Search

The Obwegeser and Dal Pont modification of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a well-established procedure in orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the actual fracture patterns achieved with BSSO by Obwegeser and Dal Pont modification using postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) datasets from 100 patients. A total of 200 split osteotomies were assessed, which could be categorized into nine different split patterns. Only one of the observed split fractures (0.5%) followed exactly the fracture line described by Obwegeser and Dal Pont, whereas 40% followed the fracture line according to the Hunsuck and Epker modification and 13.5% were seen as unfavourable splits mainly running over the buccal plate. A significant correlation was found between unfavourable buccal splits and both horizontal osteotomies reaching the buccal surface at the dorsal ramus (P = 0.001) and a vertical caudal bone cut end at the corpus with a buccal position (P < 0.001). These results show that a complete antero-posterior horizontal osteotomy at the mandibular ramus does not lead to the intended fracture pattern, which rebuts the argument of a greater amount of bony overlap using the Obwegeser and Dal Pont modification.

Objectives: The present study assesses the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) cone beam CT (CBCT) and intra-oral radiography (CR) in visualizing peri-implant bone compared with histology. Methods: 26 titanium dental implants were placed in dog jaws with chronic type vestibular defects. After a healing period of 2 and 8 weeks (n = 12 dogs) the animals were sacrificed. CBCT scans and CR of the specimen were recorded. Dissected blocks were prepared, and histomorphometric analysis was performed. Both modalities were measured twice by two observers and compared with histomorphometry regarding bone levels and thickness around implants as well as length and diameter of implants. Results: Measurements of CBCT correlated well with histomorphometry of the vestibular bone level, oral bone thickness and implant length (all p-values <0.05). Compared with histomorphometry, the mean differences between CBCT and histomorphometry were between 0.06 and 2.61mm. Mesial bone level (MBL) and distal bone level (DBL) were underestimated by both CR and CBCT. CR and histology measurements were only significantly correlated for implant length measurements. All intraclass correlations were highly significant. Conclusions: 3D CBCT provides usable information about bone in all dimensions around implants with varying accuracy. CR and CBCT perform similar in assessing MBL and DBL, but, within its limits, the CBCT can assess oral and buccal bone. Metallic artefacts limit the visualization quality of bone around implants and further research could elucidate the value of post-processing algorithms. When information about osseous perforation of implants is needed, CBCT may still provide clinically valuable information.

Objectives: The present study assesses the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) cone beam CT (CBCT) and intra-oral radiography (CR) in visualizing peri-implant bone compared with histology. Methods: 26 titanium dental implants were placed in dog jaws with chronic type vestibular defects. After a healing period of 2 and 8 weeks (n = 12 dogs) the animals were sacrificed. CBCT scans and CR of the specimen were recorded. Dissected blocks were prepared, and histomorphometric analysis was performed. Both modalities were measured twice by two observers and compared with histomorphometry regarding bone levels and thickness around implants as well as length and diameter of implants. Results: Measurements of CBCT correlated well with histomorphometry of the vestibular bone level, oral bone thickness and implant length (all p-values <0.05). Compared with histomorphometry, the mean differences between CBCT and histomorphometry were between 0.06 and 2.61mm. Mesial bone level (MBL) and distal bone level (DBL) were underestimated by both CR and CBCT. CR and histology measurements were only significantly correlated for implant length measurements. All intraclass correlations were highly significant. Conclusions: 3D CBCT provides usable information about bone in all dimensions around implants with varying accuracy. CR and CBCT perform similar in assessing MBL and DBL, but, within its limits, the CBCT can assess oral and buccal bone. Metallic artefacts limit the visualization quality of bone around implants and further research could elucidate the value of post-processing algorithms. When information about osseous perforation of implants is needed, CBCT may still provide clinically valuable information.

