1. Profiling cognitive–motor interference in a large sample of persons with progressive multiple sclerosis and impaired processing speed: results from the CogEx study
- Author
-
Veldkamp, R., D’hooge, M., Sandroff, B. M., DeLuca, J., Kos, D., Salter, A., Feinstein, A., Amato, M. P., Brichetto, G., Chataway, J., Farrell, R., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Dalgas, U., Filippi, M., Freeman, J., Motl, R. W., Meza, C., Inglese, M., Rocca, M. A., Cutter, G., and Feys, P.
- Subjects
Cognitive–motor interference ,Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/complications ,Walking ,Dual task ,Multiple sclerosis ,Retinoids ,Cognition ,Progressive ,Neurology ,Humans ,Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology ,Neurology (clinical) ,Gait ,Processing Speed - Abstract
Background: Performing cognitive–motor dual tasks (DTs) may result in reduced walking speed and cognitive performance. The effect in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPMS) having cognitive dysfunction is unknown. Objective: To profile DT-performance during walking in cognitively impaired pwPMS and examine DT-performance by disability level. Methods: Secondary analyses were conducted on baseline data from the CogEx-study. Participants, enrolled with Symbol Digit Modalities Test 1.282 standard deviations below normative value, performed a cognitive single task ([ST], alternating alphabet), motor ST (walking) and DT (both). Outcomes were number of correct answers on the alternating alphabet task, walking speed, and DT-cost (DTC: decline in performance relative to the ST). Outcomes were compared between EDSS subgroups (≤ 4, 4.5–5.5, ≥ 6). Spearman correlations were conducted between the DTCmotor with clinical measures. Adjusted significance level was 0.01. Results: Overall, participants (n = 307) walked slower and had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST (both p < 0.001), with a DTCmotor of 15.8% and DTCcognitive of 2.7%. All three subgroups walked slower during the DT versus ST, with DTCmotor different from zero (p’s < 0.001). Only the EDSS ≥ 6 group had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST (p < 0.001), but the DTCcognitive did not differ from zero for any of the groups (p ≥ 0.039). Conclusion: Dual tasking substantially affects walking performance in cognitively impaired pwPMS, to a similar degree for EDSS subgroups.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF