1. Ureteral stent replacement in women
- Author
-
Keisuke Ozaki, Yoshiteru Ueno, Yasuyo Yamamoto, Hiro-omi Kanayama, Megumi Tsuda, Tomoya Fukawa, Masayuki Takahashi, Kei Daizumoto, Yutaro Sasaki, Yoshito Kusuhara, and Kunihisa Yamaguchi
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Forceps ,Cystoscope ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Humans ,Medicine ,Fluoroscopy ,Stent replacement ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Stent ,General Medicine ,Cystoscopy ,Ureteral stents ,Surgical Instruments ,ureteral stent replacement ,fluoroscopy ,Surgery ,pean forceps ,Female ,Stents ,Ureter ,business ,Ureteral Obstruction - Abstract
Purpose : To evaluate the efficacy of the direct grasping technique using pean forceps under fluoroscopic guidance for ureteral stent replacement in women. Methods : Between April 2018 and September 2020, 28 female patients underwent ureteral stent replacements at our facility, and 184 stent replacement procedures were performed. A total of 127 stents were replaced using pean forceps under fluoroscopic guidance (pean forceps group), and 57 stents were replaced using the cystoscope (cystoscopy group). Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results : All stents were successfully replaced. There was a statistically significant difference in the procedure time between the two groups (median [interquartile range], pean forceps group : 10.8 [8.2-13.9] minutes vs. cystoscopy group : 15.8 [11.1-20.9] minutes, P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF