Search

In challenging times, home is frequently the primary basis of environmental self-regulation processes, individual and relational coping, and well-being. This study aimed to identify multiple types of security experiences at home during the first lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used data from 757 Hungarian adults who completed the online, modified form of the Emotional Map of the Home Interview method in 2020 after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants imagined their homes, chose the place of security in their homes and rated their personal experiences (i.e., experiences of agency, communion, self-recovery, and distress) related to these places. Latent profile analysis of personal experiences revealed four types of relational-environmental self-regulation in secure places: "security in active self-recovery," "security in detachment," "security in doing and feeling good enough," and "security in stress and compensation." Profile membership was predicted by age, gender, and indices of psychological support and well-being. Results suggest that finding psychological security in the home is a multifaceted phenomenon that may be partly affected by the perception of the broader social-ecological context. Identifying subpopulations vulnerable to the challenges of the pandemic may help researchers and practitioners provide better support in times of local and global crises.

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

In this study, we examined loneliness and hope components as predictors of unhappy conditions (viz., anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, & suicidal ideation) in young adults. The sample was comprised of 489 Hungarian college students. Results of conducting hierarchical regression analyses indicated that loneliness and hope pathways (but not hope agency) were important unique predictors of anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation. Moreover, in part, consistent with the notion that hope might buffer the negative effects of loneliness on unhappy conditions, evidence for a significant Loneliness × Hope Pathways interaction effect in predicting each of the three indices of unhappy conditions was found. In contrast, the Loneliness × Hope Agency interaction effect was not found to be significant. Some implications of the present findings for the study and treatment of unhappy conditions in adults are discussed

Objetives: Identify putative functional variants in the CYP11A1 and CYP17A1 genes associated with musculoskeletal effects (accelerated bone mass loss and arthralgia) derived from treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AI). Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort is a prospective study of postmenopausal women with breast cancer undergoing AI treatment. Bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by densitometry and joint pain using visual analogue scale. From single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes CYP11A1 (rs4077581, rs11632698 and rs900798) and CYP17A1 (rs4919686, rs4919683, rs4919687, rs3781287, rs10786712, rs6163, rs743572), previously associated with musculoskeletal events, haplotypes were constructed for each pacient from the cohort, and those haplotypes that showed greatest phenotypic differences were chosen (p<0.05). Within each haplotype, patients with extreme phenotypes were chosen for the sequencing of respective genes and identifying functional genetic variants. Finally, a multiple linear regression analysis was carried out considering the models of dominant, recessive and additive genetic inheritance. Results: No mutation was found in coding regions. A genetic variant (D15S520), in the basal promoter region of gene CYP11A1, was found associated with femoral neck bone loss at 24 month of AI treatment. Conclusions: Variants in regulatory regions of the CYP11A1 gene could modulate the expression of this gene, thus explaining part of the phenotypic variability found in bone loss of patients undergoing AI treatment., Objetivos: Identificar putativas variantes funcionales en los genes CYP11A1 y CYP17A1 asociadas a efectos musculoesqueléticos (pérdida acelerada de la masa ósea y artralgias) derivados del tratamiento con inhibidores de la aromatasa (IA). Material y métodos: La cohorte B-ABLE es un estudio prospectivo de mujeres postmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama en tratamiento con IA. La densidad mineral ósea en columna lumbar y cuello femoral se midió mediante densitometría, y el dolor articular mediante escala analógica visual. A partir de polimorfismos de cambio de un nucleótido (SNPs) en los genes CYP11A1 (rs4077581, rs11632698 y rs900798) y CYP17A1 (rs4919686, rs4919683, rs4919687, rs3781287, rs10786712, rs6163, rs743572), asociados previamente con eventos musculoesqueléticos, se construyeron los haplotipos para cada paciente de la cohorte, y se seleccionaron aquellos que mostraron mayor diferencia fenotípica (p<0,05). Dentro de cada haplotipo, se eligieron aquellas pacientes con fenotipos extremos para la secuenciación de los respectivos genes y la identificación de variantes genéticas funcionales. Finalmente, se realizó un análisis de regresión lineal múltiple contemplando los modelos de herencia genética dominante, recesivo y aditivo. Resultados: No se encontró ninguna mutación en las regiones codificantes. En la región del promotor basal del gen CYP11A1 se encontró una variante genética (D15S520) asociada a la pérdida de masa ósea del cuello de fémur a los 24 meses de tratamiento con IA. Conclusiones: Variantes en regiones reguladoras del gen CYP11A1 podrían modular la expresión de este gen, explicando así parte de la variabilidad fenotípica encontrada en la pérdida de hueso de las pacientes en tratamiento con IA.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze bone mineral density (BMD) changes throughout aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in clinical cases and also consider its association with the CYP11A1 gene and the BMD variation after treatment. Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort is a prospective study of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, in AI treatment. BMD variation was analyzed during AI treatment, as well as the differences those patients who were treated and not treated previously with tamoxifen (TMX). Three polymorphisms (rs4077581, rs11632698 and rs900798) of the CYP11A1 gene were genotyped for their association with BMD variation. Results: TMX-treated patients presented more rapid BMD loss than those who did not undergo prior TMX treatment (60% less in spine and 46% in femur at 2 years and 70% less in the spine and 63% in the femur at 3 years). However, no significant BMD loss was detected after treatment in either group. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with BMD variation in the femur at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: BMD was reduced more rapidly in patients with prior TMX treatment than in those who only received AI, although no significant differences were detected after treatment. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were associated with BMD variation in response to AI treatment., Objetivos: El objetivo del estudio fue analizar los cambios en la densidad mineral ósea (DMO) a lo largo del tratamiento con inhibidores de aromatasa (IA) en la práctica clínica y evaluar la asociación entre el gen CYP11A1 y la variación de DMO al final del tratamiento. Material y métodos: La cohorte B-ABLE es un estudio prospectivo de mujeres postmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama, en tratamiento con IA. Se analizó la variación de DMO durante todo el tratamiento con IA, así como las diferencias entre las pacientes tratadas y no-tratadas previamente con tamoxifeno (TMX). Tres polimorfismos (rs4077581, rs11632698 y rs900798) del gen CYP11A1, fueron genotipados para su asociación con la variación de DMO. Resultados: Las pacientes tratadas con TMX mostraron pérdidas más aceleradas de DMO que las no tratadas previamente con TMX (60% menos en columna y 46% en fémur a los 2 años y 70% menos en columna y 63% en fémur a los 3 años). No obstante, al final del tratamiento no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la pérdida de DMO entre ambos grupos de pacientes. Los 3 polimorfismos del gen CYP11A1 resultaron significativamente asociados a la variación de DMO en fémur al final del tratamiento. Conclusiones: La DMO disminuyó de forma más acelerada en las pacientes con tratamiento previo con TMX que en las que solo recibieron AI, a pesar de que no se detectaron diferencias significativas al final de tratamiento. Polimorfismos en el gen CYP11A1 están relacionados con la variación de la DMO en respuesta al tratamiento con IA.