1. Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
- Author
-
Gemma Molero, M. John Foulkes, Matthew P. Reynolds, Erik H. Murchie, Carlos A. Robles-Zazueta, and Francisco de Assis de Carvalho Pinto
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Canopy ,Physiology ,Population ,Plant Science ,Photochemical Reflectance Index ,01 natural sciences ,Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ,03 medical and health sciences ,wheat ,education ,RUE ,Ecosystem ,Triticum ,Remote sensing ,Biomass (ecology) ,education.field_of_study ,AcademicSubjects/SCI01210 ,partial least squares regression ,Enhanced vegetation index ,Vegetation ,Research Papers ,Plant Leaves ,Plant Breeding ,030104 developmental biology ,Photosynthetically active radiation ,vegetation indices ,Remote Sensing Technology ,High-throughput phenotyping ,Environmental science ,hyperspectral reflectance ,physiological breeding ,010606 plant biology & botany ,Photosynthesis and Metabolism - Abstract
Radiation use efficiency can be predicted with ~70% accuracy. Canopy water content, greenness, and gas exchange spectral indices are the best predictors for RUE, biomass accumulation, and light interception., Wheat yields are stagnating or declining in many regions, requiring efforts to improve the light conversion efficiency, known as radiation use efficiency (RUE). RUE is a key trait in plant physiology because it links light capture and primary metabolism with biomass accumulation and yield, but its measurement is time consuming and this has limited its use in fundamental research and large-scale physiological breeding. In this study, high-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) approaches were used among a population of field-grown wheat with variation in RUE and photosynthetic traits to build predictive models of RUE, biomass, and intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR). Three approaches were used: best combination of sensors; canopy vegetation indices; and partial least squares regression. The use of remote sensing models predicted RUE with up to 70% accuracy compared with ground truth data. Water indices and canopy greenness indices [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI)] are the better option to predict RUE, biomass, and IPAR, and indices related to gas exchange, non-photochemical quenching [photochemical reflectance index (PRI)] and senescence [structural-insensitive pigment index (SIPI)] are better predictors for these traits at the vegetative and grain-filling stages, respectively. These models will be instrumental to explain canopy processes, improve crop growth and yield modelling, and potentially be used to predict RUE in different crops or ecosystems.
- Published
- 2021