Search

Natural resource extraction projects, including those in the mining sector, have various effects on human health and wellbeing, with communities in resource-rich areas in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) being particularly vulnerable. While impact assessments (IA) can predict and mitigate negative effects, it is unclear whether and to what extent health aspects are included in current IA practice in SSA. For collecting IA reports, we contacted 569 mining projects and 35 ministries regulating the mining sector. The reports obtained were complemented by reports identified in prior research. The examination of the final sample of 44 IA reports revealed a heavy focus on environmental health determinants and included health outcomes were often limited to a few aspects, such as HIV, malaria and injuries. The miniscule yield of reports (1.6% of contacted projects) and the low response rate by the contacted mining companies (18%) might indicate a lack of transparency in the IA process of the mining sector in SSA. To address the shortcomings identified, policies regulating IA practice should strengthen the requirements for public disclosure of IA reports and promote a more comprehensive inclusion of health in IA, be it through stand-alone health impact assessment or more rigorous integration of health in other forms of IA., International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (11), ISSN:1660-4601, ISSN:1661-7827

Table S3. RNA sequencing read counts and alignment statistics. As stated in the title. (DOCX 15 kb)

Table S2. Primer list. List of the primers used in this study. (DOCX 12 kb)

Table S3. RNA sequencing read counts and alignment statistics. As stated in the title. (DOCX 15 kb)

Table S1. Used organisms. Used organism in this study including strain and source information. (DOCX 13 kb)

Table S2. Primer list. List of the primers used in this study. (DOCX 12 kb)