Oral Diseases (2012) 18, 692699 Objectives: Current clinicopathological parameters cannot predict the risk of malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia sufficiently. Recent studies have shown that podoplanin is expressed in oral cancer and precancerous lesions. The aim of our study was to assess whether podoplanin expression in pretreatment biopsies could serve as a biomarker to predict the risk of malignant transformation in patients with oral leukoplakia. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, podoplanin expression was analysed in 60 patients with previously untreated oral leukoplakia by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the associations between podoplanin expression and various clinicopathological variables including oral cancer-free survival (OCFS) and the SIN-classification. Results: The chi-square-test revealed that high expression of podoplanin in pretreatment biopsies was associated with malignant transformation (P = 0.003) and increasing SIN-classification (P = 0.009). In univariate analysis, podoplanin expression in oral leukoplakia had a significant impact on OCFS (P = 0.009). The 5-year OCFS rate decreased from 100% for patients with no podoplanin expression to 41.7% for patients with the highest level of podoplanin expression. Conclusion: Although podoplanin expression and the SIN-classification served as factors to predict malignant transformation in patients with oral leukoplakia in univariate analysis, no significant impact was found for both factors in multivariate analysis.

Contains fulltext : 47774.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes in rats. Five commercially available and three experimental membranes (VN) were included: (1) BioGide (BG) (non-cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens), (2) BioMend (BM), (3) BioMendExtend (BME) (glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (4) Ossix (OS) (enzymatic-cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (5) TutoDent (TD) (non-cross-linked bovine type I collagen, and (6-8) VN(1-3) (chemical cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens). Specimens were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches separated surgically on the back of 40 wistar rats, which were divided into five groups (2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks), including eight animals each. After 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: biodegradation over time, vascularization, tissue integration, and foreign body reaction. Highest vascularization and tissue integration was noted for BG followed by BM, BME, and VN(1); TD, VN(2), and VN(3) showed prolongated, while OS exhibited no vascularization. Subsequently, biodegradation of BG, BM, BME and VN(1) was faster than TD, VN(2), and VN(3). OS showed only a minute amount of superficial biodegradation 24 weeks following implantation. Biodegradation of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) was associated with the presence of inflammatory cells. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that cross-linking of bovine and porcine-derived collagen types I and III was associated with (i) prolonged biodegradation, (ii) decreased tissue integration and vascularization, and (iii) in case of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) foreign body reactions.

Contains fulltext : 47774.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes in rats. Five commercially available and three experimental membranes (VN) were included: (1) BioGide (BG) (non-cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens), (2) BioMend (BM), (3) BioMendExtend (BME) (glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (4) Ossix (OS) (enzymatic-cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (5) TutoDent (TD) (non-cross-linked bovine type I collagen, and (6-8) VN(1-3) (chemical cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens). Specimens were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches separated surgically on the back of 40 wistar rats, which were divided into five groups (2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks), including eight animals each. After 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: biodegradation over time, vascularization, tissue integration, and foreign body reaction. Highest vascularization and tissue integration was noted for BG followed by BM, BME, and VN(1); TD, VN(2), and VN(3) showed prolongated, while OS exhibited no vascularization. Subsequently, biodegradation of BG, BM, BME and VN(1) was faster than TD, VN(2), and VN(3). OS showed only a minute amount of superficial biodegradation 24 weeks following implantation. Biodegradation of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) was associated with the presence of inflammatory cells. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that cross-linking of bovine and porcine-derived collagen types I and III was associated with (i) prolonged biodegradation, (ii) decreased tissue integration and vascularization, and (iii) in case of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) foreign body reactions.

Contains fulltext : 47774.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes in rats. Five commercially available and three experimental membranes (VN) were included: (1) BioGide (BG) (non-cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens), (2) BioMend (BM), (3) BioMendExtend (BME) (glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (4) Ossix (OS) (enzymatic-cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (5) TutoDent (TD) (non-cross-linked bovine type I collagen, and (6-8) VN(1-3) (chemical cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens). Specimens were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches separated surgically on the back of 40 wistar rats, which were divided into five groups (2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks), including eight animals each. After 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: biodegradation over time, vascularization, tissue integration, and foreign body reaction. Highest vascularization and tissue integration was noted for BG followed by BM, BME, and VN(1); TD, VN(2), and VN(3) showed prolongated, while OS exhibited no vascularization. Subsequently, biodegradation of BG, BM, BME and VN(1) was faster than TD, VN(2), and VN(3). OS showed only a minute amount of superficial biodegradation 24 weeks following implantation. Biodegradation of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) was associated with the presence of inflammatory cells. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that cross-linking of bovine and porcine-derived collagen types I and III was associated with (i) prolonged biodegradation, (ii) decreased tissue integration and vascularization, and (iii) in case of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) foreign body reactions.