1. The EAT-26 as screening instrument for clinical nutrition unit attenders
- Author
-
Barbara Orbitello, Matteo Balestrieri, M. Armellini, C Taboga, L Tonutti, Rossana P. Ciano, Pier Luigi Rocco, and M. Corsaro
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Psychometrics ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Nutritional service ,Body Mass Index ,Feeding and Eating Disorders ,Endocrinology ,Age Distribution ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Binge-eating disorder ,Eating disorder not otherwise specified ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Obesity ,Bulimia ,Sex Distribution ,Risk factor ,Psychiatry ,Referral and Consultation ,Aged ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Bulimia nervosa ,business.industry ,Environmental and Occupational Health ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Eating disorders ,Screening instrument ,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ,Female ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Food Science ,Diabetes and Metabolism ,Predictive value of tests ,Physical therapy ,Public Health ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Body mass index ,Dieting - Abstract
The aim of this study was to use the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) as a screening instrument on a specific population with a marked prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). The EAT-26 questionnaire was used in order to identify the high-risk subjects for referral to clinical evaluation. EAT-26 was administered to 845 subjects who, for the first time, came to the Nutritional Medicine Service looking for a diet between January 1999 and December 2002. From this initial sample, subsequently, 250 subjects were randomly selected and administered a semistructured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID I, version 2.0). Discriminant analysis provided a cutoff value of EAT-26=11. Logistic regression analysis indicated high Dieting (D) or Bulimia (B) subscale scores as a risk factor of EDNOS or bulimia nervosa (BN) cases, respectively; on the other hand, a high Oral Control (O) subscale score represented a protecting factor for BED cases. Our study tried to assess the usefulness of EAT-26 as a screening instrument for obese patients attending a Medical Nutritional Service. Results from this study suggest that a cutoff score of 11, lower than that indicated in the literature, improves the diagnostic accuracy of the EAT-26 in a high-risk setting regarding sensibility level (68.1%) and leading to a reduction of the false negative rate (31.9%).
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF