Search

BackgroundPerineal hernias can be secondarily acquired following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. While transabdominal minimally invasive techniques have traditionally used laparoscopy, there are few studies published on the robotic platform, which has been gaining popularity for other types of hernia repairs. We review the existing literature, share a video vignette, and provide practical tips for surgeons interested in adopting this approach.MethodsA literature search in Pubmed was performed to include all articles in English describing robotic repair of perineal hernias with identification of variables of interest related to repair. A case presentation with an accompanying video vignette and lessons learned from the experience are provided.ResultsSeven case reports (four containing video) published between 2019 and 2022 were included. Most articles (n = 5) utilized the Da Vinci Si or Xi, and most patients (n = 5) had undergone abdominoperineal resection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat rectal cancer. Patients were positioned in Trendelenburg with rightward tilt (n = 2), modified lithotomy (n = 1), or a combination of the two (n = 1). All articles (n = 7) reported closing the defect and using mesh. Three articles describe placing five ports (one camera, three robotic, one assistant). There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications reported, and no recurrence noted at 3-27 months follow-up. Based on our experience, as shown in the video vignette, we recommend lithotomy positioning, using porous polypropylene mesh anchored to the periosteum of the sacrum and peritoneum overlying the bladder and side wall, and placing a drain above the mesh.ConclusionsA robotic transabdominal approach to perineal hernia repair is a viable alternate to laparoscopy based on low complication rates and lack of recurrence. Prospective and longer duration data are needed to compare the techniques.

Im Gespräch mit dem Digital Manager, Stefan Lienhard, spricht Alfred Angerer über die neuen Technologien. Von AI bis Robotik – das Angebot ist riesig. Die Kunst liegt darin, die richtige Wahl zu treffen. Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Mitarbeitende eines Spitals sollen einen nachhaltigen Mehrwert spüren. Wie man die richtige Wahl trifft und der Thematik am besten begegnet, hören Sie in dieser Episode.

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables., La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras va

Im Gespräch mit dem Digital Manager, Stefan Lienhard, spricht Alfred Angerer über die neuen Technologien. Von AI bis Robotik – das Angebot ist riesig. Die Kunst liegt darin, die richtige Wahl zu treffen. Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Mitarbeitende eines Spitals sollen einen nachhaltigen Mehrwert spüren. Wie man die richtige Wahl trifft und der Thematik am besten begegnet, hören Sie in dieser Episode.

In this paper, we study who first used the Latin anatomical term “cerebellum” for the posterior part of the brain. The suggestion that this term was introduced by Leonardo da Vinci is unlikely. Just before the start of the da Vinci era in the fifteenth century, several authors referred to the cerebellum as “cerebri posteriorus.” Instead, in his translation of Galen’s anatomical text De utilitare particularum of 1307, Nicolo da Reggio used the Latinized Greek word “parencephalon.” More peculiar was the Latin nautical term “puppi,” referring to the stern of a ship, that was applied to the cerebellum by Constantine the African in his translation of the Arabic Liber regius in the eleventh century. The first to use the term “cerebellum” appears to be Magnus Hundt in his Anthropologia from 1501. Like many of the anatomists of this period, he was a humanist with an interest in classical literature. They may have encountered the term “cerebellum” in the writings by classical authors such as Celsus, where it was used as the diminutive of “cerebrum” for the small brains of small animals, and, subsequently, applied the term to the posterior part of the brain. In the subsequent decades of the sixteenth century, an increasing number of pre-Vesalian authors of anatomical texts started to use the name “cerebellum,” initially often combined with one or more of the earlier terms, but eventually more frequently in isolation. We found that a woodcut in Dryander’s Anatomia capitis humani of 1536 is the first realistic picture of the cerebellum.

Tato diplomová práce pojednává o hře Fate/Grand Order, která se stala globálně rozšířeným fenoménem v rámci japonské populární kultury. Cílem práce bude porovnat, s jakým záměrem byly postavy vizuálně ztvárněny (a proč jim byly dány schopnosti a vlastnosti, jakými ve hře disponují) a jak postavy vnímají samotní hráči (jaké hodnoty si s postavami spojují a jak je interpretují a chápou). Rozhovory s autory hry mi nahradí Knihy materiálů, které obsahují všechny informace o postavách včetně komentářů ilustrátorů., This diploma thesis deals with the game Fate/Grand Order, which has become a globally widespread phenomenon within Japanese popular culture. The aim of the thesis will be to compare with what purpose the characters were visually portrayed (and why they were given the abilities and qualities they possess in the game) and how players perceive the characters (what values they associate with the characters and how they interpret and understand them). Interviews with the authors of the game will be replaced by the Books of Materials, which contain all the information about the characters, including the comments of the illustrators., Fakulta filozofická, Student představil téma své diplomové práce. Vymezil základní cíle, metody a výsledky svého výzkumu. Student reagovala na doplňující dotazy členů komise., Dokončená práce s úspěšnou obhajobou

Objectives/hypothesisTo objectively assess the initial and long-term retention of robotic surgical skills of otolaryngology residents.Study designThis study was performed in an academic otolaryngology residency training program. Between October 2015 and November 2016, residents were invited to complete a prospective, multiphase robotic surgical skills training course: 1) online da Vinci Surgical System Assessment and didactic, 2) faculty-supervised robotic simulator training, 3) robotic docking and draping training, 4) robotic dry-lab exercises. To optimize surgical skill retention, the training laboratory was repeated 2 weeks after the initial training session.MethodsTwenty otolaryngology residents were included. Primary outcome was measured as robotic skill assessment scores on three tasks: camera targeting, peg board, and needle targeting. Skill assessments were completed prior to training, between the two training sessions, and at 1 month and 6 months after training. Residents were also asked to complete a self-assessment questionnaire.ResultsCamera targeting scores were improved at midtraining (P < .001) and 1-month posttraining (P = .010). Peg board scores were improved at 1 month training (P = .043). Needle targeting scores were improved at midtraining (P = .002), 1 month (P = .002), and 6 months posttraining (P < .001). Resident self-assessment scores demonstrating comfort with using the robotic console (P < .01) and docking/draping (P < .01) improved significantly following the training.ConclusionsFollowing a multiphase robotic training program, otolaryngology residents demonstrated significant, objective skill acquisition and retention at 1 month and 6 months follow-up. Although the proposed training strategy may be considered an important step in otolaryngology residency training, additional innovations are being designed toward a formal robotic training curriculum.Level of evidenceNA Laryngoscope, 129:1380-1385, 2019.

Objectives/hypothesisTo objectively assess the initial and long-term retention of robotic surgical skills of otolaryngology residents.Study designThis study was performed in an academic otolaryngology residency training program. Between October 2015 and November 2016, residents were invited to complete a prospective, multiphase robotic surgical skills training course: 1) online da Vinci Surgical System Assessment and didactic, 2) faculty-supervised robotic simulator training, 3) robotic docking and draping training, 4) robotic dry-lab exercises. To optimize surgical skill retention, the training laboratory was repeated 2 weeks after the initial training session.MethodsTwenty otolaryngology residents were included. Primary outcome was measured as robotic skill assessment scores on three tasks: camera targeting, peg board, and needle targeting. Skill assessments were completed prior to training, between the two training sessions, and at 1 month and 6 months after training. Residents were also asked to complete a self-assessment questionnaire.ResultsCamera targeting scores were improved at midtraining (P < .001) and 1-month posttraining (P = .010). Peg board scores were improved at 1 month training (P = .043). Needle targeting scores were improved at midtraining (P = .002), 1 month (P = .002), and 6 months posttraining (P < .001). Resident self-assessment scores demonstrating comfort with using the robotic console (P < .01) and docking/draping (P < .01) improved significantly following the training.ConclusionsFollowing a multiphase robotic training program, otolaryngology residents demonstrated significant, objective skill acquisition and retention at 1 month and 6 months follow-up. Although the proposed training strategy may be considered an important step in otolaryngology residency training, additional innovations are being designed toward a formal robotic training curriculum.Level of evidenceNA Laryngoscope, 129:1380-1385, 2019.

The number of procedures performed with robotic surgery may exceed one million globally in 2018. The continual lack of haptic feedback, however, forces surgeons to rely on visual cues in order to avoid breaking sutures due to excessive applied force. To mitigate this problem, the authors developed and validated a novel grasper-integrated system with biaxial shear sensing and haptic feedback to warn the operator prior to anticipated suture breakage. Furthermore, the design enables facile suture manipulation without a degradation in efficacy, as determined via measured tightness of resulting suture knots. Biaxial shear sensors were integrated with a da Vinci robotic surgical system. Novice subjects (n = 17) were instructed to tighten 10 knots, five times with the Haptic Feedback System (HFS) enabled, five times with the system disabled. Seven suture failures occurred in trials with HFS enabled while seventeen occurred in trials without feedback. The biaxial shear sensing system reduced the incidence of suture failure by 59% (p = 0.0371). It also resulted in 25% lower average applied force in comparison to trials without feedback (p = 0.00034), which is relevant because average force was observed to play a role in suture breakage (p = 0.03925). An observed 55% decrease in standard deviation of knot quality when using the HFS also indicates an improvement in consistency when using the feedback system. These results suggest this system may improve outcomes related to knot tying tasks in robotic surgery and reduce instances of suture failure while not degrading the quality of knots produced.

