1. Why do my thoughts feel so bad? Getting at the reciprocal effects of rumination and negative affect using dynamic structural equation modeling
- Author
-
Andreas B. Neubauer, Marlies Houben, Elisabeth S. Blanke, Annette Brose, Yasemin Erbas, Tilburg Experience Sampling Center (TESC), Medical and Clinical Psychology, and Developmental Psychology
- Subjects
Control theory (sociology) ,Experience sampling method ,CROSS-LAGGED ASSOCIATIONS ,BIPOLARITY ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Emotions ,Social Sciences ,negative affect ,Structural equation modeling ,MINDFULNESS ,medicine ,Psychology ,Humans ,POSITIVE AFFECT ,Problem Solving ,General Psychology ,dynamic structural equation modeling ,media_common ,HAPPINESS ,Psychology, Experimental ,rumination ,DAILY EVENTS ,inertia ,experience sampling ,Distress ,Antecedent (behavioral psychology) ,DAILY-LIFE ,Feeling ,Latent Class Analysis ,DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS ,EMOTIONAL INERTIA ,Rumination ,medicine.symptom ,Reciprocal ,RESPONSES ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Rumination means to perseveratively think about one's negative feelings and problems. It is a response to affective distress that is often referred to as maladaptive emotion regulation. According to the response styles theory and control theory, rumination may further prolong and exacerbate affective distress. This means that rumination can be viewed as both an antecedent and an outcome of negative affect (NA), and vice versa. However, at the level of short-term dynamics, state rumination and NA have previously mainly been examined as two separate outcomes. To model the reciprocal within-person effects and hence, to match theoretical assumptions, we combined the two interrelated time series in one model using dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM). Both effects (NA on subsequent rumination and rumination on subsequent NA) were modeled simultaneously while acknowledging the autoregressive nature of both states (inert properties). We used data from two experience sampling studies (NStudy 1 = 200 Belgian university students; NStudy 2 = 70 German university students). Participants were paged on smartphones several times a day (Study 1: 10; Study 2: 6) for several days (Study 1: 7; Study 2: 9-12). In both studies, we found evidence for reciprocal effects of NA and rumination, and both processes showed autoregressive relationships. Aside from central findings, higher levels of rumination were also associated with higher rumination inertia, pointing toward more habitual rumination also being associated with prolonged rumination. Together, using DSEM, we found reciprocal associations between rumination and NA, while providing new insights into the dynamics between the two processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved). ispartof: EMOTION vol:22 issue:8 pages:1773-1786 ispartof: location:United States status: published
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF