1. Validation of an iPad version of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS)
- Author
-
Costabile, Teresa, Signoriello, Elisabetta, Lauro, Francesca, Altieri, Manuela, Ziello, Antonio Rosario, D'Ambrosio, Alessandro, Bisecco, Alvino, Maniscalco, Giorgia, Bonavita, Simona, Gallo, Antonio, Brescia Morra, Vincenzo, Lus, Giacomo, Saccà, Francesco, Russo, Cinzia Valeria, Costabile, Teresa, Signoriello, Elisabetta, Lauro, Francesca, Altieri, Manuela, Ziello, Antonio Rosario, D'Ambrosio, Alessandro, Bisecco, Alvino, Maniscalco, Giorgia, Bonavita, Simona, Gallo, Antonio, Brescia Morra, Vincenzo, Lus, Giacomo, Saccà, Francesco, and Russo, Cinzia Valeria
- Subjects
Cognitive impairment ,Neurology ,Neurology (clinical) ,General Medicine ,Multiple sclerosis (MS) ,Neuropsychological assessment ,BICAMS - Abstract
Background: The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) is the most widely used screening tool for cognitive impairment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, the administration and scoring procedures of the paper version are time consuming and prone to errors. Aim of our study was to develop a tablet version of BICAMS (iBICAMS), and to assess its reliability compared to the paper version.Methods: We administered both BICAMS and iBICAMS to 139 MS patients in two different sessions. We compared scores on both versions using a paired t-test. We used a repeated measures ANOVA to test the impact of rater, order of administration and test-retest time on test-retest performances. We used the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability between BICAMS and iBICAMS.Results: All three sub-tests of the BICAMS (SDMT, CVLT-II and BVMT-R) were different between the paper and the tablet versions. Order of administration influenced test-retest performances at the SDMT (pConclusions: Results suggest that using the iBICAMS guarantees a better adherence to standardized procedures in both administration and scoring phase of tests. The high reliability between the two versions and the inherent advantages of automated scoring, favor the iBICAMS as the most appropriate method.
- Published
- 2023