Search

This review article summarizes the major clinical studies in neurological emergency and intensive care medicine from the end of 2020 to 2021 on the topics: recanalizing treatment in ischemic stroke, usefulness and effect of brain tissue oxygen monitoring in subarachnoid hemorrhage, efficacy of induced hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest (CA), value of early cranial imaging after CA, relevance of rapid management and effects of different anticonvulsants in status epilepticus and incidence of critical illness polyneuropathy myopathy in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 infections.Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit fasst wichtige klinische Studien der neurologischen Notfall- und Intensivmedizin zwischen 2020 und 2021 zusammen zu den Themen: rekanalisierende Therapie beim ischämischen Schlaganfall, Anwendbarkeit und Auswirkung eines zerebralen Sauerstoffgewebemonitorings bei Subarachnoidalblutung, Wirksamkeit induzierter Hypothermie bei Patienten mit „cardiac arrest“ (CA), Wertigkeit früher kranialer Bildgebung nach CA, Relevanz eines schnellen Managements und medikamentöser Therapie beim Status epilepticus sowie Inzidenz von Critical-illness-Polyneuropathie-Myopathie bei intensivpflichtigen COVID-Patienten.

Stroke is a leading cause of death, disability and is a symptom burden worldwide. It impacts patients and their families in various ways, including physical, emotional, social, and spiritual aspects. As stroke is potentially lethal and causes severe symptom burden, a palliative care (PC) approach is indicated in accordance with the definition of PC published by the WHO in 2002. Stroke patients can benefit from a structured approach to palliative care needs (PCN) and the amelioration of symptom burden. Stroke outcome is uncertain and outlook may change rapidly. Regarding these challenges, core competencies of PC include the critical appraisal of various treatment options, and openly and respectfully discussing therapeutic goals with patients, families, and caregivers. Nevertheless, PC in stroke has to date mainly been restricted to short care periods for dying patients after life-limiting complications. There is currently no integrated concept for PC in stroke care addressing the appropriate moment to initiate PC for stroke patients, and the question of how to screen for symptoms remains unanswered. Therefore, PC for stroke patients is often perceived as a stopgap in cases of unfavorable prognosis and very short survival times. In contrast, PC can provide much more for stroke patients and support a holistic approach, improve quality of life and ensure treatment according to the patient's wishes and values. In this short review we identify key aspects of PC in stroke care and current barriers to implementation. Additionally, we provide insights into our approach to PC in stroke care.

Background and Purpose— Granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (G-CSF; AX200; Filgrastim) is a stroke drug candidate with excellent preclinical evidence for efficacy. A previous phase IIa dose–escalation study suggested potential efficacy in humans. The present large phase IIb trial was powered to detect clinical efficacy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods— G-CSF (135 µg/kg body weight intravenous over 72 hours) was tested against placebo in 328 patients in a multinational, multicenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial (NCT00927836; www.clinicaltrial.gov ). Main inclusion criteria were ≤9-hour time window after stroke onset, infarct localization in the middle cerebral artery territory, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score range of 6 to 22, and baseline diffusion-weighted imaging lesion size ≥15 mL. Primary and secondary end points were the modified Rankin scale score and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at day 90, respectively. Data were analyzed using a prespecified model that adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, and initial infarct volume (diffusion-weighted imaging). Results— G-CSF treatment failed to meet the primary and secondary end points of the trial. For additional end points such as mortality, Barthel index, or infarct size at day 30, G-CSF did not show efficacy either. There was, however, a trend for reduced infarct growth in the G-CSF group. G-CSF showed the expected peripheral pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, with a strong increase in leukocytes and monocytes. In parallel, the cytokine profile showed a significant decrease of interleukin-1. Conclusions— G-CSF, a novel and promising drug candidate with a comprehensive preclinical and clinical package, did not provide any significant benefit with respect to either clinical outcome or imaging biomarkers. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00927836.

Supplemental Material for Therapeutic hypothermia for acute ischaemic stroke. Results of a European multicentre, randomised, phase III clinical trial by H Bart van der Worp, Malcolm R Macleod, Philip MW Bath, Raj Bathula, Hanne Christensen, Bridget Colam, Charlotte Cordonnier, Jacques Demotes-Mainard, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Bernd Kallmünzer, Rainer Kollmar, Derk W Krieger, Kennedy R Lees, Dominik Michalski, Carlos Molina, Joan Montaner, Risto O Roine, Jesper Petersson, Richard Perry, Nikola Sprigg, Dimitre Staykov, Istvan Szabo, Geert Vanhooren, Joanna M Wardlaw, Per Winkel, Stefan Schwab and the EuroHYP-1 investigators in European Stroke Journal