The present paper focuses on Marsilio Ficino and Leonardo da Vinci. Both authors describe the human production of artifacts as transformative principles that affect the world from both a technical and an aesthetic viewpoint. In this light, manus and risus become the strongholds of a typically Renaissance anthropology, according to which the homo faber rises to that godlike status which plays a major role in Nicholas of Cusa’s philosophy; while the human hand is the active transformative principle, the smile is the sign of an accomplished work. In sum, these two aspects unveil a process of spiritualization of reality, i.e., the perfect interpenetration of beauty with virtue and truth. This paper will explore the similarities between the two authors also with reference to Leonardo da Vinci’s portrait of Ginevra de’ Benci (1475-1478 ca.), a very special picture sermon, with the back of the table being a concise philosophical treaty that reads “virtutem forma decorat”, a formula which evokes Ficino’s Convivium., Il presente saggio si concentra su Marsilio Ficino e Leonardo da Vinci. Entrambi si riferiscono alla produzione umana di artefatti come a un principio di trasformazione che riguarda il mondo, sia da un punto di vista tecnico, sia da un punto di vista estetico. Secondo questa prospettiva, manus e visus diventano i cardini di una antropologia tipicamente rinascimentale, secondo cui l’homo faber ascende a quello statuto divino che riveste un ruolo preminente nel pensiero di Nicola Cusano. Mentre la mano è il principio attivo di trasformazione, il sorriso è il segno di un lavoro ben riuscito. In sintesi, questi due aspetti svelano una spiritualizzazione della realtà, ovvero la perfetta compenetrazione di bellezza e di virtù e verità. Il presente saggio analizza le similitudini tra i due autori, anche in riferimento al ritratto leonardiano di Ginevra de’ Benci (1475-1478 ca.); uno speciale “sermone dipinto”, con il retro del quadro che, alla stregua di un brevissimo trattato filosofico, recita “virtutem forma decorat”, una formula che evoca il Commento al Convito di Marsilio Ficino.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained popularity over traditional open surgery due to its advantages of decreased incision size and pain to the patient, lower risk of infection, and shorter recovery time. Recent developments in robotic surgical systems have shown promise to further advance MIS by offering the surgeons with increased manipulability and dexterity along with 3D vision. However, the lack of tactile feedback is the key feature that is needed for robotic surgery to reach its full potential. Recent research efforts have successfully integrated some degree of tactile feedback components onto surgical robotic instruments, and have shown significant improvement of the outcome of the surgical performance. The primary barrier to the adoption of tactile feedback in clinical use is the unavailability of suitable tri-axial force sensing technologies that can be integrated with the medical instruments. Besides well-understood normal force sensing, shear force sensing is also critical in clinical tasks, such as suturing, where shear sensing could prevent breakage of sutures due to excessive shear force. This paper describes the design, batch microfabrication, and characterization of a miniature force sensor for providing haptic feedback in robotic surgical systems. We demonstrate for the first time a microfabricated sensor that can provide triaxial sensing (normal, x-shear, y-shear) in a single sensor element that is integrated with commercial robotic surgical graspers. Features of this capacitive force sensor include differential sensing in the shear directions as well as a design where all electrical connections are on one side, leaving the backside pristine as the sensing face for surgical tasks. The sensor readout is performed by a custom-designed printed circuit board with 24-bit resolution. The integration of read-out circuits with the capacitive sensor is designed on two printed circuit boards that can be clipped together, providing the possibility for

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained popularity over traditional open surgery due to its advantages of decreased incision size and pain to the patient, lower risk of infection, and shorter recovery time. Recent developments in robotic surgical systems have shown promise to further advance MIS by offering the surgeons with increased manipulability and dexterity along with 3D vision. However, the lack of tactile feedback is the key feature that is needed for robotic surgery to reach its full potential. Recent research efforts have successfully integrated some degree of tactile feedback components onto surgical robotic instruments, and have shown significant improvement of the outcome of the surgical performance. The primary barrier to the adoption of tactile feedback in clinical use is the unavailability of suitable tri-axial force sensing technologies that can be integrated with the medical instruments. Besides well-understood normal force sensing, shear force sensing is also critical in clinical tasks, such as suturing, where shear sensing could prevent breakage of sutures due to excessive shear force. This paper describes the design, batch microfabrication, and characterization of a miniature force sensor for providing haptic feedback in robotic surgical systems. We demonstrate for the first time a microfabricated sensor that can provide triaxial sensing (normal, x-shear, y-shear) in a single sensor element that is integrated with commercial robotic surgical graspers. Features of this capacitive force sensor include differential sensing in the shear directions as well as a design where all electrical connections are on one side, leaving the backside pristine as the sensing face for surgical tasks. The sensor readout is performed by a custom-designed printed circuit board with 24-bit resolution. The integration of read-out circuits with the capacitive sensor is designed on two printed circuit boards that can be clipped together, providing the possibility for

BackgroundThe principal objective of the experiment was to analyze the effects of the clutch operation of robotic surgical systems on the performance of the operator. The relative coordinate system introduced by the clutch operation can introduce a visual-perceptual mismatch which can potentially have negative impact on a surgeon's performance. We also assess the impact of the introduction of additional tactile sensory information on reducing the impact of visual-perceptual mismatch on the performance of the operator.MethodsWe asked 45 novice subjects to complete peg transfers using the da Vinci IS 1200 system with grasper-mounted, normal force sensors. The task involves picking up a peg with one of the robotic arms, passing it to the other arm, and then placing it on the opposite side of the view. Subjects were divided into three groups: aligned group (no mismatch), the misaligned group (10 cm z axis mismatch), and the haptics-misaligned group (haptic feedback and z axis mismatch). Each subject performed the task five times, during which the grip force, time of completion, and number of faults were recorded.ResultsCompared to the subjects that performed the tasks using a properly aligned controller/arm configuration, subjects with a single-axis misalignment showed significantly more peg drops (p = 0.011) and longer time to completion (p < 0.001). Additionally, it was observed that addition of tactile feedback helps reduce the negative effects of visual-perceptual mismatch in some cases. Grip force data recorded from grasper-mounted sensors showed no difference between the different groups.ConclusionsThe visual-perceptual mismatch created by the misalignment of the robotic controls relative to the robotic arms has a negative impact on the operator of a robotic surgical system. Introduction of other sensory information and haptic feedback systems can help in potentially reducing this effect.

