Search

A woman in her 50s with HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) positive, estrogen/progesterone receptor negative, metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, presented with acral cyanosis and severe throbbing pain after recent administration of gemcitabine. She was treated with aspirin, heparin, amlodipine, topical nitroglycerin and analgesics. Gemcitabine was discontinued permanently. She had a gradual recovery except for a small necrotic area over the right 4th digit. However, surgical intervention was avoided.

PURPOSE Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies of pemetrexed plus platinum compounds have also shown activity in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS This noninferiority, phase III, randomized study compared the overall survival between treatment arms using a fixed margin method (hazard ratio [HR] < 1.176) in 1,725 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (n = 863) or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1 (n = 862) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. RESULTS Overall survival for cisplatin/pemetrexed was noninferior to cisplatin/gemcitabine (median survival, 10.3 v 10.3 months, respectively; HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.05). Overall survival was statistically superior for cisplatin/pemetrexed versus cisplatin/gemcitabine in patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 847; 12.6 v 10.9 months, respectively) and large-cell carcinoma histology (n = 153; 10.4 v 6.7 months, respectively). In contrast, in patients with squamous cell histology, there was a significant improvement in survival with cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/pemetrexed (n = 473; 10.8 v 9.4 months, respectively). For cisplatin/pemetrexed, rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia ( P ≤ .001); febrile neutropenia ( P = .002); and alopecia ( P < .001) were significantly lower, whereas grade 3 or 4 nausea ( P = .004) was more common. CONCLUSION In advanced NSCLC, cisplatin/pemetrexed provides similar efficacy with better tolerability and more convenient administration than cisplatin/gemcitabine. This is the first prospective phase III study in NSCLC to show survival differences based on histologic type.

A 55-year-old female presented to the hospital with a complaint of gross hematuria. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed. The specimens pathologically showed signet ring cells and no urothelial carcinoma components. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed bladder tumor, cervical metastasis, bilateral ovarian metastasis, and multiple lymph node metastasis. She was diagnosed with a primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder with cT3bN2M1, and was treated with chemotherapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC). After 2 cycles of GC, the value of CEA which was elevated to 106 ng/ml before treatment, became negative. CT scan showed that her disease had successfully responded to the chemotherapy, and remained efficacious till the end of 6 cycles. The patient subsequently received 1 cycle of gemcitabine and nedaplatin and 3 cycles of avelumab due to renal insufficiency. Yet, 14 months after diagnosis, cerebellar metastases appeared and the patient died of meningeal carcinomatosis.

ImportanceEarly results at 3 years from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial showed survival benefits with adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mature data are now available.ObjectiveTo report 5-year outcomes and explore prognostic factors for overall survival.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 77 hospitals in France and Canada and included patients aged 18 to 79 years with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection within 3 to 12 weeks before randomization. Patients were included from April 16, 2012, through October 3, 2016. The cutoff date for this analysis was June 28, 2021.InterventionsA total of 493 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 of body surface area; irinotecan, 150-180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) as adjuvant therapy for 24 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Prognostic factors for overall survival were determined.ResultsOf the 493 patients, 216 (43.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 62.0 (8.9) years. At a median of 69.7 months’ follow-up, 367 disease-free survival events were observed. In patients receiving chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine, median disease-free survival was 21.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-26.7) vs 12.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P P = .001), and 5-year overall survival was 43.2% vs 31.4%; median metastasis-free survival was 29.4 months (95% CI, 21.4-40.1) vs 17.7 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.2) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P P Conclusions and RelevanceThe final 5-year results from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial indicate that adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX yields significantly longer survival than gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Trial RegistrationEudraCT: 2011-002026-52; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526135

Gemcitabine is widely used in the clinic as a first-line antitumor agent. However, intrinsic and acquired resistance hinders its wide clinical application. In this study, a gemcitabine prodrug nominated as WRQ-2 was designed and synthesized by conjugating gemcitabine with the indole-3-methanol analogue OSU-A9 through a carbamate linkage. WRQ-2 exhibited high cytotoxicity against six cancer cell lines (HeLa, A549, MDA-MB-231, HuH-7, MGC-803, and HCT-116) with IC

Chemotherapy has remained the mainstay for the treatment of multiple types of cancers. In particular, topical use of chemotherapy has been used for skin cancers. Though effective, topical chemotherapy has been limited due to adverse effects such as local and even systemic toxicities. Our recent studies demonstrated that exposure to pro-oxidative stressors, including therapeutic agents induces the generation of extracellular vesicles known as microvesicle particles (MVP) which are dependent on activation of the Platelet-activating factor-receptor (PAFR), a G-protein coupled receptor present on various cell types, and acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase), an enzyme required for MVP biogenesis. Based upon this premise, we tested the hypothesis that topical application of gemcitabine will induce MVP generation in human and murine skin. Our ex vivo studies using human skin explants demonstrate that gemcitabine treatment results in MVP generation in a dose-dependent manner in a process blocked by PAFR antagonist and aSMase inhibitor. Importantly, gemcitabine-induced MVPs carry PAFR agonists. To confirm the mechanisms, we employed PAFR-expressing and deficient (Ptafr

Gemcitabine-based regimens are effective salvage therapy for RR lymphoma patients eligible for ASCT, but there is limited data in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients. Here, we present a retrospective analysis on the outcome of TIE adult patients with RR lymphoma treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin or carboplatin and dexamethasone (GDP/GDCarboP) +/- rituximab regimen in our center.We identified 33 patients: 54.5% diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (DLBCL), 6.1% double/triple hit lymphoma, 15% follicular lymphoma, 18% T-cell lymphoma, and 6% classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Majority of the patients had advanced-stage disease and raised LDH at relapse. The cohort's median age was 71 years. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2, and 60.6% were refractory to their last line of treatment.The overall response rate was 33% (complete response 15%) for the entire cohort and 62.5% for DLBCL patients not refractory to prior line of treatment. At median follow-up of 25 months, the median duration of response and overall survival in the responders were not reached. Conversely, the median overall survival for the non-responders was dismal at 5 months. Fifty-five percent required treatment alteration (dose attenuation or omission and treatment delay for1 week) due to adverse events, 73% needed transfusion, and 70% had at least 1 hospital admission during treatment.Our real-world data showed that GDP/GDCarboP provides meaningful efficacy and durability, especially among the responders. However, dose modification and inpatient support are frequently needed, indicating the need for good supportive care and close follow-up in this frailer population.

In the tumor microenvironment, there exist microorganisms that metabolize anticancer drugs, leading to chemotherapy failure. To solve this problem, herein, we develop antibiotic and anticancer drug co-delivery micelles, termed colistin crosslinked gemcitabine micelle (CCGM). A self-immolative linker enables colistin and gemcitabine to be released on demand without affecting their antibacterial and anticancer effects. Once CCGM is delivered to the tumor microenvironment, intracellular glutathione triggers the release of colistin and gemcitabine, inhibiting the growth of microbes in the tumor, thus eliminating the microbe-induced drug resistance of tumor.

Palliative chemotherapy using platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was recommended as one of the standard treatments in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative EGFR mutation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) and those treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG).We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing PC and CG at Hatyai Hospital between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was survival analysis, and the secondary outcome was chemotherapy-related adverse events, and the rate and reason for stopping chemotherapy.The median overall survivals of both groups was comparable (9.0 months for the PC group and 9.6 months for the CG group; log-rank, p=0.287). The CG group had a higher incidence of adverse events (89.7% vs. 77.9%, p=0.010) and tended to have a lower rate of chemotherapy discontinuation (29.6% vs. 41.2%, p=0.080) than the PC group. In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]=0.351; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.158-0.780; p=0.010) and higher performance status (OR=76.374; 95%CI, 32.533-179.295; p0.001) were independent predictive factors for stopping chemotherapy. In the proportional hazards model, the factors associated with decreased survival included higher performance status (hazard ratio [HR]=1.939; 95%CI, 1.388-2.709; P0.001) and discontinuation of chemotherapy (HR=2.572; 95%CI, 1.792-3.691; p=0.001).These two platinum-based regimens had comparable effects on overall survival. The CG group had a higher incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events, while the PC group had a marginally significantly higher rate of stopping chemotherapy from unacceptable adverse events and deterioration of patients' clinical status.

CEND-1 is a novel cyclic peptide that targets αV integrins and neuropilin-1 and enhances tumour delivery of co-administered anticancer drugs. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and biological activity of CEND-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine.This open-label, multicentre, phase 1 study, conducted at three hospitals in Australia, enrolled participants aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had one or more lesions measurable on MRI or CT, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Exclusion criteria included previous chemotherapy and brain metastases or other malignancy (unless receiving curative intent). There was no randomisation or masking. CEND-1 monotherapy was given as an intravenous fluid bolus on day 1 of a run-in phase of 7 days (0·2-3·2 mg/kg) followed by CEND-1 plus intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/mBetween Aug 13, 2018, and Nov 30, 2019, 31 patients were enrolled (eight in the dose-escalation phase [cohort 1a] and 23 in the expansion phase [cohort 1b]). Two patients were excluded from the efficacy population. No CEND-1 dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the safety population (n=31). The most common grade 3 or 4 events were neutropenia (17 [55%] patients), anaemia (eight [26%]), leukopenia (five [16%]), and pulmonary embolism (four [13%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 22 (71%) patients, mostly related to disease progression. Ten deaths occurred during the study due to progression of metastatic pancreatic cancer (n=9) and a left middle cerebral artery stroke (n=1). In the efficacy population (n=29), 17 (59%) patients had an objective response, including one complete response and 16 partial responses. After a median follow-up of 26 months (IQR 24-30), median overall survival was 13·2 months (95% CI 9·7-22·5).CEND-1 with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine has an acceptable safety profile, with no dose-limiting toxicities and encouraging activity. Adverse events were generally consistent with those seen with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Further randomised trials to determine the efficacy of CEND-1 are warranted.DrugCendR Australia Pty.

Therapeutic alternatives in advanced urothelial carcinoma are limited, especially in advanced lines, with only a few drugs having demonstrated relevant clinical benefit. This article discusses about a young patient with significant cardiovascular comorbidities, already treated with recommended first- and second-line drugs, and suffering from liver metastases. Despite the known poor prognosis of this disease and the few supporting data, given his peculiar clinical history, we opted to treat him with a third-line gemcitabine rechallenge with a notable response on his liver lesions. We present an intriguing case, both in terms of the therapeutic sequence and the disease course.

Purpose Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a molecularly heterogeneous tumor entity with no clinically established imaging biomarkers. We hypothesize that tumor morphology and physiology, including vascularity and perfusion, show variations that can be detected by differences in contrast agent (CA) accumulation measured non-invasively. This work seeks to establish imaging biomarkers for tumor stratification and therapy response monitoring in PDAC, based on this hypothesis. Methods and materials Regional CA accumulation in PDAC was correlated with tumor vascularization, stroma content, and tumor cellularity in murine and human subjects. Changes in CA distribution in response to gemcitabine (GEM) were monitored longitudinally with computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units ratio (HUr) of tumor to the aorta or with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ΔR1 area under the curve at 60 s tumor-to-muscle ratio (AUC60r). Tissue analyses were performed on co-registered samples, including endothelial cell proliferation and cisplatin tissue deposition as a surrogate of chemotherapy delivery. Results Tumor cell poor, stroma-rich regions exhibited high CA accumulation both in human (meanHUr 0.64 vs. 0.34, p < 0.001) and mouse PDAC (meanAUC60r 2.0 vs. 1.1, p < 0.001). Compared to the baseline, in vivo CA accumulation decreased specifically in response to GEM treatment in a subset of human (HUr −18%) and mouse (AUC60r −36%) tumors. Ex vivo analyses of mPDAC showed reduced cisplatin delivery (GEM: 0.92 ± 0.5 mg/g, vs. vehicle: 3.1 ± 1.5 mg/g, p = 0.004) and diminished endothelial cell proliferation (GEM: 22.3% vs. vehicle: 30.9%, p = 0.002) upon GEM administration. Conclusion In PDAC, CA accumulation, which is related to tumor vascularization and perfusion, inversely correlates with tumor cellularity. The standard of care GEM treatment results in decreased CA accumulation, which impedes drug delivery. Further investigation is warranted into potentially detrimental effects of GEM in combinatorial therapy regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Immunochemotherapy using PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in combination with chemotherapeutic agents has become a mainstream treatment for cancer patients, but it remains unclear which drug combination would produce best therapeutic outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare two common chemotherapeutic drugs, gemcitabine and cisplatin, for their impact on the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 antibody in K-ras-driven cancers known to overexpress PD-L1. METHODS: Both in vitro assays and syngeneic mouse tumor models were used in this study. Biochemical and molecular assays were used to determine the effects of drugs on T cell functions in cell culture models and mouse/human tumor tissues. Allograft tumor models with K-ras mutation were used to investigate the combination effect of gemcitabine or cisplatin with immunotherapy. Data of lung cancer patients with K-ras mutation treated with cisplatin and toripalimab were analyzed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the lab findings. RESULTS: Cisplatin and gemcitabine unexpectedly exert opposite effect on the therapeutic activity of PD-1 antibody in vivo . Gemcitabine antagonizes the therapeutic effect of PD-1 antibody due to its significant inhibition on CD8 + T cell infiltration, which was observed both in mouse tumor allografts and in human pancreatic cancer tissues. In contrast, cisplatin shows synergistic activity with PD-1 antibody by activation of CD8 + T cells through the DNA damage-mediated cGASSTING sensing mechanism, leading to increase of T cell infiltration and secretion of antitumor cytokines. Clinical data show that a combination of cisplatin with PD-1 antibody toripalimab could be effective in advanced lung cancer patients with K-ras mutation who failed prior therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a key factor in selecting chemotherapeutic agents for immunochemotherapy is the drug’s impact on T cell functions, and that cisplatinbased chemotherapy is an excellent choice for combination with immune checkpoint antibody to achieve favorable clinical outcome.

Ultrasound stimulated microbubbles (USMB) is a widely used technology that can promote chemotherapeutic delivery to tumors yet the best treatment occasion for USMB is unknown or ignored. We aimed to determine the optimal treatment occasion for USMB treatment to enhance tumor chemotherapy to achieve the highest drug concentration in tumors. Experiments were conducted on VX2 tumors implanted in 60 rabbits. Gemcitabine (GEM) was intravenously infused as a chemotherapeutic agent and USMB was administered before, during or after chemotherapy. USMB was conducted with a modified diagnostic ultrasound at 3 MHz employing short bursts (5 cycles and 0.125% duty cycle) at 0.26 MPa in combination with a lipid microbubble. Subsequently, tumor blood perfusion quantitation, drug concentration detection, and fluorescence microscopy were performed. The results showed that the group that received USMB treatment immediately after GEM infusion had the highest drug concentration in tumors, which was 2.83 times that of the control group. Fifteen tumors were then treated repeatedly with the optimal USMB-plus-GEM combination, and along with the GEM and the control groups, were studied for tumor growth, tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and related cytokine contents. The combined treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth and promoted apoptosis. The levels of related cytokines, including HIF-1α, decreased after six combination therapies. These results suggest that the optimal treatment occasion for USMB occurs immediately after chemotherapy and tumor hypoxia improves after multiple combination therapies.

