Search

Background High uptake of hepatitis B virus (HBV) tests and antiviral therapy are required to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) at the population level. In the current study, we used the Basic Medical Care Insurance for Employees (BMCIE) to investigate the changes of clinical care cascade of CHB in Beijing, China. Methods Records for medical service of CHB patients from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 were retrieved from the BMCIE database. The annual and cumulative rates of CHB patients in care, receiving HBV tests and on antiviral therapy were calculated. The trends of annual percentage changes (APCs) were estimated using Joinpoint regression model. Findings Among estimated HBsAg positive employees, the rate of CHB patients in care increased from 4•77% in 2010 to 18•61% in 2018 (APC=17•3, 95%CI: 14•4-20•4). The rate of HBV tests increased from 4•41% in 2010 to 16•39% in 2018. Among the estimated eligible employees for treatment, the rate of antiviral therapy increased from 3•92% in 2010 to 30•88% in 2018. The proportion of hospital visits for HBV≥4 times per year had increased from 47•07% in 2010 to 65•31% in 2018. By 2018, entecavir (65•07%) and tenofovir (12•98%) had become the predominantly prescribed antiviral agents. Interpretation The rates of CHB patients in care, receiving HBV tests and on antiviral therapy substantially increased in Beijing, China. However, more efforts are still needed to increase the uptake of HBV tests and treatment for achieving the goal of HBV elimination by 2030. Funding Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (No.D161100002716003), National Science and Technology Major Special Project for Infectious Diseases (No.Z191100007619037, No.2018ZX10302204), and Digestive Medical Coordinated Development Center of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals (No. XXX 0104).

BackgroundDecision-making in initiating life-sustaining health technology is complex and often conducted at time-critical junctures in clinical care. Many of these decisions have profound, often irreversible, consequences for the child and family, as well as potential benefits for functioning, health and quality of life. Yet little is known about what influences these decisions. A systematic review of reasoning identified the range of reasons clinicians give in the literature when initiating technology dependence in a child, and as a result helps determine the range of influences on these decisions.MethodsMedline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA and Global Health Library databases were searched to identify all reasons given for the initiation of technology dependence in a child. Each reason was coded as a broad and narrow reason type, and whether it supported or rejected technology dependence.Results53 relevant papers were retained from 1604 publications, containing 116 broad reason types and 383 narrow reason types. These were grouped into broad thematic categories: clinical factors, quality of life factors, moral imperatives and duty and personal values; and whether they supported, rejected or described the initiation of technology dependence. The majority were conceptual or discussion papers, less than a third were empirical studies. Most discussed neonates and focused on end-of-life care.ConclusionsThere is a lack of empirical studies on this topic, scant knowledge about the experience of older children and their families in particular; and little written on choices made outside ‘end-of-life’ care. This review provides a sound basis for empirical research into the important influences on a child’s potential technology dependence.

OBJECTIVE Abstracts act as short, efficient sources of new information. This intentional brevity potentially diminishes scientific reliability of described findings. The authors’ objective was to 1) determine the proportion of abstracts submitted to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) annual meeting that subsequently are published in peer-reviewed journals, 2) assess AANS abstract publications for publication bias, and 3) assess AANS abstract publications for differing results. METHODS The authors screened all abstracts from the annual 2012 AANS meeting and identified their corresponding full-text publication, if applicable, by searching PubMed/MEDLINE. The abstract and subsequent publication were analyzed for result type (positive or negative) and differences in results. RESULTS Overall, 49.3% of abstracts were published as papers. Many (18.1%) of these published papers differed in message from their original abstract. Publication bias exists, with positive abstracts being 40% more likely to be published than negative abstracts. The top journals in which the full-text articles were published were Journal of Neurosurgery (13.1%), Neurosurgery (7.3%), and World Neurosurgery (5.4%). CONCLUSIONS Here, the authors demonstrate that alone, abstracts are not reliable sources of information. Many abstracts ultimately remain unpublished; therefore, they do not attain a level of scientific scrutiny that merits alteration of clinical care. Furthermore, many that are published have differing results or conclusions. In addition, positive publication bias exists, as positive abstracts are more likely to be published than negative abstracts.

