1. Lessons learned conducting breastfeeding intervention research in two northern plains tribal communities
- Author
-
Kim Rodehorst-Weber, Melody Hertzog, Manda Clarke, Mary Beth Flanders Stepans, Susan L. Wilhelm, Trina Aguirre, and Amy Herboldsheimer
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Community-Based Participatory Research ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Minnesota ,Breastfeeding ,Community-based participatory research ,Trust ,Pediatrics ,Pregnancy ,Perception ,Maternity and Midwifery ,Medicine ,Humans ,Health Education ,Qualitative Research ,media_common ,Motivation ,Native american ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Infant, Newborn ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Nebraska ,Public relations ,Focus Groups ,Patient Acceptance of Health Care ,Focus group ,Breast Feeding ,Intervention research ,Indians, North American ,Female ,Diffusion of Innovation ,business ,Attitude to Health ,Culturally appropriate ,Qualitative research - Abstract
Aim: The overall purpose of this article was to describe the challenges and benefits of conducting breastfeeding intervention research with two Native American Tribal communities. Methods: A focus group with an interpretive approach was used to collect data within this qualitative study as a means of incorporating a complex, holistic, subjective interpretation of the case managers' perceptions and experiences. In addition, researchers' field notes were used. Findings are discussed in relation to Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Framework. Results: Themes that emerged during the focus group discussions were related to innovation, relative advantage, complexity, compatibility, trialability, and observability. Conclusions: Conducting research in Native American Tribal communities was both enriching and challenging. The research protocol needs to be culturally appropriate, and complex components need to be videotaped for review on an ongoing basis. Time constraints of case managers need to be examined...
- Published
- 2011