Search

Background For the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) during the delayed phase (24–120 hours) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), the use of 3‐day dexamethasone (DEX) is often recommended. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two DEX‐sparing regimens with 3‐day DEX, focusing on delayed nausea. Patients and Methods This open‐label, randomized, phase III study was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of two DEX‐sparing regimens: ondansetron + DEX on day 1 + metoclopramide on days 2–3 (MCP arm), and palonosetron + DEX on day 1 (PAL arm) versus ondansetron on day 1 + DEX on days 1–3 (DEX arm) in chemotherapy‐naïve patients receiving MEC. Primary efficacy endpoint was total control (TC; no emetic episodes, no use of rescue medication, no nausea) in the delayed phase. Noninferiority was defined as a lower 95% CI greater than the noninferiority margin set at −20%. Secondary endpoints included no vomiting, no rescue medication, no (significant) nausea, impact of CINV on quality of life, and antiemetics‐associated side effects. Results Treatment arms were comparable for 189 patients analyzed: predominantly male (55.7%), median age 65.0 years, colorectal cancer (85.7%), and oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy (81.5%). MCP demonstrated noninferiority to DEX for delayed TC (MCP 56.1% vs. DEX 50.0%; 95% CI, −11.3%, 23.5%). PAL also demonstrated noninferiority to DEX (PAL 55.6% vs. DEX 50.0%; 95% CI, −12.0%, 23.2%). There were no statistically significant differences for all secondary endpoints between treatment arms. Conclusion This study showed that DEX‐sparing regimens are noninferior to multiple‐day DEX in terms of delayed TC rate in patients undergoing MEC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT02135510. Implications for Practice Chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the delayed phase (24–120 hours after chemotherapy) remains one of the most troublesome adverse effects associated with cancer treatment. In particular, delayed nausea is often poorly controlled. The role of dexamethasone (DEX) in the prevention of delayed nausea after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) is controversial. This study is the first to include nausea assessment as a part of the primary study outcome to better gauge the effectiveness of CINV control and patients’ experience. Results show that a DEX‐sparing strategy does not result in any significant loss of overall antiemetic control: DEX‐sparing strategies incorporating palonosetron or multiple‐day metoclopramide are safe and at least as effective as standard treatment with a 3‐day DEX regimen with ondansetron in controlling delayed CINV—and nausea in particular—following MEC., Chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in the delayed phase after chemotherapy are troublesome adverse effects associated with cancer treatment. This article compares the efficacy and safety of two dexamethasone‐sparing regimens with multiple‐day dexamethasone, focusing on delayed nausea.

Simple Summary Strategies to enhance the preferential accumulation and activation of Natural Killer (NK) cells in the tumor microenvironment can be expected to increase the efficacy of NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy. In this study, we report that a bispecific single domain antibody (VHH) that targets CD16 (FcRγIII) on NK cells and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on tumor cells can be used to target and enhance cytolysis of cancer cells. The bispecific VHH enhanced NK cell activation and cytotoxicity in an EGFR- and CD16-dependent and KRAS-independent manner. Moreover, the bispecific VHH induced stronger activity of cancer patient-derived NK cells and resulted in tumor control in a co-culture of metastatic colorectal cancer cells and either autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells or allogeneic CD16+ NK cells. We believe that this novel approach could represent a valid therapeutic strategy either alone or in combination with other NK cell-based therapies. Abstract The ability to kill tumor cells while maintaining an acceptable safety profile makes Natural Killer (NK) cells promising assets for cancer therapy. Strategies to enhance the preferential accumulation and activation of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment can be expected to increase the efficacy of NK cell-based therapies. In this study, we show binding of a novel bispecific single domain antibody (VHH) to both CD16 (FcRγIII) on NK cells and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on tumor cells of epithelial origin. The bispecific VHH triggered CD16- and EGFR-dependent activation of NK cells and subsequent lysis of tumor cells, regardless of the KRAS mutational status of the tumor. Enhancement of NK cell activation by the bispecific VHH was also observed when NK cells of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were co-cultured with EGFR expressing tumor cells. Finally, higher levels of cytotoxicity were found against patient-derived metastatic CRC cells in the presence of the bispecific VHH and autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells or allogeneic CD16 expressing NK cells. The anticancer activity of CD16-EGFR bispecific VHHs reported here merits further exploration to assess its potential therapeutic activity either alone or in combination with adoptive NK cell-based therapeutic approaches.

Upregulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 contributes to the progression and metastasis of both solid and hematological malignancies, rendering this receptor an attractive therapeutic target. Besides the only FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor (AMD3100), multiple other classes of CXCR4-targeting molecules are under (pre-)clinical development. Nanobodies (Nb), small single variable domains of heavy-chain only antibodies from Camelids, have appeared to be ideal antibody-fragments for targeting a broad range of epitopes and cavities within GPCRs such as CXCR4. Compared to conventional antibodies, monovalent nanobodies show fast blood clearance and no effector functions. In order to further increase their binding affinities and to restore antibody-mediated effector functions, we have constructed three different bivalent nanobody Fc-fusion molecules (Nb-Fc), targeting distinct epitopes on CXCR4, via fusion of Nbs to a Fc domain of a human IgG1 antibody. Most Nb-Fc constructs show increased binding affinity and enhanced potency in CXCL12 displacement, inhibition of CXCL12-induced signaling and CXCR4-mediated HIV entry, when compared to their monovalent Nb counterparts. Moreover, Nb-Fc induced ADCC- and CDC-mediated cell-death of CXCR4-overexpressing CCRF-CEM leukemia cells and did not affect cells expressing low levels or no CXCR4. These highly potent CXCR4 Nb-Fc constructs with Fc-mediated effector functions are attractive molecules to therapeutically target CXCR4-overexpressing tumors. ispartof: BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY vol:158 pages:413-424 ispartof: location:England status: published

Natural killer (NK) cells are a population of innate immune cells known to play a pivotal role against tumor spread. In multiple murine models, it was shown that physical exercise had the potential to increase NK cell antitumor activity through their mobilization and tissue redistribution in an interleukin (IL)‐6 and epinephrine‐dependent manner. The translation of this finding to patients is unclear. In this randomized pilot trial, we analyzed blood samples of patients with resectable breast or colon cancer who were randomized into an evidence‐based moderate‐high intensity resistance and aerobic exercise intervention (n = 8) or a control group (n = 6) during the first 9–12 weeks of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. In this pilot, we did not solely focus on statistical significance, but also explored whether average between‐group differences reached 10%. NK cell degranulation was preserved in the exercise group whereas it decreased in the control group resulting in a between‐group difference of 11.4% CD107a+ degranulated NK cells (95%CI = 0.57;22.3, p = 0.04) in the presence and 13.8% (95%CI = −2.5;30.0, p = 0.09) in the absence of an anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (EGFR‐mAb). In line, the between‐group difference of tumor cell lysis was 7.4% (95%CI = −9.1;23.9, p = 0.34), and 13.7% (95%CI = −10.1;37.5, p = 0.23) in favor of the exercise group in the presence or absence of EGFR mAb, respectively. Current explorative analyses showed that exercise during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit NK cell activity. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm this finding and to establish its clinical potential. Trial registration: Dutch trial register number NTR4105., We analyzed blood samples of patients with resectable breast or colon cancer who were randomized into an evidence‐based exercise intervention (n = 8) or control group (n = 6) during the first 9–12 weeks of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. NK cell degranulation was preserved during exercise and, although not statistically significant, cytotoxicity levels were 7%–14% higher compared to controls suggesting that physical exercise during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy might benefit NK cell activity.

Simple Summary Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes that play an important role in the immune response against cancer. Their activity is controlled by a balance of inhibitory and activating receptors, which in cancer can be skewed to favor their suppression in support of immune escape. It is therefore imperative to find ways to optimize their antitumor functionality. In this review, we explore and discuss how their activity influences, or even mediates, the efficacy of various anti-cancer therapies and, vice versa, how their activity can be affected by these therapies. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying these observations could provide rationales for combining anti-cancer treatments with strategies enhancing NK cell function in order to improve their therapeutic efficacy. Abstract Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate immune cells with the unique ability to recognize and kill virus-infected and cancer cells without prior immune sensitization. Due to their expression of the Fc receptor CD16, effector NK cells can kill tumor cells through antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, making them relevant players in antibody-based cancer therapies. The role of NK cells in other approved and experimental anti-cancer therapies is more elusive. Here, we review the possible role of NK cells in the efficacy of various anti-tumor therapies, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, as well as the impact of these therapies on NK cell function.

Background The ability to kill tumor cells with an acceptable toxicity profile, makes Natural Killer (NK) cells promising assets for cancer therapy. However, strategies to enhance the preferential accumulation and activation of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment would likely increase the efficacy of NK cell-based therapies. Methods In this study, we show a novel bispecific nanobody-based construct (biVHH) targeting both CD16A (low-affinity Fc receptor: FcRγIIIA) on NK cells and EGFR on tumors of epithelial origins. Results Higher levels of NK cell activity and subsequent tumor cell lysis were found in vitro in the presence of the biVHH and were dependent on the expression of both CD16A and EGFR while they were independent of the KRAS mutational status of the tumor. Increased NK cell activity was found in NK cells derived from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients when co-cultured with the biVHH and EGFR expressing tumor cells. Finally, higher levels of cytotoxicity were found against patient-derived metastatic CRC cells in the presence of the biVHH and autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells or allogeneic NK cells. Conclusions Based on our results, the bispecific CD16A and EGFR targeting VHH construct could be a useful tool in combination with various NK cell-based therapies.