mainly by downregulating proinflammatory cytokine signatures and cell signaling. Belatacept is potent in inhibiting B/T cell interaction, preventing formation of antibodies; however, it lacks the potency of CNIs in preventing T cell-mediated rejections. Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors have strong antiproliferative activity on all cell types interfering with multiple metabolic pathways, partly explaining poor tolerability, whereas their superior effector T cell function might explain their benefits in the case of viral infections. Over the past decades, clinical and experimental studies provided a good overview on the underlying mechanisms of immunosuppressants. However, more data are needed to delineate the interaction between innate and adaptive immunity to better achieve tolerance and control of rejection. A better and more comprehensive understanding of the mechanistic reasons for failure of immunosuppressants, including individual risk/benefit assessments, may permit improved patient stratification., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and T cell response after a two-dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: In this observational study, patients with RA who are ≥18 years of age and vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 according to the Argentine National Health Ministry's vaccination strategy were included. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (ELISA-COVIDAR test), neutralizing activity (cytotoxicity in VERO cells), and specific T cell response (IFN-γ ELISpot Assay) were assessed after the first and second dose., Results: A total of 120 patients with RA were included. Mostly, homologous regimens were used, including Gam-COVID-Vac (27.5%), ChAdOx1 (24.2%), and BBIBP-CorV (22.5%). The most frequent combination was Gam-COVID-Vac/mRNA-1273 (21.7%). After the second dose, 81.7% presented with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 70.0% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65.3% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV and treatment with abatacept (ABA) and rituximab (RTX) were associated with undetectable antibodies and no neutralizing activity after two doses. BBIBP-CorV was also associated with the absence of T cell response. The total incidence of adverse events was 357.1 events per 1,000 doses, significantly lower with BBIBP-CorV (166.7 events per 1,000 doses, P < 0.02)., Conclusion: In this RA cohort vaccinated with homologous and heterologous regimens against COVID-19, 2 out of 10 patients did not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 70% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV was associated with deficient humoral and cellular response, whereas treatment with ABA and RTX resulted in an impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG formation and neutralizing activity., (© 2023 American College of Rheumatology.)

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disease characterised by skin ulcers that are associated with autoimmune diseases. Although the effectiveness of immunosuppression with glucocorticoids and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in treating PG has been reported, the utility of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for severe ulcerative lesions in patients with PG remains controversial. Herein, we report the case of a 76-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who developed PG after undergoing surgery for a forefoot deformity. The patient showed improvement in deep ulcer lesions through NPWT while receiving treatment with abatacept and systemic glucocorticoids. Subsequent topical glucocorticoid therapy led to the remission of the PG. This case suggests that NPWT, when used under immunosuppressive conditions, does not exacerbate the pathergy and may be beneficial for treating severe ulcerative PG., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Immune rejection has long hindered allogeneic cell transplantation therapy. Current genetic modification approaches, including direct targeting of major histocompatibility complex or constitutive expression of immune inhibitory molecules, exhibit drawbacks such as severe adverse effects or elevated tumorigenesis risks. To overcome these limitations, we introduce an innovative approach to induce cell-type-specific immune tolerance in differentiated cells. By engineering human embryonic stem cells, we ensure the exclusive production of the immune inhibitory molecules PD-L1/CTLA4Ig in differentiated cells. Using this strategy, we generated hepatocyte-like cells expressing PD-L1 and CTLA4Ig, which effectively induced local immunotolerance. This approach was evaluated in a humanized mouse model that mimics the human immune system dynamics. We thus demonstrate a robust and selective induction of immunotolerance specific to hepatocytes, improving graft survival without observed tumorigenesis. This precise immune tolerance strategy holds great promise for advancing the development of stem cell-based therapeutics in regenerative medicine., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig)-a monoclonal antibody which restricts T cell activation-is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, only 50% of RA patients attain clinical responses, while predictors of response are rather limited. Herein, we aimed to investigate for early biomarkers of response to abatacept, based on a detailed immunological profiling of peripheral blood (PB) cells and serum proteins. We applied flow cytometry and proteomics analysis on PB immune cells and serum respectively, of RA patients starting abatacept as the first biologic agent. After 6 months of treatment, 34.5% of patients attained response. At baseline, Th1 and FoxP3+ T cell populations were positively correlated with tender joint counts ( p -value = 0.047 and p -value = 0.022, respectively). Upon treatment, CTLA4-Ig effectively reduced the percentages of Th1 and Th17 only in responders ( p -value = 0.0277 and p -value = 0.0042, respectively). Notably, baseline levels of Th1 and myeloid cell populations were significantly increased in PB of responders compared to non-responders ( p -value = 0.009 and p -value = 0.03, respectively). Proteomics analysis revealed that several inflammatory mediators were present in serum of responders before therapy initiation and strikingly 10 amongst 303 serum proteins were associated with clinical responses. Finally, a composite index based on selected baseline cellular and proteomics' analysis could predict response to abatacept with a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.24%).

