Search

Background Synkinesis is commonly encountered after flaccid facial paralysis and can have a detrimental impact on a patient's life. First-line treatment of synkinesis is chemodenervation with botulinum toxin (Botox) and neuromuscular retraining. Surgical options include selective myectomy, selective neurectomy (SN), cross-facial nerve grafting, nerve substitution, and free gracilis muscle transfer. Data on surgical management of synkinesis using SN is limited. Evidence Review PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Neuromuscular Register, Clinicaltrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched using a comprehensive keyword strategy in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All English-only texts published in the past 20 years were included. Two independent investigators reviewed 906 abstracts and 7 studies met inclusion criteria. Demographics, etiology of paralysis, time to surgery, and primary outcomes studied were collected. Findings A total of 250 patients were included across 7 studies. In 6 out of 7 studies, Botox was used prior to surgical intervention. Two studies showed significant reduction in Botox dosage postoperatively, while one study showed no difference. Other primary outcomes included the House–Brackmann Score, palpebral fissure width, electronic clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE) score, Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale, and Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Three studies showed significant improvement in the eFACE score, two studies showed significant improvement in the FaCE scale, while one study showed improvement in quality of life measured by the SAQ. Conclusion SN can be considered as an adjunct to other management options including neuromuscular retraining, Botox, selective myectomy, and reanimation procedures. While there is great heterogeneity of study design in the studies included, many cohorts showed improvement in facial symmetry, facial function, and quality of life. There remains a great gap in knowledge in this subject matter and a need for large well-designed prospective studies comparing this technique to other management options.

Study Design Case series. Objective This retrospective review of frontal sinus fractures aims to describe our current experience managing these fractures at an urban level I trauma center. Methods An institutional database of 2081 patients who presented with maxillofacial fractures on computed tomography face/sinus in 2019 was queried for all patients with traumatic frontal sinus fractures. Demographics, trauma-related history, management approach, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results Sixty-three (7.3%) patients had at least one fracture involving the frontal sinus. The most common etiologies were assaults, falls, and motor vehicle accidents. Surgical repair was performed in 26.8% of patients with frontal sinus fractures, and the other 73.2% were observed. Fractures that were displaced, comminuted, obstructive of the frontal sinus outflow tract, or associated with a dural tear or cerebrospinal fluid leak were more likely to be operative. Conclusions The majority of frontal sinus fractures in this study were treated with observation. Despite advances in transnasal endoscopic approaches, many surgeons still rely on open approaches to repair frontal sinus fractures.

This review article discusses the basic principles behind the use of flaps and grafts for reconstructive surgery in the head and neck, with a special emphasis on the types of commonly used free flaps, their imaging appearance as well as some frequently encountered postoperative complications. Given the ubiquity and complexity of these reconstructive techniques, it is essential that head and neck radiologists be familiar in distinguishing between the expected evolving findings, complications, and tumor recurrence.