BackgroundPreliminary case series have reported clinical feasibility and safety of a transoral minimally invasive technique to approach parapharyngeal space masses. With the assistance of the surgical robotic system, tumors within the parapharyngeal space can now be excised safely without neck incisions. A detailed technical description is included.MethodsAfter developing compressive symptoms from a parapharyngeal space lipomatous tumor, the patient was referred by his primary otolaryngologist because of poor open surgical access to the nasopharyngeal component of the tumor.ResultsTransoral robotic assisted resection of a 54- × 46-mm parapharyngeal space mass was performed, utilizing 97 minutes of robotic surgical time. Pictorial demonstration of the robotic resection is provided.ConclusionParapharyngeal space tumors have traditionally been approached via transcervical skin incisions, typically including blunt dissection from tactile feedback. The transoral robotic approach offers magnified 3D visualization of the parapharyngeal space that allows for complete and safe resection.

BackgroundPreliminary case series have reported clinical feasibility and safety of a transoral minimally invasive technique to approach parapharyngeal space masses. With the assistance of the surgical robotic system, tumors within the parapharyngeal space can now be excised safely without neck incisions. A detailed technical description is included.MethodsAfter developing compressive symptoms from a parapharyngeal space lipomatous tumor, the patient was referred by his primary otolaryngologist because of poor open surgical access to the nasopharyngeal component of the tumor.ResultsTransoral robotic assisted resection of a 54- × 46-mm parapharyngeal space mass was performed, utilizing 97 minutes of robotic surgical time. Pictorial demonstration of the robotic resection is provided.ConclusionParapharyngeal space tumors have traditionally been approached via transcervical skin incisions, typically including blunt dissection from tactile feedback. The transoral robotic approach offers magnified 3D visualization of the parapharyngeal space that allows for complete and safe resection.

While adoption of da Vinci systems has been rapid worldwide, there exists a wide variance in surgical procedure performance impacting care quality, cost and patient safety negatively, due in part to inefficient training practices and limited mechanisms for objectively assessing surgical performance. To address the demand for improved training, Mimic Technologies has developed da Vinci simulators, the dV-Trainer and da Vinci Skills Simulator, in collaboration with Intuitive Surgical, which collect and analyze diverse performance data, and then recommend steps for addressing identified weaknesses. Conversely, Johns Hopkins University's Surgical Assistant Workstation collects and analyzes data from da Vinci during training and surgery. In this Phase I feasibility study, we developed a proof-of-concept working prototype framework capable of providing continuous surgical skills assessment and decision support throughout initial training and thereafter during surgery with the ultimate goal of accelerating a surgeon's acquisition of da Vinci surgical skills. Preliminary analysis of training tasks (anastomosis and peg transfer) across simulation and phantom training laboratories performed by the developed prototype framework highlights the promise of cross-platform data collection and performance measurement across training curriculum, and the opportunity for designing dynamic, customized curricula to a trainee's needs. Developed prototype framework is also a first effort towards cross-platform assessment of robotic surgical performance. This work explored several new concepts including a distributed system for decision support, the role played by instrument and hand pose in planning surgical tasks and metrics assessing this role, distinction of man-machine skills from surgical and task skills, and refinement of simulation training environments to match the corresponding real world training., The original document contains color images.

El presente artículo investiga una relación entre Foucault y Kafka señalando el tema autoral de la “renuncia de sí”, o de la “anulación de sí”. Tal desaparición se da de modo distinto de casos como las mascarillas de Fernando Pessoa o como la anulación del inventor en el ámbito del Renacimiento. Asimismo, Foucault se ríe como Mona Lisa, de Leonardo Da Vinci, imagen de Durval Albuquerque Júnior, y en esta risa de nosotros y de sí mismo, nos abre pistas para que podamos imaginarlo dentro de su obra. Una obra que involucra el problema de la autoría de tal modo que atingió el repaso del concepto helenístico del “cuidado de uno mismo”, en su última fase., This article investigates a relationship between Foucault and Kafka punctuating the authorial theme of the "selfdenial," or "self-effacement." This disappearance occurs differently from cases like the masks of Fernando Pessoa, or as the effacement of the inventor in the Renaissance. Even so, Foucault smiles like Mona Lisa, by Leonardo Da Vinci, image of Durval Albuquerque Júnior, and this laugh at us and at himself opens up clues to us so we can imagine him inside his work. A work that evolved the authorship issue in such a way that affected the Hellenistic concept’s review of the "self- care" in his last phase.KEYWORDS: Foucault; Kafka; person; Da Vinci, self-care., O presente artigo investiga uma relação entre Foucault e Kafka pontuando o tema autoral da “renúncia de si”, ou do “apagamento de si”. Tal desaparecimento se dá de modo distinto de casos como as máscaras de Fernando Pessoa ou como o apagamento do inventor no âmbito da Renascença. Mesmo assim, Foucault sorri como Mona Lisa, de Leonardo Da Vinci, imagem de Durval Albuquerque Júnior, e neste riso de nós e de si mesmo, abre-nos pistas para que possamos imaginá-lo dentro de sua obra. Uma obra que evolveu o problema da autoria de tal modo que atingiu a revisão do conceito helenístico do “cuidado de si”, em sua última fase.

