Search

Background and Objective: The Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI) is a recently validated tool in Spanish that measures psoriasis severity by integrating 3 different spheres: clinical severity (SPI-s), psychosocial impact (SPI-p), and natural history (SPI-i). Our objective was to study the validity and equivalence of this new scale compared to routinely used scales such as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)., Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional and observational study that included 45 patients aged 18-74 years. Demographic data and information associated with psoriasis severity and the patients' quality of life were collected, using PASI, DLQI, and SPI simultaneously. The correlation of reference scales (PASI and DLQI) with SPI was examined. The degree of agreement between the 2 versions of SPI completed by the physician (proSPI-s) and self-administered by the patient (saSPI-s) was also studied., Results: The mean age of the study population was 51 years, with a mean psoriasis history of 14.05 years. A strong correlation was found between PASI and proSPI-s (r=0.89), as well as between DLQI and SPI-p (r=0.89), with a moderate correlation being reported between PASI and saSPI-s (r=0.52). The degree of agreement between proSPI-s and saSPI-s was moderate., Conclusions: These findings represent the initial results of real clinical practice using the validated Spanish version of SPI, making its use truly promising in the routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze the prognostic accuracy of the scores NEWS, qSOFA, GYM used in hospital emergency department (ED) in the assessment of elderly patients who consult for an infectious disease., Methods: Data from the EDEN (Emergency Department and Elderly Need) cohort were used. This retrospective cohort included all patients aged ≥65 years seen in 52 Spanish EDs during two weeks (from 1-4-2019 to 7-4-2019 and 30/3/2020 to 5/4/2020) with an infectious disease diagnosis in the emergency department. Demographic variables, demographic variables, comorbidities, Charlson and Barthel index and needed scores parameters were recorded. The predictive capacity for 30-day mortality of each scale was estimated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different cut-off points. The primary outcome variable was 30-day mortality., Results: 6054 patients were analyzed. Median age was 80 years (IQR 73-87) and 45.3% women. 993 (16,4%) patients died. NEWS score had better AUC than qSOFA (0.765, 95CI: 0.725-0.806, versus 0.700, 95%CI: 0.653-0.746; P < .001) and GYM (0.716, 95%CI: 0.675-0.758; P = .024), and there was no difference between qSOFA and GYM (P = .345). The highest sensitivity scores for 30-day mortality were GYM ≥ 1 point (85.4%) while the qSOFA score ≥2 points showed high specificity. In the case of the NEWS scale, the cut-off point ≥4 showed high sensitivity, while the cut-off point NEWS ≥ 8 showed high specificity., Conclusion: NEWS score showed the highest predictive capacity for 30-day mortality. GYM score ≥1 showed a great sensitivity, while qSOFA ≥2 scores provide the highest specificity but lower sensitivity., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background and Objective: The Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI) is a recently validated tool in Spanish that measures psoriasis severity by integrating 3 different spheres: clinical severity (SPI-s), psychosocial impact (SPI-p), and natural history (SPI-i). Our objective was to study the validity and equivalence of this new scale compared to routinely used scales such as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)., Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional and observational study that included 45 patients aged 18 to 74 years. Demographic data and information associated with psoriasis severity and the patients' quality of life were collected, using PASI, DLQI, and SPI simultaneously. The correlation of reference scales (PASI and DLQI) with SPI was examined. The degree of agreement between the 2 versions of SPI completed by the physician (proSPI-s) and self-administered by the patient (saSPI-s), was also studied., Results: The mean age of the study population was 51 years, with a mean psoriasis history of 14.05 years. A strong correlation was found between PASI and proSPI-s (r=0.89), as well as between DLQI and SPI-p (r=0.89), with a moderate correlation being reported between PASI and saSPI-s (r=0.52). The degree of agreement between proSPI-s and saSPI-s was moderate., Conclusions: These findings represent the initial results of real clinical practice using the validated Spanish version of SPI, making its use truly promising in the routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Multiple scales have been designed to stratify the severity and predict the prognosis in the initial evaluation of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our study aimed to validate the most commonly used prognostic scales for aSAH in our population: Hunt-Hess, modified Hunt-Hess, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), Prognosis on Admission of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (PAASH), and Barrow Aneurysm Institute (BAI) scales., Methods: This study includes all aSAH cases treated at our institution between June 2019 and December 2020. We developed a retrospective cohort by reviewing medical records and radiologic images performed during hospitalization. The outcome was evaluated using the modified Rankin scale (mRS). It was defined as a poor outcome (mRS 4-5) and mortality (mRS 6). The ROC curves and the area under the curve (AUC) of each of the prognostic scales were calculated to evaluate their prognostic prediction capacity., Results: A total of 142 patients were diagnosed with aSAH. A poor outcome occurred in 52.1% of the patients, whereas mortality was 27.5%. The AUC of the scales studied was similar and no significant difference was found between them for predicting a poor outcome (P = .709) or mortality (P = .715)., Conclusion: We determined that the prognostic scales for aSAH had a similar predictive value for poor clinical outcomes and mortality in our institution, with no significant difference. Thus, we recommend the most simple and well-known scale used institutionally., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze the correlation between the degrees of smoking dependence, measured with the Fagerström Test Nicotine Dependence (FTND), Glover-Nilsson Smoking Behavioral Dependence (GN-SBQ) and a measure of self-perceived-dependence (SPD)., Design: Cross-sectional descriptive observational study. SITE: Urban primary health-care center., Participants: Men and women between 18 and 65 years old, daily smokers, selected by non-random consecutive sampling., Interventions: Self-administration of various questionnaires though an electronic device., Main Measurements: Age, sex and nicotine dependence assessed by: FTND, GN-SBQ and SPD. Statistical analysis, with SPSS 15.0: descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and conformity analysis., Results: Two hundred fourteen smokers were included, 54.7% were women. Median age 52 years (range: 27-65). Depending on the test used, different results of the high/very high degree of dependence were found: FTND 17.3%, GN-SBQ 15.4% and SPD 69.6%. A moderate magnitude (r≈0.5) correlation between the 3 test was found. When assessing concordance, comparing the FTND with SPD, 70.6% of smokers didn't coincide in the severity of dependence, reporting a milder degree of dependence with the FTND than with SPD. Comparing GN-SBQ versus FTND, showed conformity in 44.4% of patients while in 40.7%, the FTND underestimated the severity of dependence. Likewise, when comparing SPD with the GN-SBQ, in the 64% GN-SBQ underestimates, while in 34.1% smokers conformity was demonstrated., Conclusions: The number of patients who consider their SPD to be high/very high was four times higher compared to the GN-SBQ or the FNTD; the latter, being the most demanding, categorizing patients with very high dependence. Requiring a FTND score greater than 7 to prescribe drugs for smoking cessation may exclude subsidiary patients from receiving treatment., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

INTRODUCCIóN: La cefalea es el motivo de consulta neurológico más prevalente en los distintos niveles asistenciales, donde la anamnesis y exploración son primordiales para realizar un diagnóstico y tratamiento adecuados. Con la intención de unificar la atención de esta patología, el Grupo de Estudio de Cefalea de la Sociedad Española de Neurología (GECSEN) ha decidido elaborar unas recomendaciones consensuadas para mejorar y garantizar una adecuada asistencia en Atención Primaria, Urgencias y Neurología. METODOLOGíA: El documento es práctico, sigue el orden de la dinámica de actuación durante una consulta: anamnesis, escalas que cuantifican el impacto y la discapacidad y exploración. Además, finaliza con pautas para realizar un seguimiento adecuado y un manejo de las expectativas del paciente con el tratamiento pautado. CONCLUSIONES: Esperamos ofrecer una herramienta que mejore la atención al paciente con cefalea para garantizar una asistencia adecuada y homogénea a nivel nacional., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Headache is the most common neurological complaint at the different levels of the healthcare system, and clinical history and physical examination are essential in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. With the objective of unifying the care given to patients with headache, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (GECSEN) has decided to establish a series of consensus recommendations to improve and guarantee adequate care in primary care, emergency services, and neurology departments., Methods: With the aim of creating a practical document, the recommendations follow the dynamics of a medical consultation: clinical history, physical examination, and scales quantifying headache impact and disability. In addition, we provide recommendations for follow-up and managing patients' expectations of the treatment., Conclusions: With this tool, we aim to improve the care given to patients with headache in order to guarantee adequate, homogeneous care across Spain., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Falls in the hospital setting are a major health problem due to their high prevalence and their physical, functional, psychological or economic consequences. Since 1990s, different fall risk assessment scales have been developed to detect high-risk patients, which are also applied in the hospital setting. The aim of this review is to analyse the validity of different scales for assessing fall risk in adults in the hospital setting, especially in elderly patients. Following a literature search in April 2021, 36 primary studies were found that analysed the validity of the Downton, Morse, HendrichII, Stratify and Tinetti scales. Meta-analyses of sensitivity and specificity showed a high heterogeneity that does not allow recommending a specific tool that can be considered as standard in acute inpatients., (Copyright © 2022 SEGG. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Spasticity is a motor disorder characterised by an increase in muscle tone that appears as a consequence of a central nervous system disorder, leading to deficit and disability and impairing quality of life. In acquired adult brain damage, spasticity is a severe and frequent problem, appearing in 20-30% of patients with stroke and in 13-20% of patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. The main objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the treatments used in spasticity in adult patients with acquired brain damage secondary to stroke and head trauma. A systematic search of randomised controlled trials, published between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2017 in English and Spanish, was carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane plus Library and Ovid databases. We finally selected 17 studies, with methodological quality that was at least acceptable according to the Jadad scale. The most frequently investigated treatments are botulinum toxin, especially serotype A, together with rehabilitative measures. Clinical scales are the most frequently used to assess spasticity., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y Medicina Física. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objective: In clinical practice, assessing patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex, time-consuming task. Our purpose is to provide a rigorous and objective evaluation of how motor function in PD patients is assessed by neurologists specialising in movement disorders, on the one hand, and by nurses specialising in PD management, on the other., Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, single-centre study of 50 patients with PD (52% men; mean age: 64.7 ± 8.7 years) who were assessed between 5 January 2016 and 20 July 2016. A neurologist and a nurse evaluated motor function in the early morning hours using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts III and IV and Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale. Tests were administered in the same PD periods (in 48 patients during the 'off' time and in 2 patients during the 'on' time). Inter-rater variability was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: Forty-nine patients (98%) were classified in the same H&Y stage by both raters. Assessment times were similar for both raters. ICC for UPDRS-IV and UPDRS-III total scores were 0.955 (P<.0001) and 0.954 (P<.0001), respectively. The greatest variability was found for UPDRS-III item 29 (gait; ICC=0.746; P<.0001) and the lowest, for item 30 (postural stability; ICC=0.918; P<.0001)., Conclusions: Motor function assessment of PD patients by a trained nurse is equivalent to that made by an expert neurologist and takes the same time to complete., (Copyright © 2017 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between degrees of nicotine dependence measured by the Fagerström test (FTCD) and different tests of motivation to stop smoking., Material and Methods: Observational study, multicenter conducted in smoking clinics in daily clinical practice. Demographics, smoking status, FTCD scores, and motivation test results were collected: Richmond test (TR), Henri Mondor Paris motivation test (HMP), Khimji-Watts test (KW), and the visual analog scale of motivation to stop smoking. The statistical analysis was descriptive, and correlation and analysis tests and regression models were used., Results: A total of 314 subjects were included [162 women (51.59%)]. Males smoked an average of 3.3 cigarettes/day more than women (95% CI: 0.9-5.6 cigarettes/day, p=0.006) and their cumulative consumption was 7.8 pack-years higher than in women (95% CI: 2.1 to 13.5 pack-years). We found no association between FTCD and the motivation tests to stop smoking used in this study., Conclusions: We found no association between the degree of dependence and the motivation to quit smoking measured by the aforementioned instruments., (Copyright © 2018 SEPAR. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We compared the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) with the probability of survival using the TRISS methodology (PS-TRISS) in geriatric severe trauma patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU) participating in the Spanish trauma ICU registry (RETRAUCI)., Methods: Retrospective analysis from the RETRAUCI. Quantitative data were reported as median (Interquartile Range (IQR)), and categorical data as number (percentage). We analyzed the validity of the GTOS and PS-TRISS to predict survival. Discrimination was analyzed using receiver operating characteristics curves. Calibration was analyzed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: The cohort included 1417 patients aged ≥ 65 years. Median age was 75.5 (70.5-80.5), 1003 