Background and Objectives: The treatments of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with Cisplatin (Cis) and Gemcitabine (Gem) often cause side effects and drug resistance. This study aimed to investigate the combined effects of Tiliacora triandra leaf powder ethanolic extract (TLPE) and Cis or Gem on CCA cells in vitro and in nude mouse xenografts. Materials and Methods: Antiproliferative activity was evaluated using MTT assay. Drug interaction was studied by Chou-Talalay method. Apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest were analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell cycle and apoptosis regulating proteins were evaluated by western blot analysis. Results:Treatments with Cis or Gem in combination with TLPE significantly inhibited the growth of KKU-M213B and KKU-100 cells compared with single drug treatments. Synergistic drug interactions were observed with the dose reduction of Cis and Gem treatments. The safety of TLPE was demonstrated in vitro by the hemolytic assay. Synergistic combination treatments down-regulated Bcl2 and reduced the ratio of Bcl2/Bax in both CCA cells. TLPE enhanced tumor suppression of both Cis and Gem in nude mouse xenograft models. Combination treatments with Cis and TLPE reduced Cis toxicity, as demonstrated by the enhanced body weight change of the treated mice compared with the treatment with Cis alone. Furthermore, TLPE reduced hepatotoxicity caused by Gem treatment and reduced kidney and spleen toxicities caused by Cis treatment. Conclusion: These findings suggest that TLPE enhances the anticancer activity of Cis and Gem and reduces their toxicity both in vitro and in nude mouse xenograft models.

Ο καρκίνος είναι μία από τις πιο σοβαρές ασθένειες σε παγκόσμιο επίπεδο και είναι δυνατό να εμφανιστεί σε οποιοδήποτε όργανο ή ιστό του σώματος, ύστερα από απορρύθμιση των μηχανισμών που ελέγχουν τη συμπεριφορά των φυσιολογικών κυττάρων. Η κλασική μέθοδος που χρησιμοποιείται ως αντικαρκινική θεραπεία είναι η χημειοθεραπεία, όπου και χορηγούνται στον ασθενή ισχυρά κυτταροτοξικά φάρμακα, τα οποία όμως προκαλούν σοβαρές παρενέργειες λόγω της μειωμένης ειδικότητας και στόχευσης που παρουσιάζουν και της μεγάλης τοξικότητας έναντι των φυσιολογικών κυττάρων. Για το λόγο αυτό η αποτελεσματικότητα της μεθόδου αυτής είναι αρκετά μειωμένη και εναλλακτικές προσεγγίσεις οι οποίες φαίνονται πολλά υποσχόμενες αναπτύσσονται και επικεντρώνονται στη σύνδεση κυτταροτοξικών φαρμάκων με έναν στοχευτικό προσδέτη, ο οποίος αναγνωρίζει το κύτταρο-στόχο, μέσω μιας βιοδιασπώμενης γέφυρας. Τα στοχευτικά προσδέματα που χρησιμοποιούνται κατά κύριο λόγο είναι αντισώματα και πεπτίδια και στοχεύουν σε υποδοχείς που υπερεκφράζονται στην επιφάνεια των καρκινικών κυττάρων, με αποτέλεσμα τη στοχευμένη θεραπεία. Αν και τέτοιου είδους συζεύγματα βρίσκονται ήδη σε κλινικές δοκιμές και εμφανίζουν ενθαρρυντικά αποτελέσματα, παρόλα αυτά υπάρχουν σημαντικές δυσκολίες στην αντιμετώπιση ετερογενών όγκων. Τα συζεύγματα που υπάρχουν όμως φέρουν μόνο έναν αντικαρκινικό παράγοντα και μία στοχευτική ομάδα, γεγονός που μειώνει την αποτελεσματικότητά τους καθώς οι όγκοι μπορούν να εμφανίσουν ανθεκτικότητα και δοσοεξαρτώμενη τοξικότητα στο φάρμακο. Για την αντιμετώπιση αυτών των εμποδίων, η ερευνητική κοινότητα έχει στρέψει το ενδιαφέρον της στην στοχευμένη θεραπεία με συνδυασμό φαρμάκων με διαφορετικούς μηχανισμούς δράσης, που μπορεί να επιφέρει σημαντικές βελτιώσεις λόγω της συνεργιστικής δράσης των διαφορετικών κυτταροτοξικών μορίων. Ελλείψει στοχευτικών συζευγμάτων πολλαπλών φαρμάκων σαν αυτά που περιγράφηκαν πιο πάνω, η παρούσα μεταπτυχιακή διατριβή επικεντρώθηκε σε αυτό το σκοπό, την ανάπτυξη δηλαδή μια γενικής μεθοδολογίας που θα επιτρέπει την ορθογωνική σύνθεση διαφόρων στοχευτικών συζευγμάτων δύο ή περισσότερων αντικαρκινικών φαρμάκων (γεμσιταβίνη, ντοσεταξέλη, σουνιτινίμπη κτλ). Η στρατηγική που ακολουθήθηκε βασίστηκε στη σύνθεση ενός ικριώματος διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης, όπου μέσω των ατόμων αζώτου αυτού μπορεί να επιτευχθεί η σύζευξη των φαρμακευτικών μορίων, μέσω μιας βιοδιασπώμενης διπεπτιδικής γέφυρας (Val-Cit) και ενός αυτοκαταστροφικού συνδέτη, ώστε να επιτραπεί η χημική/ενζυμική απελευθέρωση των φαρμάκων στο ενδόσωμα, μετά την ενδοκυττάρωση του συζεύγματος. Τα άτομα βρωμίου του διπλού δεσμού του ικριώματος της διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης είναι ιδιαίτερα χρήσιμα για αντιδράσεις σύζευξης με μεγάλο αριθμό στοχευτικών προσδετών, οι οποίοι φέρουν ελεύθερες θειόλες, όπως για παράδειγμα πεπτίδια με κατάλοιπα κυστεΐνης, σχηματίζοντας σταθερούς σουλφιδικούς δεσμούς. Στα πλαίσια της παρούσας διατριβής επιτεύχθηκαν αρχικά η σύνθεση ενός πρότυπου ικριώματος διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης και του αντίστοιχου ενεργοποιημένου εστέρα και στη συνέχεια η παραγωγή του σε μεγάλη κλίμακα. Με βάση τις συνθετικές πορείες που ακολουθήθηκαν στο παρελθόν στα πλαίσια των διατριβών των προηγούμενων ερευνητών του εργαστηρίου, έγινε η σύνθεση της βιοδιασπώμενης διπεπτιδικής γέφυρας Val-Cit σε μεγαλύτερες ποσότητες και η σύνδεση αυτής με τη γεμσιταβίνη και το SAP και βελτιστοποιήθηκε η διαδικασία παραλαβής του τελικού προϊόντος. Εκκρεμεί όμως η σύνδεση της γέφυρας με την ντοσεταξέλη που βρίσκεται σε στάδιο ολοκλήρωσης. Τέλος, επιτεύχθηκε η σύνδεση του γεφυρωμένου SAP στο ικρίωμα της διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης, γεγονός που θέτει τη βάση για την εισαγωγή του δεύτερου φαρμάκου (π.χ. γεμσιταβίνη), και στη συνέχεια των στοχευτικών προσδετών που θα προσδώσουν τη στοχευτική ικανότητα στο σύζευγμα. Cancer is one of the most serious diseases worldwide and it is possible to appear in any organ or tissue of the body, after deregulation of the mechanisms that control the behavior of normal cells. The classic method used as an anti-cancer treatment is chemotherapy, where strong cytotoxic drugs are administered to the patient. However, these drugs cause serious side effects due to their reduced specificity and targeting and the high toxicity against non-diseased cells. For this reason the effectiveness of this method is quite reduced and alternative approaches, which seem promising, are being developed and focus on the conjugation of cytotoxic drugs with a targeting ligand, which recognizes the target cell, through a biodegradable linker. The targeting ligands primarily used are antibodies and peptides which target receptors overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells, resulting in targeted therapy. Although such conjugates are already in clinical trials and show encouraging results, there are still significant difficulties in treating heterogeneous tumors. The conjugates that do exist, however, carry only one anticancer agent and one targeting group, which reduces their effectiveness, as tumors can show resistance and dose-dependent toxicity to the drug. To address these obstacles, the research community has switched their focus to targeted therapy by combining drugs with different mechanisms of action, which can yield significant improvements due to the synergistic action of different cytotoxic molecules. In the absence of targeting multidrug conjugates like those described above, this master's thesis is focused on this purpose, i.e. the development of a general methodology that will allow the orthogonal synthesis of various targeted conjugates of two or more anticancer drugs (gemcitabine, docetaxel, sunitinib, etc.). The strategy which was followed is based on the synthesis of a dibromopyridazinodione scaffold which employs its nitrogen atoms for the conjugation of the drug molecules through a biodegradable dipeptide bridge (Val-Cit) and a self-destructive linker, which will allow the chemical/enzymatic release of the drugs into the endosome following the endocytosis of the conjugate. The bromine atoms of the double bond of the dibromopyridazinodione scaffold are particularly useful for conjugation reactions with a large number of targeting ligands, which bear free thiols, such as peptides with cysteine residues, forming stable sulfide bonds. In the context of the present thesis, the synthesis of a model dibromopyridazinodione scaffold and its corresponding activated ester was initially achieved, followed by their large-scale production. Based on the synthetic routes followed in the past by previous researchers in our laboratory, the synthesis of the biodegradable Val-Cit dipeptide linker in larger quantities and its conjugation with gemcitabine and SAP was carried out. Also, an optimized process for the isolation of the final conjugated product was achieved. However, the conjugation of the dipeptide linker with docetaxel is currently under investigation and remains to be completed. Finally, the attachment of the conjugated SAP to the dibromopyridazinodione scaffold was achieved, which sets the groundwork for the attachment of the second drug (e.g. gemcitabine) and the introduction of the targeting ligands which will endow the targeting capability to the conjugate. Περιεχόμενα ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ 8 ABSTRACT 10 Λίστα συντομογραφιών 12 ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ 14 1. Καρκίνος 14 2. Στοχευμένη χημειοθεραπεία με θεραπευτικά συζεύγματα 21 2.1. Χημειοθεραπεία μέσω στοχευτικού προσδέτη (Ligand-Targeted Drug Therapy) 21 2.2. Επαγόμενη ενδοκυττάρωση μέσω υποδοχέα (Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis, RME) 25 2.3. Συζεύγματα πολλαπλών φαρμάκων (Multi-Drug Conjugates) 27 3. Στρατηγική σύνθεσης συζευγμάτων με πολλαπλό θεραπευτικό φορτίο 30 3.1. Ικρίωμα Διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης 30 3.2. Πολυτροπικά συζεύγματα με βάση την διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνη 32 3.3. Σχεδιασμός πολυτροπικών συζευγμάτων με βάση το ικρίωμα διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης 34 3.4. Στρατηγική σύνθεσης του ικριώματος διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης 36 3.5. Επιλογή φαρμάκων για τη σύζευξη 37 3.5.1. Ντοσεταξέλη (Docetaxel, DTX) 39 3.5.2. Γεμσιταβίνη (Gemsitabine, Gem) 40 3.5.3. Σουνιτινίμπη (Sunitinib) 41 3.5.4. Ανάλογο σουνιτινίμπης (SAP) 43 ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΑ- ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΗ 44 Σύνθεση ενός πρότυπου ικριώματος diBrPD και μελέτες ορθογωνικής σύζευξης 44 Μελέτες σύζευξης 45 Σύνθεση του ενεργοποιημένου εστέρα του ικριώματος diBrPD 46 Βελτιστοποίηση σύνθεσης της διπεπτιδικής γέφυρας Val-Cit 48 Μελέτη σύζευξης της ντοσεταξέλης με τη διπεπτιδική γέφυρα Val- Cit (Docetaxel-Linker) 51 Βελτιστοποίηση σύνθεσης της συζευγμένης γεμσιταβίνης με τη διπεπτιδική γέφυρα Val-Cit (Gemcitabine-Linker) 53 Βελτιστοποίηση σύνθεσης του συζευγμένου με τη διπεπτιδική γέφυρα Val-Cit αναλόγου σουνιτινίμπης (SAP-Linker) 56 Σύζευξη του γεφυρωμένου SAP με το ικρίωμα διβρωμοπυριδαζινοδιόνης (SAP Conjugate) 57 ΠΕΙΡΑΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΜΕΡΟΣ 60 1. Σύνθεση μορίων 60 1.1. Όργανα, υλικά και μέθοδοι 60 1.2. Σύνθεση των ενώσεων 1-23 61 ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑΤΑ 96 ΠΡΟΤΑΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΜΕΛΛΟΝΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ 97 ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ 98 1. Καθαρισμός/Διαχωρισμός Ενώσεων 98 1.1. Χρωματογραφία 98 1.1.1. Χρωματογραφία λεπτής στιβάδας (Thin Layer Chromatography- TLC) 98 1.1.2. Χρωματογραφία στήλης (Column Chromatography) 100 2. Ταυτοποίηση Ενώσεων 103 2.1. Φασματοσκοπία Πυρηνικού Μαγνητικού Συντονισμού (NMR) 103 2.1.1. Χαρακτηριστικά στοιχεία φασμάτων NMR 105 2.1.2. Εφαρμογές φασματοσκοπίας NMR 108 2.2. Φασματομετρία Μαζών (MS) 109 2.2.1. Χαρακτηριστικά στοιχεία MS 110 2.2.2. Εφαρμογές Φασματομετρίας Μαζών 111 ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ 112 115 σ.

Cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) is a critical contributor to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mortality. Thus, there is an urgent need for new strategies to mitigate PDAC-associated cachexia; and the exploration of dietary interventions is a critical component. We previously observed that a ketogenic diet (KD) combined with gemcitabine enhances overall survival in the autochthonous LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53 R172H/+; Pdx1-Cre (KPC) mouse model. In this study, we investigated the effect and cellular mechanisms of a KD in combination with gemcitabine on the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in KPC mice. For this purpose, male and female pancreatic tumor-bearing KPC mice were allocated to a control diet (CD), a KD, a CD + gemcitabine (CG), or a KD + gemcitabine (KG) group. We observed that a KD or a KG-mitigated muscle strength declined over time and presented higher gastrocnemius weights compared CD-fed mice. Mechanistically, we observed sex-dependent effects of KG treatment, including the inhibition of autophagy, and increased phosphorylation levels of eIF2α in KG-treated KPC mice when compared to CG-treated mice. Our data suggest that a KG results in preservation of skeletal muscle mass. Additional research is warranted to explore whether this diet-treatment combination can be clinically effective in combating CAC in PDAC patients.

Pharmaceuticals are widely recognized as potentially hazardous to aquatic ecosystems. In the last two decades, the constant intake of biologically active chemicals used in human healthcare has been related to the growing release of these agents into natural environments. As reported by several studies, various pharmaceuticals have been detected, mainly in surface water (seas, lakes, and rivers), but also in groundwater and drinking water. Moreover, these contaminants and their metabolites can show biological activity even at very low concentrations. This study aimed to evaluate the developmental toxicity of exposure to the chemotherapy drugs gemcitabine and paclitaxel in aquatic environments. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were exposed to doses of gemcitabine 15 μM in combination with paclitaxel 1 μM from 0 to 96 h post-fertilization (hpf) using a fish embryo toxicity test (FET). This study highlights that both gemcitabine and paclitaxel exposure at single non-toxic concentrations affected survival and hatching rate, morphology score, and body length after exposure in combination. Additionally, exposure significantly disturbed the antioxidant defense system and increased ROS in zebrafish larvae. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel exposure caused changes in the expression of inflammation-related, endoplasmic reticulum stress-related (ERS), and autophagy-related genes. Taken together, our findings underline that gemcitabine and paclitaxel increase developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos in a time-dependent manner.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of combined use of docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy and 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) targeted therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Eighty advanced NSCLC patients in Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University) (March 2020 - March 2021) were selected and randomly assigned to chemo group (CHEG) and combination group (COMG), with 40 patients per group. All patients received docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy. On the 1st, 8th and 15th day of treatment, docetaxel (20 mg/m2) was injected via intravenous drip. On the 2nd, 9th and 16th day, gemcitabine hydrochloride (1 g/m2) was injected, also via intravenous drip. The dose regimens were repeated once every 28 days. In addition, patients in COMG received 5-FU targeted therapy at a dose of 15 mg/kg body weight, in 5 % glucose solution, via intravenous drip for 5 - 8 h daily for 5 consecutive days. Thereafter, the dose was reduced by half and the drug injected once every other day. Therapeutic efficacy as well as various clinical and biochemical indices were assessed in both groups. Results: Compared with CHEG, COMG had a slightly higher objective remission rate and a higher disease control rate (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was decrease in levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CY-FRA21- 1), with lower levels in COMG than in CHEG (p < 0.05). The median survival time was shorter in CHEG than in COMG (p < 0.05). However, no notable differences in the incidence of adverse reactions were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Combined use of docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy and 5-FU-targeted therapy downregulates the expressions of serum CEA, SCC and CY-FRA21-1 tumor markers, but significantly prolongs overall survival of patients. Therefore, this therapeutic strategy is safe but should be subjected to further clinical trials prior to application in clinical practice. Keywords: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU; Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); docetaxel; Gemcitabine

Refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients' failure of salvage chemotherapy had extremely worse prognoses. Herein, 14 R/R DLBCL patients failed to salvage chemotherapy were exposed to dual epigenetic agents (Chidamide 30 mg biw*2w and Decitabine 10 mg/m

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically on the based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. We previously reported significantly improved failure-free survival using gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) analysis. In this multicenter, randomized trial, patients were assigned to be treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (standard therapy, n = 238) or gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 242). With a median follow-up of 69.8 months, the induction chemotherapy group had a significantly higher 5-year OS (87.9% v 78.8%, hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI 0.34 to 0.78]; P = .001) and a comparable risk of late toxicities (≥ grade 3, 11.3% v 11.4%). Notably, the depth of the tumor response to induction chemotherapy correlated significantly and positively with survival (complete response v partial response v stable/progressive disease, 5-year OS, 100% v 88.4% v 61.5%, P = .005). Besides, patients with a low pretreatment cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA load (< 4,000 copies/mL) might not benefit from induction chemotherapy (5-year OS, 90.6% v 91.4%, P = .77). In conclusion, induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved OS significantly in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, without increasing the risk of late toxicities. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy and pretreatment cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA might be useful to guide individualized treatment.

Objective S-1 and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) were often used as the second-line chemotherapies after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) until nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy was approved as an alternative in Japan in 2020. However, the clinical outcomes of S-1 and mFFX after GnP have scarcely been reported. Therefore, we retrospectively studied them. Methods We extracted the clinical data of 86 patients with UPC who received second-line chemotherapy after GnP between 2015 and 2020. Among the patients who had a good organ functions and no massive ascites, 41 patients treated with S-1 and 21 treated with mFFX were enrolled. Results Compared to S-1, mFFX tended to be used for younger patients with a good general condition (median age, 63 vs. 71 years, p0.01; and performance status 0, 67% vs. 37%, p0.05). The median progression-free and overall survival were similar between the S-1 (3.7 and 7.2 months, respectively) and mFFX (3.3 and 7.4 months, respectively) groups. The response rate in patients with measurable lesions was 4% (n=1/23) in the S-1 group and 17% (n=2/12) in the mFFX group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 20% in the S-1 group and 57% (neutrophil count decreased in 43%) in the mFFX group (p0.01). Conclusion S-1 and mFFX were both acceptable second-line chemotherapies after GnP therapy for UPC, although attention should be paid to myelosuppression during mFFX treatment. Further studies involving nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy are necessary to facilitate the selection of the optimal regimen for each patient.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in patients aged ≥ 75 years with advanced pancreatic cancer and compare it with monotherapy (GEM or S-1).We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer aged ≥ 75 years who received either GnP or monotherapy (GEM or S-1) between January 2014 and May 2020. The primary efficacy outcome was overall survival (OS).A total of 96 patients were included in this study; 51 were treated with GnP and 45 with monotherapy (31 with GEM and 14 with S-1). The median OS and progression-free survival were 10.8 and 6.7 months in the GnP group and 10.7 and 4.3 months in the monotherapy group, respectively. The treatment effect on OS was consistently favorable in the GnP group across most subgroups, particularly in patients with locally advanced cancer, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0 or 1, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio lt; 3.1. The disease control rates were 76% and 48% in the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 23 (45%) and 11 (24%) patients of the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively.This study demonstrated that GnP was not superior to monotherapy with regard to OS. However, multivariate analysis showed that GnP treatment positively affected the OS and could be considered as a treatment option, even for elderly patients.

The regimen of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (Nal-IRI/FL) was approved in Japan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine-based treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 2020. We examined the difference in outcome between patients treated with second-line folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and those treated with nal-IRI/FL after first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP).The outcomes of 34 patients with PDAC who received second-line FOLFIRINOX (n=21) or nal-IRI/FL (n=13) after GnP at our Department from January 2016 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively.Patient backgrounds did not differ between the groups. Dose reduction was more frequently required for treatment with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL (86% vs. 46%, p=0.022). Pegfilgrastim and aprepitant were used more frequently in the FOLFIRINOX group (both p0.01). Progression-free survival (5.9 vs. 8.3 months) and overall survival (9.1 vs. 11.2 months) did not differ significantly between the groups. The frequency of grade 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) or higher adverse events was similar between the groups. All-grade peripheral neuropathy was more common in the FOLFIRINOX group (100% vs. 77%, p=0.048).FOLFIRINOX and nal-IRI/FL as second-line therapy after GnP provided similar prognoses, although supportive treatment and dose reduction were more frequently required for FOLFIRINOX.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) comprise a small population of cells in cancerous tumors and play a critical role in tumor resistance to chemotherapy. miRNAs have been reported to enhance the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy. However, the underlying molecular mechanism requires better understanding.Cell viability and proliferation were examined with CCK8 assays. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was executed to assess mRNA expression. StarBase database was used to select the target genes of miRNA, which were further affirmed by dual luciferase assay. Transwell assay was used to analyze cell invasion and migration.We proved that miR-497 could be obviously downregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and CSCs from Aspc-1 and Bxpc-3 cells. In addition, inhibition of miR-497 evidently accelerated pancreatic CSC gemcitabine resistance, migration and invasion. Moreover, we revealed that nuclear factor kappa B 1 (NFκB1) was prominently upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and pancreatic CSCs, and NFκB1 was also identified as a direct target of miR-497. Furthermore, we demonstrated that overexpression of NFκB1 could also notably promote the viability, migration, and invasion of gemcitabine-treated pancreatic CSCs, but this effect could be partially abolished by miR-497 overexpression.Those findings suggest that miR-497 overexpression could suppress gemcitabine resistance and the metastasis of pancreatic CSCs and non-CSCs by directly targeting NFκB1.

Background This randomised phase II/III trial aimed to determine whether perioperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) is non-inferior to the standard Adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods Patients with localised high-risk STS in the extremities or trunk were randomised to receive AI or GD. The treatments were repeated for three preoperative and two postoperative courses. The primary endpoint was OS. Results Among 143 enrolled patients who received AI (70 patients) compared to GD (73 patients), the estimated 3-year OS was 91.4% for AI and 79.2% for GD (hazard ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.80–8.14, P = 0.78), exceeding the prespecified non-inferiority margin in the second interim analysis. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 79.1% for AI and 59.1% for GD. The most common Grade 3–4 adverse events in the preoperative period were neutropenia (88.4%), anaemia (49.3%), and febrile neutropenia (36.2%) for AI and neutropenia (79.5%) and febrile neutropenia (17.8%) for GD. Conclusions Although GD had relatively mild toxicity, the regimen—as administered in this study—should not be considered a standard treatment of perioperative chemotherapy for high-risk STS in the extremities and trunk. Clinical trial registration jRCTs031180003.

In patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), the peritoneal cavity is the second-most common site of metastasis after the liver. Peritoneal macrophages (PMs) have been demonstrated to play a significant role in the peritoneal metastases of different cancers. Gemcitabine (GEM) is known to affect PC-associated immune cells, including macrophages. However, its effect on PMs and its possible clinical implication is yet to be investigated. In this study, mouse-derived PMs were treated with GEM ex vivo to analyze the polarization status. Production of GEM-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species was evaluated using DCFH-DA, DAF-FM, and Griess assay. Antitumor effects of PMs on UN-KC-6141and UN-KPC-961 murine PC cells were evaluated in presence and absence of GEM in vitro. Similarly, effect of GEM on human THP-1 macrophage polarization and its tumoricidal effect was studied in vitro. Furthermore, the effect of GEM-treated PMs on peritoneal metastasis of UN-KC-6141 cells was evaluated in a syngeneic mouse model of PC. GEM upregulated M1 phenotype-associated molecular markers (Tnf-α and Inos) in vitro in PMs obtained from naïve mouse. Moreover, IL-4-induced M2-like PMs reverted to M1-like after GEM treatment. Co-culture of UN-KC-6141 and UN-KPC-961 cancer cells with PMs in the presence of GEM increased apoptosis of these cells, whereas cell death was markedly reduced after N-acetyl-L-cysteine treatment. Corroborating these findings co-culture of GEM-treated human THP-1 macrophages also induced cell death in MIAPaCa-2 cancer cells. GEM-treated PMs injected intraperitoneally along with UN-KC-6141 cells into mice extended survival period, but did not stop disease progression and mortality. Together, GEM induced M1-like polarization of PMs from naive and/or M2-polarized PMs in a ROS-dependent manner. GEM-induced M1-like PMs prompted cytotoxicity in PC cells and delayed disease progression in vivo.

Purpose: Although programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are promising agents for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy has shown modest efficacy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus gemcitabine in patients with NPC who failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. Patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. To identify potential biomarkers, whole-exome sequencing, whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immune phenotype analysis based on Lunit SCOPE IO, an artificial intelligence–powered spatial tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte analyzer, were performed. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled between June 2018 and June 2019. The ORR was 36.1% and disease control rate was 97.2%. With median follow-up of 22.0 months, median PFS was 13.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.6–16.8 months]. Median OS was not reached, and OS rate at 6 months was 97.0% (95% CI, 80.4%–99.6%). The grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (2.8%) and anemia (2.8%). In multivariate analysis of mutation of chromatin modifier gene, tumor mutational burden (≥ 2.1 mut/Mb), and somatic copy-number alteration (SCNA) level, the group with high SCNA (> 3 points; HR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.3–37.9; P = 0.02) had independently associated with poor PFS. Immune phenotype analysis showed that tumors with high proportion of immune-excluded immune phenotype was significantly correlated with poor PFS (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2–16.2; P = 0.018). Conclusions: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine showed promising efficacy with favorable toxicity profiles in patients with advanced NPC in whom platinum-based combination chemotherapy failed.

The present study aimed to explore the sensitising capability of the anticancer agents, gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OXA), encapsulated in a novel SLN (GEM:OXA-SLN) against the ovarian cancer cell lines. A novel SLN, prepared using hot homogenisation by mixing phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, tween 80, and oleic acid, was characterised using Transmission Electron Microscope and zetasizer. The anticancer activities and the underlying molecular mechanisms of GEM:OXA-SLN were investigated. The average

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor response to the first-line chemotherapy drug gemcitabine. We previously identified stanniocalcin-1 as a gemcitabine-resistant-related gene, but its specific role and function in pancreatic cancer remain unclear. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to evaluate differential protein and mRNA expressions. The biological functions of genes were determined using proliferation and drug-resistance experiments. Subcutaneous tumorigenesis experiment was performed on nude mice. Prognostic analysis was performed using public databases and our clinical data. We found HIF-1α-regulated STC1 expression mediated chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Deeper, we explored the action mechanism of STC1 and identified PI3K/AKT as the downstream signaling pathway of STC1. Furthermore, we analyzed clinical data and found that STC1 expression was related to the prognosis of gemcitabine-treated patients after surgery. In general, we proved the HIF-1α/STC1/PI3K-AKT axis participated in PDAC progression and chemoresistance, and STC1 may serve as a potential prognostic factor and therapeutic target for PDAC treatment.

Tao Ma,1 Jin-Ling Jiang,1 Wei-Xiang Qi,2 Jia-Yi Chen,2 Hao-Ping Xu2 1Department of Oncology; Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hao-Ping Xu, Email xhp11701@rjh.com.cnIntroduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and is characterized by high malignancy, occult incidence and poor prognosis. Traditional chemotherapy drugs have limited efficacy and strong side effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a better treatment of the malignancy.Methods: The prepared arginine glycine peptide (RGD)-human serum albumin (HSA)-Gemcitabine (GEM)/Curcumin (CUR) nanoparticles (NPs) were characterized for physicochemical properties, stability and in vitro release. Comparisons of HSA-GEM/CUR NPs and RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs regarding tissue distributions and pharmacodynamics were also carried out using mice as the animal models.Results: Transmission electron micrographs showed that RGD peptide-conjugated HSA-NPs had an irregular surface, good dispersion (PDI=0.139± 0.03) and a uniform size distribution (Mean PS=115.6± 5.7 nm). The ζ-potential was − 17.3 mV. As regards in vitro release, non RGD modified NPs showed a faster release rate in 24 hours, yielding a release amount of 75% for GEM and 72% for CUR. RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs exhibited 67% of accumulated release of GEM (63% for CUR) in 24 hours. This may be due to the HSA chain covering the surface of NPs, which hindered the drug release. The cytotoxicity of GEM/CUR co-loaded NPs was significantly higher than that of single-drug NPs (P < 0.05). In vivo study results indicated that RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs had notable targeting effect on subcutaneous tumors, with a potential to actively deliver drugs to tumor tissues.Conclusion: In this study, we prepared RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs that had both good water solubility and tumor-targeting property. The results also showed that the RGD modified NPs had advantages in increasing GEM/CUR concentration at tumor sites and reducing its distribution in peripheral organs.Keywords: arginine glycine peptide, human serum albumin, Gemcitabine/Curcumin, nanoparticles, pancreatic cancer

Docetaxel and gemcitabine have different mechanisms of action, are well tolerated as monotherapies, and are affordable. This combination represents a good option for the second-line, bladder-preserving standard of care for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

We report the use of combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine (800 mg/m² on day1 and 8) and nedaplatin (60 mg/m² on day 1), including neoadjuvant therapy in four cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. In each case, the dose was reduced after assessing the performance status and renal function of the patient. Among the four cases, the best overall outcome was complete response in one case, partial response in two cases, and stable disease in one case. The main adverse event observed was thrombocytopenia; however, no serious adverse events were observed, and this regimen was safely administered. Therefore, we believe that this regimen could be an effective treatment option for progressive squamous cell carcinoma originating from the urinary tract.

Gemcitabine (GEM) is among the most used chemotherapies for advanced malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer. The clinical efficacy of GEM is, however, downplayed by its poor bioavailability, short half-life, drug resistance, and dose-limiting toxicities (e.g. myelosuppression). In spite of many approaches exploited to improve the efficacy and safety of GEM, limited success was achieved. The short A6 peptide (sequence: Ac-KPSSPPEE-NH

Aim: To compare the overall survival (OS) among patients who received first-line modified gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (G/nab-P) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, real-world study was conducted. Results: The median OS was 9.4 months versus 7.5 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and modified G/Nab-P groups, respectively (p = 0.16). An exploratory subgroup analysis excluding patients who received one infusion and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 2 demonstrated similar OS of 11.3 months and 8.9 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure were not significantly different. Higher rates of adverse events were noted with mFOLFIRINOX. Conclusion: mFOLFIRINOX did not significantly prolong OS compared with modified G/nab-P and was associated with increased toxicities.

Background According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. Methods The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0-2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. Discussion Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021-005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023.

