1. THERE ARE COALITIONS EVERYWHERE
- Author
-
Peter Nedergaard
- Subjects
Argumentative ,Paper document ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Geography, Planning and Development ,Subject (philosophy) ,TheoryofComputation_GENERAL ,Public administration ,Payment ,CONTEST ,Test (assessment) ,Open method of coordination ,Political science ,media_common.cataloged_instance ,European union ,GeneralLiterature_REFERENCE(e.g.,dictionaries,encyclopedias,glossaries) ,Demography ,media_common - Abstract
Do members of the committees under the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) find that there are coalitions of specific member states in these committees? If so, then what kind of side payments hold these coalitions together? For the first time in scholarly literature, and based on an empirical investigation, the findings in this paper document that two opposing coalitions – with the United Kingdom and France as the respective leaders – exist in OMC committees where mutual learning is the raison d’etre. In the existing theory on this subject in the EU, it is claimed that consensus decision-making leads to a weakening of coalition-building. All three committees analysed in this paper build on consensus decision-making, which is achieved after intensive meetings between all the members. However, it is contended that the ‘argumentative contest’ working method of the OMC committees leads to more – not less – coalition-building. On the basis of a test, it is also shown that these committees are primarily ...
- Published
- 2009