Search

The neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) oseltamivir is stockpiled globally as part of influenza pandemic preparedness. However, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) resistance develops in avian influenza virus (AIV) infecting mallards exposed to environmental-like OC concentrations, suggesting that environmental resistance is a real concern. Herein we used an in vivo model to investigate if avian influenza H1N1 with the OC-resistant mutation NA-H274Y (51833/H274Y) as compared to the wild-type (wt) strain (51833 /wt) could transmit from mallards, which would potentially be exposed to environmentally contaminated environments, to and between chickens, thus posing a potential zoonotic risk of antiviral-resistant AIV. Regardless of whether the virus had the OC-resistant mutation or not, chickens became infected both through experimental infection, and following exposure to infected mallards. We found similar infection patterns between 51833/wt and 51833/H274Y such that, one chicken inoculated with 51833/wt and three chickens inoculated with 51833/H274Y were AIV positive in oropharyngeal samples more than 2 days consecutively, indicating true infection, and one contact chicken exposed to infected mallards was AIV positive in faecal samples for 3 consecutive days (51833/wt) and another contact chicken for 4 consecutive days (51833/H274Y). Importantly, all positive samples from chickens infected with 51833/H274Y retained the NA-H274Y mutation. However, none of the virus strains established sustained transmission in chickens, likely due to insufficient adaptation to the chicken host. Our results demonstrate that an OC-resistant avian influenza virus can transmit from mallards and replicate in chickens. NA-H274Y does not constitute a barrier to interspecies transmission per se, as the resistant virus did not show reduced replicative capacity compared to the wild-type counterpart. Thus, responsible use of oseltamivir and surveillance for resistance development is warranted to limit the ris

The neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) oseltamivir is stockpiled globally as part of influenza pandemic preparedness. However, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) resistance develops in avian influenza virus (AIV) infecting mallards exposed to environmental-like OC concentrations, suggesting that environmental resistance is a real concern. Herein we used an in vivo model to investigate if avian influenza H1N1 with the OC-resistant mutation NA-H274Y (51833/H274Y) as compared to the wild-type (wt) strain (51833 /wt) could transmit from mallards, which would potentially be exposed to environmentally contaminated environments, to and between chickens, thus posing a potential zoonotic risk of antiviral-resistant AIV. Regardless of whether the virus had the OC-resistant mutation or not, chickens became infected both through experimental infection, and following exposure to infected mallards. We found similar infection patterns between 51833/wt and 51833/H274Y such that, one chicken inoculated with 51833/wt and three chickens inoculated with 51833/H274Y were AIV positive in oropharyngeal samples more than 2 days consecutively, indicating true infection, and one contact chicken exposed to infected mallards was AIV positive in faecal samples for 3 consecutive days (51833/wt) and another contact chicken for 4 consecutive days (51833/H274Y). Importantly, all positive samples from chickens infected with 51833/H274Y retained the NA-H274Y mutation. However, none of the virus strains established sustained transmission in chickens, likely due to insufficient adaptation to the chicken host. Our results demonstrate that an OC-resistant avian influenza virus can transmit from mallards and replicate in chickens. NA-H274Y does not constitute a barrier to interspecies transmission per se, as the resistant virus did not show reduced replicative capacity compared to the wild-type counterpart. Thus, responsible use of oseltamivir and surveillance for resistance development is warranted to limit the ris

The neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) oseltamivir is stockpiled globally as part of influenza pandemic preparedness. However, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) resistance develops in avian influenza virus (AIV) infecting mallards exposed to environmental-like OC concentrations, suggesting that environmental resistance is a real concern. Herein we used an in vivo model to investigate if avian influenza H1N1 with the OC-resistant mutation NA-H274Y (51833/H274Y) as compared to the wild-type (wt) strain (51833 /wt) could transmit from mallards, which would potentially be exposed to environmentally contaminated environments, to and between chickens, thus posing a potential zoonotic risk of antiviral-resistant AIV. Regardless of whether the virus had the OC-resistant mutation or not, chickens became infected both through experimental infection, and following exposure to infected mallards. We found similar infection patterns between 51833/wt and 51833/H274Y such that, one chicken inoculated with 51833/wt and three chickens inoculated with 51833/H274Y were AIV positive in oropharyngeal samples more than 2 days consecutively, indicating true infection, and one contact chicken exposed to infected mallards was AIV positive in faecal samples for 3 consecutive days (51833/wt) and another contact chicken for 4 consecutive days (51833/H274Y). Importantly, all positive samples from chickens infected with 51833/H274Y retained the NA-H274Y mutation. However, none of the virus strains established sustained transmission in chickens, likely due to insufficient adaptation to the chicken host. Our results demonstrate that an OC-resistant avian influenza virus can transmit from mallards and replicate in chickens. NA-H274Y does not constitute a barrier to interspecies transmission per se, as the resistant virus did not show reduced replicative capacity compared to the wild-type counterpart. Thus, responsible use of oseltamivir and surveillance for resistance development is warranted to limit the ris

The neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) oseltamivir is stockpiled globally as part of influenza pandemic preparedness. However, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) resistance develops in avian influenza virus (AIV) infecting mallards exposed to environmental-like OC concentrations, suggesting that environmental resistance is a real concern. Herein we used an in vivo model to investigate if avian influenza H1N1 with the OC-resistant mutation NA-H274Y (51833/H274Y) as compared to the wild-type (wt) strain (51833 /wt) could transmit from mallards, which would potentially be exposed to environmentally contaminated environments, to and between chickens, thus posing a potential zoonotic risk of antiviral-resistant AIV. Regardless of whether the virus had the OC-resistant mutation or not, chickens became infected both through experimental infection, and following exposure to infected mallards. We found similar infection patterns between 51833/wt and 51833/H274Y such that, one chicken inoculated with 51833/wt and three chickens inoculated with 51833/H274Y were AIV positive in oropharyngeal samples more than 2 days consecutively, indicating true infection, and one contact chicken exposed to infected mallards was AIV positive in faecal samples for 3 consecutive days (51833/wt) and another contact chicken for 4 consecutive days (51833/H274Y). Importantly, all positive samples from chickens infected with 51833/H274Y retained the NA-H274Y mutation. However, none of the virus strains established sustained transmission in chickens, likely due to insufficient adaptation to the chicken host. Our results demonstrate that an OC-resistant avian influenza virus can transmit from mallards and replicate in chickens. NA-H274Y does not constitute a barrier to interspecies transmission per se, as the resistant virus did not show reduced replicative capacity compared to the wild-type counterpart. Thus, responsible use of oseltamivir and surveillance for resistance development is warranted to limit the ris

The neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) oseltamivir is stockpiled globally as part of influenza pandemic preparedness. However, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) resistance develops in avian influenza virus (AIV) infecting mallards exposed to environmental-like OC concentrations, suggesting that environmental resistance is a real concern. Herein we used an in vivo model to investigate if avian influenza H1N1 with the OC-resistant mutation NA-H274Y (51833/H274Y) as compared to the wild-type (wt) strain (51833 /wt) could transmit from mallards, which would potentially be exposed to environmentally contaminated environments, to and between chickens, thus posing a potential zoonotic risk of antiviral-resistant AIV. Regardless of whether the virus had the OC-resistant mutation or not, chickens became infected both through experimental infection, and following exposure to infected mallards. We found similar infection patterns between 51833/wt and 51833/H274Y such that, one chicken inoculated with 51833/wt and three chickens inoculated with 51833/H274Y were AIV positive in oropharyngeal samples more than 2 days consecutively, indicating true infection, and one contact chicken exposed to infected mallards was AIV positive in faecal samples for 3 consecutive days (51833/wt) and another contact chicken for 4 consecutive days (51833/H274Y). Importantly, all positive samples from chickens infected with 51833/H274Y retained the NA-H274Y mutation. However, none of the virus strains established sustained transmission in chickens, likely due to insufficient adaptation to the chicken host. Our results demonstrate that an OC-resistant avian influenza virus can transmit from mallards and replicate in chickens. NA-H274Y does not constitute a barrier to interspecies transmission per se, as the resistant virus did not show reduced replicative capacity compared to the wild-type counterpart. Thus, responsible use of oseltamivir and surveillance for resistance development is warranted to limit the ris

type:Text, This study investigated whether quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), using specific probes composed of locked nucleic acids (LNA/qRT-PCR), designed to evaluate H1N1 pdm09 H275Y, H3N2 E119V and R292K variant populations, could replace a neuraminidase (NA) inhibition assay to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of NA activity.For H1N1 pdm09, when the H275Y variant RNA load was 50% or 70% and the infective H275Y variant load was 40% or 70%, the IC50 were >10- and 100-fold higher, respectively, than that of the wild-type (WT) strain. For H3N2, when the E119V RNA load and infective E119V variant load were >90% and >60%, respectively, the IC50 of the mixed sample was >10-fold higher than that of the WT strain. The variant-mixed samples with a 70% or 80% R292K variant RNA load and a 60% or 70% infective R292K variant load exhibited >10- and 100-fold decreased susceptibility, respectively, compared with that of the WT. A positive correlation between the variant RNA load and infective variant load populations was observed.The LNA/qRT-PCR method can be used to improve the treatment and management of patients during antiviral therapy for influenza virus infection.

type:Text, This study investigated whether quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), using specific probes composed of locked nucleic acids (LNA/qRT-PCR), designed to evaluate H1N1 pdm09 H275Y, H3N2 E119V and R292K variant populations, could replace a neuraminidase (NA) inhibition assay to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of NA activity.For H1N1 pdm09, when the H275Y variant RNA load was 50% or 70% and the infective H275Y variant load was 40% or 70%, the IC50 were >10- and 100-fold higher, respectively, than that of the wild-type (WT) strain. For H3N2, when the E119V RNA load and infective E119V variant load were >90% and >60%, respectively, the IC50 of the mixed sample was >10-fold higher than that of the WT strain. The variant-mixed samples with a 70% or 80% R292K variant RNA load and a 60% or 70% infective R292K variant load exhibited >10- and 100-fold decreased susceptibility, respectively, compared with that of the WT. A positive correlation between the variant RNA load and infective variant load populations was observed.The LNA/qRT-PCR method can be used to improve the treatment and management of patients during antiviral therapy for influenza virus infection.

Background: Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a single-dose, oral antiinfluenza drug with a novel mechanism of action. We compared the incidence of hospitalization in patients treated with baloxavir vs neuraminidase inhibitors. Methods: In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, we used real-world patient data extracted from a Japanese health insurance claims database. The enrollment period was 1 October 2018 to 17 April 2019. On day 1, eligible patients (N = 339 007) received baloxavir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir. Baseline characteristics were standardized using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary end point was the incidence of hospitalization (days 2–14). Secondary end points included antibacterial use, secondary pneumonia, and additional antiinfluenza drug use. Results: Compared with the baloxavir group, the incidence of hospitalization was greater in the oseltamivir group (risk ratio [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 [1.00–2.00]; risk difference [RD] and 95% CI, 0.06 [.01–.12]) and zanamivir group (RR, 1.85 [1.23–2.78]; RD, 0.11 [.02–.20]). Oseltamivir-treated patients were less likely to require antibacterials than baloxavir-treated patients (RR, 0.87 [.82–.91]). However, oseltamivir-treated patients were more likely to be hospitalized with antibacterials (RR, 1.70 [1.21–2.38]) or antibacterial injection (RR, 1.67 [1.17–2.38]) than baloxavir-treated patients (post hoc analysis). Compared with baloxavir-treated patients, additional antiinfluenza drug use was greater in oseltamivir-, zanamivir-, and laninamivir-treated patients (RR, 1.51 [1.05–2.18], 2.84 [2.04–3.96], and 1.68 [1.35–2.10], respectively). Conclusions: Baloxavir is an efficacious antiinfluenza treatment that may reduce hospitalization compared with oseltamivir and zanamivir. Clinical Trials Registration: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000038159)., Clinical Infectious Diseases, 73(5), pp. e1181–e1190; 2021

Background : In Japan, four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) and one cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir), are currently available for treatment of influenza. We investigated prescription trends of each anti-influenza drug and the clinical course of patients with influenza who were treated with anti-influenza drugs, including baloxavir, during the 2019-2020 influenza season....

Vaccines and therapeutics targeting viral surface glycoproteins are a major component of disease prevention for respiratory viral diseases. Over the years, vaccines have proven to be the most successful intervention for preventing disease. Technological advances in vaccine platforms that focus on viral surface glycoproteins have provided solutions for current and emerging pathogens like SARS-CoV-2, and our understanding of the structural basis for antibody neutralization is guiding the selection of other vaccine targets for respiratory viruses like RSV. This review discusses the role of viral surface glycoproteins in disease intervention approaches.

Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are the gold standard treatment for influenza A virus (IAV). Oseltamivir is mostly used, followed by zanamivir (ZA). NAIs are not readily degraded in conventional wastewater treatment plants and can be detected in aquatic environments. Waterfowl are natural IAV hosts and replicating IAVs could thus be exposed to NAIs in the environment and develop resistance. Avian IAVs form the genetic basis for new human IAVs, and a resistant IAV with pandemic potential poses a serious public health threat, as NAIs constitute a pandemic preparedness cornerstone. Resistance development in waterfowl IAVs exposed to NAIs in the water environment has previously been investigated in an in vivo mallard model and resistance development was demonstrated in several avian IAVs after the exposure of infected ducks to oseltamivir, and in an H1N1 IAV after exposure to ZA. The N1 and N2 types of IAVs have different characteristics and resistance mutations, and so the present study investigated the exposure of an N2-type IAV (H4N2) in infected mallards to 1, 10 and 100 µg l−1 of ZA in the water environment. Two neuraminidase substitutions emerged, H274N (ZA IC50 increased 5.5-fold) and E119G (ZA IC50 increased 110-fold) at 10 and 100 µg l−1 of ZA, respectively. Reversion towards wild-type was observed for both substitutions in experiments with removed drug pressure, indicating reduced fitness of both resistant viruses. These results corroborate previous findings that the development of resistance to ZA in the environment seems less likely to occur than the development of resistance to oseltamivir, adding information that is useful in planning for prudent drug use and pandemic preparedness.

The natural Influenza A virus (IAV) host is waterfowl. Human IAV is treated with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), which are stockpiled worldwide in case of an IAV pandemic. As the drugs escape regular waste water treatment, they can be detected in river waters. We hypothesize that exposure of low pathogenic avian IAV (LPAIV) infecting Mallards to NAIs in the water promotes development of resistance that can persist in the absence of drugs. Dissemination of resistance genes to humans pose a health risk, particularly if incorporated into a pandemic IAV. To test the hypothesis, LPAIVs of both NA phylogenetic groups were assessed in an in vivo Mallard model by inoculation and exposure of birds to NAI in their water. In previous work in the model, the oseltamivir-resistant H275Y mutation emerged in H1N1 in response to oseltamivir exposure and persisted without drug pressure. In this thesis, a H7N9 was exposed to oseltamivir and a H1N1 and H4N2 to zanamivir and peramivir. Furthermore, a H1N1 with the H275Y mutation was exposed to zanamivir in order to assess the additional development of zanamivir resistance and the persistence of the H275Y mutation in the presence of zanamivir. Several substitutions reducing drug susceptibility emerged; I222T in H7N9, V116A, A138V, T157I, R152K and D199G in H1N1 exposed to zanamivir, H275N and E119G in H4N2 exposed to zanamivir and 275Y in H4N2 exposed to peramivir. None of the tested zanamivir-induced substitutions persisted in the absence of drug, indicating lower risk of circulation of these substitutions in the wild as compared to oseltamivir. There is a risk of NAI resistance emerging in LPAIVs of Mallards exposed to NAIs in the water. Zanamivir appears to be the best option from an environmental perspective. Drug concentrations in the Mallard model are mostly higher than the concentrations detected in rivers, but are in the same magnitude regarding OC and an H1N1 LPAIV. Given the importance of NAIs as the first line of defence in t