Introduction: The study aimed to optimize medical care for elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by examining the 3-year continuation rate of different molecular targeted therapies across age groups in Japan, which has a significant elderly population., Methods: The study included patients with RA who started molecular targeted therapies between 2013 and 2019 and divided them into three age groups. The primary outcome was to assess the 3-year continuation rate of each drug and analyze reasons for treatment discontinuation using inverse probability of treatment weighting., Results: Among 2292 patients analyzed, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were most commonly used in those younger than 65 years of age (43.5%), while Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were also utilized (17.1%). In contrast, JAK inhibitors were less frequently used in patients aged 75 years and older (7.8%), with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion proteins (CTLA4-Ig) being the most common (39.2%). JAK inhibitors and anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies had higher continuation rates than other drugs in patients under 65 years (p < 0.001). For those aged 65-74 years, JAK inhibitors and CTLA4-Ig had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001), while among those aged 75 years and older, CTLA4-Ig and IL-6R antibodies had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001). Inadequate efficacy was the main reason for discontinuation in all age groups, while infection leading to discontinuation increased with age., Conclusions: The study highlights the need to consider different age groups separately in elderly RA care. Among patients aged 75 years and older, abatacept and anti-IL-6R antibodies showed the highest continuation rates, suggesting their potential suitability and efficacy for this specific age cohort., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: LPS-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LRBA -/- ) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) insufficiency (CTLA4 +/- ) are mechanistically overlapped diseases presenting with recurrent infections and autoimmunity. The effectiveness of different treatment regimens remains unknown., Objective: Our aim was to determine the comparative efficacy and long-term outcome of therapy with immunosuppressants, CTLA4-immunoglobulin (abatacept), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a single-country multicenter cohort of 98 patients with a 5-year median follow-up., Methods: The 98 patients (63 LRBA -/- and 35 CTLA4 +/- ) were followed and evaluated at baseline and every 6 months for clinical manifestations and response to the respective therapies., Results: The LRBA -/- patients exhibited a more severe disease course than did the CTLA4 +/- patients, requiring more immunosuppressants, abatacept, and HSCT to control their symptoms. Among the 58 patients who received abatacept as either a primary or rescue therapy, sustained complete control was achieved in 46 (79.3%) without severe side effects. In contrast, most patients who received immunosuppressants as primary therapy (n = 61) showed either partial or no disease control (72.1%), necessitating additional immunosuppressants, abatacept, or transplantation. Patients with partial or no response to abatacept (n = 12) had longer disease activity before abatacept therapy, with higher organ involvement and poorer disease outcomes than those with a complete response. HSCT was performed in 14 LRBA -/- patients; 9 patients (64.2%) showed complete remission, and 3 (21.3%) continued to receive immunosuppressants after transplantation. HSCT and abatacept therapy gave rise to similar probabilities of survival., Conclusions: Abatacept is superior to immunosuppressants in controlling disease manifestations over the long term, especially when started early, and it may provide a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to transplantation., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) can be life-threatening, if hemoglobin (Hb) levels continue to decline after established treatments with glucocorticoids, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis. Impaired regulatory T cells (Treg) are proposed to alleviate AIHA development through decreased binding of CTLA-4 to antigen-presenting cells. Abatacept is a fusion protein with a CTLA-4 domain and is approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis. It mimics the immunosuppressive CTLA-4 effect of Treg. Thus, application of abatacept in refractory AIHA might be reasonable. A 54-year-old woman with known AIHA was admitted to our clinic due to therapy-refractory hemoglobin decrease to 4.0 g/dl. Previously, multiple courses of glucocorticoids, rituximab, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and a splenectomy failed to stop or stabilize hemoglobin levels and hemolysis. A new immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine was initiated and erythropoiesis was stimulated with darbepoetin alfa. Again, therapy failed even though we tried to support immunosuppressive therapy by reducing the amount of pathogenic antibody through plasmapheresis. We stopped the treatment with cyclosporine and applied abatacept instead. After seven days hemoglobin stabilized at 4.3 g/dl and no further red blood cells transfusions were necessary. About one month later hemolysis aggravated again and azathioprine was added to the ongoing abatacept treatment. Finally, the combination of abatacept and azathioprine led to a long-lasting increase of the Hb level above 11 g/dl six months later. Abatacept can be applied to overcome therapy refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia but should be combined with an additional immunosuppressive medication such as azathioprine.