El presente artículo investiga una relación entre Foucault y Kafka señalando el tema autoral de la “renuncia de sí”, o de la “anulación de sí”. Tal desaparición se da de modo distinto de casos como las mascarillas de Fernando Pessoa o como la anulación del inventor en el ámbito del Renacimiento. Asimismo, Foucault se ríe como Mona Lisa, de Leonardo Da Vinci, imagen de Durval Albuquerque Júnior, y en esta risa de nosotros y de sí mismo, nos abre pistas para que podamos imaginarlo dentro de su obra. Una obra que involucra el problema de la autoría de tal modo que atingió el repaso del concepto helenístico del “cuidado de uno mismo”, en su última fase., This article investigates a relationship between Foucault and Kafka punctuating the authorial theme of the "selfdenial," or "self-effacement." This disappearance occurs differently from cases like the masks of Fernando Pessoa, or as the effacement of the inventor in the Renaissance. Even so, Foucault smiles like Mona Lisa, by Leonardo Da Vinci, image of Durval Albuquerque Júnior, and this laugh at us and at himself opens up clues to us so we can imagine him inside his work. A work that evolved the authorship issue in such a way that affected the Hellenistic concept’s review of the "self- care" in his last phase.KEYWORDS: Foucault; Kafka; person; Da Vinci, self-care., O presente artigo investiga uma relação entre Foucault e Kafka pontuando o tema autoral da “renúncia de si”, ou do “apagamento de si”. Tal desaparecimento se dá de modo distinto de casos como as máscaras de Fernando Pessoa ou como o apagamento do inventor no âmbito da Renascença. Mesmo assim, Foucault sorri como Mona Lisa, de Leonardo Da Vinci, imagem de Durval Albuquerque Júnior, e neste riso de nós e de si mesmo, abre-nos pistas para que possamos imaginá-lo dentro de sua obra. Uma obra que evolveu o problema da autoria de tal modo que atingiu a revisão do conceito helenístico do “cuidado de si”, em sua última fase.

The inspiration for the development of this project - The Museum for the Human Body in Georgetown, Washington D.C. - was based on a study of the anatomy of movement and its Relationship to space. 'A Journey from the mind to the soul’ is the connective experience linking the spaces of the project (body, mind and soul). This study is inspired by ideas from the early Chinese, Egyptian and Aristotelian philosophies as well as the drawings of Leonardo da Vinci in searching for the 'sensus communis' as the location of the soul within the body.

A comparative analysis is developed here between the original cryptograms and poems found in Dan Brown's novel, The Da Vinci Code, and its Spanish counterpart translated by Juanjo Estrella. This analysis focuses on the translation of each of the cases and the work done by the translator, thus encouraging readers to become more critical in their readings., Se desarrolla un análisis comparativo entre los criptogramas y poemas originales de la novela de Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, y su correspondiente traducción al español, realizada por Juanjo Estrella. El trabajo de contraste analiza la traducción de cada uno de los casos y evalúa la labor del traductor, motivando a la vez a que los lectores sean más críticos en su práctica literaria.

A comparative analysis is developed here between the original cryptograms and poems found in Dan Brown's novel, The Da Vinci Code, and its Spanish counterpart translated by Juanjo Estrella. This analysis focuses on the translation of each of the cases and the work done by the translator, thus encouraging readers to become more critical in their readings., Se desarrolla un análisis comparativo entre los criptogramas y poemas originales de la novela de Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, y su correspondiente traducción al español, realizada por Juanjo Estrella. El trabajo de contraste analiza la traducción de cada uno de los casos y evalúa la labor del traductor, motivando a la vez a que los lectores sean más críticos en su práctica literaria.

Lékařská robotika je oblast robotů používaných v medicíně a jejím hlavním účelem je poskytovat pomoc a rozšiřovat možnosti zdravotnického personálu. Dále se používá pro pomoc a asistenci pacientům a starším osobám, kteří jsou závislí na pomoci druhých. I když je to stále velmi mladý obor, lékařská robotika změnila způsob, jakým je medicína vnímána v posledních několika desetiletích. Díky jeho vysoké přesnosti a schopnosti pomáhat lidem je jeho potenciál obrovský. Specialisté a vývojáři se proto snaží tuto oblast dále rozšiřovat a zlepšovat. Cílem této práce je poskytnout komplexní přehled vývoje robotů používaných v medicíně, uvést konkrétní příklady robotů, které se v této oblasti používají, a vysvětlit, jak jednotliví roboti fungují a jak jsou někteří z nich naprogramováni., Medical robotics is an area of robots used in medicine and its main purpose is to provide assistance and expand the capabilities of medical personnel. It is also used to help and assist patients and the elderly who are dependent on the help of others. Although it is still a very young field, medical robotics has changed the way in which medicine has been perceived in the last few decades. Due to its high accuracy and ability to help people, its potential is enormous. Specialists and developers are therefore trying to further expand and improve this area. The aim of this work is to provide a comprehensive survey of medical robots’ evolution including concrete examples of robots that are used in this area and to explain how individual robots work and how some of them are programmed.

Lékařská robotika je oblast robotů používaných v medicíně a jejím hlavním účelem je poskytovat pomoc a rozšiřovat možnosti zdravotnického personálu. Dále se používá pro pomoc a asistenci pacientům a starším osobám, kteří jsou závislí na pomoci druhých. I když je to stále velmi mladý obor, lékařská robotika změnila způsob, jakým je medicína vnímána v posledních několika desetiletích. Díky jeho vysoké přesnosti a schopnosti pomáhat lidem je jeho potenciál obrovský. Specialisté a vývojáři se proto snaží tuto oblast dále rozšiřovat a zlepšovat. Cílem této práce je poskytnout komplexní přehled vývoje robotů používaných v medicíně, uvést konkrétní příklady robotů, které se v této oblasti používají, a vysvětlit, jak jednotliví roboti fungují a jak jsou někteří z nich naprogramováni., Medical robotics is an area of robots used in medicine and its main purpose is to provide assistance and expand the capabilities of medical personnel. It is also used to help and assist patients and the elderly who are dependent on the help of others. Although it is still a very young field, medical robotics has changed the way in which medicine has been perceived in the last few decades. Due to its high accuracy and ability to help people, its potential is enormous. Specialists and developers are therefore trying to further expand and improve this area. The aim of this work is to provide a comprehensive survey of medical robots’ evolution including concrete examples of robots that are used in this area and to explain how individual robots work and how some of them are programmed.

Práca popisuje návrh systému riadenia nástroja ruky operačného robota Da Vinci amerického výrobcu Intuitive Surgical. Prvotný návrh spočíva v nadviazaní na program pre generovanie riadiaceho bitového slova v prostredí LabVIEW a následnom vykonaní pohybu nástroja pomocou krokových motorov prostredníctvom mikrokontroléra Arduino. Výsledne implementovaný riadiaci systém využíva servomotory ovládané analógovými manipulátormi pripojenými priamo na mikrokontrolér. Práca uvažuje ošetrenie kontroly a preklzu hraničných polôh u oboch riadiacich systémov., This bachelor thesis deals with the design of the control system of the Da Vinci robotic hand made by american company Intuitive Surgical. The initial draft consists of linking with the program for control bitword generation in the LabVIEW environment and subsequent execution of movement using stepper motors with the Arduino microcontroller. The resulting design is using servos controlled by analog manipulators connected directly to the microcontroller. Treatment of border position control and slip is considered within both control systems.

Práce popisuje tvorbu ovládacího rozhraní pro nástroj ruky operačního robota Da Vinci firmy Intuitive Surgical. Prvotním cílem je základní seznámení s funkcemi operačního robota, kterým je věnována první část. V dalších částech následuje návrh komunikace, jejímž základem je ergonomické ovládací zařízení - gamepad, které pomocí páček umožňuje kontrolu nad dvěma nezávislými čepelemi na operačním nástroji. Přenos pohybu hlavy nástroje ruky zajišťuje program sestavený v LabVIEW. Vyhodnocuje vstupní data z ovladače a na základě předem definovaných mezí odesílá bitové instrukce. Komunikace je sestavena v závěrečné části programu v LabVIEW a data jsou prostřednictvím sériového protokolu odeslána na cílové zařízení. Program poskytuje také omezené možnosti nastavení pro snadnou přenositelnost na jiné PC a modulovatelnost. Díky uživatelskému prostředí má uživatel plnou vizuální kontrolu nad vstupními hodnotami. V návrhu rozhraní je počítáno s reálnými možnostmi ovládání a mechanického návrhu supportu za pomocí krokových motorků., Bachelor work describes creation of interface for surgical robotic hand Da Vinci made by Intuitive Surgical. First goal was to get familiarized with its functions. This is the contents of the first few chapters. The rest of the work focuses on communication design between computer and Da Vinci arm instrument. On the user side, there is a controlling device connected, a gamepad with levers, which allows user to move two independent blades on the instrument. Transmission of this movement to the robotic arm instrument is task of a software programmed in LabVIEW. It evaluates entry data from the gamepad and after comparing them to predefined bounds, it sends bit instructions to Da Vinci. The communication is opened in the last part of the sofware solution and the data (2 bytes) are sent through serial protocol to target device. Program provides also a limited options, which can be set by the user. These settings are primarily used for easy portability between computers. Via graphical interface has user complete visual control over input values. The whole design is based on the real possibilities of arm instrument manoeuvreability and mechanical support design using stepping motors.

Práca popisuje návrh systému riadenia nástroja ruky operačného robota Da Vinci amerického výrobcu Intuitive Surgical. Prvotný návrh spočíva v nadviazaní na program pre generovanie riadiaceho bitového slova v prostredí LabVIEW a následnom vykonaní pohybu nástroja pomocou krokových motorov prostredníctvom mikrokontroléra Arduino. Výsledne implementovaný riadiaci systém využíva servomotory ovládané analógovými manipulátormi pripojenými priamo na mikrokontrolér. Práca uvažuje ošetrenie kontroly a preklzu hraničných polôh u oboch riadiacich systémov., This bachelor thesis deals with the design of the control system of the Da Vinci robotic hand made by american company Intuitive Surgical. The initial draft consists of linking with the program for control bitword generation in the LabVIEW environment and subsequent execution of movement using stepper motors with the Arduino microcontroller. The resulting design is using servos controlled by analog manipulators connected directly to the microcontroller. Treatment of border position control and slip is considered within both control systems.

