Search

For much of American history, elite colleges and universities were largely reserved for wealthy, predominantly white Americans. Only in the 20th century did these institutions begin to actively prioritize diversity and expand access by adopting tools such as affirmative action—the narrowly tailored practice of considering race and ethnicity as part of a holistic evaluation of a student’s application. This report suggests that affirmative action is one of the best tools colleges and universities have to promote diversity and ensure that those who are otherwise shut out of the American postsecondary system have a chance to earn a quality degree.

Oral history interview with Russell Seibert conducted by Alan Brown on December 6, 1998. Continuing from the November 23rd interview, Seibert discusses his career at WMU as Vice President of Academic Affairs. He recalls board members, campus renovations, building the Honors College curriculum, relations with the state representatives, student unrest in the 70s including the bombing of the ROTC building by student radicals and the black action group’s take over of the student union building, difficulties launching the Martin Luther King Program, the transition of WMU’s status as a teachers college to that of a university in 1957, and the launching of several programs including medieval studies and the business college and the college of fine arts., No audio available.

For much of American history, elite colleges and universities were largely reserved for wealthy, predominantly white Americans. Only in the 20th century did these institutions begin to actively prioritize diversity and expand access by adopting tools such as affirmative action—the narrowly tailored practice of considering race and ethnicity as part of a holistic evaluation of a student’s application. This report suggests that affirmative action is one of the best tools colleges and universities have to promote diversity and ensure that those who are otherwise shut out of the American postsecondary system have a chance to earn a quality degree.

Oral history interview with Chauncey Brinn, alumnus and former administrator, conducted by Lew Carlson on July 23, 1989 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. He discusses his experience working with student financial aid, minority student services units, the MLK Academy, as secretary for the Board of Trustees, and short terms as athletic director. Brinn retired in 1994 from Western Michigan University as vice president emeritus for administrative affairs., No transcript available.

Issue of the University of Scranton student newspaper, The Aquinas.

Issue of the University of Scranton student newspaper, The Aquinas.

Issue of the University of Scranton student newspaper, The Aquinas.

Issue of the University of Scranton student newspaper, The Aquinas.

Fact sheet for the University of Scranton's Office of Equity and Diversity for the 2007-2008 academic year. 1 page, 2 sided.

Issue of the University of Scranton student newspaper, The Aquinas.

University of Scranton 2004-2005 Affirmative Action Plan for Minorities and Women

The University of Scranton's Affirmative Action Plans for September 30, 2004 - September 29, 2005

University of Scranton 2002-2004 Affirmative Action Plan

This study analyzed the variations of policies and practices of university personnel in their use of affirmative action programs for African American students. In this study, the policy topic is affirmative action and the practices used in admissions, financial aid, and special support services for African-American students. Surveys were mailed to 231 subjects representing thirty-two Missouri colleges and universities. Most of the survey respondents were male, white, and nearly two-thirds were above the age of forty. Ethnic minorities were underrepresented among the professionals. Seventy-two percent of respondents were white, 23% were African American, and 5% were Hispanic. The results of this study suggest a positive picture of student affirmative action practices and policies used by Missouri personnel. Differences among professionals were at a minimum. The overall mean score for support in diversifying Missouri institutions was fairly high, and this may reflect diversity initiatives taken by the Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education in the late 1980s, and early 1990s. Data suggested that Missouri personnel are aware of the judicial scrutiny by the courts in administering student affirmative action. Most Missouri institutions use a single process for assessing all applicants for admission, without reliance on a quota system. The recent Hopwood decision showed little impact on the decisions regarding professionals' use of student affirmative action at Missouri institutions. Although public attitudes toward student affirmative action may play a role in establishing policies and practices, Missouri personnel are very similar in their perceptions regardless of race/ethnicity, gender, and institutional office or position.

This study analyzed the variations of policies and practices of university personnel in their use of affirmative action programs for African American students. In this study, the policy topic is affirmative action and the practices used in admissions, financial aid, and special support services for African-American students. Surveys were mailed to 231 subjects representing thirty-two Missouri colleges and universities. Most of the survey respondents were male, white, and nearly two-thirds were above the age of forty. Ethnic minorities were underrepresented among the professionals. Seventy-two percent of respondents were white, 23% were African American, and 5% were Hispanic. The results of this study suggest a positive picture of student affirmative action practices and policies used by Missouri personnel. Differences among professionals were at a minimum. The overall mean score for support in diversifying Missouri institutions was fairly high, and this may reflect diversity initiatives taken by the Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education in the late 1980s, and early 1990s. Data suggested that Missouri personnel are aware of the judicial scrutiny by the courts in administering student affirmative action. Most Missouri institutions use a single process for assessing all applicants for admission, without reliance on a quota system. The recent Hopwood decision showed little impact on the decisions regarding professionals' use of student affirmative action at Missouri institutions. Although public attitudes toward student affirmative action may play a role in establishing policies and practices, Missouri personnel are very similar in their perceptions regardless of race/ethnicity, gender, and institutional office or position.

Executive Summary draft of the University of Scranton's 2000 Affirmative Action Plan

Year End Report 1997-1998 and Planning Goals 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 for the University of Scranton's Affirmative Action Office.

Interoffice memorandum from Dr. Shirley Adams, Chair of the University of Scranton's President's Taskforce to Review Sex Offense and URB Policies, regarding initial and continuing meetings.

The University of Scranton's Cultural Diversity Committee Revised Departmental Plans for 1998-1999.

The Campus Diversity Survey sponsored by The Regional Consortium for Multicultural Education

The University of Scranton's Affirmative Action Office Revised Departmental Plans for 1998-1999.

For more than 20 years, the issue of affirmative action has spawned major legal and political battles. On October 14, 1997, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor found itself on the front lines of those battles when the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) filed suit in federal court on behalf of several White students who failed to get into the undergraduate college.' In their complaint, the plaintiffs charge the University with unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of race, claiming that they were not admitted as result of the race-conscious admissions policy maintained by the school.' On December 3, 1997 CIR filed another action against the University of Michigan Law School on behalf of a White woman who had similarly not been admitted to the Law School.3 The advent of these lawsuits sparked a range of responses among members of the University of Michigan community. Law students debated the issue, developed statements, and held press conferences. Additionally, students brought in speakers and panels to discuss, debate and explore affirmative action and related issues. This report compiles the statements on affirmative action followed by the Asian Pacific American Law Students Association Symposium.

For more than 20 years, the issue of affirmative action has spawned major legal and political battles. On October 14, 1997, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor found itself on the front lines of those battles when the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) filed suit in federal court on behalf of several White students who failed to get into the undergraduate college.' In their complaint, the plaintiffs charge the University with unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of race, claiming that they were not admitted as result of the race-conscious admissions policy maintained by the school.' On December 3, 1997 CIR filed another action against the University of Michigan Law School on behalf of a White woman who had similarly not been admitted to the Law School.3 The advent of these lawsuits sparked a range of responses among members of the University of Michigan community. Law students debated the issue, developed statements, and held press conferences. Additionally, students brought in speakers and panels to discuss, debate and explore affirmative action and related issues. This report compiles the statements on affirmative action followed by the Asian Pacific American Law Students Association Symposium.

University of Scranton 1997 Affirmative Action Plan

University of Scranton 1996 Affirmative Action Plan

University of Scranton 1995 Affirmative Action Plan

Memorandum from Shirley M. Adams, Dean of the University of Scranton's Dexter Hanley College, regarding students with learning and/or physical disabilities. Attached is a pamphlet on Section 504 from the American Council on Education.

Letter and accompanying list from Joseph A. Panuska, S.J., University of Scranton President, regarding 12 major planning issues.

Memorandum from Dr. Shirley Adams to Diana Trygar, James Devers, and Mark Murphy with a synopsis of a meeting discussing the University of Scranton's Emergency Evacuation Plan.

A University of Scranton Campus Diversity Questionnaire with accompanying handwritten notes between Dr. Shirley Adams and Dr. Jim Bryan.

A two-page pamphlet put out by the Northeast Pennsylvania A.D.A. Coalition explaining the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Memorandum from Dr. Shirley Adams to 'Distribution List' regarding the University of Scranton's Evacuation Plan for People Needing Assistance.

Memorandum from Dr. Richard Passon to Dr. Shirley Adams with recommendations regarding Affirmative Action and Cultural Diversity at the University of Scranton.

Memorandum from Mary Anne Foley, C.N.D. of the University of Scranton Committee on the Status of Women to Dr. Richard Passon concerning the creation of an Affirmative Action Officer position.

University of Scranton 1994 Affirmative Action Plan

Memorandum from Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. to 'Dick' regarding a Affirmative Action Officer memo from Shirley Adams.

Newspaper article from the Times Leader regarding the Northeastern Pennsylvania African Society's goals to fight African stereotypes. One member mentioned is University of Scranton student Arthur Mutaremwa.

Letter from University of Scranton President Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. to campus community members regarding the University's Affirmative Action Plan.

Memorandums from Dave Christiansen and Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. regarding an Affirmative Action-related meeting agenda.

Memorandum from John Beidler to Dr. Richard Passon and Dr. Shirley Adams regarding the University of Scranton providing access to controversial Internet News Groups.

A fax message lead sheet from University of Scranton President Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. to William Byron, S.J. at Georgetown University attaching Scranton's 1994 Affirmative Action Plan.

Correspondence from Daniel A. Degnan, S.J., St. Peter's College President regarding policies on Race, Ethnicity and Gender. Included are a University of Scranton President's Office Action Slip.

Two versions of a letter from Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. addressing the University of Scranton's Affirmative Action policy. Attached is a note from Mary Anne Foley requesting the change.

Memorandum from Shirley M. Adams, Dean of the University of Scranton's Dexter Hanley College, and Joseph A. Panuska, S.J., President, regarding Affirmative Action-related pages in an issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Notes addressed to Dan Lanken of the University of Scranton newspaper, The Aquinas, addressing issues of diversity.

List of the International Students attending the University of Scranton in Fall 1993.

Newspaper article from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette about Jim Post, a disabled post-graduate student at the University of Scranton.

Letter from Velma Cotton, University of Scranton Admissions Counselor/Multicultural Recruitment Officer to Joseph A. Panuska, S.J., President, inviting him to attend a Multicultural Student Welcome Celebration.

Letter from University of Scranton President Joseph A. Panuska, S.J. to Dr. James Bryan, Dr. Richard Passon, and Mr. Robert Sylvester regarding minority involvement in University activities.

Memorandum from Dr. Shirley Adams to all University of Scranton faculty regarding a brochure from the American Council on Education on meeting the academic needs of students with learning and/or physical disabilities.