Pancreatic tumors can be resistant to drug penetration due to high interstitial fluid pressure, dense stroma, and disarrayed vasculature. Ultrasound-induced cavitation is an emerging technology that may overcome many of these limitations. Low-intensity ultrasound, coupled with co-administered cavitation nuclei consisting of gas-stabilizing sub-micron scale SonoTran Particles, is effective at increasing therapeutic antibody delivery to xenograft flank tumors in mouse models. Here, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in situ using a large animal model that mimics human pancreatic cancer patients. Immunocompromised pigs were surgically engrafted with human Panc-1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors in targeted regions of the pancreas. These tumors were found to recapitulate many features of human PDAC tumors. Animals were intravenously injected with the common cancer therapeutics Cetuximab, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel, followed by infusion with SonoTran Particles. Select tumors in each animal were targeted with focused ultrasound to induce cavitation. Cavitation increased the intra-tumor concentrations of Cetuximab, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel by 477%, 148%, and 193%, respectively, compared to tumors that were not targeted with ultrasound in the same animals. Together, these data show that ultrasound-mediated cavitation, when delivered in combination with gas-entrapping particles, improves therapeutic delivery in pancreatic tumors under clinically relevant conditions. Published version

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a fatal disease with poor prognosis. Gemcitabine is the first-line therapy for PDAC, but gemcitabine resistance is a major impediment to achieving satisfactory clinical outcomes. This study investigated whether methylglyoxal (MG), an oncometabolite spontaneously formed as a by-product of glycolysis, notably favors PDAC resistance to gemcitabine. We observed that human PDAC tumors expressing elevated levels of glycolytic enzymes together with high levels of glyoxalase 1 (GLO1), the major MG-detoxifying enzyme, present with a poor prognosis. Next, we showed that glycolysis and subsequent MG stress are triggered in PDAC cells rendered resistant to gemcitabine when compared with parental cells. In fact, acquired resistance, following short and long-term gemcitabine challenges, correlated with the upregulation of GLUT1, LDHA, GLO1, and the accumulation of MG protein adducts. We showed that MG-mediated activation of heat shock response is, at least in part, the molecular mechanism underlying survival in gemcitabine-treated PDAC cells. This novel adverse effect of gemcitabine, i.e., induction of MG stress and HSR activation, is efficiently reversed using potent MG scavengers such as metformin and aminoguanidine. We propose that the MG blockade could be exploited to resensitize resistant PDAC tumors and to improve patient outcomes using gemcitabine therapy.

Due to the severe toxicity posed by chemotherapeutic drugs, adjuvant nutritional intervention has gained increased attention in the treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC). Amino acid (AA) metabolism is aberrantly regulated in PC and circulating histidine (His) levels are low in PC patients. We hypothesized that His uptake and/or metabolism is dysregulated in PC and that combining His with gemcitabine (Gem), a drug used in the treatment of PC, will enhance the anti-cancer effects of Gem. We performed in vitro and in vivo studies to determine the anticancer effect of the combination of His and Gem against lethal PC. We demonstrate that circulating His levels are low in both human subjects and genetically engineered mice exhibiting pancreatic tumors. Interestingly, the expression of histidine ammonia lyase, an enzyme involved in His catabolism, is higher in PC compared to normal subjects. His + Gem exerts a more potent cytotoxic effect in PC cells compared to individual treatments. His treatment results in a profound increase in His accumulation, accompanied by a depletion of a number of AAs, promoting cancer cell survival and/or glutathione (GSH) synthesis. His but not Gem increases hydrogen peroxide and depletes cellular GSH. Supplementation with GSH protects cells against His + Gem-induced cytotoxicity. Further, our in vivo studies demonstrate that His + Gem potently reduced tumor mass and improved mouse survival. Taken together, our data suggest that PC cells exhibit an aberrant His uptake/accumulation which, in turn, leads to oxidative stress and depletion of AA pool, thereby enhancing the anticancer effect of Gem.

Advanced pancreatic cancer is underscored by progressive therapeutic resistance and a dismal 5-year survival rate of 3%. Preclinical data demonstrated glutamine supplementation, not deprivation, elicited antitumor effects against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) alone and in combination with gemcitabine in a dose-dependent manner. The GlutaPanc phase I trial is a single-arm, open-label clinical trial investigating the safety of combination L-glutamine, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel in subjects (n = 16) with untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Following a 7-day lead-in phase with L-glutamine, the dose-finding phase via Bayesian design begins with treatment cycles lasting 28 days until disease progression, intolerance, or withdrawal. The primary objective is to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of combination L-glutamine, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel. Secondary objectives include safety of the combination across all dose levels and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Exploratory objectives include evaluating changes in plasma metabolites across multiple time points and changes in the stool microbiome pre and post L-glutamine supplementation. If this phase I clinical trial demonstrates the feasibility of L-glutamine in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, we would advance the development of this combination as a first-line systemic option in subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer, a high-risk subgroup desperately in need of additional therapies.

Background: Terrein (Terr) is a bioactive marine secondary metabolite that possesses antiproliferative/cytotoxic properties by interrupting various molecular pathways. Gemcitabine (GCB) is an anticancer drug used to treat several types of tumors such as colorectal cancer; however, it suffers from tumor cell resistance, and therefore, treatment failure. Methods: The potential anticancer properties of terrein, its antiproliferative effects, and its chemomodulatory effects on GCB were assessed against various colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT-116, HT-29, and SW620) under normoxic and hypoxic (pO2 ≤ 1%) conditions. Further analysis via flow cytometry was carried out in addition to quantitative gene expression and 1HNMR metabolomic analysis. Results: In normoxia, the effect of the combination treatment (GCB + Terr) was synergistic in HCT-116 and SW620 cell lines. In HT-29, the effect was antagonistic when the cells were treated with (GCB + Terr) under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The combination treatment was found to induce apoptosis in HCT-116 and SW620. Metabolomic analysis revealed that the change in oxygen levels significantly affected extracellular amino acid metabolite profiling. Conclusions: Terrein influenced GCB’s anti-colorectal cancer properties which are reflected in different aspects such as cytotoxicity, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, autophagy, and intra-tumoral metabolism under normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is standard for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). On the basis of the activity of atezolizumab (A) in metastatic BC, we tested neoadjuvant GC plus A for MIBC. METHODS Eligible patients with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0M0) received a dose of A, followed 2 weeks later by GC plus A every 21 days for four cycles followed 3 weeks later by a dose of A before RC. The primary end point was non–muscle-invasive downstaging to < pT2N0. RESULTS Of 44 enrolled patients, 39 were evaluable. The primary end point was met, with 27 of 39 patients (69%) < pT2N0, including 16 (41%) pT0N0. No patient with < pT2N0 relapsed and four (11%) with ≥ pT2N0 relapsed with a median follow-up of 16.5 months (range: 7.0-33.7 months). One patient refused RC and two developed metastatic disease before RC; all were considered nonresponders. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (n = 16; 36%). Grade 3 immune-related AEs occurred in five (11%) patients with two (5%) requiring systemic steroids. The median time from last dose of chemotherapy to surgery was 7.8 weeks (range: 5.1-17 weeks), and no patient failed to undergo RC because of AEs. Four of 39 (10%) patients had programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive tumors and were all < pT2N0. Of the patients with PD-L1 low or negative tumors, 23 of 34 (68%) achieved < pT2N0 and 11 of 34 (32%) were ≥ pT2N0 ( P = .3 for association between PD-L1 and < pT2N0). CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant GC plus A is a promising regimen for MIBC and warrants further study. Patients with < pT2N0 experienced improved relapse-free survival. The PD-L1 positivity rate was low compared with published data, which limits conclusions regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker.

Although gemcitabine (GEM) is widely used in chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), drug resistance restricts its clinical effectiveness. To examine the mechanism of GEM resistance, we established two GEM-resistant cell lines from human PDA cells by continuous treatment with GEM and CoCl2-induced chemical hypoxia. One resistant cell line possessed reduced energy production and decreased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species levels, while the other resistant cell line possessed increased stemness. In both cell lines, ethidium bromide-stained mitochondrial DNA levels decreased, suggesting mitochondrial DNA damage. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in both cell lines did not restore the GEM sensitivity. In contrast, treatment of both cell types with lauric acid (LAA), a medium-chain fatty acid, restored GEM sensitivity. These results suggest that decreased energy production, decreased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species levels, and increased stemness associated with mitochondrial damage caused by GEM lead to GEM resistance, and that hypoxia may promote this process. Furthermore, forced activation of oxidative phosphorylation by LAA could be a tool to overcome GEM resistance. Clinical verification of the effectiveness of LAA in GEM resistance is necessary in the future.