Práca popisuje návrh systému riadenia nástroja ruky operačného robota Da Vinci amerického výrobcu Intuitive Surgical. Prvotný návrh spočíva v nadviazaní na program pre generovanie riadiaceho bitového slova v prostredí LabVIEW a následnom vykonaní pohybu nástroja pomocou krokových motorov prostredníctvom mikrokontroléra Arduino. Výsledne implementovaný riadiaci systém využíva servomotory ovládané analógovými manipulátormi pripojenými priamo na mikrokontrolér. Práca uvažuje ošetrenie kontroly a preklzu hraničných polôh u oboch riadiacich systémov., This bachelor thesis deals with the design of the control system of the Da Vinci robotic hand made by american company Intuitive Surgical. The initial draft consists of linking with the program for control bitword generation in the LabVIEW environment and subsequent execution of movement using stepper motors with the Arduino microcontroller. The resulting design is using servos controlled by analog manipulators connected directly to the microcontroller. Treatment of border position control and slip is considered within both control systems.

Práce popisuje tvorbu ovládacího rozhraní pro nástroj ruky operačního robota Da Vinci firmy Intuitive Surgical. Prvotním cílem je základní seznámení s funkcemi operačního robota, kterým je věnována první část. V dalších částech následuje návrh komunikace, jejímž základem je ergonomické ovládací zařízení - gamepad, které pomocí páček umožňuje kontrolu nad dvěma nezávislými čepelemi na operačním nástroji. Přenos pohybu hlavy nástroje ruky zajišťuje program sestavený v LabVIEW. Vyhodnocuje vstupní data z ovladače a na základě předem definovaných mezí odesílá bitové instrukce. Komunikace je sestavena v závěrečné části programu v LabVIEW a data jsou prostřednictvím sériového protokolu odeslána na cílové zařízení. Program poskytuje také omezené možnosti nastavení pro snadnou přenositelnost na jiné PC a modulovatelnost. Díky uživatelskému prostředí má uživatel plnou vizuální kontrolu nad vstupními hodnotami. V návrhu rozhraní je počítáno s reálnými možnostmi ovládání a mechanického návrhu supportu za pomocí krokových motorků., Bachelor work describes creation of interface for surgical robotic hand Da Vinci made by Intuitive Surgical. First goal was to get familiarized with its functions. This is the contents of the first few chapters. The rest of the work focuses on communication design between computer and Da Vinci arm instrument. On the user side, there is a controlling device connected, a gamepad with levers, which allows user to move two independent blades on the instrument. Transmission of this movement to the robotic arm instrument is task of a software programmed in LabVIEW. It evaluates entry data from the gamepad and after comparing them to predefined bounds, it sends bit instructions to Da Vinci. The communication is opened in the last part of the sofware solution and the data (2 bytes) are sent through serial protocol to target device. Program provides also a limited options, which can be set by the user. These settings are primarily used for easy portability between computers. Via graphical interface has user complete visual control over input values. The whole design is based on the real possibilities of arm instrument manoeuvreability and mechanical support design using stepping motors.

Práca popisuje návrh systému riadenia nástroja ruky operačného robota Da Vinci amerického výrobcu Intuitive Surgical. Prvotný návrh spočíva v nadviazaní na program pre generovanie riadiaceho bitového slova v prostredí LabVIEW a následnom vykonaní pohybu nástroja pomocou krokových motorov prostredníctvom mikrokontroléra Arduino. Výsledne implementovaný riadiaci systém využíva servomotory ovládané analógovými manipulátormi pripojenými priamo na mikrokontrolér. Práca uvažuje ošetrenie kontroly a preklzu hraničných polôh u oboch riadiacich systémov., This bachelor thesis deals with the design of the control system of the Da Vinci robotic hand made by american company Intuitive Surgical. The initial draft consists of linking with the program for control bitword generation in the LabVIEW environment and subsequent execution of movement using stepper motors with the Arduino microcontroller. The resulting design is using servos controlled by analog manipulators connected directly to the microcontroller. Treatment of border position control and slip is considered within both control systems.

Lékařská robotika je oblast robotů používaných v medicíně a jejím hlavním účelem je poskytovat pomoc a rozšiřovat možnosti zdravotnického personálu. Dále se používá pro pomoc a asistenci pacientům a starším osobám, kteří jsou závislí na pomoci druhých. I když je to stále velmi mladý obor, lékařská robotika změnila způsob, jakým je medicína vnímána v posledních několika desetiletích. Díky jeho vysoké přesnosti a schopnosti pomáhat lidem je jeho potenciál obrovský. Specialisté a vývojáři se proto snaží tuto oblast dále rozšiřovat a zlepšovat. Cílem této práce je poskytnout komplexní přehled vývoje robotů používaných v medicíně, uvést konkrétní příklady robotů, které se v této oblasti používají, a vysvětlit, jak jednotliví roboti fungují a jak jsou někteří z nich naprogramováni., Medical robotics is an area of robots used in medicine and its main purpose is to provide assistance and expand the capabilities of medical personnel. It is also used to help and assist patients and the elderly who are dependent on the help of others. Although it is still a very young field, medical robotics has changed the way in which medicine has been perceived in the last few decades. Due to its high accuracy and ability to help people, its potential is enormous. Specialists and developers are therefore trying to further expand and improve this area. The aim of this work is to provide a comprehensive survey of medical robots’ evolution including concrete examples of robots that are used in this area and to explain how individual robots work and how some of them are programmed.

Práce popisuje tvorbu ovládacího rozhraní pro nástroj ruky operačního robota Da Vinci firmy Intuitive Surgical. Prvotním cílem je základní seznámení s funkcemi operačního robota, kterým je věnována první část. V dalších částech následuje návrh komunikace, jejímž základem je ergonomické ovládací zařízení - gamepad, které pomocí páček umožňuje kontrolu nad dvěma nezávislými čepelemi na operačním nástroji. Přenos pohybu hlavy nástroje ruky zajišťuje program sestavený v LabVIEW. Vyhodnocuje vstupní data z ovladače a na základě předem definovaných mezí odesílá bitové instrukce. Komunikace je sestavena v závěrečné části programu v LabVIEW a data jsou prostřednictvím sériového protokolu odeslána na cílové zařízení. Program poskytuje také omezené možnosti nastavení pro snadnou přenositelnost na jiné PC a modulovatelnost. Díky uživatelskému prostředí má uživatel plnou vizuální kontrolu nad vstupními hodnotami. V návrhu rozhraní je počítáno s reálnými možnostmi ovládání a mechanického návrhu supportu za pomocí krokových motorků., Bachelor work describes creation of interface for surgical robotic hand Da Vinci made by Intuitive Surgical. First goal was to get familiarized with its functions. This is the contents of the first few chapters. The rest of the work focuses on communication design between computer and Da Vinci arm instrument. On the user side, there is a controlling device connected, a gamepad with levers, which allows user to move two independent blades on the instrument. Transmission of this movement to the robotic arm instrument is task of a software programmed in LabVIEW. It evaluates entry data from the gamepad and after comparing them to predefined bounds, it sends bit instructions to Da Vinci. The communication is opened in the last part of the sofware solution and the data (2 bytes) are sent through serial protocol to target device. Program provides also a limited options, which can be set by the user. These settings are primarily used for easy portability between computers. Via graphical interface has user complete visual control over input values. The whole design is based on the real possibilities of arm instrument manoeuvreability and mechanical support design using stepping motors.

Práca popisuje návrh systému riadenia nástroja ruky operačného robota Da Vinci amerického výrobcu Intuitive Surgical. Prvotný návrh spočíva v nadviazaní na program pre generovanie riadiaceho bitového slova v prostredí LabVIEW a následnom vykonaní pohybu nástroja pomocou krokových motorov prostredníctvom mikrokontroléra Arduino. Výsledne implementovaný riadiaci systém využíva servomotory ovládané analógovými manipulátormi pripojenými priamo na mikrokontrolér. Práca uvažuje ošetrenie kontroly a preklzu hraničných polôh u oboch riadiacich systémov., This bachelor thesis deals with the design of the control system of the Da Vinci robotic hand made by american company Intuitive Surgical. The initial draft consists of linking with the program for control bitword generation in the LabVIEW environment and subsequent execution of movement using stepper motors with the Arduino microcontroller. The resulting design is using servos controlled by analog manipulators connected directly to the microcontroller. Treatment of border position control and slip is considered within both control systems.

Lékařská robotika je oblast robotů používaných v medicíně a jejím hlavním účelem je poskytovat pomoc a rozšiřovat možnosti zdravotnického personálu. Dále se používá pro pomoc a asistenci pacientům a starším osobám, kteří jsou závislí na pomoci druhých. I když je to stále velmi mladý obor, lékařská robotika změnila způsob, jakým je medicína vnímána v posledních několika desetiletích. Díky jeho vysoké přesnosti a schopnosti pomáhat lidem je jeho potenciál obrovský. Specialisté a vývojáři se proto snaží tuto oblast dále rozšiřovat a zlepšovat. Cílem této práce je poskytnout komplexní přehled vývoje robotů používaných v medicíně, uvést konkrétní příklady robotů, které se v této oblasti používají, a vysvětlit, jak jednotliví roboti fungují a jak jsou někteří z nich naprogramováni., Medical robotics is an area of robots used in medicine and its main purpose is to provide assistance and expand the capabilities of medical personnel. It is also used to help and assist patients and the elderly who are dependent on the help of others. Although it is still a very young field, medical robotics has changed the way in which medicine has been perceived in the last few decades. Due to its high accuracy and ability to help people, its potential is enormous. Specialists and developers are therefore trying to further expand and improve this area. The aim of this work is to provide a comprehensive survey of medical robots’ evolution including concrete examples of robots that are used in this area and to explain how individual robots work and how some of them are programmed.