patients were male (68.2%) and median Injury Severity Score was 18 (13-25). Mechanical ventilation was required in 61%. Falls were the mechanism of injury in 659 patients (44.8%). In-hospital mortality rate was 18.2%. The areas under the curve were: PS-TRISS 0.69 (95%CI 0.66-0.73), and GTOS 0.66 (95%CI 0.62-0.70); P<.05. Both scores overestimated mortality in the upper range of predicted mortality., Conclusions: In our sample of geriatric severe trauma patients, the accuracy of GTOS was lower than the accuracy of the PS-TRISS to predict in-hospital survival. The calibration of both scores for the geriatric population was deficient., (Copyright © 2018 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In order to avoid delay in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and reduce the margin of error, the use of scales has been used. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Alvarado and RIPASA scores in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate with the histopathological results., Methods: Prospective, longitudinal, analytical, comparative and observational study. Patients with abdominal pain syndrome suggestive of acute appendicitis and submitted to surgical intervention were included; the Alvarado and RIPASA scores were simultaneously applied. The pathology report was obtained and the efficacy of both scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was compared., Results: One hundred patients were included. It was shown that the RIPASA score demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy compared to the Alvarado score, with sensitivity of 98,8% and specificity of 71,4% versus 90,7% and 64,3%, respectively. The RIPASA score showed an area under the curve of 0,88 and the Alvarado scale of 0,80., Conclusions: The RIPASA score is a more specific, convenient and accurate system than the Alvarado score for the Mexican population., (Copyright © 2017 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the internal consistency and content validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) in dental students from Cartagena, Colombia., Materials and Methods: Scale validation study in 886 dental students from Cartagena, Colombia. Factor structure was determined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was measured using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Analyses were performed using the Stata v.13.2 for Windows (Statacorp., USA) and Mplus v.7.31 for Windows (Muthén & Muthén, USA) software., Results: Internal consistency was α=.806. The factor structure showed three that accounted for the 56.6% of the variance. CFA revealed: χ 2 =926.036; df=85; RMSEA=.106 (90%CI, .100-.112); CFI=.947; TLI=.934., Conclusions: The MBI showed an adequate internal consistency and a factor structure being consistent with the original proposed structure with a poor fit, which does not reflect adequate content validity in this sample., (Copyright © 2016 Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría. Publicado por Elsevier España. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To adapt the Graded Chronic Pain Scale for use in Primary care patients in Spain, and to assess its psychometric properties., Methods: Clinical measures observational study investigating the severity of chronic pain. The methodology included a process of translation and back-translation following the international guidelines. Study participants were 75 patients who experienced lower back pain for more than six months and were sent to Primary Care physiotherapy units. Internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and answering capacity were analysed., Results: The Spanish version of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale had a high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81. Regarding construct validity, it was identified that two factors explained 72.37% of the variance. Convergent validity showed a moderate positive correlation with the Visual Analogue Scale, the activity avoidance subscale of the Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, and the FearAvoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. A moderate negative correlation was identified with the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. The mean time of questionnaire administration was 2minutes and 28seconds., Conclusions: The Spanish version of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale appears to be a valid, reliable, and useful tool for measuring chronic pain at an early stage in Primary Care settings in Spain., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the effect of the use of hearing aids in self-perception of tinnitus and hearing loss in the elderly., Methods: A total of 24 elderly patients between 60 and 70 years of age with moderate-grade sensorineural hearing loss were evaluated and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of tinnitus. All volunteers were fitted with binaural micro-channel hearing aids of the same brand and model and submitted to tests, scales, and questionnaires relevant to this topic. The evaluations were performed before and after one and three months of effective use of these hearing aids., Results: Acoustic stimulation through the effective use of hearing aids caused a reduction in the perception of tinnitus sound intensity (especially in evaluations