1. Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants-a review
- Author
-
Zhongtang Yu, Angela Schwarm, Christopher K. Reynolds, Alexander N. Hristov, Diego P. Morgavi, Padraig O'Kiely, Ermias Kebreab, David R. Yáñez-Ruiz, Jan Dijkstra, K. J. Shingfield, André Bannink, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Department of Animal Science, University of California, Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 (UMRH), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority, University of Reading (UOR), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana], University of Illinois System-University of Illinois System, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System-Penn State System, INIA (Spain) MIT01-GLOBALNET-EEZ, Ministry of Economic Affairs (The Netherlands, project Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouses Gases) BO-20-007-006, USDA-NIFA (USA)French National Research Agency through the program FACCE-JPI program, Agricultural GHG Research Initiative for Ireland (AGRI-I), Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (UK), BLW (Switzerland), Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland 281337, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS), Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (UK), CSIC - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Ministry of Economic Affairs (The Netherlands), and Academy of Finland
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Rumen ,In Vitro Techniques ,Animal Nutrition ,Dairy & Animal Science ,Mitigation ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Enteric methane ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,03 medical and health sciences ,Volatile fatty acids ,Animal Production ,In vivo measurements ,Microbial inoculum ,[INFO]Computer Science [cs] ,Animal species ,2. Zero hunger ,International research ,business.industry ,Chemistry ,0402 animal and dairy science ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,040201 dairy & animal science ,Diervoeding ,3. Good health ,Biotechnology ,030104 developmental biology ,In vitro gas production ,13. Climate action ,WIAS ,Animal Science and Zoology ,business ,Feed evaluation ,Methane - Abstract
In vitro fermentation techniques (IVFT) have been widely used to evaluate the nutritive value of feeds for ruminants and in the last decade to assess the effect of different nutritional strategies on methane (CH4) production. However, many technical factors may influence the results obtained. The present review has been prepared by the 'Global Network' FACCE-JPI international research consortium to provide a critical evaluation of the main factors that need to be considered when designing, conducting and interpreting IVFT experiments that investigate nutritional strategies to mitigate CH emission from ruminants. Given the increasing and wide-scale use of IVFT, there is a need to critically review reports in the literature and establish what criteria are essential to the establishment and implementation of in vitro techniques. Key aspects considered include: i) donor animal species and number of animal used, ii) diet fed to donor animals, iii) collection and processing of rumen fluid as inoculum, iv) choice of substrate and incubation buffer, v) incubation procedures and CH measurements, vi) headspace gas composition and vii) comparability of in vitro and in vivo measurements. Based on an evaluation of experimental evidence, a set of technical recommendations are presented to harmonize IVFT for feed evaluation, assessment of rumen function and CH production., This review is part of the FACCE-JPI ‘Global Network’ project and the ‘Feeding and Nutrition Network’ of Livestock Research Group, in the Global Research Alliance for Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (www.globalresearchalliance.org). Authors acknowledge national funding from INIA (Spain, project MIT01-GLOBALNET-EEZ), the Ministry of Economic Affairs (The Netherlands; project Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouses Gases, BO-20-007-006), USDA-NIFA (USA), French National Research Agency through the program FACCE-JPI program, the Irish contribution to this JPI-FACCE project was funded by the Agricultural GHG Research Initiative for Ireland (AGRI-I), Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (UK), BLW (Switzerland) and Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland (Project 281337).
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF