Search

Objectivethe biomarkers’ performance for diagnosis and severity stratification of sepsis has not been properly evaluated anew using the SEPSIS-3 criteria introduced in 2016. We evaluated the accuracy of 21 biomarkers classically tested in sepsis research to identify infection, sepsis, and septic shock in surgical patients classified using SEPSIS-3.Methodsfour groups of adult surgical patients were compared: post-surgical patients with no infection, patients with infection but no sepsis, patients with sepsis, and patients with septic shock were recruited prospectively from the surgery departments and surgical ICUs from four Spanish hospital. The area under the curve (AUC) to differentiate between groups was calculated for each biomarker.ResultsA total of 187 patients were recruited (50 uninfected post-surgery controls, 50 patients with infection, 47 with sepsis and 40 with septic shock). The AUCs indicated that none of the biomarkers tested was accurate enough to differentiate those patients with infection from the uninfected controls. In contrast, procalcitonin, lipocalin 2, pentraxin 3, IL-15, TNF-α, IL-6, angiopoietin 2, TREM-1, D-dimer and C-reactive protein yielded AUCs > 0.80 to discriminate the patients with sepsis or septic shock from those with no infection. C-reactive protein and IL-6 were the most accurate markers to differentiate plain infection from sepsis (AUC = 0.82). Finally, our results revealed that sepsis and septic shock shared similar profiles of biomarkers.ConclusionRevaluation in the “SEPSIS-3 era” identified the scenarios where biomarkers do and do not provide useful information to improve the management of surgical patients with infection or sepsis.

Background Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 S antibodies prevent viral replication. Critically ill COVID‐19 patients show viral material in plasma, associated with a dysregulated host response. If these antibodies influence survival and viral dissemination in ICU‐COVID patients is unknown. Patients/Methods We studied the impact of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 S antibodies levels on survival, viral RNA‐load in plasma, and N‐antigenaemia in 92 COVID‐19 patients over ICU admission. Results Frequency of N‐antigenaemia was >2.5‐fold higher in absence of antibodies. Antibodies correlated inversely with viral RNA‐load in plasma, representing a protective factor against mortality (Adjusted HR [CI 95%], p): (S IgM [AUC ≥ 60]: 0.44 [0.22; 0.88], 0.020); (S IgG [AUC ≥ 237]: 0.31 [0.16; 0.61]