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibil

The natural Influenza A virus (IAV) host is waterfowl. Human IAV is treated with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), which are stockpiled worldwide in case of an IAV pandemic. As the drugs escape regular waste water treatment, they can be detected in river waters. We hypothesize that exposure of low pathogenic avian IAV (LPAIV) infecting Mallards to NAIs in the water promotes development of resistance that can persist in the absence of drugs. Dissemination of resistance genes to humans pose a health risk, particularly if incorporated into a pandemic IAV. To test the hypothesis, LPAIVs of both NA phylogenetic groups were assessed in an in vivo Mallard model by inoculation and exposure of birds to NAI in their water. In previous work in the model, the oseltamivir-resistant H275Y mutation emerged in H1N1 in response to oseltamivir exposure and persisted without drug pressure. In this thesis, a H7N9 was exposed to oseltamivir and a H1N1 and H4N2 to zanamivir and peramivir. Furthermore, a H1N1 with the H275Y mutation was exposed to zanamivir in order to assess the additional development of zanamivir resistance and the persistence of the H275Y mutation in the presence of zanamivir. Several substitutions reducing drug susceptibility emerged; I222T in H7N9, V116A, A138V, T157I, R152K and D199G in H1N1 exposed to zanamivir, H275N and E119G in H4N2 exposed to zanamivir and 275Y in H4N2 exposed to peramivir. None of the tested zanamivir-induced substitutions persisted in the absence of drug, indicating lower risk of circulation of these substitutions in the wild as compared to oseltamivir. There is a risk of NAI resistance emerging in LPAIVs of Mallards exposed to NAIs in the water. Zanamivir appears to be the best option from an environmental perspective. Drug concentrations in the Mallard model are mostly higher than the concentrations detected in rivers, but are in the same magnitude regarding OC and an H1N1 LPAIV. Given the importance of NAIs as the first line of defence in t

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibil

The natural Influenza A virus (IAV) host is waterfowl. Human IAV is treated with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), which are stockpiled worldwide in case of an IAV pandemic. As the drugs escape regular waste water treatment, they can be detected in river waters. We hypothesize that exposure of low pathogenic avian IAV (LPAIV) infecting Mallards to NAIs in the water promotes development of resistance that can persist in the absence of drugs. Dissemination of resistance genes to humans pose a health risk, particularly if incorporated into a pandemic IAV. To test the hypothesis, LPAIVs of both NA phylogenetic groups were assessed in an in vivo Mallard model by inoculation and exposure of birds to NAI in their water. In previous work in the model, the oseltamivir-resistant H275Y mutation emerged in H1N1 in response to oseltamivir exposure and persisted without drug pressure. In this thesis, a H7N9 was exposed to oseltamivir and a H1N1 and H4N2 to zanamivir and peramivir. Furthermore, a H1N1 with the H275Y mutation was exposed to zanamivir in order to assess the additional development of zanamivir resistance and the persistence of the H275Y mutation in the presence of zanamivir. Several substitutions reducing drug susceptibility emerged; I222T in H7N9, V116A, A138V, T157I, R152K and D199G in H1N1 exposed to zanamivir, H275N and E119G in H4N2 exposed to zanamivir and 275Y in H4N2 exposed to peramivir. None of the tested zanamivir-induced substitutions persisted in the absence of drug, indicating lower risk of circulation of these substitutions in the wild as compared to oseltamivir. There is a risk of NAI resistance emerging in LPAIVs of Mallards exposed to NAIs in the water. Zanamivir appears to be the best option from an environmental perspective. Drug concentrations in the Mallard model are mostly higher than the concentrations detected in rivers, but are in the same magnitude regarding OC and an H1N1 LPAIV. Given the importance of NAIs as the first line of defence in t