Background The causal pathway between complications after pancreatic cancer resection and impaired long-term survival remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of complications after pancreatic cancer resection on disease-free interval and overall survival, with adjuvant chemotherapy as a mediator. Methods This observational study included all patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection in the Netherlands (2014–2017). Clinical data were extracted from the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Recurrence and survival data were collected additionally. In causal mediation analysis, direct and indirect effect estimates via adjuvant chemotherapy were calculated. Results In total, 1071 patients were included. Major complications (hazards ratio 1.22 (95 per cent c.i. 1.04 to 1.43); P = 0.015 and hazards ratio 1.25 (95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.46); P = 0.003) and organ failure (hazards ratio 1.86 (95 per cent c.i. 1.32 to 2.62); P < 0.001 and hazards ratio 1.89 (95 per cent c.i. 1.36 to 2.63); P < 0.001) were associated with shorter disease-free interval and overall survival respectively. The effects of major complications and organ failure on disease-free interval (−1.71 (95 per cent c.i. −2.27 to −1.05) and −3.05 (95 per cent c.i. −4.03 to −1.80) respectively) and overall survival (−1.92 (95 per cent c.i. −2.60 to −1.16) and −3.49 (95 per cent c.i. −4.84 to −2.03) respectively) were mediated by adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, organ failure directly affected disease-free interval (−5.38 (95 per cent c.i. −9.27 to −1.94)) and overall survival (−6.32 (95 per cent c.i. −10.43 to −1.99)). In subgroup analyses, the association was found in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, but not in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. Conclusion Major complications, including organ failure, negatively impact survival in patients after pancreatic cancer resection, largely mediated by adjuvant chemotherapy. Prevention or adequate treatment of complications and use of neoadjuvant treatment may improve oncological outcomes.

Gemcitabine is an analogue of cytidine arabinoside, used alone or in combination chemotherapy to treat various type of cancer. The dose-banding of gemcitabine provides the opportunity to anticipate the preparation of this anticancer drug on condition of carrying out stability studies. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a stability-indicating ultra-high-performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) method for measuring the concentration of gemcitabine and to evaluate its stability at standardised rounded doses in polyolefin bags. The UHPLC with photodiode array (PDA) detector method was developed and validated (linearity, precision, accuracy, limits of detection and quantification, robustness and degradation test). Thirty polyolefin bags of gemcitabine (1600 mg/292 ml (n = 10), 1800 mg/297 ml (n = 10) and 2000 mg/303 ml (n = 10)) were prepared under aseptic conditions and stored at 5 ± 3 °C and 23 ± 2 °C for 49 days. Physical stability tests were periodically performed: visual and microscopic inspection and optical densities. The chemical stability was evaluated through pH monitoring and chromatographic assays. The results confirm the stability of Gemcitabine at selected standardised rounded doses of 1600 mg, 1800 mg and 2000 mg in NaCl 0.9% polyolefin bags for at least 49 days at 5 ± 3 °C and 23 ± 2 °C, allowing in-advance preparation.

In breast cancer therapy, Gemcitabine (Gem) is an antineoplastic antimetabolite with greater anticancer efficacy and tolerability. However, effectiveness of Gem is limited by its off-target effects. The synergistic potential of MUC1 (mucin 1) inhibitors and Gem-loaded polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) was discussed in this work in order to reduce dose-related toxicities and enhance the therapeutic efficacy. The double emulsion solvent evaporation method was used to prepare poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether

The added value of capecitabine to adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy (GEM) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was shown by the ESPAC-4 trial. Real-world data on the effectiveness of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEMCAP), in patients ineligible for mFOLFIRINOX, are lacking. Our study assessed whether adjuvant GEMCAP is superior to GEM in a nationwide cohort. Patients treated with adjuvant GEMCAP or GEM after resection of PDAC without preoperative treatment were identified from The Netherlands Cancer Registry (2015-2019). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), measured from start of chemotherapy. The treatment effect of GEMCAP vs GEM was adjusted for sex, age, performance status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, resection margin and tumor differentiation in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcome was the percentage of patients who completed the planned six adjuvant treatment cycles. Overall, 778 patients were included, of whom 21.1% received GEMCAP and 78.9% received GEM. The median OS was 31.4 months (95% CI 26.8-40.7) for GEMCAP and 22.1 months (95% CI 20.6-25.0) for GEM (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90; logrank P = .004). After adjustment for prognostic factors, survival remained superior for patients treated with GEMCAP (HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.92, logrank P = .009). Survival with GEMCAP was superior to GEM in most subgroups of prognostic factors. Adjuvant chemotherapy was completed in 69.5% of the patients treated with GEMCAP and 62.7% with GEM (P = .11). In this nationwide cohort of patients with PDAC, adjuvant GEMCAP was associated with superior survival as compared to GEM monotherapy and number of cycles was similar.

Gemcitabine, as a standard and classic strategy for B-cell lymphoma in the clinic, is limited by its poor pharmacodynamics. Although stimuli-responsive polymeric nanodelivery systems have been widely investigated in the past decade, issues such as complicated procedures, low loading capacity, and uncontrollable release kinetics still hinder their clinical translation. In view of the above considerations, we attempt to construct hyperbranched polyprodrug micelles with considerable drug loading via simple procedures and make use of the particularity of the tumor microenvironment to ensure that the micelles are "inactivated" in normal tissues and "activated" in the tumor microenvironment. Hence, in this work, a redox-responsive polymeric gemcitabine-prodrug (GEM-S-S-PEG) was one-pot synthesized via facile esterification and acylation. The self-assembled subsize (100 nm) GEM-S-S-PEG (GSP NPs) with considerable loading capacity (≈ 24.6%) exhibited on-demand and accurate control of gemcitabine release under a simulated tumor microenvironment and thus significantly induced the apoptosis of B-cell lymphoma in vitro. Moreover, in the A20 tumor xenograft murine model, GSP NPs efficiently decreased the expansion of tumor tissues with minimal systemic toxicity. In summary, these redox-responsive and self-assembling GSP NPs with a facile one-pot synthesis procedure may hold great potency in clinical translation for enhanced chemotherapy of B-cell lymphoma. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A redox-responsive polymeric gemcitabine-prodrug (GEM-S-S-PEG) was one-pot synthesized via facile esterification and acylation. The self-assembled subsize (100 nm) GEM-S-S-PEG (GSP NPs) exhibited significant tumor therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. The polyprodrug GEM-S-S-PEG prepared in this study shows the great potential of redox-responsive nanodrugs for antitumor activity, which provides a reference value for the optimization of the design of functional polyprodrugs.

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a poor survival rate, which can be improved by systemic treatment. Consensus on the most optimal first- and second-line palliative systemic treatment is lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the use of first- and second-line systemic treatment, overall survival (OS), and time to failure (TTF) of first- and second-line treatment in metastatic PDAC in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: Patients with synchronous metastatic PDAC diagnosed between 2015 and 2018 who received systemic treatment were selected from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS and TTF were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results: The majority of 1,586 included patients received FOLFIRINOX (65%), followed by gemcitabine (18%), and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (13%) in the first line. Median OS for first-line FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, and gemcitabine monotherapy was 6.6, 4.7, and 2.9 months, respectively. Compared to FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel showed significantly inferior OS after adjustment for confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02–1.41), and gemcitabine monotherapy was independently associated with a shorter OS and TTF (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.71–2.30 and HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.88–2.83, respectively). Of the 121 patients who received second-line systemic treatment, 33% received gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, followed by gemcitabine (31%) and FOLFIRINOX (10%). Conclusions: Based on population-based data in patients with metastatic PDAC, treatment predominantly consists of FOLFIRINOX in the first line and gemcitabine with or without nab-paclitaxel in the second line. FOLFIRINOX in the first line shows superior OS compared with gemcitabine with or without nab-paclitaxel.