Gerofke, Antje, David, Madlen, Schmidt, Phillipp, Vicente, Joana Lobo, Buekers, Jurgen, Gilles, Liese, Colles, Ann, Bessems, Jos, Bastiaensen, Michiel, Covaci, Adrian, Den Hond, Elly, Koppen, Gudrun, Laeremans, Michelle, Verheyen, Veerle J, Černá, Milena, Klánová, Jana, Krsková, Andrea, Zvonař, Martin, Knudsen, Lisbeth E, Koch, Holger M, Jensen, Tina Kold, Rambaud, Loïc, Riou, Margaux, Vogel, Nina, Gabriel, Catherine, Karakitsios, Spyros, Papaioannou, Nafsika, Sarigiannis, Denis, Kakucs, Réka, Középesy, Szilvia, Rudnai, Péter, Szigeti, Tamás, Barbone, Fabio, Rosolen, Valentina, Guignard, Cedric, Gutleb, Arno C, Sakhi, Amrit Kaur, Haug, Line Småstuen, Janasik, Beata, Ligocka, Danuta, Estokova, Milada, Fabelova, Lucia, Kolena, Branislav, Murinova, Lubica Palkovicova, Petrovicova, Ida, Richterova, Denisa, Horvat, Milena, Mazej, Darja, Tratnik, Janja Snoj, Runkel, Agneta Annika, Castaño, Argelia, Esteban-López, Marta, Pedraza-Díaz, Susana, Åkesson, Agneta, Lignell, Sanna, Vlaanderen, Jelle, Zock, Jan-Paul, Schoeters, Greet, Kolossa-Gehring, Marike, IRAS OH Epidemiology Chemical Agents, IRAS OH Epidemiology Chemical Agents, Unión Europea. Comisión Europea. H2020, The Research Council of Norway, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (Alemania), Ministry of Health (República Checa), Slovak Research and Development Agency, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (España), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Flemish Government, Ministère de la Santé (Francia), Jožef Stefan Institute, Odense University Hospital (Dinamarca), Odense Municipality (Dinamarca), Novo Nordisk Foundation, and Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Polonia)
Within the European Human Biomonitoring (HBM) Initiative HBM4EU we derived HBM indicators that were designed to help answering key policy questions and support chemical policies. The result indicators convey information on chemicals exposure of different age groups, sexes, geographical regions and time points by comparing median exposure values. If differences are observed for one group or the other, policy measures or risk management options can be implemented. Impact indicators support health risk assessment by comparing exposure values with health-based guidance values, such as human biomonitoring guidance values (HBM-GVs). In general, the indicators should be designed to translate complex scientific information into short and clear messages and make it accessible to policy makers but also to a broader audience such as stakeholders (e.g. NGO's), other scientists and the general public. Based on harmonized data from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies (2014-2021), the usefulness of our indicators was demonstrated for the age group children (6-11 years), using two case examples: one phthalate (Diisobutyl phthalate: DiBP) and one non-phthalate substitute (Di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2- dicarboxylate: DINCH). For the comparison of age groups, these were compared to data for teenagers (12-18 years), and time periods were compared using data from the DEMOCOPHES project (2011-2012). Our result indicators proved to be suitable for demonstrating the effectiveness of policy measures for DiBP and the need of continuous monitoring for DINCH. They showed similar exposure for boys and girls, indicating that there is no need for gender focused interventions and/or no indication of sex-specific exposure patterns. They created a basis for a targeted approach by highlighting relevant geographical differences in internal exposure. An adequate data basis is essential for revealing differences for all indicators. This was particularly evident in our studies on the indicators on age differences. The impact indicator revealed that health risks based on exposure to DiBP cannot be excluded. This is an indication or flag for risk managers and policy makers that exposure to DiBP still is a relevant health issue. HBM indicators derived within HBM4EU are a valuable and important complement to existing indicator lists in the context of environment and health. Their applicability, current shortcomings and solution strategies are outlined. The authors received funding from the EUHorizon 2020 framework (grant agreement No 733032). Additional financial support for the conduct of the studies is provided by each participating country. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has contributed to funding of the Norwegian Environmental Biobank (NEB). The laboratory measurements have partly been funded by the Research Council of Norway through research projects (275903 and 268465). The funding of the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection is gratefully acknowledged. PCB cohort was supported by Ministry of Health of the Slovak Re public, grant no. 2012/47-SZU-11 and by Slovak Research and Development Agency, grant no. APVV-0571-12. PCB cohort follow-up received additional funding from the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, program 07B0103. Riksmaten Adolescents was performed by the Swedish Food Agency with financial support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. The BEA study was co-funded by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (SEG 1321/15). The CELSPAC study is supported by the MEYS (LM2018121, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000469) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement (857560). This publication reflects only the author’s view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. NIRAS/ONDRAF (Belgian National Agency for Radioactive Waste and enriched Fissile Material), STORA (Study and Consultation Radioactive Waste Dessel) and MONA (Mols Overleg Nucleair Afval) financed the 3xG study. The FLEHS IV study was conducted within the framework of the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health (FLEHS 2016–2020) and funded by the Flemish Government, Department of Environment & Spatial Development. CROME study is co-funded by the European Commission research funds of Horizon 2020 and LIFE financial instrument of the European Community (LIFE12 ENV/GR/001040). ESTEBAN is funded by Sant´e Publique France and the French ministries of Health and the Environment. The Slovenian SLO-CRP study was co-financed by the Jozef Stefan Institute program P1-0143, and a national project “Exposure of children and adolescents to selected chemicals through their habitat environment” (grant agreement No. C2715-16-634802). The OCC studies were supported by Odense University Hospital, the Region of Southern Denmark, the Municipality of Odense, the Mental Health Service of the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense Patient data Exploratory Network (OPEN), Novo Nordisk Foundation [grant nr. NNF15OC00017734 and NNF19OC0058266], the Danish Council for Independent Research [4004-00352B_FSS]. POLAES study was co-financed by Ministry of Science and Education of Poland (contract no.3764/H2020/2017/2) Sí