Search

BACKGROUND: Preoperative optimization is increasingly emphasized for high-risk surgical patients. One critical component of this includes preoperative advanced care planning to promote goal-concordant care. We aimed to define a subset of patients that might benefit from preoperative palliative care consult for advanced care planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined adult patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2018 to a university health system for elective surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with death within one year, and presence of palliative care consult preoperatively. Chi-square analysis evaluated the impact of a palliative care consult on advanced care planning variables. RESULTS: Of the 29,132 inpatient elective procedures performed, there was a 2.0% mortality rate at 6 months and 3.5% at one year. Those who died were more likely to be older, male, underweight (BMI

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in patients with pancreatitis requiring hospitalization and its impact on outcomes. METHODS Adult patients admitted from 2011 to 2018 for pancreatitis were identified. Every admission for pancreatitis in the first year after diagnosis was evaluated for a VTE (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or mesenteric vessel thrombosis) within 30 days of discharge. Characteristics of patients who developed a thromboembolic event were compared with those who did not. RESULTS There were 4613 patients with pancreatitis identified, 301 of whom developed a VTE (6.5%). Patients who developed a VTE were more likely to be male (P < 0.01), older (P = 0.03), and have an underlying coagulopathy (P < 0.01). Those with VTEs were more likely to die (27% vs 13%, P < 0.01), have more readmissions for pancreatitis (1.7 vs 1.3, P < 0.01), longer length of stay (16 vs 5.5 days, P < 0.01), and be discharged to acute or long-term rehabilitation rather than home (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Acute pancreatitis requiring hospitalization is associated with high risk of VTE in the first year after diagnosis. Thromboembolic disease is associated with worse morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to assess whether vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) increases the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis and Barrett esophagus (BE) relative to patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients with and without preoperative GERD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Concerns for potentiation of GERD, supported by multiple high-quality retrospective studies, have hindered greater adoption of the VSG. METHODS From the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, VSG and RYGB patients with ≥2 years enrollment were identified and matched by follow-up time. GERD [reflux esophagitis, prescription for acid reducing medication (Rx) and/or diagnosis of BE], upper endoscopy (UE), and re-admissions were evaluated beyond 90 days. RESULTS A total of 8362 patients undergoing VSG were matched 1:1 to patients undergoing RYGB, on the basis of post-operative follow-up interval. Age, sex, and follow-up time were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Among all patients, postoperative GERD was more frequently observed in VSG patients relative to RYGB patients (60.2% vs 55.6%, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas BE was more prevalent in RYGB patients (0.7% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). Postoperatively, de novo esophageal reflux symptomatology was more common in VSG patients (39.3% vs 35.3%; P < 0.001), although there was no difference in development of the histologic diagnoses reflux esophagitis and BE. Furthermore, postoperative re-admission was higher in the RYGB cohort (38.9% vs 28.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared to RYGB, VSG may not have inferior long-term GERD outcomes, while also leading to fewer re-hospitalizations. These data challenge the prevailing opinion that patients with GERD should undergo RYGB instead of VSG.

This cross-sectional study assesses potential opportunities for genotype-guided prescribing in pediatric populations among multiple health systems by examining the prevalence of prescriptions for each drug with the highest level of evidence and estimating the prevalence of potentially actionable prescribing decisions., Key Points Question What is the opportunity for genotype-guided prescribing among pediatric patients in the US? Findings In this serial cross-sectional study of annual prescribing data at 16 health systems representing approximately 2.9 million pediatric patients per year from 2011 to 2017, the annual prevalence of exposure to at least 1 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium level A drug ranged from 7987 to 10 629 per 100 000 pediatric patients, with increasing prevalence before reaching a plateau in 2014. The medications with the highest potential for actionability were analgesics (oxycodone, codeine, and tramadol), the antiemetic ondansetron, and antidepressants (citalopram, escitalopram, and amitriptyline). Meaning These findings suggest that ample opportunity exists for genotype-guided prescribing among pediatric patients in the US, especially for drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 or CYP2C19., Importance Genotype-guided prescribing in pediatrics could prevent adverse drug reactions and improve therapeutic response. Clinical pharmacogenetic implementation guidelines are available for many medications commonly prescribed to children. Frequencies of medication prescription and actionable genotypes (genotypes where a prescribing change may be indicated) inform the potential value of pharmacogenetic implementation. Objective To assess potential opportunities for genotype-guided prescribing in pediatric populations among multiple health systems by examining the prevalence of prescriptions for each drug with the highest level of evidence (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium level A) and estimating the prevalence of potential actionable prescribing decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants This serial cross-sectional study of prescribing prevalences in 16 health systems included electronic health records data from pediatric inpatient and outpatient encounters from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. The health systems included academic medical centers with free-standing children’s hospitals and community hospitals that were part of an adult health care system. Participants included approximately 2.9 million patients younger than 21 years observed per year. Data were analyzed from June 5, 2018, to April 14, 2020. Exposures Prescription of 38 level A medications based on electronic health records. Main Outcomes and Measures Annual prevalence of level A medication prescribing and estimated actionable exposures, calculated by combining estimated site-year prevalences across sites with each site weighted equally. Results Data from approximately 2.9 million pediatric patients (median age, 8 [interquartile range, 2-16] years; 50.7% female, 62.3% White) were analyzed for a typical calendar year. The annual prescribing prevalence of at least 1 level A drug ranged from 7987 to 10 629 per 100 000 patients with increasing trends from 2011 to 2014. The most prescribed level A drug was the antiemetic ondansetron (annual prevalence of exposure, 8107 [95% CI, 8077-8137] per 100 000 children). Among commonly prescribed opioids, annual prevalence per 100 000 patients was 295 (95% CI, 273-317) for tramadol, 571 (95% CI, 557-586) for codeine, and 2116 (95% CI, 2097-2135) for oxycodone. The antidepressants citalopram, escitalopram, and amitriptyline were also commonly prescribed (annual prevalence, approximately 250 per 100 000 patients for each). Estimated prevalences of actionable exposures were highest for oxycodone and ondansetron (>300 per 100 000 patients annually). CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 substrates were more frequently prescribed than medications influenced by other genes. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that opportunities for pharmacogenetic implementation among pediatric patients in the US are abundant. As expected, the greatest opportunity exists with implementing CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic guidance for commonly prescribed antiemetics, analgesics, and antidepressants.

Objective This study sought to compare trends in the development of cirrhosis between patients with NAFLD who underwent bariatric surgery and a well-matched group of nonsurgical controls. Summary of background data Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery generally have improvements in liver histology. However, the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on clinically relevant liver outcomes has not been investigated. Methods From a large insurance database, patients with a new NAFLD diagnosis and at least 2 years of continuous enrollment before and after diagnosis were identified. Patients with traditional contraindications to bariatric surgery were excluded. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched 1:2 with patients who did not undergo bariatric surgery based on age, sex, and comorbid conditions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate differences in progression from NAFLD to cirrhosis. Results A total of 2942 NAFLD patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched with 5884 NAFLD patients who did not undergo surgery. Cox proportional hazards modeling found that bariatric surgery was independently associated with a decreased risk of developing cirrhosis (hazard ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.52). Male gender was associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.31-3.27). Conclusions Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery are at a decreased risk for progression to cirrhosis compared to well-matched controls. Bariatric surgery should be considered as a treatment strategy for otherwise eligible patients with NAFLD. Future bariatric surgery guidelines should include NAFLD as a comorbid indication when determining eligibility.