The natural Influenza A virus (IAV) host is waterfowl. Human IAV is treated with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), which are stockpiled worldwide in case of an IAV pandemic. As the drugs escape regular waste water treatment, they can be detected in river waters. We hypothesize that exposure of low pathogenic avian IAV (LPAIV) infecting Mallards to NAIs in the water promotes development of resistance that can persist in the absence of drugs. Dissemination of resistance genes to humans pose a health risk, particularly if incorporated into a pandemic IAV. To test the hypothesis, LPAIVs of both NA phylogenetic groups were assessed in an in vivo Mallard model by inoculation and exposure of birds to NAI in their water. In previous work in the model, the oseltamivir-resistant H275Y mutation emerged in H1N1 in response to oseltamivir exposure and persisted without drug pressure. In this thesis, a H7N9 was exposed to oseltamivir and a H1N1 and H4N2 to zanamivir and peramivir. Furthermore, a H1N1 with the H275Y mutation was exposed to zanamivir in order to assess the additional development of zanamivir resistance and the persistence of the H275Y mutation in the presence of zanamivir. Several substitutions reducing drug susceptibility emerged; I222T in H7N9, V116A, A138V, T157I, R152K and D199G in H1N1 exposed to zanamivir, H275N and E119G in H4N2 exposed to zanamivir and 275Y in H4N2 exposed to peramivir. None of the tested zanamivir-induced substitutions persisted in the absence of drug, indicating lower risk of circulation of these substitutions in the wild as compared to oseltamivir. There is a risk of NAI resistance emerging in LPAIVs of Mallards exposed to NAIs in the water. Zanamivir appears to be the best option from an environmental perspective. Drug concentrations in the Mallard model are mostly higher than the concentrations detected in rivers, but are in the same magnitude regarding OC and an H1N1 LPAIV. Given the importance of NAIs as the first line of defence in t

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibil

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibil

The natural Influenza A virus (IAV) host is waterfowl. Human IAV is treated with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), which are stockpiled worldwide in case of an IAV pandemic. As the drugs escape regular waste water treatment, they can be detected in river waters. We hypothesize that exposure of low pathogenic avian IAV (LPAIV) infecting Mallards to NAIs in the water promotes development of resistance that can persist in the absence of drugs. Dissemination of resistance genes to humans pose a health risk, particularly if incorporated into a pandemic IAV. To test the hypothesis, LPAIVs of both NA phylogenetic groups were assessed in an in vivo Mallard model by inoculation and exposure of birds to NAI in their water. In previous work in the model, the oseltamivir-resistant H275Y mutation emerged in H1N1 in response to oseltamivir exposure and persisted without drug pressure. In this thesis, a H7N9 was exposed to oseltamivir and a H1N1 and H4N2 to zanamivir and peramivir. Furthermore, a H1N1 with the H275Y mutation was exposed to zanamivir in order to assess the additional development of zanamivir resistance and the persistence of the H275Y mutation in the presence of zanamivir. Several substitutions reducing drug susceptibility emerged; I222T in H7N9, V116A, A138V, T157I, R152K and D199G in H1N1 exposed to zanamivir, H275N and E119G in H4N2 exposed to zanamivir and 275Y in H4N2 exposed to peramivir. None of the tested zanamivir-induced substitutions persisted in the absence of drug, indicating lower risk of circulation of these substitutions in the wild as compared to oseltamivir. There is a risk of NAI resistance emerging in LPAIVs of Mallards exposed to NAIs in the water. Zanamivir appears to be the best option from an environmental perspective. Drug concentrations in the Mallard model are mostly higher than the concentrations detected in rivers, but are in the same magnitude regarding OC and an H1N1 LPAIV. Given the importance of NAIs as the first line of defence in t

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibil

submitted by Carina Bachmair, University of Innsbruck, Diplomarbeit, 2018, (VLID)2519553

Background and objectives: The Influenza Resistance Information Study (IRIS) was initiated in 2008 to study the emergence of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) resistance and the clinical course of influenza in immunocompetent treated and untreated patients. Methods: Patients had throat/nose swabs collected on days 1, 3, 6 and 10 for analyses of influenza type, subtype and virus susceptibility to NAIs. RT-PCR-positive samples were cultured and tested for NAI resistance by specific RT-PCR and phenotypic testing. Scores for influenza symptoms were recorded on diary cards (Days 1-10). This study focuses on influenza A-infected cases only. Results: Among 3230 RT-PCR-positive patients, 2316 had influenza A of whom 1216 received oseltamivir monotherapy within 2 days of symptom onset (9 seasonal H1N1; 662 H3N2; 545 H1N1pdm2009). Except for 9 patients with naturally resistant seasonal H1N1 (2008/9), no resistance was detected in Day 1 samples. Emergence of resistance (post-Day 1) was detected in 43/1207 (3.56%) oseltamivir-treated influenza A-infected patients, with a higher frequency in 1- to 5-year-olds (11.8%) vs >5-year-olds (1.4%). All N1- and N2-resistant viruses had H275Y (n = 27) or R292K (n = 16) substitutions, respectively. For 43 patients, virus clearance was significantly delayed vs treated patients with susceptible viruses (8.1 vs 10.9 days; P < .0001), and 11 (23.2%) remained RT-PCR positive for influenza at Day 10. However, their symptoms resolved by Day 6 or earlier. Conclusions: Oseltamivir resistance was only detected during antiviral treatment, with the highest incidence occurring among 1- to 5-year-olds. Resistance delayed viral clearance, but had no impact on symptom resolution.

