Search

Two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology has been used to study the actions of two amyloid peptides (Abeta(1-42), Abeta(1-40)) on alpha7, alpha4beta2 and alpha3beta4 recombinant human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nicotinic AChRs), heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The application of Abeta(1-42) or Abeta(1-40) (1 pM-100 nM) for 5 s does not directly activate expressed human alpha7, alpha4beta2 or alpha3beta4 nicotinic AChRs.Abeta(1-42) and Abeta(1-40) are antagonists of alpha7 nicotinic AChRs. For example, 10 nM Abeta(1-42) and Abeta(1-40) both reduced the peak amplitude of currents recorded (3 mM ACh) to 48+/-5 and 45+/-10% (respectively) of control currents recorded in the absence of peptide. In both the cases the effect is sustained throughout a 30 min peptide application and is poorly reversible.Abeta(1-42) and Abeta(1-40) (10 nM) enhance currents recorded in response to ACh (3 mM) from oocytes expressing alpha4beta2 nicotinic AChRs by 195+/-40 and 195+/-41% respectively. This effect is transient, reaching a peak after 3 min and returning to control values after a 24 min application of 10 nM Abeta(1-42). We observe an enhancement of 157+/-22% of control ACh-evoked current amplitude in response to 100 nM Abeta(1-42) recorded from oocytes expressing alpha4beta2 nicotinic AChRs.Abeta(1-42) and Abeta(1-40) (10 nM) were without antagonist actions on the responses of alpha3beta4 nicotinic AChRs to ACh (1 nM-3 mM).

We test the hypothesis that lysinuric protein intolerance (LPI), a rare autosomal recessive defect of cationic amino acid transport, results from the absence of the recently described y+L amino acid transporter. We compare fluxes of lysine (1 microM) into erythrocytes of normal subjects with those of patients homozygous for the LPI mutation. No significant differences in fluxes through system y+L in normal or LPI cells were found, excluding the possibility that system y+L cannot be expressed in patients with LPI. Reasons for supposing that there may be tissue-specific processing of two recently described genes encoding the y+L transporter are discussed. Polymerase chain reaction measurement of expression of these two genes in an erythroleukemic cell line suggests that alternatively there may be an as-yet-unidentified additional member of this gene family.