Manta birostris (Walbaum, 1792). Selected synonymy. Brachioptilon hamiltoni Newman, 1849 (see Beebe and Tee-van 1941, as Manta hamiltoni); Ceratoptera ehrenbergii M��ller and Henle, 1841. Common names. Giant manta ray, Pacific manta ray, devilfish, chevron manta, pelagic manta, oceanic manta. Diagnosis. Disc approximately 2.2���2.3 times as broad as it is long. Maximum disc width over 7000 mm. Slender whip-like tail. Reduced caudal spine predominantly encased in a calcified mass present on the dorsum of tail immediately posterior to the dorsal fin. Dermal denticles situated on long, sagittally oriented, raised ridges in the dermis that extend down the length of both the dorsal and ventral surfaces. Dental ligament embedded with small cusped teeth on the lower jaw measuring roughly 25 % of total disc length with approximately 12���16 rows, 220���250 files across entire width of the band. Total tooth counts of 3000���4000 for entire tooth band. Upper jaw contains at least two rows of enlarged denticles that span the same width of the upper jaw as the tooth band on the lower jaw. Morphometrics. See Table 1 for complete measurements of Manta birostris. A total of ten nonoverlapping proportional measurements were identified that could be used to separate Manta birostris from Manta alfredi (highlighted in Table 2). Colouration. Dorsal surface black, with large, conspicuous, white shoulder patches in the supra-branchial region, with or without black spots within them (Fig. 1 a, 2 a���h). Shoulder patches, which occur on either side of a dark midline, are distinct and approximately triangular in shape with hook shaped lateral extensions (Fig. 2 a���h). Anterior edge of shoulder patches runs medially from spiracle in an approximately straight line parallel to the edge of the upper jaw, a diagnostic character of this species (Fig. 2 a���h). Pale to white chevron shaped patch, of variable size, extends anteriorly from the anterior insertion point of the dorsal fin (Fig. 1 a). Small blazes of white colour are also often visible on the dorsal tips of the pectoral fins (Fig. 1 a). Mouth black to charcoal grey in colouration (Fig. 1 b). Dark colouration around mouth often extends posteriorly on the ventral surface from the base of the cephalic fins to the anterior edge of the first gill slits (Fig. 1 b, 3 a���h). Ventral surface largely cream to white with dark grey to black spots and patches most commonly occurring on the abdominal region between gill slit openings and anterior to the opening of the cloaca (Fig. 1 b). Spots do not occur medially between the five gill slits or on the pectoral fins lateral to the body cavity (Fig. 3 a���h). Medium to large black semi-circular spots posterior to the fifth gill slits are present (Fig. 1 b). Posterior third of disc charcoal-coloured forming a V-shaped margin along the posterior edges of the pectoral fins (Fig. 1 b, 3 a���h), a diagnostic feature for M. birostris. A melanistic form occurs that is entirely black on the dorsal surface and predominately black on the ventral surface except for a variably-sized white blaze along the ventral mid-line. Typical spot patterns are often visible along the white portion of the midline, which are centralised on the abdominal region and absent medially between the gill slits (Fig. 4 a,b). A whitish, or leucistic, colour morph has also been documented which exhibits increased white colouration on the dorsal surface, a near white or completely white face and mouth and light ventral colouration, including an interrupted charcoal-coloured pectoral fin margin (Fig. 4 a,b). This leucistic colour form appears to be rare, with less than a dozen observed specimens documented worldwide. All other morphological and meristic characters were the same as other examined individuals of M. birostris. Dentition. Tooth band on lower jaw comprising 64.76���69.65 % of total jaw width (Fig. 5 a). Tooth band containing 12���16 rows of small cusped teeth (approximately 1.5 mm in length) and 220���250 files across entire width of the band (Fig. 5 b). Total tooth counts range from 3000���4000 for entire tooth band. Morphology of individual teeth variable and may be dimorphic between sexes. Each tooth has a bulbous root, which is embedded in the dental ligament and freestanding stalk that ends in a curved cusp that forms the occlusal surface and is oriented to face the lingual side of the jaw (Fig. 5 b-d). Teeth in the tooth band slightly overlap (Fig. 5 c). Tooth band absent in upper jaw but two irregular bands of enlarged denticles extend along the upper jaw for a distance equivalent to the length of the lower tooth band (Marshall 2009). Denticles. Prominent dermal denticles present on both the dorsal and ventral surfaces are randomly distributed along sagittally oriented ridges in the skin (Fig. 6 a,b), a diagnostic feature of M. birostris. Denticles on the dorsal and ventral surfaces are similar in appearance and distribution, with slightly larger denticles on the ventral surface (Fig. 6 a,b). Denticles have pronounced bifid cusps (Fig. 6 c) that give the skin a much rougher texture than that of M. alfredi. The morphology of the most common denticle form on both the dorsal and ventral surfaces is shown in Fig. 6 c,d. Caudal spine. A calcified mass with an embedded spine is located on the