Purpose We hypothesized that neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) compared to conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation (MV) decreases duration of MV and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Methods We carried out a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in patients with ARF from several etiologies. Intubated patients ventilated for ≤ 5 days expected to require MV for ≥ 72 h and able to breathe spontaneously were eligible for enrollment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned based on balanced treatment assignments with a computerized randomization allocation sequence to two ventilatory strategies: (1) lung-protective MV (control group), and (2) lung-protective MV with NAVA (NAVA group). Allocation concealment was maintained at all sites during the trial. Primary outcome was the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days. Secondary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality. All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Between March 2014 and October 2019, we enrolled 306 patients and randomly assigned 153 patients to the NAVA group and 153 to the control group. Median VFDs were higher in the NAVA than in the control group (22 vs. 18 days; between-group difference 4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 8 days; p = 0.016). At hospital discharge, 39 (25.5%) patients in the NAVA group and 47 (30.7%) patients in the control group had died (between-group difference − 5.2%, 95% CI − 15.2 to 4.8, p = 0.31). Other clinical, physiological or safety outcomes did not differ significantly between the trial groups. Conclusion NAVA decreased duration of MV although it did not improve survival in ventilated patients with ARF. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06181-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BACKGROUND: High intraoperative PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres may improve perioperative outcomes. We re-examined this question by conducting a patient-level meta-analysis of three clinical trials in adult patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who underwent non-cardiothoracic and non-neurological surgery. METHODS: The three trials enrolled patients at 128 hospitals in 24 countries from February 2011 to February 2018. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with low tidal volume. Analyses were performed using one-stage, two-level, mixed modelling (site as a random effect; trial as a fixed effect). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first week, analysed using mixed-effect logistic regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of nine patient characteristics and seven procedure and care-delivery characteristics were also performed. RESULTS: Complete datasets were available for 1913 participants ventilated with high PEEP and recruitment manoeuvres, compared with 1924 participants who received low PEEP. The primary outcome occurred in 562/1913 (29.4%) participants randomised to high PEEP, compared with 620/1924 (32.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.87; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-1.01; P=0.06). Higher PEEP resulted in 87/1913 (4.5%) participants requiring interventions for desaturation, compared with 216/1924 (11.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (OR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.45). Intraoperative hypotension was associated more frequently (784/1913 [41.0%]) with high PEEP, compared with low PEEP (579/1924 [30.1%]; OR=1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.17). CONCLUSIONS: High PEEP combined with recruitment manoeuvres during low tidal volume ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03937375 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Producción Científica, Background: Stratification of the severity of infection is currently based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which is difficult to calculate outside the ICU. Biomarkers could help to stratify the severity of infection in surgical patients. Methods: Levels of ten biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction, 22 indicating emergency granulopoiesis, and six denoting neutrophil degranulation were compared in three groups of patients in the first 12 h after diagnosis at three Spanish hospitals. Results: There were 100 patients with infection, 95 with sepsis and 57 with septic shock. Seven biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction (mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-ProADM), syndecan 1, thrombomodulin, angiopoietin 2, endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin) had stronger associations with sepsis than infection alone. MR-ProADM had the highest odds ratio (OR) in multivariable analysis (OR 11·53, 95 per cent c.i. 4·15 to 32·08; P = 0·006) and the best area under the curve (AUC) for detecting sepsis (0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·80 to 0·91; P < 0·001). In a comparison of sepsis with septic shock, two biomarkers of neutrophil degranulation, proteinase 3 (OR 8·09, 1·34 to 48·91; P = 0·028) and lipocalin 2 (OR 6·62, 2·47 to 17·77; P = 0·002), had the strongest association with septic shock, but lipocalin 2 exhibited the highest AUC (0·81, 0·73 to 0·90; P < 0·001). Conclusion: MR-ProADM and lipocalin 2 could be alternatives to the SOFA score in the detection of sepsis and septic shock respectively in surgical patients with infection., Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grants PI15/01959, PI15/01451 and PI16/01156)

Purposeto evaluate the association between anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgM and IgG antibodies with viral RNA load in plasma, the frequency of antigenemia and with the risk of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Methodsanti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibodies levels, viral RNA load and antigenemia were profiled in plasma of 92 adult patients in the first 24 hours following ICU admission. The impact of these variables on 30-day mortality was assessed by using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis.Resultsnon survivors showed more frequently absence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG and IgM antibodies than survivors (26.3% vs 5.6% for IgM and 18.4% vs 5.6% for IgG), and a higher frequency of antigenemia (47.4% vs 22.2%) (p p]: [S IgM (AUC ≥60): 0.48 (0.24; 0.97), 0.040]; [S IgG (AUC ≥237): 0.47 (0.23; 0.97), 0.042]; [Antigenemia (+): 2.45 (1.27; 4.71), 0.007]; [N1 viral load (≥ 2.156 copies/mL): 2.21 (1.11; 4.39),0.024]; [N2 viral load (≥ 3.035 copies/mL): 2.32 (1.16; 4.63), 0.017]. Frequency of antigenemia was >2.5-fold higher in patients with absence of antibodies. Levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibodies correlated inversely with viral RNA load.Conclusionabsence / insufficient levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibodies following ICU admission is associated to poor viral control, evidenced by increased viral RNA loads in plasma, higher frequency of antigenemia, and also to increased 30-day mortality.Take-home messageabsent or low levels of antibodies against the S protein of SARS-CoV- 2 at ICU admission is associated to an increased risk of mortality, higher frequency of antigenemia and higher viral RNA loads in plasma. Profiling anti-SARS-CoV-2 s antibodies at ICU admission could help to predict outcome and to better identify those patients potentially deserving replacement treatment with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies.

