1. Ethical attitudes in neurosurgery at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic
- Author
-
Robin Van der Straeten, Diedrik Peuskens, Frank Weyns, Neurosurgery, and Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy
- Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic - the likes of which no healthcare provider has experienced in recent decades - has catapulted our society in un- charted territory. As countless people got infected, a sustained and dra- matic increase in demand for healthcare ensued. Scarcity arose when demand exceeded the availability of healthcare resources. This applies to the financial, logistical and “architectural” constraints of the healthcare system, as well as its most valuable inelastic asset of skilled care pro- viders and supporting staff (Myles and Maswime, 2020; World Health Organization, 2020). As governments and hospital administrators across the globe mustered resources to combat the influx of COVID-19 cases in March and April of 2020, many neurosurgeons saw their working conditions dras- tically altered. Whilst some were redeployed as first-line workers, the majority was forced to postpone or cancel elective surgeries. Several government agencies and professional organisations such as the ACS and EANS, issued recommendations regarding triaging and scheduling of elective surgeries (American College of Surgeons, 2020; Belgian Society of Neurosurgery, 2020; European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, 2020). Notwithstanding efforts to preserve essential supplies, scarcity has prompted several ethical questions regarding the allocation and distribution of healthcare-related resources (White and Lo, 2020). We aimed to survey neurosurgical practice and ethical attitudes during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic on. We explored whether consensus exists amongst neurosurgeons as to what substitutes an essential intervention with regard to restrictions on elective surgeries. Also, we examined how neuro-ethical decision-making was influenced by the ongoing pandemic.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF