Search

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Drought is an abstract and complex phenomenon that can be difficult for many people to comprehend. Proactive planning to improve response during drought events is necessary but complicated because it involves stakeholders and decision-makers with competing interests. A category of games, called serious games, have proven to be helpful when learning about abstract concepts, and for improving communication and conflict resolution with respect to water-related issues. In this study, we present a new in-person role-playing game that serves as a drought educational tool in both classroom and professional settings. The message of the game emphasizes the importance of communication and cooperation between various communities and sectors that can be affected by drought. Furthermore, it also encourages discussions and collaborations between stakeholders involved in drought planning and can serve as an icebreaker activity. The game has been played in a variety of settings including university classes, university extension workshops, and drought workshops. This study describes the game itself, its development, and the results of surveys from game participants that were used to evaluate the usability of the game as an educational and icebreaker activity.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Map showing Utah drought conditions. The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale conditions.

Water laws and drought plans are used to prioritize and allocate scarce water resources. Both have historically been human-centric, failing to account for non-human water needs. In this paper, we examine the development of instream flow legislation and the evolution of drought planning to highlight the growing concern for the non-human impacts of water scarcity. Utilizing a new framework for ecological drought, we analyzed five watershed-scale drought plans in southwestern Montana, USA to understand if, and how, the ecological impacts of drought are currently being assessed. We found that while these plans do account for some ecological impacts, it is primarily through the narrow lens of impacts to fish as measured by water temperature and streamflow. The latter is typically based on the same ecological principles used to determine instream flow requirements. We also found that other resource plans in the same watersheds (e.g., Watershed Restoration Plans, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Watershed Assessments or United States Forest Service (USFS) Forest Plans) identify a broader range of ecological drought risks. Given limited resources and the potential for mutual benefits and synergies, we suggest greater integration between various planning processes could result in a more holistic consideration of water needs and uses across the landscape.

THE RISING RISK OF DROUGHT. Droughts of the twenty-first century are characterized by hotter temperatures, longer duration, and greater spatial extent, and are increasingly exacerbated by human demands for water. This situation increases the vulnerability of ecosystems to drought, including a rise in drought-driven tree mortality globally (Allen et al. 2015) and anticipated ecosystem transformations from one state to another—for example, forest to a shrubland (Jiang et al. 2013). When a drought drives changes within ecosystems, there can be a ripple effect through human communities that depend on those ecosystems for critical goods and services (Millar and Stephenson 2015). For example, the “Millennium Drought” (2002–10) in Australia caused unanticipated losses to key services provided by hydrological ecosystems in the Murray–Darling basin—including air quality regulation, waste treatment, erosion prevention, and recreation. The costs of these losses exceeded AUD $800 million, as resources were spent to replace these services and adapt to new drought-impacted ecosystems (Banerjee et al. 2013). Despite the high costs to both nature and people, current drought research, management, and policy perspectives often fail to evaluate how drought affects ecosystems and the “natural capital” they provide to human communities. Integrating these human and natural dimensions of drought is an essential step toward addressing the rising risk of drought in the twenty-first century.

Data from 34 Greenland firn cores, extending from 1982 to 1996, are used to identify spatial accumulation variability patterns and their associated atmospheric circulation and cyclone frequencies. The first principal component, representing west-central Greenland accumulation, is correlated to NAO variability, having increased southwesterly (northeasterly) flow over that area during high (low) accumulation winters. The flow is linked to a relative increase in cyclone activity on the west central region of the ice sheet during high accumulation periods. The second principal component represents accumulation over southeastern Greenland where strong westerly flow leads to high accumulation and an increase in lee cyclones on the east and southeast coast. The study provides evidence that increased cyclone activity occurs over, or immediately adjacent to, areas experiencing anomalously high accumulation and it is important to distinguish lee cyclones from ‘‘Icelandic’’ cyclones, as they produce opposite precipitation effects over the ice sheet.