Introduction: obesity has become a worldwide health problem due to its relationship with cardiovascular morbimortality, thus bariatric surgery is considered as one of the main solutions for the correction of excess weight and, consequently, the improvement of its associated heart diseases. Objective: to compare vertical gastrectomy (VG) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) by observing echocardiographic characteristics both before and after surgery, as well as to evaluate surgical outcome in terms of the BAROS scale. Methods: results were collected from the echocardiographic testing requested for the preoperative study of patients who underwent surgery over the course of 24 months (from January 2014 to December 2015), as well as their anthropometric data. These were compared with postoperative parameters measured at 3 years after surgery. Results: finally, 26 patients were selected (13 VG and 13 BPD) with a mean age of 42 yrs. VG: initial BMI: 44.6 ± 7.1; final BMI: 31.8 ± 11.3 (p0.01); BPD: initial BMI: 48.1 ± 14.2; final BMI: 32.7 ± 10.4 (p0.01). Echocardiography: normal systolic function: 100% vs 92%; normal diastolic function: 88.5% vs 69.2%; no valvulopathy: 80% vs 69%; normal left atrium: 76.9% vs 73.1% (p0.05); HTA: 38.5% vs 19.2% (p0.05), preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Conclusions: no significant differences were found between the two groups studied with different techniques, although a slight deterioration in diastolic function was found in both groups. The comorbidities associated with obesity improved in both groups, and the surgery was scored as positive. The scant variation revealed by echocardiography prompts to reconsider its systematic preoperative use in these patients given the low cost-benefit ratio.Introducción: la obesidad se ha convertido en un problema de salud a nivel mundial por su relación con la morbimortalidad cardiovascular. La cirugía bariátrica se plantea como una de las soluciones para la corrección del exceso de peso y mejoría de las cardiopatías asociadas. Objetivo: comparar la gastrectomía vertical con la derivación biliopancreática de tipo Scopinaro para observar la repercusión de los cambios que se producen en la estructura cardiaca tras la cirugía. Además, evaluar el resultado quirúrgico en función de la escala BAROS. Material y métodos: se recogieron los resultados de la ecocardiografía incluida en el estudio preoperatorio de los pacientes candidatos a cirugía bariátrica de nuestro hospital, intervenidos en un periodo de 2 años, junto a los datos antropométricos y de comorbilidad. Estos se compararon con los resultados postoperatorios medidos a los 3 años de la cirugía. Resultados: finalmente se seleccionaron 26 pacientes (13 GV y 13 DBP), con una edad media de 42 años. GV: IMC inicial de 44,6 ± 7,1; IMC final de 31,8 ± 11,3 (p0,01). DBP: IMC inicial de 48,1 ± 14,2; IMC final de 32,7 ± 10,4 (p0,01). Ecocardiografía: función sistólica normal: 100% vs. 92%; función diastólica normal: 88,5% vs. 69,2%; sin valvulopatía: 80% vs. 69%; aurícula izquierda normal: 76,9% vs. 73,1% (p0,05); HTA: 38% vs. 19% (p0,05), en el preoperatorio y postoperatorio, respectivamente. Conclusiones: no se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos estudiados con técnicas diferentes, si bien pudo encontrarse un ligero deterioro de la función diastólica en ambos grupos. Las comorbilidades asociadas a la obesidad mejoraron en ambos grupos y el grado de evaluación de la cirugía fue positivo. La escasa variación de la ecocardiografía hace replantearse su uso sistemático en el preoperatorio de estos pacientes por el bajo índice coste-beneficio.

