Search

Trabzon-Değirmendere Valley is the third holy place for the Orthodox after Jerusalem and Hagion Oros (the Holy mountain). This study intends, through a field work, to trace and document the places of worship built by non-Muslims in Hamsiköy Valley, which is a branch of Değirmendere Valley that had the densest non-Muslim population, not included in the current literature or not made subject to comprehensive determinations and analyses. On-site determination and documentation studies were carried out in the study by tracing down the Non-Muslim places of worship situated in Hamsiköy Valley. Coordinates of these buildings were established, measurements were conducted whether the building/remnant was existing, schematic plans were drawn and photographs were taken. Inventory forms were generated in accordance with the information obtained. The building/remnants were processed on maps and their locations/positions were documented and their interrelations and the topography of the area was exhibited. A total number of 47 non-Muslim worship places were identified in Hamsiköy Valley in the current literature. Only 14 of these 47 buildings were located during the land study and 19 more buildings that could not be matched with the 47 buildings in the literature were identified during the field work. Hamsiköy Valley which is a branch of Değirmendere Valley, extending from the center of Maçka to Zigana in the south defines the spatial boundaries of the research. While the beginning of the period in question commences with conquest of Trabzon by the Ottoman, the temporal boundary of the study is drawn by the 19th century when extensive rights were granted to non-Muslims and then Turkish-Greek population exchange that took in 1923. This study was conducted for tracing down the places of worship built by non-Muslims in the past in Hamsiköy Valley in Trabzon. These non-Muslim buildings, for which there is not enough information about their current situation despite references in the

The starting point of this study is the problematic perspective of focusing only on the final product in spatial planning, while ignoring the planning process, and a lack of certain standards/criteria of the evaluation stage for the internal and external consistencies of spatial plans. Although it has recently attracted significant interest in the field, the methodological use of evaluation is not widespread in planning practice. Evaluation, which is considered to be a simple checking duty in the Turkish planning system (TPS), is not considered in the related literature and legislation. Focusing on the “evaluation stage” of spatial planning, this paper aims to demonstrate the contribution of the previously developed Guideline for Evaluation of Spatial Plans (GESP) in testing and ensuring the consistency of different scale and types of plans prior to their approval. The first phase of the study focuses on the concept of evaluation, reviews a series of related literature for the evaluation of plans, and discusses the evaluation stage in the TPS. In the second phase, the consistency of the selected case area plansafter addition of new resources that comply with the input of the previously developed evaluation framework GESPis examined. This guideline, which is an analytical method proposal, is applied over the selected cases, involving the upper-scale plans that cover Trabzon province and lower-scale plans for some settlements that were selected from within this province. Consistencies of all the plan components (plan sheets, plan report, plan notes, plan legend) of plans with different scales for the case area were tested in terms of the criteria of the developed guideline. Most of these plans were found to be inconsistent, both internally and externally. In the study, it was determined that the plans in fact contained many inconsistencies on their approval without being subjected to such evaluation. Although the study did not focus on the frequency of evaluation of

The city of Trabzon, was established on a plenary hillside which remains in between Tabakhane and Zağnos valleys horizontally. In resources, it is mentioned that the first usage of the city’s name was “Trapezus” which means “table” and this usage was a result of the city’s position, since it is established on a decent hillside which rises between two valleys. The east border of the study, which is the East Gate (Tabakhane Gate) of the historical walls, is important as it is the entrance point to the city through “Gavur Square”, which became the second centre of the city in time. The west border (Fatih Grand Mosque) of the study is also important since it is the oldest church of the city and it was the first example which was transformed into mosque due to Ottoman conquest procedures after the city was conquered by Fatih Sultan Mehmet. The border of the study is determined as the curled artery, which continues between these two historical elements and the public, and civil architectural examples in the artery from Tabakhane Mosque and Bridge to Fatih Grand Mosque are studied with a framework of historical chronology.In the first phase of the study, brief information about the history of Ortahisar is composed and data about the historical structures in the determined area (Tabakhane Gate, Bridge and Mosque, Ortahisar and Old Government House, Fatih Grand Mosque) are compiled. In the second phase of the study, the space between the city’s east gate (Tabakhane Gate) and the Fatih Grand Mosque (Panaghia Chrysokephalos Church), which is one of the most important sacred structures, transformed from church and still exists today, is evaluated by comparing the oldest photos that can be reached, archive documents from the Directorate of Cultural and Natural Heritage Conservation Board in Trabzon region, historical plans and the recent photos that are taken from close points. Evaluation of the subject is made through legal regulations, conscious of protection and Architectura

Önemli bir coğrafi konumda bulunan Karadeniz, tarih boyunca kıyısında olan siyasi güçlerin ilgisini çekmiş ve bu denizde tarihin en eski dönemlerinden itibaren önemli ticari faaliyetler meydana gelmiştir. Her ne kadar bir iç deniz olmasına rağmen Karadeniz bilhassa İstanbul ve Çanakkale boğazlarına hâkim olan devletlerin de kontrol edebileceği bir bölge olagelmiştir. Böyle olmakla birlikte bu bölge, Yunan kolonilerinden XIX. yüzyılın emperyalist güçlerine kadar her zaman başka ülkelerin siyasi ve ticari çıkarları için de bir sahne olmuştur. Osmanlı Devleti’nin kurulması ve Karadeniz de dahil yakın doğunun önemli bir gücü haline gelmesi Karadeniz’in durumunu etkilemiş ve Karadeniz II. Mehmet ve II. Bayezid’in fetihlerinden sonra bir Türk gölü haline gelmiştir. Karadeniz’in bu durumu XVIII. Yüzyılın sonlarına kadar devam etmiş ve Küçük Kaynarca Antlaşması sonrası Osmanlılar bu denizdeki üstünlüklerini kaybetmişlerdir. Bu tarihten sonra Rus yayılması ve Avrupalıların ticari faaliyetleri Karadeniz’in önemine katkı yapmış, bu bölge büyük güçlerin ekonomik ve siyasi mücadelelerinin gerçekleştiği bir yer olmuştur. Karadeniz liman kentleri bu yeni gelişmeden etkilenmiş ve Trabzon örneğinde olduğu gibi büyük bir ekonomik gelişme göstermişlerdir

Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : PhoVerre2

Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : PhoVerre2

Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : PhoVerre2

Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : PhoVerre2

Échelle(s) : 1:12 500, Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : MssSGE1

Échelle(s) : [Echelle non mentionnée]

Échelle(s) : [Echelle non mentionnée]

Échelle(s) : [Echelle non mentionnée]