Search

Funder: GlaxoSmithKline; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004330, Funder: Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) Fellowship, Funder: NUS YIA, Funder: Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Program Studentship, Animal models have shown that chronic alcohol exposure is associated with persistent neuroadaptations in amygdala synaptic function, whereas human studies have consistently reported amygdala grey‐matter volume (GMV) reductions in alcohol dependent patients (ADP). We hypothesised that chronic alcohol use associated with neuroadaptations may entail a reconfiguration of the amygdala's functional interactions and that these mechanisms may be affected by structural atrophy. We compared amygdala resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) using a whole brain seed‐based approach and amygdala GMV in abstinent ADP (n = 20) and healthy controls (HC; n = 39), balanced for age, gender and levels of head motion. The potential moderating influence of age, cumulative alcohol exposure, abstinence length and head motion was further examined in the two groups separately using correlational analyses. We found increased amygdala RSFC with substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) in ADP compared with HC. As expected, amygdala GMV was lower in ADP. Multiple regression analyses of the ADP group showed that amygdala‐SN/VTA RSFC increases were primarily associated with cumulative alcohol exposure rather than age, whereas amygdala GMV reductions were primarily associated with age rather than cumulative alcohol exposure. The same association between age and amygdala GMV was not observed amongst HC. Importantly, amygdala GMV and amygdala‐SN/VTA RSFC were uncorrelated in ADP, and neither measure was correlated with abstinence length. These results suggest that chronic alcohol exposure is associated with persistent elevations in amygdala‐SN/VTA RSFC and accelerated age‐related grey‐matter atrophy through potentially distinct mechanisms.

The brain exhibits substantial diurnal variation in physiology and function, but neuroscience studies rarely report or consider the effects of time of day. Here, we examined variation in resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) in around 900 individuals scanned between 8 AM and 10 PM on two different days. Multiple studies across animals and humans have demonstrated that the brain’s global signal (GS) amplitude (henceforth referred to as “fluctuation”) increases with decreased arousal. Thus, in accord with known circadian variation in arousal, we hypothesised that GS fluctuation would be lowest in the morning, increase in the midafternoon, and dip in the early evening. Instead, we observed a cumulative decrease in GS fluctuation as the day progressed. Although respiratory variation also decreased with time of day, control analyses suggested that this did not account for the reduction in GS fluctuation. Finally, time of day was associated with marked decreases in resting-state functional connectivity across the whole brain. The magnitude of decrease was significantly stronger than associations between functional connectivity and behaviour (e.g., fluid intelligence). These findings reveal time of day effects on global brain activity that are not easily explained by expected arousal state or physiological artefacts. We conclude by discussing potential mechanisms for the observed diurnal variation in resting brain activity and the importance of accounting for time of day in future studies., The brain exhibits substantial diurnal variation in physiology and function. A large-scale fMRI study reveals that the brain’s global signal amplitude, typically elevated during drowsy states, unexpectedly reduces steadily as the day progresses.

Graphical abstract Network based statistics (NBS) analyses detected a graph sub-network comprising 153 edges between 59 nodes of the connectome where the ADD group demonstrated significantly less connectivity compared with the CON group. These differences in connectivity were mostly intra-hemispheric (55%), the majority (38%) being in the right hemisphere. The anatomical distribution of these connectivity differences between the two groups involved frontal (insula, inferior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex), limbic-associated (anterior cingulate gyrus, thalamus), and striatal (accumbens, caudate, pallidum) regions. The connectivity differences reported in this ADD sample indicate alterations between cognitive, striatal and limbic-associated regions during reward anticipation that persist into extended abstinence., Highlights • Analytical methods can capture key features of whole brain networks in addiction. • We compared reward network connectivity in addiction (ADD) and control (CON) groups. • The ADD group showed disruptions in global network connectivity. • Global network measures may be more sensitive than traditional voxel-wise analyses., The prevalent spatial distribution of abnormalities reported in cognitive fMRI studies in addiction suggests there are extensive disruptions across whole brain networks. Studies using resting state have reported disruptions in network connectivity in addiction, but these studies have not revealed characteristics of network functioning during critical psychological processes that are disrupted in addiction populations. Analytic methods that can capture key features of whole brain networks during psychological processes may be more sensitive in revealing additional and widespread neural disturbances in addiction, that are the provisions for relapse risk, and targets for medication development. The current study compared a substance addiction (ADD; n = 83) group in extended abstinence with a control (CON; n = 68) group on functional MRI (voxel-wise activation) and global network (connectivity) measures related to reward anticipation on a monetary incentive delay task. In the absence of group differences on MID performance, the ADD group showed reduced activation predominantly across temporal and visual regions, but not across the striatum. The ADD group also showed disruptions in global network connectivity (lower clustering coefficient and higher characteristic path length), and significantly less connectivity across a sub-network comprising frontal, temporal, limbic and striatal nodes. These results show that an addiction group in extended abstinence exhibit localised disruptions in brain activation, but more extensive disturbances in functional connectivity across whole brain networks. We propose that measures of global network functioning may be more sensitive in highlighting latent and more widespread neural disruptions during critical psychological processes in addiction and other psychiatric disorders.

Identifying key neural substrates in addiction disorders for targeted drug development remains a major challenge for clinical neuroscience. One emerging target is the opioid system, where substance-dependent populations demonstrate prefrontal opioid dysregulation that predicts impulsivity and relapse. This may suggest that disturbances to the prefrontal opioid system could confer a risk for relapse in addiction due to weakened 'top-down' control over impulsive behaviour. Naltrexone is currently licensed for alcohol dependence and is also used clinically for impulse control disorders. Using a go/no-go (GNG) task, we examined the effects of acute naltrexone on the neural correlates of successful motor impulse control in abstinent alcoholics (AUD), abstinent polysubstance-dependent (poly-SUD) individuals and controls during a randomised double blind placebo controlled fMRI study. In the absence of any differences on GNG task performance, the AUD group showed a significantly greater BOLD response compared to the control group in lateral and medial prefrontal regions during both placebo and naltrexone treatments; effects that were positively correlated with alcohol abstinence. There was also a dissociation in the positive modulating effects of naltrexone in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and anterior insula cortex (AIC) of the AUD and poly-SUD groups respectively. Self-reported trait impulsivity in the poly-SUD group also predicted the effect of naltrexone in the AIC. These results suggest that acute naltrexone differentially amplifies neural responses within two distinct regions of a salience network during successful motor impulse control in abstinent AUD and poly-SUD groups, which are predicted by trait impulsivity in the poly-SUD group.

Identifying key neural substrates in addiction disorders for targeted drug development remains a major challenge for clinical neuroscience. One emerging target is the opioid system, where substance-dependent populations demonstrate prefrontal opioid dysregulation that predicts impulsivity and relapse. This may suggest that disturbances to the prefrontal opioid system could confer a risk for relapse in addiction due to weakened ‘top-down’ control over impulsive behaviour. Naltrexone is currently licensed for alcohol dependence and is also used clinically for impulse control disorders. Using a go/no-go (GNG) task, we examined the effects of acute naltrexone on the neural correlates of successful motor impulse control in abstinent alcoholics (AUD), abstinent polysubstance-dependent (poly-SUD) individuals and controls during a randomised double blind placebo controlled fMRI study. In the absence of any differences on GNG task performance, the AUD group showed a significantly greater BOLD response compared to the control group in lateral and medial prefrontal regions during both placebo and naltrexone treatments; effects that were positively correlated with alcohol abstinence. There was also a dissociation in the positive modulating effects of naltrexone in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and anterior insula cortex (AIC) of the AUD and poly-SUD groups respectively. Self-reported trait impulsivity in the poly-SUD group also predicted the effect of naltrexone in the AIC. These results suggest that acute naltrexone differentially amplifies neural responses within two distinct regions of a salience network during successful motor impulse control in abstinent AUD and poly-SUD groups, which are predicted by trait impulsivity in the poly-SUD group.

There is a concerted research effort to investigate brain mechanisms underlying addiction processes that may predicate the development of new compounds for treating addiction. One target is the brain's opioid system, because of its role in the reinforcing effects of substances of abuse. Substance-dependent populations have increased numbers of the mu opioid receptor (MOR) in fronto-striatal regions that predict drug relapse, and demonstrate disturbances in these regions during the processing of non-drug rewards. Naltrexone is currently licensed for alcohol and opiate dependence, and may remediate such disturbances through the blockade of MORs in fronto-striatal reward circuitry. Therefore, we examined the potential acute modulating effects of naltrexone on the anticipation of, and instrumental responding for, non-drug rewards in long-term abstinent alcoholics, alcoholic poly substance-dependent individuals and controls using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task during a randomized double blind placebo controlled functional MRI study. We report that the alcoholic poly substance-dependent group exhibited slower and less accurate instrumental responding compared to alcoholics and controls that was less evident after acute naltrexone treatment. However, naltrexone treatment was unable to remediate disturbances within fronto-striatal regions during reward anticipation and 'missed' rewards in either substance-dependent group. While we have not been able to identify the underlying neural mechanisms for improvement observed with naltrexone in the alcoholic poly-substance dependent group, we can confirm that both substance-dependent groups exhibit substantial neural deficits during an MID task, despite being in long-term abstinence.

Alcohol dependence is a global societal problem, yet current avenues for its treatment are largely ineffective in slowing its chronic-relapsing trajectory. Animal studies of alcohol dependence have described neuroadaptations in the amygdala that may play a central role in mechanisms of relapse. In this thesis, spontaneous amygdala network function was examined in abstinent alcohol dependent patients (ADP) using functional magnetic resonance imaging within the framework of a multi-site neuroimaging platform: ICCAM. Participants underwent five scans that included baseline, as well as scans under placebo, acute antagonism of μ-opioid, Dopamine D3 (DRD3) and Neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor systems previously implicated in mechanisms of addiction. At baseline, amygdala – substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) was elevated in abstinent ADP, despite widespread grey-matter (GM) volumetric atrophy, in both amygdala and SN/VTA, compared with age-matched healthy controls (HC). The strength of amygdala – SN/VTA RSFC in ADP was primarily associated with years of cumulative alcohol exposure, but not with amygdala or SN/VTA GM volume, length of abstinence, smoking status, or head motion. Amygdala RSFC with other regions showed sensitivity to core clinical features of ADP at baseline. Amygdala – frontoparietal (FPN) RSFC was inversely associated with abstinence length, with ADP in the first two months of abstinence showing significantly reduced amygdala – FPN RSFC compared with HC. Voxelwise comparison of amygdala RSFC between each drug session and placebo, did not reveal differential effects of receptor blockade on ADP and HC. Across both groups, however, the three drugs exhibited both overlapping and differential effects on distinct brain networks. Notably, amygdala RSFC in the superior temporal gyrus showed increases under NK1-antagonism, and decreases under naltrexone compared with placebo. Finally, amygdala – SN/VTA was significantly elevated in ADP relative to HC across all four sessions, suggesting that it may represent a stable neurophysiological feature of alcohol dependence. Open Access

RATIONALE: Dependence on drugs and alcohol is associated with impaired impulse control, but deficits are rarely compared across individuals dependent on different substances using several measures within a single study. OBJECTIVES: We investigated impulsivity in abstinent substance-dependent individuals (AbD) using three complementary techniques: self-report, neuropsychological and neuroimaging. We hypothesised that AbDs would show increased impulsivity across modalities, and that this would depend on length of abstinence. METHODS: Data were collected from the ICCAM study: 57 control and 86 AbDs, comprising a group with a history of dependence on alcohol only (n = 27) and a group with history of dependence on multiple substances ("polydrug", n = 59). All participants completed self-report measures of impulsivity: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale, Behaviour Inhibition/Activation System and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory. They also performed three behavioural tasks: Stop Signal, Intra-Extra Dimensional Set-Shift and Kirby Delay Discounting; and completed a Go/NoGo task during fMRI. RESULTS: AbDs scored significantly higher than controls on self-report measures, but alcohol and polydrug dependent groups did not differ significantly from each other. Polydrug participants had significantly higher discounting scores than both controls and alcohol participants. There were no group differences on the other behavioural measures or on the fMRI measure. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the current set of self-report measures of impulsivity is more sensitive in abstinent individuals than the behavioural or fMRI measures of neuronal activity. This highlights the importance of developing behavioural measures to assess different, more relevant, aspects of impulsivity alongside corresponding cognitive challenges for fMRI.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to set up a robust multi-centre clinical fMRI and neuropsychological platform to investigate the neuropharmacology of brain processes relevant to addiction - reward, impulsivity and emotional reactivity. Here we provide an overview of the fMRI battery, carried out across three centres, characterizing neuronal response to the tasks, along with exploring inter-centre differences in healthy participants. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three fMRI tasks were used: monetary incentive delay to probe reward sensitivity, go/no-go to probe impulsivity and an evocative images task to probe emotional reactivity. A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis was carried out for the reward and impulsivity tasks to help establish region of interest (ROI) placement. A group of healthy participants was recruited from across three centres (total n=43) to investigate inter-centre differences. Principle observations: The pattern of response observed for each of the three tasks was consistent with previous studies using similar paradigms. At the whole brain level, significant differences were not observed between centres for any task. CONCLUSIONS: In developing this platform we successfully integrated neuroimaging data from three centres, adapted validated tasks and applied whole brain and ROI approaches to explore and demonstrate their consistency across centres.