Search

Objective The Spanish health system is made up of seventeen regional health systems. Through the official reporting systems, some inconsistencies and differences in case fatality rates between Autonomous Communities (CC.AA.) have been observed. Therefore the objective of this paper is to compare COVID-19 case fatality rates across the Spanish CC.AA. Material and methods Observational descriptive study. The COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) was estimated according to the official records (CFR-PCR+), the daily mortality monitory system (MoMo) record (CFR-Mo), and the seroprevalence study ENE-COVID-19 (Estudio Nacional de sero Epidemiologia Covid-19) according to sex, age group and CC.AA. between March and June 2020. The main objective is to detect whether there are any differences in CFR between Spanish Regions using two different register systems, i. e., the official register of the Ministry of Health and the MoMo. Results Overall, the CFR-Mo was higher than the CFR-PCR+, 1.59% vs 0.98%. The differences in case fatality rate between both methods were significantly higher in Castilla La Mancha, Castilla y León, Cataluña, and Madrid. The difference between both methods was higher in persons over 74 years of age (CFR-PCR+ 7.5% vs 13.0% for the CFR-Mo) but without statistical significance. There was no correlation of the estimated prevalence of infection with CFR-PCR+, but there was with CFR-Mo (R2 = 0.33). Andalucía presented a SCFR below 1 with both methods, and Asturias had a SCFR higher than 1. Cataluña and Castilla La Mancha presented a SCFR greater than 1 in any scenario of SARS-CoV-2 infection calculated with SCFR-Mo. Conclusions The PCR+ case fatality rate underestimates the case fatality rate of the SARS-CoV- 2 virus pandemic. It is therefore preferable to consider the MoMo case fatality rate. Significant differences have been observed in the information and registration systems and in the severity of the pandemic between the Spanish CC.AA. Although the infection prevalence correlates with case fatality rate, other factors such as age, comorbidities, and the policies adopted to address the pandemic can explain the differences observed between CC.AA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the factors associated with impaired renal function in the population attended in primary care (PC). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional and multicentre study carried out in the baseline patients of the IBERICAN study (Identificacion de la poBlacion Espanola de RIesgo CArdiovascular y reNal). CKD was considered with an estimated glomerular filtration (eGF)

Following its emergence in late 2019, the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)1,2 has been tracked via phylogenetic analysis of viral genome sequences in unprecedented detail3–5. While the virus spread globally in early 2020 before borders closed, intercontinental travel has since been greatly reduced. However, within Europe travel resumed in the summer of 2020. Here we report on a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant, 20E (EU1), that emerged in Spain in early summer, and subsequently spread across Europe. We find no evidence of increased transmissibility, but instead demonstrate how rising incidence in Spain, resumption of travel, and lack of effective screening and containment may explain the variant’s success. Despite travel restrictions, we estimate 20E (EU1) was introduced hundreds of times to European countries by summertime travelers, likely undermining local efforts to keep SARS-CoV-2 cases low. Our results demonstrate how a variant can rapidly become dominant even in absence of a substantial transmission advantage in favorable epidemiological settings. Genomic surveillance is critical to understanding how travel can impact SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and thus for informing future containment strategies as travel resumes., This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through grant numbers 31CA30 196046 (to RAN, EBH, CLA), 31CA30 196267 (to TS), European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme - project EpiPose (No 101003688) (MLR, CLA), core funding by the University of Basel and ETH Zürich, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM120553 to DV), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP1AI158186 and HHSN272201700059C to DV), a Pew Biomedical Scholars Award (DV), an Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Awards from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (DV and JDB), a Fast Grants (DV), and NIAID grants R01AI141707 (JDB) and F30AI149928 (KHDC). SeqCOVID-SPAIN is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III project COV20/00140, Spanish National Research Council and ERC StG 638553 to IC and BFU2017-89594R from MICIN to FGC. JDB is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in Spain, and although the incidence rates have been declining for years due to improvements in prevention and treatment, there is still room for further reduction. Primary Care has a leading role in the prevention and control of these diseases. Determining the prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases in the Spanish adult population attended in Primary Care is the objective of the study to identify the Spanish population at cardiovascular and renal risk (IBERICAN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using a consecutive non-probabilistic sampling population between 18 and 85 years that attended Primary Care centres between April 1, 2014 and October 31, 2018. By reviewing the medical history, laboratory results, and medical visits, the Primary Care physicians collected socio-demographic information, personal and family history of the patients, as well as prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and renal disease. The incidents and associated factors will be estimated using proportional risk models of Cox and Kaplan-Meier Curves. RESULTS: A total of 8,066 patients have been recruited by 531 Primary Care physicians from all Autonomous Communities of Spain as part of the IBERICAN cohort, with the exception of Ceuta. The mean age of the cohort is 57.9 years with 54.5% women. Obesity, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension are the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors. There was a history of CVD in16.3%, and 25.5% had a subclinical organ lesion. CONCLUSION: The IBERICAN study is a cohort of people treated in Primary Care that expects to provide relevant information on the factors that determine the incidence of cardiovascular and renal disease in Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in Spain, and although the incidence rates have been declining for years due to improvements in prevention and treatment, there is still room for further reduction. Primary Care has a leading role in the prevention and control of these diseases. Determining the prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases in the Spanish adult population attended in Primary Care is the objective of the study to identify the Spanish population at cardiovascular and renal risk (IBERICAN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using a consecutive non-probabilistic sampling population between 18 and 85 years that attended Primary Care centres between April 1, 2014 and October 31, 2018. By reviewing the medical history, laboratory results, and medical visits, the Primary Care physicians collected socio-demographic information, personal and family history of the patients, as well as prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and renal disease. The incidents and associated factors will be estimated using proportional risk models of Cox and Kaplan-Meier Curves. RESULTS: A total of 8,066 patients have been recruited by 531 Primary Care physicians from all Autonomous Communities of Spain as part of the IBERICAN cohort, with the exception of Ceuta. The mean age of the cohort is 57.9 years with 54.5% women. Obesity, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension are the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors. There was a history of CVD in16.3%, and 25.5% had a subclinical organ lesion. CONCLUSION: The IBERICAN study is a cohort of people treated in Primary Care that expects to provide relevant information on the factors that determine the incidence of cardiovascular and renal disease in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the prevalence in clinical practice of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as their causal relationship, in the study inclusion visit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the study inclusion visit of 8,066 patients of 18 to 85years of age included in the IBERICAN study. By reviewing the medical history, analytics and medical visits, the patient's physician has collected socio-demographic information, personal and family history and prevalence of CVRF and CVD and renal disease. A multivariate analysis was carried out using a logistic regression that included the autonomous region variable as a random effect variable, in order to analyse the impact of certain variables on the development of each CVRF, metabolic syndrome, subclinical organ damage, renal disease, and CVD. RESULTS: Dyslipidaemia was 2.4 times more frequent in diabetics, and the risk was increased by 59% in hypertensive patients. Arterial hypertension was twice as frequent in diabetics, and increased 94% in hyperuricaemic patients and 62.1% in dyslipidaemia patients. Diabetes mellitus was 2.5 times higher in dyslipidaemia patients, and 2.2 times higher in hypertensive patients. CVD was four times more frequent in patients with a family history, and the risk in women was increased by 90.8% and by 53.8% in patients with renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish population seen in Primary Care that were analysed in the IBERICAN study had a high prevalence of CVRF and CVD, which gives it a high CVR. The multivariate analysis performed shows a close causal relationship between the CVRF with each other, and with renal disease and CVD.

Objetivos: Estudiar en población penitenciaria la concordancia de la prueba de la tuberculina (PT) y las pruebas de interferón gamma (IFG). Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo realizado en una prisión en mayo-junio de 2009. Se estudian los ingresos sin antecedente de tuberculosis (TB) o con PT previa negativa o no realizada. Se realizó IDR de Mantoux (positivo ³ 10 mm) y extracción sanguínea para prueba de IFG (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold). En los infectados, se realizó despistaje de TB. Se pasó un cuestionario y se solicitó consentimiento informado. El estudio fue aprobado por un Comité ético ajeno a instituciones penitenciarias. La concordancia entre PT e IFG se basó en el índice Kappa. Resultados: Se incluyeron 181 casos. El 62% eran extranjeros, el 17% vacunados por BCG, el 8,4% UDI y el 4% VIH+. En los extranjeros había más vacunados, menos UDI y menos infectados por VIH que en autóctonos (p=0,02, p=0,02, y p=0,01, respectivamente). La PT fue positiva en el 24% y la IFG en el 26%. Hubo información de ambas en 149 (82%) casos. El 15,8% fueron discordantes. El índice Kappa fue de 0,6 (0,4-0,7). La concordancia varió según subgrupos, siendo mayor en autóctonos (kappa= 0,8) y menor en vacunados (kappa=0,4) e inmigrantes (kappa=0,5). Conclusión: La concordancia global fue moderada-buena, pero en vacunados e inmigrantes fue menor. El nivel de discordancia aconseja ampliar el estudio, así como evaluar que prueba predice mejor el riesgo de progresión a TB y el coste-beneficio de ambas en la población reclusa de nuestro país. Objective: To study the agreement of Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) and Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) when screening tuberculosis infection amongst inmates recently admitted to prison. Materials and methods: Prospective study conducted in a prison during the months of May and June 2009. Inmates without a TB history, with previous TST negatives or without prior TSTs were included. Participants signed an informed consent form and the study was approved by an independent Ethical Committee. TST (positive 10 > or = mm) and IGRA (Quantiferon TB-Gold) were performed and standardized data collection was carried out. The agreement between both tests was analysed using the Kappa index. Results: A total of 181 people were included. 62% were foreign-born, 17% had previous BCG vaccination, 8.4% were IDUs and 4% HIV-infected. Foreign born subjects were more frequently vaccinated and presented less drug use and HIV infection than people born in Spain. (p=0.02, p=0.02 and p=0.01 respectively). TST results were positive in 24% and IGRA in 26%. Both tests were performed in 149 people (82%). Discordant results were observed in 15.8%. Agreement of the Kappa coefficient was 0.6 (CI 0.4-0.7). Agreement was better in the native population (K=0.8) and worse in BCG vaccinated (K=0.4) and foreign-born subjects (K=0.8). Conclusion: Overall agreement was moderate and was less amongst vaccinated subjects and those born abroad. Extension of the study could be useful to evaluate which test better predicts the risk of progression to active TB and the cost-benefit of both tests among the prison population.

The PREDIMED-Plus trial was supported by the European Research Council (Advanced Research grant 2014–2019; agreement #340918; granted to M.Á.M.-G.); the official Spanish institutions for funding scientific biomedical research, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN) and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the Fondo de Investigación para la Salud (FIS) which is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (coordinated FIS projects led by J.S-S. and J.V., including the following projects: PI13/00673, PI13/00492, PI13/00272, PI13/01123, PI13/00462, PI13/00233, PI13/02184, PI13/00728, PI13/01090, PI13/01056, PI14/01722, PI14/00636, PI14/00618, PI14/00696, PI14/01206, PI14/01919, PI14/00853, PI14/01374, PI14/00972, PI14/00728, PI14/01471, PI16/00473, PI16/00662, PI16/01873, PI16/01094, PI16/00501, PI16/00533, PI16/00381, PI16/00366, PI16/01522, PI16/01120, PI17/00764, PI17/01183, PI17/00855, PI17/01347, PI17/00525, PI17/01827, PI17/00532, PI17/00215, PI17/01441, PI17/00508, PI17/01732, PI17/00926, PI19/00957, PI19/00386, PI19/00309, PI19/01032, PI19/00576, PI19/00017, PI19/01226, PI19/00781, PI19/01560, PI19/01332), and the Especial Action Project “Implementación y evaluación de una intervención intensiva sobre la actividad física Cohorte PREDIMED-Plus” (J.S.