Search

Interrogating the tumor genome in its entirety by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers an unprecedented insight into the biology and pathogenesis of cancer, with potential impact on diagnostics, prognostication and therapy selection. WGS is able to detect sequence as well as structural variants and thereby combines central domains of cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Given the potential of WGS in directing targeted therapeutics and clinical decision-making, we envision a gradual transition of the method from research to clinical routine. This review is one out of three within this issue aimed at facilitating this effort, by discussing in-depth analytical validation, clinical interpretation and clinical utility of WGS. The review highlights the requirements for implementing, validating and maintaining a clinical WGS pipeline to obtain high-quality patient-specific data in accordance with the local regulatory landscape. Every step of the WGS pipeline, which includes DNA extraction, library preparation, sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and data storage, is considered with respect to its logistics, necessities, potential pitfalls, and the required quality management. WGS is likely to drive clinical diagnostics and patient care forward, if requirements and challenges of the technique are recognized and met.

PURPOSE: The combination of whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) is expected to transform diagnosis and treatment for patients with cancer. WGTS is a comprehensive precision diagnostic test that is starting to replace the standard of care for oncology molecular testing in health care systems around the world; however, the implementation and widescale adoption of this best-in-class testing is lacking. METHODS: Here, we address the barriers in integrating WGTS for cancer diagnostics and treatment selection and answer questions regarding utility in different cancer types, cost-effectiveness and affordability, and other practical considerations for WGTS implementation. RESULTS: We review the current studies implementing WGTS in health care systems and provide a synopsis of the clinical evidence and insights into practical considerations for WGTS implementation. We reflect on regulatory, costs, reimbursement, and incidental findings aspects of this test. CONCLUSION: WGTS is an appropriate comprehensive clinical test for many tumor types and can replace multiple, cascade testing approaches currently performed. Decreasing sequencing cost, increasing number of clinically relevant aberrations and discovery of more complex biomarkers of treatment response, should pave the way for health care systems and laboratories in implementing WGTS into clinical practice, to transform diagnosis and treatment for patients with cancer.