Search

We aimed first to assess associations between maternal health characteristics and newborn metabolite concentrations and second to assess associations between metabolites associated with maternal health characteristics and child body mass index (BMI). This study included 3492 infants enrolled in three birth cohorts with linked newborn screening metabolic data. Maternal health characteristics were ascertained from questionnaires, birth certificates, and medical records. Child BMI was ascertained from medical records and study visits. We used multivariate analysis of variance, followed by multivariable linear/proportional odds regression, to determine maternal health characteristic-newborn metabolite associations. Significant associations were found in discovery and replication cohorts of higher pre-pregnancy BMI with increased C0 and higher maternal age at delivery with increased C2 (C0: discovery: aβ 0.05 [95% CI 0.03, 0.07]; replication: aβ 0.04 [95% CI 0.006, 0.06]; C2: discovery: aβ 0.04 [95% CI 0.003, 0.08]; replication: aβ 0.04 [95% CI 0.02, 0.07]). Social Vulnerability Index, insurance, and residence were also associated with metabolite concentrations in a discovery cohort. Associations between metabolites associated with maternal health characteristics and child BMI were modified from 1–3 years (interaction: p < 0.05). These findings may provide insights on potential biologic pathways through which maternal health characteristics may impact fetal metabolic programming and child growth patterns.

IMPORTANCEMany hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have been treated with convalescent plasma. However, it is uncertain whether this therapy lowers mortality and if so, if the mortality benefit is larger among specific subgroups, such as recipients of plasma with high antibody content and patients treated early in the disease course.OBJECTIVETo examine the association of COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion with mortality and the differences between subgroups in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.DATA SOURCESOn October 26, 2022, a systematic search was performed for clinical studies of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the literature.STUDY SELECTIONRandomized clinical trials and matched cohort studies investigating COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion compared with standard of care treatment or placebo among hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. The electronic search yielded 3,841 unique records, of which 744 were considered for full-text screening. The selection process was performed independently by a panel of five reviewers.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISThe study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data were extracted by 5 independent reviewers in duplicate and pooled using inverse-variance random-effects model.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPrespecified end point was all-cause mortality during hospitalization.RESULTSThirty-nine randomized clinical trials enrolling 21,529 participants and 70 matched cohort studies enrolling 50,160 participants were included in the systematic review. Separate meta-analyses demonstrated that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a significant decrease in mortality compared with the control cohort for both randomized clinical trials (odds ratio (OR), 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-1.00]) and matched cohort studies (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.94]). Meta-analysis of subgroups revealed two important findings. First, treatment with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels was associated with a decrease in mortality compared to convalescent plasma containing low antibody levels (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73 to 0.99]). Second, earlier treatment with COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a significant decrease in mortality compared with the later treatment cohort (OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.82]).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCECOVID-19 convalescent plasma use was associated with a 13% reduced risk in mortality, implying a mortality benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, particularly those treated with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels treated earlier in the disease course.Key PointsQuestionWhat is the evidence regarding the potential mortality benefit associated with transfusion of convalescent plasma in hospitalized patients with COVID-19?FindingsIn this meta-analysis of 39 randomized clinical trials enrolling 21,529 participants and 70 matched cohort studies enrolling 50,160 participants, transfusion of convalescent plasma was associated with a 13% mortality benefit. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients treated with plasma containing higher levels of antibodies and patients treated earlier in the course of the disease had a greater mortality benefit associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion.MeaningThese findings suggest that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is associated with a mortality benefit for hospitalized patients, particularly those treated earlier in the disease course.

Some research has suggested a possible role for past infection in the development of preeclampsia. The objective of this study was to explore the role of Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the development of preeclampsia in a prospective pregnancy sample.We conducted a nested case-control study in The Archive for Child Health (ARCH), a pregnancy cohort of 867 unselected women enrolled at the first prenatal visit with archived blood and urine in pregnancy. We matched 21 cases of preeclampsia to 52 unaffected controls on maternal age (±4 years), race, parity, and gestational age at blood draw. Using conditional logistic regression, we examined the association between preeclampsia status and immunoglobulins G (IgG) tested by indirect ELISA to each of the three microorganisms, adjusting for potential confounders.No significant difference was found between cases and controls. The unadjusted odds ratio was 1.5 (95%CI: 0.2-9.1), 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2-1.9), and 1.9 (95%CI: 0.6-5.6) for H. pylori, cytomegalovirus and C. pneumoniae respectively. After controlling for confounders analysis found increased odds of H. pylori IgG (AOR: 1.9; 95% CI: 0.2-15.3) and C. pneumoniae IgG (AOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 0.6-9.2) for preeclampsia, albeit being not significant. Conversely, cytomegalovirus IgG had lower odds for preeclampsia (AOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-1.7).Past infection with H. pylori, and C. pneumoniae in early pregnancy showed a higher risk of preeclampsia, but the findings failed to achieve statistical significance. Cytomegalovirus was not associated with preeclampsia in these data. These preliminary findings encourage future research in populations with high prevalence of these infections.

