Search

Cannabinoid effects on intestinal transit are commonly evaluated in rats. We characterized the cannabinoid receptors mediating the inhibitory effect of 5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)-cyclohexyl]-phenol (CP 55,940), (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), arachidonylethanolamide (AEA) and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) on contractions of the rat ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle (MPLM) preparation.The interaction of each agonist was examined with the CB(1) and CB(2) receptor antagonist rimonabant and SR 144,528 respectively, on contractions elicited by electrical field stimulation (EFS) or exogenous ACh. The interaction of AEA with capsazepine, a TRPV(1) receptor antagonist, was also investigated.EFS with single and trains of pulses evoked neurogenic ACh-mediated twitch and rebound contractions respectively. The rank order of potency for inhibition was CP 55,940 = WIN 55,212-2AEADelta(9)-THC and AEAWIN 55,212-2 =Delta(9)-THC = CP 55,940 respectively. The stereoisomer WIN 55,212-3 was without effect. Rimonabant antagonized the inhibition of the twitches with pK(B) values of around 8.60, but only antagonized rebound contractions induced by WIN 55,212-2, AEA and Delta(9)-THC, with pA(2) values of around 6.80. Rimonabant increased the twitches but inhibited the rebound contractions. Contractions to exogenous ACh were not altered. These observations extended to the guinea pig ileum MPLM.The rat MPLM contains CB(1) receptors and at least two non-CB(1)-non-CB(2)-non-TRPV(1) receptors attenuating EFS-evoked ACh-mediated contractions in an EFS frequency-dependent pre-synaptic and stereo-specific manner. Augmentation of the twitches by rimonabant may be through antagonism of an endocannabinoid tone or inverse agonism, whereas inhibition of the rebound contractions involved partial agonism.

Histamine is widely distributed throughout the body and has a broad range of pharmacologic effects. The advent of selective agonists and antagonists has allowed the identification and characterization of three types of histamine receptor. These same compounds have helped in our understanding of physiologic and pathologic roles for histamine. Clearly, histamine plays a central role in the physiologic control of gastric acid secretion, and this fact has led to the use of H2 antagonists such as cimetidine, and ranitidine is the therapy of acid-related diseases such as peptic ulcer. Histamine is also one of the prime mediators of a variety of allergic reactions, and H1 antagonists play a therapeutic role in this context. However, despite the widespread distribution of histamine receptors in, for example, the central nervous, respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune systems, other physiologic roles for histamine have not been established. It is to be hoped that future research will alter this situation and possibly lead to other therapeutic indications for histamine agonists and antagonists.