with the prosthesis on) and in nuisance associated with this symptom and with hearing loss. In addition, all participants were satisfied with the use of hearing aids., Conclusion: The continuous use of hearing aids is beneficial for the treatment of tinnitus and hearing loss, bringing satisfaction to users., (Copyright © 2015 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of Eular Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) for Portuguese language and evaluate its psychometric properties., Method: Cross-sectional study of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). The psychometric properties (intraobserver reproducibility and construct validity) were studied. In construct validity, ESSPRI was compared with the Patient's Global Assessment (PGA), Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort (Profad), Sicca Symptoms Inventory (SSI) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Facit-F). Statistical tests used were:Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman method and Spearman coefficient. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant., Results: There was no difference between versions in both languages; thus, a Brazilian consensual version was obtained. All subjects were women aged 49.4 ± 11.6 years, with onset of symptoms of 7.2 ± 5.4 years, and time of diagnosis of 3.0 ± 3.3 years. The mean ESSPRI was 6.87 ± 1.97. The intraobserver reproducibility was high and significant (0.911) and, with Bland-Altman method, there was no systematic bias in the agreement of measures among evaluations. A moderate correlation of ESSPRI with all tested instruments was observed., Conclusion: The Brazilian Portuguese version of ESSPRI is a valid and reproducible version., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It has become common to use scales to measure the degree of involvement of facial paralysis in phonoaudiological clinics., Objective: To analyze the inter- and intra-rater agreement of the scales of degree of facial paralysis and to elicit point of view of the appraisers regarding their use., Methods: Cross-sectional observational clinical study of the Chevalier and House & Brackmann scales performed by five speech therapists with clinical experience, who analyzed the facial expression of 30 adult subjects with impaired facial movements two times, with a one week interval between evaluations. The kappa analysis was employed., Results: There was excellent inter-rater agreement for both scales (kappa>0.80), and on the Chevalier scale a substantial intra-rater agreement in the first assessment (kappa=0.792) and an excellent agreement in the second assessment (kappa=0.928). The House & Brackmann scale showed excellent agreement at both assessments (kappa=0.850 and 0.857). As for the appraisers' point of view, one appraiser thought prior training is necessary for the Chevalier scale and, four appraisers felt that training is important for the House & Brackmann scale., Conclusion: Both scales have good inter- and intra-rater agreement and most of the appraisers agree on the ease and relevance of the application of these scales., (Copyright © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: To assess the association between Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and the Fried frailty index in older people living in the community., Material and Method: Cross-sectional study of individuals aged 75 and over living in the community., Variables: nutritional status measured by Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) and MNA, and frailty measured by Fried's frailty criteria., Results: The sample consisted of 640 individuals with a mean age of 81.3±5.0 years; 39.7% were men. According to the MNA-SF, 76.9% of patients were well nourished, 19.8% were at risk of malnutrition and 1.9% were malnourished, while percentages were 78.1, 19.6 and 2.3%, respectively, according to the MNA. According to Fried criteria, 43.4% were not frail, 47% were pre-frail and 9.6% were frail. The largest proportion of frail subjects were at risk of malnutrition. The higher the score of MNA components, the higher was the frailty index. Likewise, there was a significant association between the 5 frailty criteria and the categories of MNA and MNA-SF. The area under the ROC curve for the MNA-SF was 0.75 while for the MNA it was 0.80., Conclusions: The results presented show a clear association between Mini Nutritional Assessment and Fried's criteria. They also suggest that the "nutritional risk" MNA category is the one most strongly associated with the Fried's frailty index., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

The validation of a measurement tool in mental health is a complex process that usually starts by estimating reliability, to later approach its validity. Factor analysis is a way to know the number of dimensions, domains or factors of a measuring tool, generally related to the construct validity of the scale. The analysis could be exploratory or confirmatory, and helps in the selection of the items with better performance. For an acceptable factor analysis, it is necessary to follow some steps and recommendations, conduct some statistical tests, and rely on a proper sample of participants., (Copyright © 2012 Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría. Publicado por Elsevier España. All rights reserved.)