Early recognition of sepsis is a key factor to improve survival to this disease in surgical patients, since it allows prompt control of the infectious source. Combining pro-inflammatory and immunosupression biomarkers could represent a good strategy to improve sepsis detection. Here we evaluated the combination of procalcitonin (PCT) with gene expression levels of HLA-DRA to detect sepsis in a cohort of 154 surgical patients (101 with sepsis and 53 with no infection). HLA-DRA expression was quantified using droplet digital PCR, a next-generation PCR technology. Area under the receiver operating curve analysis (AUROC) showed that the PCT/HLA-DRA ratio outperformed PCT to detect sepsis (AUROC [CI95%], p): PCT: 0.80 [0.73-0.88],0.001; PCT/HLA-DRA: 0.85 [0.78-0.91],0.001. In the multivariate analysis, the ratio showed a superior ability to predict sepsis compared to that of PCT (OR [CI 95%], p): PCT/HLA-DRA: 7.66 [1.82-32.29], 0.006; PCT: 4.21 [1.15-15.43] 0.030. Multivariate analysis was confirmed using a new surgical cohort with 74 sepsis patients and 21 controls: PCT/HLA-DRA: 34.86 [1.22-995.08], 0.038; PCT: 5.52 [0.40-75.78], 0.201. In conclusion, the combination of PCT with HLA-DRA is a promising strategy for improving sepsis detection in surgical patients.

Producción Científica, Early recognition of sepsis is a key factor to improve survival to this disease in surgical patients, since it allows prompt control of the infectious source. Combining pro-infammatory and immunosupression biomarkers could represent a good strategy to improve sepsis detection. Here we evaluated the combination of procalcitonin (PCT) with gene expression levels of HLA-DRA to detect sepsis in a cohort of 154 surgical patients (101 with sepsis and 53 with no infection). HLA-DRA expression was quantifed using droplet digital PCR, a next-generation PCR technology. Area under the receiver operating curve analysis (AUROC) showed that the PCT/HLA-DRA ratio outperformed PCT to detect sepsis (AUROC [CI95%], p): PCT: 0.80 [0.73–0.88], Instituto de Salud Carlos III - Consejeria de Sanidad de Castilla y Leon (grants EMER 07/050, PI15/01451 and PI16/01156)

Background The effects of individualised perioperative lung-protective ventilation (based on the open-lung approach [OLA]) on postoperative complications is unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of intraoperative and postoperative ventilatory management in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery, compared with standard protective ventilation. Methods We did this prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 21 teaching hospitals in Spain. We enrolled patients who were aged 18 years or older, were scheduled to have abdominal surgery with an expected time of longer than 2 h, had intermediate-to-high-risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications, and who had a body-mass index less than 35 kg/m(2). Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1: 1: 1) online to receive one of four lung-protective ventilation strategies using low tidal volume plus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): open-lung approach (OLA)-iCPAP (individualised intraoperative ventilation [individualised PEEP after a lung recruitment manoeuvre] plus individualised postoperative continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]), OLA-CPAP (intraoperative individualised ventilation plus postoperative CPAP), STD-CPAP (standard intraoperative ventilation plus postoperative CPAP), or STD-O-2 (standard intraoperative ventilation plus standard postoperative oxygen therapy). Patients were masked to treatment allocation. Investigators were not masked in the operating and postoperative rooms; after 24 h, data were given to a second investigator who was masked to allocations. The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary and systemic complications during the first 7 postoperative days. We did the primary analysis using the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02158923. Findings Between Jan 2, 2015, and May 18, 2016, we enrolled 1012 eligible patients. Data were available for 967 patients, whom we included in the final analysis. Risk of pulmonary and systemic complications did not differ for patients in OLA-iCPAP (110 [46%] of 241, relative risk 0.89 [95% CI 0.74-1.07; p=0.25]), OLA-CPAP (111 [47%] of 238, 0.91 [0.76-1.09; p=0.35]), or STD-CPAP groups (118 [48%] of 244, 0.95 [0.80-1.14; p=0.65]) when compared with patients in the STD-O-2 group (125 [51%] of 244). Intraoperatively, PEEP was increased in 69 (14%) of patients in the standard perioperative ventilation groups because of hypoxaemia, and no patients from either of the OLA groups required rescue manoeuvres. Interpretation In patients who have major abdominal surgery, the different perioperative open lung approaches tested in this study did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications when compared with standard lung-protective mechanical ventilation.