Neuraminidase inhibitors are a cornerstone of influenza pandemic preparedness before vaccines can be mass-produced and thus a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant pandemic is a serious threat to public health. Earlier work has demonstrated the potential for development and persistence of oseltamivir resistance in influenza A viruses exposed to environmentally relevant water concentrations of the drug when infecting mallards, the natural influenza reservoir that serves as the genetic base for human pandemics. As zanamivir is the major second-line neuraminidase inhibitor treatment, this study aimed to assess the potential for development and persistence of zanamivir resistance in an in vivo mallard model; especially important as zanamivir will probably be increasingly used. Our results indicate less potential for development and persistence of resistance due to zanamivir than oseltamivir in an environmental setting. This conclusion is based on: (1) the lower increase in zanamivir IC50 conferred by the mutations caused by zanamivir exposure (2-17-fold); (2) the higher zanamivir water concentration needed to induce resistance (at least 10 µg l-1); (3) the lack of zanamivir resistance persistence without drug pressure; and (4) the multiple resistance-related substitutions seen during zanamivir exposure (V116A, A138V, R152K, T157I and D199G) suggesting lack of one straight-forward evolutionary path to resistance. Our study also adds further evidence regarding the stability of the oseltamivir-induced substitution H275Y without drug pressure, and demonstrates the ability of a H275Y-carrying virus to acquire secondary mutations, further boosting oseltamivir resistance when exposed to zanamivir. Similar studies using influenza A viruses of the N2-phylogenetic group of neuraminidases are recommended.

Background : In Japan, four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are currently prescribed to patients with influenza A and B. To know the backgrounds and clinical courses of patients with influenza who were treated with NAIs is important in the selection of appropriate medications. / Methods : We conducted a multicenter observational study in Osaka with postcard questionnaires. Patients who were prescribed NAIs were provided postcard questionnaires containing questions on their backgrounds, body temperatures, and durations of other influenza symptoms. We analyzed the factors that were associated with early fever alleviation using a logistic regression model....

Antiviral medications with activity against influenza viruses are important in controlling influenza. We compared intravenous peramivir, a potent neuraminidase inhibitor, with oseltamivir in patients with seasonal influenza virus infection. In a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled study, patients aged ≥20 years with influenza A or B virus infection were randomly assigned to receive either a single intravenous infusion of peramivir (300 or 600 mg) or oral administration of oseltamivir (75 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] for 5 days). To demonstrate the noninferiority of peramivir in reducing the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms with hazard model analysis and a noninferiority margin of 0.170, we planned to recruit 1,050 patients in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. A total of 1,091 patients (364 receiving 300 mg and 362 receiving 600 mg of peramivir; 365 receiving oseltamivir) were included in the intent-to-treat infected population. The median durations of influenza symptoms were 78.0, 81.0, and 81.8 h in the groups treated with 300 mg of peramivir, 600 mg of peramivir, and oseltamivir, respectively. The hazard ratios of the 300- and 600-mg-peramivir groups compared to the oseltamivir group were 0.946 (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.793, 1.129) and 0.970 (97.5% CI, 0.814, 1.157), respectively. Both peramivir groups were noninferior to the oseltamivir group (97.5% CI, <1.170). The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was significantly lower in the 300-mg-peramivir group, but the incidence of severe reactions in either peramivir group was not different from that in the oseltamivir group. Thus, a single intravenous dose of peramivir may be an alternative to a 5-day oral dose of oseltamivir for patients with seasonal influenza virus infection., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 55(11), pp.5267-5276; 2011