Background The United States (US) Expanded Access Program (EAP) to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma was initiated in response to the rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. While randomized clinical trials were in various stages of development and enrollment, there was an urgent need for widespread access to potential therapeutic agents. The objective of this study is to report on the demographic, geographical, and chronological characteristics of patients in the EAP, and key safety metrics following transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma. Methods and findings Mayo Clinic served as the central institutional review board for all participating facilities, and any US physician could participate as a local physician–principal investigator. Eligible patients were hospitalized, were aged 18 years or older, and had—or were at risk of progression to—severe or life-threatening COVID-19; eligible patients were enrolled through the EAP central website. Blood collection facilities rapidly implemented programs to collect convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all enrolled patients in the EAP were summarized. Temporal patterns in access to COVID-19 convalescent plasma were investigated by comparing daily and weekly changes in EAP enrollment in response to changes in infection rate at the state level. Geographical analyses on access to convalescent plasma included assessing EAP enrollment in all national hospital referral regions, as well as assessing enrollment in metropolitan areas and less populated areas that did not have access to COVID-19 clinical trials. From April 3 to August 23, 2020, 105,717 hospitalized patients with severe or life-threatening COVID-19 were enrolled in the EAP. The majority of patients were 60 years of age or older (57.8%), were male (58.4%), and had overweight or obesity (83.8%). There was substantial inclusion of minorities and underserved populations: 46.4% of patients were of a race other than white, and 37.2% of patients were of Hispanic ethnicity. Chronologically and geographically, increases in the number of both enrollments and transfusions in the EAP closely followed confirmed infections across all 50 states. Nearly all national hospital referral regions enrolled and transfused patients in the EAP, including both in metropolitan and in less populated areas. The incidence of serious adverse events was objectively low (, In an observational study of registry data, Jonathon Senefeld and colleagues study factors related to patient enrollment in the Expanded Access Program for use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the United States., Author summary Why was this study done? There was a public health need to provide expedited and broad access to convalescent plasma for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the early stages of this public health emergency in the United States. Convalescent plasma was initially administered through regulatory pathways that required per-patient approval, resulting in substantial administrative time. The Expanded Access Program (EAP) was initiated to provide broad access to COVID-19 convalescent plasma and to provide a framework for standardized collection of data describing the safety profile of convalescent plasma. What did the researchers do and find? The EAP provided rapid and broad access to convalescent plasma throughout the US and some US territories and was effective at providing therapy for demographic groups that were severely affected by COVID-19. In addition, the data provide evidence supporting that transfusion of convalescent plasma is safe in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. What do these findings mean? The study design of the EAP may serve as an example for future efforts in response to a rapidly developing infectious disease when broad access to a treatment is needed in areas and demographic groups that are often poorly represented in clinical trials.

Treatment of patients with COVID-19 using convalescent plasma from recently recovered patients has been shown to be safe, but the time course of change in clinical status following plasma transfusion in relation to baseline disease severity has not yet been described. We analyzed short, descriptive daily reports of patient status in 7,180 hospitalized recipients of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the Mayo Clinic Expanded Access Program. We assessed, from the day following transfusion, whether the patient was categorized by his or her physician as better, worse or unchanged compared to the day before, and whether, on the reporting day, the patient received mechanical ventilation, was in the ICU, had died or had been discharged. Most patients improved following transfusion, but clinical improvement was most notable in mild to moderately ill patients. Patients classified as severely ill upon enrollment improved, but not as rapidly, while patients classified as critically ill/end-stage and patients on ventilators showed worsening of disease status even after treatment with convalescent plasma. Patients age 80 and over showed little or no clinical improvement following transfusion. Clinical status at enrollment and age appear to be the primary factors in determining the therapeutic effectiveness of COVID-19 convalescent plasma among hospitalized patients.