1. Hybrid versus total sublaminar wires in patients with spinal muscular atrophy undergoing scoliosis surgery
- Author
-
Hsuan-Ti Huang, Wen-Wei Li, Po-Chih Shen, Yin-Chun Tien, Sung-Yen Lin, Cheng-Chang Lu, Kun-Ling Lin, and Shih-Hsiang Chou
- Subjects
Pelvic tilt ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sports medicine ,Radiography ,Segmental instrumentation ,Hybrid constructs ,Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,Scoliosis ,Muscular Atrophy, Spinal ,Rheumatology ,Medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Sublaminar wire ,Research ,Spinal muscular atrophy ,SMA ,medicine.disease ,Spine ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,RC925-935 ,Coronal plane ,Orthopedic surgery ,business - Abstract
Background Early versions of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis correction surgery often involved sublaminar devices. Recently, the utilization of pedicle screws has gained much popularity. Pedicle screws are generally believed to provide additional deformity correction, but pedicle size and rotational deformity limit their application in the thoracic spine, resulting in a hybrid construct involving pedicle screws and sublaminar wire. Studies of the efficacy of hybrid instrumentation in SMA scoliosis are often limited by the scarcity of the disease itself. In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between hybrid constructs involving pedicle screws and sublaminar wire and sublaminar wire alone in patients with SMA scoliosis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographic assessments of patients with SMA scoliosis who underwent corrective surgery between 1993 and 2017. The radiographic assessments included deformity correction and progressive changes in the major curve angle, pelvic tilt (PT) and coronal balance (CB). The correction of deformities was observed postoperatively and at the patient’s 2-year follow-up to test the efficacy of each type of construct. Results Thirty-three patients were included in this study. There were 14 and 19 patients in the wiring and hybrid construct groups, respectively. The hybrid construct group demonstrated a higher major curve angle correction (50.5° ± 11.2° vs. 36.4° ± 8.4°, p p p p = 0.002). Conclusion This study demonstrated that hybrid instrumentation can provide a greater magnitude of correction in major curve and apical rotation as well as less major curve progression than sublaminar wire instrumentation alone in patients with SMA scoliosis. Level of evidence III
- Published
- 2021