dorsum of tail immediately posterior to dorsal fin (Fig. 7 a). The calcified mass rests just under a thin layer of dermis, lacks attachment via collagenous connective tissue to tail and detaches easily if skin is removed (Fig. 7 b). Spine with serrated lateral edges is embedded in a large mass of highly mineralised cartilage, similar to that described for Mobula japonica (Notobartolo-di.Sciara 1987) (Fig. 7 c). Spine appears to have an enameloid exterior and is slender in shape, approximately 3.5 % of the width of the calcified cartilage mass. Tip of spine projects approximately 3 mm out from the surrounding mass (Fig. 7 c). A sagittal plane CT scan clearly shows the spine embedded one third of the way into the calcified mass (Fig. 7 d). Visual examinations in the field suggest that the size of the calcified mass is positively correlated with disc width. The calcified masses extracted from the two rays examined (male 3850 mm DW/ 1785 mm DL and female 3765 mm DW/ 1645 mm DL), were similar in overall shape and were 5.98 % and 6.69 % of the total DL of the rays respectively. Size. Dissected specimens of M. birostris measured up to 4695 mm DW but estimates of the largest individuals sighted in the field (southern Mozambique and Mexico) were slightly over 6000 mm DW. Manta birostris reaches disc widths of at least 7000 mm, with anecdotal reports up to 9100 mm (Compagno 1999). Size at maturity for M. birostris may vary slightly throughout its range, but males in southern Mozambique mature at approximately 4000 mm DW (Marshall 2009). In Indonesia, the only mature male examined was 3850 mm DW. Additional fisheries data from Lombok, Indonesia suggest male M. birostris mature at 3750 mm (White et al. 2006). The only mature females observed or examined (n = 3) in southern Mozambique were in excess of 4695 mm DW. In Indonesia, female M. birostris up to 3800 mm DW were immature. Additional fisheries data from Lombok, Indonesia suggest females mature by approximately 4130 mm DW (White et al. 2006). Habitat and distribution. Manta birostris occurs in tropical, sub-tropical and temperate waters around the globe (Fig. 8). Commonly sighted along productive coastlines with regular upwelling, oceanic island groups and particularly offshore pinnacles and seamounts (Compagno 1999; Rubin 2002). Manta birostris has been documented to occur as far north as southern California and Rhode Island on the United States west and east coasts, Mutsu Bay, Aomori, Japan, the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt and the Azores Islands in the Northern Hemisphere and as far south as Peru, Uruguay, South Africa and New Zealand in the Southern Hemisphere. In some locations, including Mozambique M. birostris is sympatric with M. alfredi (Fig. 8). When they do occur together M. alfredi and M. birostris typically exhibit different habitat use and movement patterns (Marshall 2009). Material examined (n = 11). Mature male caught in gill net on 13 May 2007 in the Alas Strait south of TanJung Luar, Lombok (3850 mm DW). Juvenile female caught in gill net on 13 May 2007 in the Alas Strait south of TanJung Luar, Lombok (3765 mm DW). Juvenile female caught in gill net on 13 May 2007 in the Alas Strait south of TanJung Luar, Lombok (3800 mm DW). Juvenile female caught in gill net on 13 May 2007 in the Alas Strait south of TanJung Luar, Lombok (3568 mm DW). Mature female caught in gill net on 13 May 2007 in the Alas Strait south of TanJung Luar, Lombok (4695 mm DW). Mature female killed in June 1949 in Bimini, Bahamas (approx. 4500 mm DW) examined at the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ 37006). Mature female sampled on 26 September 2007 off the coast of Inhambane, Mozambique (skin sample only). Mature male sampled on 23 December 2006 off the coast of Inhambane, Mozambique (skin sample only). Mature female sampled on 12 October 2007 off the coast of Inhambane, Mozambique (skin sample only). Mature female (melanistic morph) sampled on 24 November 2007 off San Benedicto Island, Mexico (skin sample). Mature female sampled on 24 November 2007 off San Benedicto Island, Mexico (skin sample)., Published as part of Marshall, Andrea D., Compagno, Leonard J. V. & Bennett, Michael B., 2009, Redescription of the genus Manta with resurrection of Manta alfredi (Krefft, 1868) (Chondrichthyes; Myliobatoidei; Mobulidae), pp. 1-28 in Zootaxa 2301 on pages 4-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.191734, {"references":["Walbaum, J. J. (1792) Petri artedi sueci genera piscium. Grypeswaldiae, Germany, pp. 535.","Beebe, W. & Tee-Van, J. (1941) Eastern Pacific Expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XXVIII Fishes from the tropical eastern pacific. Part 3: Rays, Mantas, and Chimaeras. Zoologica, 26, 245 - 278.","Muller, J. & Henle, F. G. J. (1841) Systematische Beschreibung der Plagiostomen. Berlin, pp. 187.","Compagno, L. J. V. (1999) Systematics and body form. In: Hamlett, W. C. (Eds) Sharks, Skates, and Rays: the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 1 - 42.","White, W. T., Giles, J., Dharmadi & Potter, I. C. (2006) Data on the bycatch fishery and reproductive biology of mobulid rays (Myliobatiformes) in Indonesia. Fisheries Research, 82, 65 - 73.","Rubin, R. (2002) Manta Rays: not all black and white. Shark Focus, 15, 4 - 5."]}