Search

The Atacama Desert has been pointed out as one of the places on earth where the highest surface irradiance may occur. This area is characterized by its high altitude, prevalent cloudless conditions and relatively low columns of ozone and water vapor. Aime

MAGISTER FONDECYT FONDECYT

Dihydroquinidine (DQ) is contained in substantial amounts in quinidine salts, but its direct antiarrhythmic action has not been studied. The efficacy of oral DQ (300 mg t. i. d.) compared to disopyramide (D) (200 mg t.i.d.) was thus investigated using a double-blind crossover placebo-controlled protocol in 12 patients, aged 13 to 67 years, with chronic stable high frequency premature ventricular beats (PVB), defined as greater than 100 PVB/h during 48-72-h control Holter monitoring. The protocol included three 72-h treatment periods: DQ, D, and placebo at random. On days 2 and 3 of each period a 24-h Holter recording was carried out; drug blood levels were determined at peak (days 2 and 3) and trough time (day 3). No significant difference in the mean PVB/h was found between control (735 +/- 400) and placebo periods (564 +/- 388), or between the two Holter recordings of each period. Compared to placebo both DQ (106 +/- 113, p less than 0.005) and D (240 +/- 263, p less than 0.05) reduced the mean PVB/h, but the decrease was significantly higher with DQ (78 versus 53%, p less than 0.02). Nine patients (75%) on DQ and 5 (42%) on D had a greater than 70% decrease in mean PVB/h; complex PVBs were abolished in 3 of 6 patients on both treatments. On day 3, DQ plasma levels were 1.31 +/- 0.44 (peak) and 0.92 +/- 0.45 (trough) mg/l; D plasma levels were 2.88 +/- 0.64 (peak) and 2.02 +/- 0.31 (trough) mg/l; no significant difference was found between day 2 and day 3 samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and antiarrhythmic activity of dihydroquinidine and quinidine in 14 patients (11 men, 3 women, aged 28 to 67 years) with heart disease and chronic, stable, highfrequency premature ventricular beats (PVB) (>100/hr). A randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled protocol was utilized. During Holter monitoring the patients were given either dihydroquinidine or quinidine as the gluconates in an oral solution (600 mg); blood samples were taken 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours later. The patients were then assigned to three successive treatment periods of 7 days each: dihydroquinidine HCl (900 mg/day), quinidine polygalacturonate (1,650 mg/day), or placebo. At the end of each period 24-hour Holter monitoring was carried out and a blood sample was taken for determination of drug concentration. By comparing the area under the curves dihydroquinidine was 59% as available as quinidine; rates of absorption and elimination were similar. Mean peak blood levels of dihydroquinidine and quinidine were 1.06±0.34 and 2.15±0.96 μg/ml, respectively. After dihydroquinidine, eight patients had a positive response (>50% reduction in PVB frequency), while seven patients responded to quinidine. During maintenance treatment both dihydroquinidine (233±330) and quinidine (234±311) reduced the mean PVB frequency per hour compared to placebo (690±569). Nine patients (64%) on dihydroquinidine and eight (57%) on quinidine had >70% decrease in mean PVB frequency per hour. Steady-state peak plasma concentrations of dihydroquinidine and quinidine were 1.10±0.41 and 2.24±1.13 μg/ml, respectively. Dihydroquinidine thus has stronger antiarrhythmic activity than quinidine and so may be used in lower doses; it is effective with plasma concentrations lower than those of quinidine.

The pharmacokinetic differences between two sustained-release 300 mg (A) and 400 mg (B) formulations and a rapid-release 400 mg ibuprofen conventional sugar-coated formulation (C) were compared after a single dose. Mean peak levels of 25.1 micrograms/ml for preparation A (2 X 300 mg), 31.3 micrograms/ml for preparation B (2 X 400 mg) and 68.5 micrograms/ml for preparation C (2 X 400 mg) were reached at 5.3, 3 and 2 hours respectively, after ingestion of the drugs. The individual plasma-level time-profiles for the majority of doses suggested prolonged absorption of product A and B. The absorption from formulations A and B was significantly slower (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.05 respectively) than that from the conventional tablets. The bioavailability of ibuprofen from sustained-release capsules, was not found to differ significantly from that of ibuprofen from conventional tablets. The relative bioavailability was very close to 100% in almost all subjects (coefficient of variation 14% and 17%). Projections of plasma concentrations upon multiple dosing were made from single dose data. The dosage interval concentration ratio which reflects both the frequency and the entry of the drug into and from the body was much lower for sustained-release formulations (A: 3.0; B: 3.7; C: 12.9).