Search

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Background There is a long-term safety issue in peripheral arterial disease patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon, this has also raised concerns on DCB in coronary intervention. Methods Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine observational studies (OSs) were included with a total of 3,782 patients (1,827 in the DCB group, 1,955 in the drug-eluting stent [DES] group) being analyzed. The primary outcome measure-major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death (CD), stent thrombosis (ST), all-cause death (AD), and coronary angiography outcomes included late lumen loss (LLL), minimum luminal diameter (MLD), diameter stenosis (DS) were analyzed. Results DCB treatment significantly reduced the LLL (MD: -0.13; [CI -0.23 to -0.03], p = .01). No difference was found for MLD (MD: -0.1; [CI -0.24 to 0.04], p = .17) and DS% (RR = 0.98 [CI 0.80-1.20], p = .86). There was no significant difference in TLR, TVR, MI, CD, ST, AD, and the overall incidence of MACEs between the two groups up to 3 years follow-up. Subgroup analysis for different type of ISR and DES showed no significant difference in the incidence of endpoints, and there is no difference when considering RCTs or OSs only. Conclusions The safety and efficacy of the DCB and DES in the treatment of ISR is comparable at up to 3 years follow-up.

Our previous studies have confirmed the superior biocompatibility of the poly-L-lactic acid/amorphous calcium phosphate (PLLA/ACP) scaffolds (PowerScaffold) compared to PLLA scaffolds and their similar 6-month radial strength compared with TAXUS stents. In order to conduct further dynamic observations on the performance of the PowerScaffold after 12-month implantation compared with the TAXUS stents. Twenty PowerScaffold and 20 TAXUS were implanted in porcine coronary arteries. At 12-month follow-up, Quantitative Coronary Angiography showed that the stent reference vessel diameter (3.19 ± 0.25 mm vs. 2.75 ± 0.22 mm, p < 0.05), the mean lumen diameter (3.07 ± 0.22 mm vs. 2.70 ± 0.17 mm, p < 0.05) and the late lumen gain (0.45 ± 0.07 mm vs. 0.06 ± 0.06 mm, p < 0.01) were all significantly greater with the PowerScaffold than the TAXUS. As well, Intravascular Ultrasound showed the stent reference vessel area (7.74 ± 0.48 mm2 vs. 6.96 ± 0.51 mm2, p < 0.05), the mean stent area (7.49 ± 0.46 mm2 vs. 6.53 ± 0.47 mm2, p < 0.05) and the mean lumen area (7.22 ± 0.50 mm2 vs. 6.00 ± 0.48 mm2, p < 0.01) were all significantly greater with the PowerScaffold than the TAXUS. The luminal patency rate of the PowerScaffold significantly increased from 72.45 ± 6.84% at 1 month to 93.54 ± 8.15% at 12 months (p < 0.01) while the TAXUS stents were associated with a non-significant decreasing trend (89.44 ± 8.44% vs. 86.53 ± 8.22%). Pathology indicated the average thickness of the struts degraded by 14.25 ± 3.04 μm at 1 month, 23.39 ± 2.45 μm at 6 months and 35.54 ± 2.20 μm at 12 months. Immunohistochemical examination showed that the expression of inflammatory factors NF-κB gradually decreased from 1-month to 12-month (36.79 ± 4.78 vs. 5.79 ± 2.85, P < 0.01). As the late lumen gain of arteries implanted with the PowerScaffold increases over time with the growth of vessels, it effectively reverse the late vascular negative remodeling observed with the TAXUS stents, providing a better option for lumen restoration treatment in clinical practice.

Biodegradable polymers used as vascular stent coatings and stent platforms encounter a major challenge: biocompatibility in vivo, which plays an important role in in-stent restenosis (ISR). Co-formulating amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) was investigated to address the issue. For stent coating applications, metal stents were coated with polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate/poly-n-butyl methacrylate (PEVA/PBMA), PLGA or PLGA/ACP composites, and implanted into rat aortas for one and three months. Comparing with both PEVA/PBMA and PLGA groups after one month, the results showed that stents coated with PLGA/ACP had significantly reduced restenosis (PLGA/ACP vs. PEVA/PBMA vs. PLGA: 21.24 +/- 2.59% vs. 27.54 +/- 1.19% vs. 32.12 +/- 3.93%, P < 0.05), reduced inflammation (1.25 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.38 vs. 2.30 +/- 0.21, P < 0.05) and increased speed of re-endothelialization (1.78 +/- 0.46 vs. 1.17 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.20 +/- 0.18, P < 0.05). After three months, the PLGA/ACP group still displayed lower inflammation score (1.33 +/- 0.33 vs. 2.27 +/- 0.55, P < 0.05) and higher endothelial scores (2.33 +/- 0.33 vs. 1.20 +/- 0.18, P < 0.05) as compared with the PEVA/PBMA group. Moreover, for stent platform applications, PLLA/ACP stent tube significantly reduced the inflammatory cells infiltration in the vessel walls of rabbit iliac arteries relative to their PLLA cohort (NF-kappaB-positive cells: 23.31 +/- 2.33/mm2 vs. 9.34 +/- 1.35/mm2, P < 0.05). No systemic biochemical or pathological evidence of toxicity was found in either PLGA/ACP or PLLA/ACP. The co-formulation of ACP into PLGA and PLLA resulted in improved biocompatibility without systemic toxicity.