The healthcare systems affiliated with the Mental Health Research Network strive to be learning healthcare systems that identify and address evidence gaps of importance to clinicians, patients and funders. This paper describes how research guides clinical care and how clinical care guides research in the area of suicide prevention, and some of the challenges of conducting embedded research. The transformation of healthcare systems into learning healthcare systems - where science, informatics, incentives and culture align for continuous improvement - could improve clinical care and decrease delays in implementing best practices. However, it can be challenging to ensure the necessary elements are present: a well-developed infrastructure to organize and analyze health records data, a culture of shared responsibility, and an organizational philosophy promoting bidirectional learning between healthcare practice and research. Nonetheless, strengthening research-practice partnerships to accelerate the adoption, implementation and improvement of evidence-based mental healthcare is a priority for federal funding agencies and healthcare organizations. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of establishing and maintaining engaged clinical partnerships in the area of suicide prevention.

The papers in this special series make a compelling case for the value of digital mental health services (DMHS; including technology-based interventions, assessments, and prevention programs) to help address some of the currently unmet needs in mental health care. At the same time, the papers highlight the work that needs to be accomplished for DMHS to fulfill their promise. We review the papers’ contributions in terms of (a) the imperative to increase access to evidence-informed, high-quality care, especially for underserved populations, both in the United States and globally; (b) ways to use DMHS to improve the ways that clinical care is provided to make treatment provision more effective and efficient; and (c) the current state of the research on DMHS for emotional disorders. We then consider lessons learned and recommendations to move the field forward, such as increasing (and making transparent) the research base on DMHS, adopting regulatory standards for DMHS, attending carefully to training issues for DMHS and best practices for dissemination and implementation, designing specifically for digital platforms, and being intentional about efforts to reduce disparities regarding who benefits from DMHS.

Narrative theory is a dynamic and evolving field of inquiry that has made tremendous inroads in the medical humanities over the past 40 years. Numerous authors have popularized the idea that “thinking narratively” can produce important insights about the illness experience for physician and patient alike. This paper draws on aspects of narrative theory to emphasize the moral responsibilities that arise when we step into another person's life narrative, becoming a character in her or his story. This has especially significant ethical implications for the physician–patient encounter in that each character in this shared story experiences time somewhat differently. This gives rise to the notion of “slow motion ethics” and a somewhat unique perspective on the moral responsibilities clinicians bear toward their patients.

Adherence and compliance to oral anticancer medications (OAMs) can be challenging for patients due to their complex regimens. The goal of this research project was to design an effective and engaging user interface (UI), based on user-centered design (UCD) and incorporate animations, to reinforce and improve patient's understanding of the key aspects of taking OAMs. This current paper encompasses the development process and describes the initial phase of the project, which focused on the design and development of the tablet-based educational application (app). A UCD approach was implemented by consulting with oncology clinicians and patients at an early stage of development. Animations were developed and incorporated to convey complex medical concepts and information. An iterative design process will help ensure that the tool is customized for patient engagement.

This fourth IHFD report details 3,159 hip fracture cases in patients aged 60 years and over, discharged by 16 hospitals in 2016, which accounts for 86% of all hip fracture cases nationally*.This will be the first report to compare individual hospital performances across six clinical care standards.Since its inception in 2012 and with more than 10,000 patient records on the database, the IHFD is now a powerful resource.The IHFD has a clear focus on driving improvements in patient care and data quality.As a maturing database, its remit has naturally broadened and the ability of the database to influence other areas has also grown e.g. national service re-design, research etc.Improvements include:• All sixteen eligible hospitals in the Republic of Ireland are now recording data.• National service re-design e.g. trauma bypass for hip fractures.• Increase in percentage of patients admitted to an orthopaedic ward within 4 hours.• Increase in percentage of patients having surgery within 48 hours (75%).• 77% of patients were mobilised on the day of or day after surgery.• Increase in percentage of patients seen by a Geriatrician (56%).• More patients received a bone health (57%) and falls (54%) assessment to prevent further fallsand fractures.• Median length of stay has reduced to 12 days.• Coverage of hip fracture cases has increased to 86%.• Completeness of data has increased to 98%.• In 2018, a new KPI for hip fractures will be tested which will measure the percentage ofpatients with hip fractures who have surgery within 48 hours from time of first presentation.This KPI will use IHFD data as its source.The IHFD was invited to participate in a comparison of eight hip fracture registers from around the world. The paper was published in ‘Injury’ (Johansen et al., 2017). This collaboration across nations further strengthens the focus and power of such registries to drive better, safer care for hip fracture patients.