Search

Clinical investigations in chronic heart failure (HF) have been increasingly including endpoints related to functional and exercise capacity. Noninvasive ventilation support (NIVS) constitutes a therapeutic option that could improve several markers of cardiovascular performance and functional capacity along with improvements in HF symptoms such as dyspnea. NIVS with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is a therapeutic option that can be better tolerated by patients than continuous positive airway pressure (cPAP) and potentially improve the adherence of patients with HF to NIVS. Future investigations should improve our understanding as to how to select patients with HF most amenable to respond favorably, elucidate the frequency and duration of NIVS session required to maintain the observed short-term beneficial effects for a long period of time, and shed additional light on the mechanisms associated with these benefits. In summary, NIVS appears to be a promising nonpharmacological therapy to improve exercise capacity and quality of life in chronic HF. (C) 2018 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Background: Left ventricular reconstruction (LVR) has been shown to provide transient benefits to the LV structure and function of infarcted hearts; however, long-term results have been disappointing as LVR-induced benefits are typically not sustained. We hypothesized that administration of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs), which promote myocardial repair and regeneration, may result in long-term preservation of the beneficial effects of LVR in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: Wistar Kyoto rats underwent myocardial infarction (MI) and two weeks later were randomized into 3 groups: in Group 1 (n=9), LVR was performed by plication of the infarcted apex and CDCs were injected in the infarct border zone (IBZ); group 2 animals (n=9) underwent LVR and received vehicle solution in the IBZ; and Group 3 animals (n=10) were injected with vehicle solution in the IBZ without undergoing LVR. Echocardiograms were performed at baseline, 4 days post-apex plication, and at 3 months post-MI. Results: At baseline, all animal groups had a comparable LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV end-systolic volume (ESV). Four days post-LV apex plication, Group 1 and Group 2 animals exhibited comparable significant improvement in EF and comparable significant reduction in LVEDV and LVESV. Three months post-MI, Group 1 animals had a decreased LVEDV, decreased LVESV, less impaired CS, increased peak systolic torsion and increased EF compared to animals in Groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: In infarcted rat hearts, intramyocardial delivery of CDCs in conjunction with LVR resulted in significant and sustained amelioration of LV remodeling and improvement in LV function compared to LVR alone. (C) 2016 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Aims: Inotrope treatment is often necessary in refractory to optimal management end stage heart failure, when signs of end-organ hypoperfusion appear. The effect of specific inotropes on patient outcome remains controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of levosimendan versus dobutamine, alone or in combination with levosimendan, on the outcome of end-stage heart failure patients, requiring inotropic therapy. Methods and results: We studied 63 patients in NYHA class IV, refractory to optimal medical therapy, recently hospitalized for cardiac decompensation and stabilized by an intravenous inotrope. They were randomly assigned to intermittent infusions of either a) dobutamine, 10 mg/kg/min, versus b) levosimendan, 0.3 mg/kg/min, versus c) dobutamine, 10mg/kg/min + levosimendan 0.2 mg/kg/min, each administered weekly, for 6 h, over a 6-month period. All patients received amiodarone, 400 mg/day, to suppress the proarrhythmic effects of the inotropes. Baseline characteristics of the 3 groups were similar. At 6 months, survival free from death or urgent left ventricular device implantation was 80% in the levosimendan, 48% in the dobutamine (P = 0.037 versus levosimendan), and 43% in the levosimendan + dobutamine (P = 0.009 versus levosimendan) group. At 3 months, NYHA class improved significantly in all 3 groups, whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased (27 +/- 4 to 19 +/- 8 mmHg, P = 0.008) and cardiac index increased (1.5 +/- 0.3 to 2.1 +/- 0.3 l/min/m(2), P = 0.002) significantly only in patients assigned to levosimendan. Conclusions: In patients with refractory end-stage heart failure, intermittent administration of levosimendan conferred survival and hemodynamic benefits in comparison to a regimen of intermittent infusions of dobutamine, alone or in combination with levosimendan. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Recanalization of an infarct-related artery does not predictably reflect tissue reperfusion. We examined the relationship between coronary blood flow (CBF) pattern during reperfusion and infarcted (IA) and no-reflow (NR) area in a porcine ischemia-reperfusion model. The mid-left anterior descending artery of 18 pigs was occluded for 1 h and reperfused for 2 h. CBF during reperfusion was measured with a transit-time ultrasound flowmeter, while systemic arterial and left atrial pressures were monitored. IA and NR were measured with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride and thioflavin staining, respectively. In 13 pigs, early systolic retrograde CBF developed within the first 30 min and persisted throughout reperfusion. No retrograde CBF was observed in five pigs. Mean retrograde CBF at 2 h of reperfusion predicted a larger IA (r = 0.71; p = 0.001). Time-to-development of retrograde CBF was inversely related to IA (r = -0.55; p = 0.019) and NR (r = -0.62; p = 0.006). A larger IA (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24, p = 0.037) and NR (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, p = 0.037) predicted the presence of retrograde CBF. Retrograde CBF during recanalization of the infarct-related artery predicts IA and NR and might be used as an index of successful reperfusion at the tissue level.

Background: Studies of the IABP have reported variable effects on coronary blood flow (CBF). The purpose of the present study was to measure the changes in coronary blood flow induced by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation in normal and reperfused porcine myocardium. Methods: A 30-ml IABP was placed in the descending aorta of 6 open-chest pigs. Each pig underwent occlusion of the mid-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery for 1 h, followed by reperfusion for 2 h. The effects of IABP support on systolic aortic pressure (SAP) and aortic end-diastolic pressure were recorded. The mean CBF, distal to the LAD occlusion site was measured at baseline and during reperfusion, with and without IABP counterpulsation. Results: The IABP decreased SAP and aortic end-diastolic pressure in normal and reperfused myocardium, and maintained a peak aortic diastolic augmentation at the level of SAP. In normal myocardium, the IABP decreased mean CBF by 8.4+/-2.2% (p

Objective When revascularization facilities are not available, thrombolytic therapy (TT) added to intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has been proposed as initial therapy for the management of patients presenting with postmyocardial infarction (MI) cardiogenic shock, followed by prompt transfer to another institution for revascularization. The use of TT in this setting, however, remains controversial. Methods We reviewed the records of 81 consecutive patients admitted with cardiogenic shock after acute MI and compared the outcomes of patients initially stabilized, including IABC as an adjunct to TT (IABC + TT group, n=40), with those patients initially stabilized with IABC and no TT (IABC group, n=41). Results The baseline characteristics of the two study groups were similar. The in-hospital and 6-month survival rates were 475 and 33.3% in the IABC + TT group versus 43.9 and 31.6% in the IABC group, respectively (NS). Except for mechanical ventilation more frequently required in the IABC group, other outcome measures were similar in both groups. The in-hospital (76.5 vs. 36.5%, P=0.008) and 6-month (60 vs. 25.4%, P=0.01) survival rates were significantly higher in patients who underwent delayed invasive revascularization, than in patients who underwent no invasive revascularization attempt. Conclusion In patients presenting with acute MI and cardiogenic shock, TT as an adjunct to IABC added no therapeutic benefit when compared with IABC alone. In contrast, the survival of patients was significantly increased by delayed invasive revascularization in both treatment groups. These observations suggest that, when revascularization facilities are not available, stabilization with IABC, followed by prompt transfer for delayed revascularization to a tertiary care hospital, might be the preferred management strategy for patients presenting with post-MI cardiogenic shock. Coron Artery Dis 19:521-526 (C) 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.