1. The impact of patient-reported frailty on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients after non-ST-acute coronary syndrome
- Author
-
van den Broek, W. W.A., Gimbel, M. E., Hermanides, R. S., Runnett, C., Storey, R. F., Knaapen, P., Emans, M. E., Oemrawsingh, R. M., Cooke, J., Galasko, G., Walhout, R., Stoel, M. G., von Birgelen, C., van Bergen, Paul F.M.M., Brinckman, S. L., Aksoy, I., Liem, A., van't Hof, A. W.J., Jukema, J. W., Heestermans, A. A.C.M., Nicastia, D., Alber, H., Austin, D., Nasser, A., Deneer, V., ten Berg, J. M., van den Broek, W. W.A., Gimbel, M. E., Hermanides, R. S., Runnett, C., Storey, R. F., Knaapen, P., Emans, M. E., Oemrawsingh, R. M., Cooke, J., Galasko, G., Walhout, R., Stoel, M. G., von Birgelen, C., van Bergen, Paul F.M.M., Brinckman, S. L., Aksoy, I., Liem, A., van't Hof, A. W.J., Jukema, J. W., Heestermans, A. A.C.M., Nicastia, D., Alber, H., Austin, D., Nasser, A., Deneer, V., and ten Berg, J. M.
- Abstract
Background: As life expectancy increases, the population of older individuals with coronary artery disease and frailty is growing. We aimed to assess the impact of patient-reported frailty on the treatment and prognosis of elderly early survivors of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods: Frailty data were obtained from two prospective trials, POPular Age and the POPular Age Registry, which both assessed elderly NSTE-ACS patients. Frailty was assessed one month after admission with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and was defined as a GFI-score of 4 or higher. In these early survivors of NSTE-ACS, we assessed differences in treatment and 1-year outcomes between frail and non-frail patients, considering major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and major bleeding. Results: The total study population consisted of 2192 NSTE-ACS patients, aged ≥70 years. The GFI-score was available in 1320 patients (79 ± 5 years, 37% women), of whom 712 (54%) were considered frail. Frail patients were at higher risk for MACE than non-frail patients (9.7% vs. 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–2.43, p = 0.04), but not for major bleeding (3.7% vs. 2.8%, adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65–2.32, p = 0.53). Cubic spline analysis showed a gradual increase of the risk for clinical outcomes with higher GFI-scores. Conclusions: In elderly NSTE-ACS patients who survived 1-month follow-up, patient-reported frailty was independently associated with a higher risk for 1-year MACE, but not with major bleeding. These findings emphasize the importance of frailty screening for risk stratification in elderly NSTE-ACS patients.
- Published
- 2024