Search

Item does not contain fulltext, STUDY DESIGN: A finite-element study to investigate the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture and the distribution of load between trabecular core and cortical shell, for healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences between healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae with regard to the risk of fracture and the load distribution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains no reports on the effects of osteopenia and osteoporosis on load distribution in vertebral bodies, nor any reports on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture. METHODS: Computed tomography data of vertebral bodies were used to construct patient-specific finite-element models. These models were then used in finite-element analyses to determine the physiologic stresses and strains in the vertebrae. RESULTS: For all three classes of vertebrae the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load transfer decreased from about 70% near the endplates to about 50% in the midtransverse region. The amount of trabecular bone that is at risk of fracture was about 1% for healthy vertebrae, about 3% for osteopenic vertebrae, and about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: Our finite-element models indicated that neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis had any effect on the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load placed on the vertebra. The trabecular core carried about half the load. Our finite-element models indicated that osteoporosis had a significant effect on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture, which increased from about 1% in healthy vertebrae to about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae.

Item does not contain fulltext, STUDY DESIGN: A finite-element study to investigate the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture and the distribution of load between trabecular core and cortical shell, for healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences between healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae with regard to the risk of fracture and the load distribution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains no reports on the effects of osteopenia and osteoporosis on load distribution in vertebral bodies, nor any reports on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture. METHODS: Computed tomography data of vertebral bodies were used to construct patient-specific finite-element models. These models were then used in finite-element analyses to determine the physiologic stresses and strains in the vertebrae. RESULTS: For all three classes of vertebrae the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load transfer decreased from about 70% near the endplates to about 50% in the midtransverse region. The amount of trabecular bone that is at risk of fracture was about 1% for healthy vertebrae, about 3% for osteopenic vertebrae, and about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: Our finite-element models indicated that neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis had any effect on the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load placed on the vertebra. The trabecular core carried about half the load. Our finite-element models indicated that osteoporosis had a significant effect on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture, which increased from about 1% in healthy vertebrae to about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae.

Item does not contain fulltext, STUDY DESIGN: A finite-element study to investigate the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture and the distribution of load between trabecular core and cortical shell, for healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences between healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae with regard to the risk of fracture and the load distribution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains no reports on the effects of osteopenia and osteoporosis on load distribution in vertebral bodies, nor any reports on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture. METHODS: Computed tomography data of vertebral bodies were used to construct patient-specific finite-element models. These models were then used in finite-element analyses to determine the physiologic stresses and strains in the vertebrae. RESULTS: For all three classes of vertebrae the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load transfer decreased from about 70% near the endplates to about 50% in the midtransverse region. The amount of trabecular bone that is at risk of fracture was about 1% for healthy vertebrae, about 3% for osteopenic vertebrae, and about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: Our finite-element models indicated that neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis had any effect on the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load placed on the vertebra. The trabecular core carried about half the load. Our finite-element models indicated that osteoporosis had a significant effect on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture, which increased from about 1% in healthy vertebrae to about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae.

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and an increased fracture risk. Measurements of bone mass alone, however, will not provide adequate information about the fracture risk, because the trabecular architecture or spatial distribution of the bone density has an important effect on the strength. We have developed a method to estimate the tissue strength of trabecular bone directly from 3D reconstructed axial CT-scans in combination with a finite element model. The method provides the stress distribution throughout the structure which can be used as a measure for the strength and fracture risk of the bone. A matter of concern with this method are the external loading conditions placed on the vertebral body, which might be strongly affected by the behavior of the intervertebral disk. In this study we have tested the effects of various intervertebral disk models on the load distribution through the vertebral body. A 3D model of a vertebral body was developed based on serial axial CT-scans which were converted to a 3D finite element model. The model was augmented with intervertebral disks at the upper and lower endplates. The disks contained a nucleus and an annulus region. The properties of the nucleus were varied to study the effects of a healthy disk with a functional nucleus pulposus and a degenerated disk with virtually no load bearing of the nucleus pulposus. The methods introduced in this study can be used to estimate load transfer through the vertebral body directly from CT-scans and, thereby, assessing the fracture risk of the bone and thus the status of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and an increased fracture risk. Measurements of bone mass alone, however, will not provide adequate information about the fracture risk, because the trabecular architecture or spatial distribution of the bone density has an important effect on the strength. We have developed a method to estimate the tissue strength of trabecular bone directly from 3D reconstructed axial CT-scans in combination with a finite element model. The method provides the stress distribution throughout the structure which can be used as a measure for the strength and fracture risk of the bone. A matter of concern with this method are the external loading conditions placed on the vertebral body, which might be strongly affected by the behavior of the intervertebral disk. In this study we have tested the effects of various intervertebral disk models on the load distribution through the vertebral body. A 3D model of a vertebral body was developed based on serial axial CT-scans which were converted to a 3D finite element model. The model was augmented with intervertebral disks at the upper and lower endplates. The disks contained a nucleus and an annulus region. The properties of the nucleus were varied to study the effects of a healthy disk with a functional nucleus pulposus and a degenerated disk with virtually no load bearing of the nucleus pulposus. The methods introduced in this study can be used to estimate load transfer through the vertebral body directly from CT-scans and, thereby, assessing the fracture risk of the bone and thus the status of osteoporosis