1. Optimized Identification of High-Grade Prostate Cancer by Combining Different PSA Molecular Forms and PSA Density in a Deep Learning Model
- Author
-
Antonietta Liotti, Dario Bruzzese, Bartolomeo Della Ventura, Francesco Gentile, Matteo Ferro, Raffaele Velotta, Evelina La Civita, Daniela Terracciano, Michele Cennamo, Gentile, Francesco, Ferro, Matteo, Della Ventura, Bartolomeo, La Civita, Evelina, Liotti, Antonietta, Cennamo, Michele, Bruzzese, Dario, Velotta, Raffaele, and Terracciano, Daniela
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prostate biopsy ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Psa density ,030232 urology & nephrology ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,PSA molecular form ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Overdiagnosis ,lcsh:R5-920 ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cancer ,Gold standard (test) ,prostate cancer ,medicine.disease ,PSA density ,Erectile dysfunction ,tumor markers ,PSA molecular forms ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Skin cancer ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,business ,artificial neural network - Abstract
After skin cancer, prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer among men. The gold standard for PC diagnosis is based on the PSA (prostate-specific antigen) test. Based on this preliminary screening, the physician decides whether to proceed with further tests, typically prostate biopsy, to confirm cancer and evaluate its aggressiveness. Nevertheless, the specificity of the PSA test is suboptimal and, as a result, about 75% of men who undergo a prostate biopsy do not have cancer even if they have elevated PSA levels. Overdiagnosis leads to unnecessary overtreatment of prostate cancer with undesirable side effects, such as incontinence, erectile dysfunction, infections, and pain. Here, we used artificial neuronal networks to develop models that can diagnose PC efficiently. The model receives as an input a panel of 4 clinical variables (total PSA, free PSA, p2PSA, and PSA density) plus age. The output of the model is an estimate of the Gleason score of the patient. After training on a dataset of 190 samples and optimization of the variables, the model achieved values of sensitivity as high as 86% and 89% specificity. The efficiency of the method can be improved even further by training the model on larger datasets.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF