Search

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext, 12 september 2023

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 250379.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 252787.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 252716.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 250379.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 252787.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 252716.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 245244.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 244609.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

22 december 2021, Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext, Language comprehenders can use syntactic cues to generate predictions online about upcoming language. Previous research with reading-impaired adults and healthy, low-proficiency adult and child learners suggests that reading skills are related to prediction in spoken language comprehension. Here, we investigated whether differences in literacy are also related to predictive spoken language processing in non-reading-impaired proficient adult readers with varying levels of literacy experience. Using the visual world paradigm enabled us to measure prediction based on syntactic cues in the spoken sentence, prior to the (predicted) target word. Literacy experience was found to be the strongest predictor of target anticipation, independent of general cognitive abilities. These findings suggest that (a) experience with written language can enhance syntactic prediction of spoken language in normal adult language users and (b) processing skills can be transferred to related tasks (from reading to listening) if the domains involve similar processes (e.g., predictive dependencies) and representations (e.g., syntactic).

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 235997.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), "Book language" offers a richer linguistic experience than typical conversational speech in terms of its syntactic properties. Here, we investigated the role of long-term syntactic experience on syntactic knowledge and processing. In a preregistered study with 161 adult native Dutch speakers with varying levels of literacy, we assessed the contribution of individual differences in written language experience to offline and online syntactic processes. Offline syntactic knowledge was assessed as accuracy in an auditory grammaticality judgement task in which we tested violations of four Dutch grammatical norms. Online syntactic processing was indexed by syntactic priming of the Dutch dative alternation, using a comprehension-to-production priming paradigm with auditory presentation. Controlling for the contribution of nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), verbal working memory, and processing speed, we observed a robust effect of literacy experience on the detection of grammatical norm violations in spoken sentences, suggesting that exposure to the syntactic complexity and diversity of written language has specific benefits for general (modality-independent) syntactic knowledge. We replicated previous results by finding robust comprehension-to-production structural priming, both with and without lexical overlap between prime and target. Although literacy experience affected the usage of syntactic alternates in our large sample, it did not modulate their priming. We conclude that amount of experience with written language increases explicit awareness of grammatical norm violations and changes the usage of (prepositional-object [PO] vs. double-object [DO]) dative spoken sentences but has no detectable effect on their implicit syntactic priming in proficient language users. These findings constrain theories about the effect of long-term experience on syntactic processing.

Contains fulltext : 235243.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 229989.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Item does not contain fulltext, Some theorists posit the existence of a 'core' grammar that virtually all native speakers acquire, and a 'peripheral' grammar that many do not. We investigated the viability of such a categorical distinction in the Dutch language. We first consulted linguists' intuitions as to the 'core' or 'peripheral' status of a wide range of grammatical structures. We then tested a selection of core- and peripheral-rated structures on naïve participants with varying levels of literacy experience, using grammaticality judgement as a proxy for receptive knowledge. Overall, participants demonstrated better knowledge of 'core' structures than 'peripheral' structures, but the considerable variability within these categories was strongly suggestive of a continuum rather than a categorical distinction between them. We also hypothesised that individual differences in the knowledge of core and peripheral structures would reflect participants' literacy experience. This was supported only by a small trend in our data. The results fit best with the notion that more frequent syntactic structures are mastered by more people than infrequent ones and challenge the received sense of a categorical core-periphery distinction.

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 231932.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext, This eye-tracking study explored how phonological encoding and speech production planning for successive words are coordinated in adult readers with dyslexia (N = 22) and control readers (N = 25) during rapid automatized naming (RAN). Using an object-RAN task, we orthogonally manipulated the word-form frequency and phonological neighborhood density of the object names and assessed the effects on speech and eye movements and their temporal coordination. In both groups, there was a significant interaction between word frequency and neighborhood density: shorter fixations for dense than for sparse neighborhoods were observed for low- but not for high-frequency words. This finding does not suggest a specific difficulty in lexical phonological access in dyslexia. However, in readers with dyslexia only, these lexical effects percolated to the late processing stages, indicated by longer offset eye-speech lags. We close by discussing potential reasons for this finding, including suboptimal specification of phonological representations and deficits in attention control or in multi-item coordination.

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 245244.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext, Language comprehenders can use syntactic cues to generate predictions online about upcoming language. Previous research with reading-impaired adults and healthy, low-proficiency adult and child learners suggests that reading skills are related to prediction in spoken language comprehension. Here, we investigated whether differences in literacy are also related to predictive spoken language processing in non-reading-impaired proficient adult readers with varying levels of literacy experience. Using the visual world paradigm enabled us to measure prediction based on syntactic cues in the spoken sentence, prior to the (predicted) target word. Literacy experience was found to be the strongest predictor of target anticipation, independent of general cognitive abilities. These findings suggest that (a) experience with written language can enhance syntactic prediction of spoken language in normal adult language users and (b) processing skills can be transferred to related tasks (from reading to listening) if the domains involve similar processes (e.g., predictive dependencies) and representations (e.g., syntactic).

Contains fulltext : 240053.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Contains fulltext : 235997.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), "Book language" offers a richer linguistic experience than typical conversational speech in terms of its syntactic properties. Here, we investigated the role of long-term syntactic experience on syntactic knowledge and processing. In a preregistered study with 161 adult native Dutch speakers with varying levels of literacy, we assessed the contribution of individual differences in written language experience to offline and online syntactic processes. Offline syntactic knowledge was assessed as accuracy in an auditory grammaticality judgement task in which we tested violations of four Dutch grammatical norms. Online syntactic processing was indexed by syntactic priming of the Dutch dative alternation, using a comprehension-to-production priming paradigm with auditory presentation. Controlling for the contribution of nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), verbal working memory, and processing speed, we observed a robust effect of literacy experience on the detection of grammatical norm violations in spoken sentences, suggesting that exposure to the syntactic complexity and diversity of written language has specific benefits for general (modality-independent) syntactic knowledge. We replicated previous results by finding robust comprehension-to-production structural priming, both with and without lexical overlap between prime and target. Although literacy experience affected the usage of syntactic alternates in our large sample, it did not modulate their priming. We conclude that amount of experience with written language increases explicit awareness of grammatical norm violations and changes the usage of (prepositional-object [PO] vs. double-object [DO]) dative spoken sentences but has no detectable effect on their implicit syntactic priming in proficient language users. These findings constrain theories about the effect of long-term experience on syntactic processing.

Contains fulltext : 244609.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 235243.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 229989.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 233078.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), Some theorists posit the existence of a 'core' grammar that virtually all native speakers acquire, and a 'peripheral' grammar that many do not. We investigated the viability of such a categorical distinction in the Dutch language. We first consulted linguists' intuitions as to the 'core' or 'peripheral' status of a wide range of grammatical structures. We then tested a selection of core- and peripheral-rated structures on naïve participants with varying levels of literacy experience, using grammaticality judgement as a proxy for receptive knowledge. Overall, participants demonstrated better knowledge of 'core' structures than 'peripheral' structures, but the considerable variability within these categories was strongly suggestive of a continuum rather than a categorical distinction between them. We also hypothesised that individual differences in the knowledge of core and peripheral structures would reflect participants' literacy experience. This was supported only by a small trend in our data. The results fit best with the notion that more frequent syntactic structures are mastered by more people than infrequent ones and challenge the received sense of a categorical core-periphery distinction.

Item does not contain fulltext

22 december 2021, Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 228246.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), This eye-tracking study explored how phonological encoding and speech production planning for successive words are coordinated in adult readers with dyslexia (N = 22) and control readers (N = 25) during rapid automatized naming (RAN). Using an object-RAN task, we orthogonally manipulated the word-form frequency and phonological neighborhood density of the object names and assessed the effects on speech and eye movements and their temporal coordination. In both groups, there was a significant interaction between word frequency and neighborhood density: shorter fixations for dense than for sparse neighborhoods were observed for low- but not for high-frequency words. This finding does not suggest a specific difficulty in lexical phonological access in dyslexia. However, in readers with dyslexia only, these lexical effects percolated to the late processing stages, indicated by longer offset eye-speech lags. We close by discussing potential reasons for this finding, including suboptimal specification of phonological representations and deficits in attention control or in multi-item coordination.

Contains fulltext : 231932.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 244609.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)