-S.); the Recercaixa (grant number 2013ACUP00194) (J.S.-S.). Moreover, J.S-S. gratefully acknowledges the financial support by ICREA under the ICREA Academia program; the SEMERGEN grant; Department of Health of the Government of Navarra (61/2015), the Fundació La Marató de TV (Ref. 201630.10); the AstraZeneca Young Investigators Award in Category of Obesity and T2D 2017 (D.R.); grants from the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía (PI0458/2013; PS0358/2016; PI0137/2018), the PROMETEO/2017/017 grant from the Generalitat Valenciana, the SEMERGEN grant; grant of support to research groups 35/2011 (Balearic Islands Government; FEDER funds) (J.A.T.). R.S.-C. acknowledges financial support from the Juan de la Cierva Program Training Grants of the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y Ministerio de Universidades (FJC2018-038168- I). N.B.-T. acknowledges financial support from the Juan de la Cierva Formación Program Training Grants of the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y Ministerio de Universidades (FJC2018-036016-I). M.R.B.-L. was supported by “Miguel Servet Type I” program (CP15/00028) from the ISCIII-Madrid (Spain), cofinanced by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional-FEDER. S.K.N. acknowledges financial support from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, CIHR Fellowship. J.K. was supported by the ‘FOLIUM’ programme within the FUTURMed project from the Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (financed by 2017 annual plan of the sustainable tourism tax and at 50% with charge to the ESF Operational Program 2014–2020 of the Balearic Islands. C.M.-P. was financially supported by a joint grant from the Community of Madrid and the European Social Fund (grant PEJD-2019- POST/SAL-15892). The METHYL-UP project was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTI2018-095569-B-I00, Programa de Proyectos Orientados a los Retos de la Sociedad “Projects Toward Society Challenges Program”)., The association between ultra-processed food (UPF) and risk of cardiometabolic disorders is an ongoing concern. Different food processing-based classification systems have originated discrepancies in the conclusions among studies. To test whether the association between UPF consumption and cardiometabolic markers changes with the classification system, we used baseline data from 5636 participants (48.5% female and 51.5% male, mean age 65.1 4.9) of the PREDIMEDPlus (“PREvention with MEDiterranean DIet”) trial. Subjects presented with overweight or obesity and met at least three metabolic syndrome (MetS) criteria. Food consumption was classified using a 143-item food frequency questionnaire according to four food processing-based classifications: NOVA, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), International Food Information Council (IFIC) and University of North Carolina (UNC). Mean changes in nutritional and cardiometabolic markers were assessed according to quintiles of UPF consumption for each system. The association between UPF consumption and cardiometabolic markers was assessed using linear regression analysis. The concordance of the different classifications was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC3, overall = 0.51). The highest UPF consumption was obtained with the IARC classification (45.9%) and the lowest with NOVA (7.9%). Subjects with high UPF consumption showed a poor dietary profile. We detected a direct association between UPF consumption and BMI (p = 0.001) when using the NOVA system, and with systolic (p = 0.018) and diastolic (p = 0.042) blood pressure when using the UNC system. Food classification methodologies markedly influenced the association between UPF consumption and cardiometabolic risk markers., European Research Council (ERC) European Commission #340918, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red-Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion PI16/00473, PI16/00662, PI16/01873, PI16/01094, PI16/00501, PI16/00533, PI16/00381, PI16/00366, PI16/01522, PI16/01120, PI17/00764, PI17/01183, PI17/00855, PI17/01347, PI17/00525, PI17/01827, PI17/00532, PI17/00215, PI17/01441 PI13/00673, PI13/00492, PI13/00272, PI13/01123, PI13/00462, PI13/00233, PI13/02184, PI13/00728, PI13/01090, PI13/01056, PI14/01722, PI14/00636, PI14/00618, PI14/00696, PI14/01206, PI14/01919, PI14/00853, PI14/01374, PI14/00972, PI14/00728, PI14/01471 PI17/00508, PI17/01732, PI17/00926, PI19/00957, PI19/00386, PI19/00309, PI19/01032, PI19/00576, PI19/00017, PI19/01226, PI19/00781, PI19/01560, PI19/01332